KHAN OUT, KHAN IN: ICC swaps one morally corrupt prosecutor with another. Karim Khan stepped down over allegations he raped his employee repeatedly—and indicted Israeli leaders to divert attention. Now Deputy Prosecutor Nazhat Khan replaces him. But I saw how unethical she is: 🧵
When she used to chair UN Human Rights Council sessions, Nazhat Khan violated freedom of speech to appease the world's worst tyrannies. Here she is cutting me off after a few seconds—as demanded by Cuba & the PLO—after I tried to simply read out the names of tyrannies who spoke.
Two years before Oct. 7, when I warned that UNRWA teachers glorify Hitler & incite hatred of Jews, Nazhat Khan cut me off. She said I made “derogatory, insulting & inflammatory remarks”—by quoting their own posts. “This amounts to personal attacks. The statement is out of order.”
3/ Therefore, Khan played a direct role in shielding Hamas terrorists who worked at UNRWA, such as Mohammed Abu Ittiwi and Fathi Sharif. Without any basis, Khan arbitrarily blocked human rights activists from reporting on systemic antisemitism incited by the teachers of UNRWA.
4/ As UN human rights council chief in 2021, Nazhat Shameem Khan selected Israel hater Navi Pillay to chair the UNHRC's permanent inquiry against Israel.
Khan is now ICC Deputy Prosecutor in The Hague. She hasn't recused herself from meeting Pillay and taking her submissions.
5/ Hamas rejoiced: As ICC Deputy Prosecutor, Nazhat Shameem Khan unethically met in The Hague with the Israel-hating figures—including Navi Pillay and Miloon Kothari—whom she had shamefully appointed to the UNHRC commission of inquiry targeting Israel. asianewslb.com/?page=article&…
6/ After she abused her UNHRC presidency to appoint rabid Israel haters to the perpetual commission of inquiry targeting Israel, Nazhat Shameem Khan became ICC Deputy Prosecutor. Here she is meeting with PLO foreign minister Riad Malki during his visit to the ICC in June 2022.
7/ A mere 19 days after the October 7th Hamas invasion and massacre of Israelis, Nazhat Shameem Khan again met in The Hague with the PLO's Riad Malki, to receive “evidence of the recent Israeli crimes against the Palestinian people.” english.wafa.ps/Pages/Details/…
8/ For more on the bigoted anti-Israel members of the perpetual Pillay Commission who were deliberately appointed for their bias by Nazhat Shameem Khan, in violation of the UN's own rules of impartiality, see here: unwatch.org/pillay-commiss…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
2/ In most legal systems, the term “lawyer” is reserved for those who passed the bar exam and have been admitted to the bar.
Francesca Albanese never took a bar exam. She was never admitted to practice in any country.
Thus in any professional or legal sense she is not a lawyer.
3/ Despite never having taken a bar exam and never having been admitted to practice law in any country in the world, Francesca Albanse has repeatedly described herself as a “lawyer.”
Last May, she told Italian TV: “I'm a technical expert, I'm a lawyer.”
1/ On Sky News, I explained how the UN and global media spread a deadly lie: 14,000 babies were “about to die” in Gaza. A total lie. No basis. No fact-checking. Just the latest blood libel dressed up as a humanitarian message by a top UN official and broadcast around the world.
2/ The Total Lie started early. Ten days after the October 7th Hamas massacre, media headlines screamed “Israel bombs Gaza hospital, kills 500.” A total lie. It was Islamic Jihad. The blast hit a parking lot. But the lie was spread by the UN, Amnesty & Canadian FM Melanie Joly.
3/ Why do such lies flourish? Many in the world want it. Newsrooms rush to fill a reserved spot on their front pages for the headline “Israel kills innocents.” Their fact verification systems short circuit. The public rarely hears the corrections. Only the slander sticks.
Dear Secretary-General @antonioguterres: This is legal notice that the purported renewal of Francesca Albanese as “Special Rapporteur on human rights in the Palestinian territories” was unlawful, and is therefore null and void. Her terms ends Wednesday: 🧵 unwatch.org/wp-content/upl…
2/ As you know, her purported renewal, announced at the conclusion of the 58th session of the Human Rights Council, was carried out illegally, in direct contravention of HRC Presidential Statement 8/PRST/2—adopted by consensus in 2008, and enshrined in Art. 7 of the Manual of Operations of the Special Procedures—which imposes a clear and binding obligation: “The President of the Human Rights Council will convey to the Council information brought to his or her attention… concerning cases of persistent non-compliance by a mandate-holder” with the Code of Conduct, particularly in advance of reappointments. International law experts have deemed 8/PRST/2 one of the Council’s four “institution building texts.” Contempt for this core rule carries consequences.
3/ As you are aware, a formal submission with a 56-page dossier documenting Ms. Albanese’s gross and systematic violations of that Code—including breaches of impartiality, integrity, and restraint—was submitted by United Nations Watch to the President of the Council on 26 March 2025, receipt of which was duly acknowledged by the President’s office. In addition, letters to the President were filed by the Governments of Argentina, Hungary, and Israel, as well as by the Chairman of the U.S. House Foreign Affairs Committee, who called on the President to exercise his “sworn duty to utilize [his] authority as stated in Presidential Statement 8/2 (PRST/8/2) to ‘convey to the Council any information brought to [his] attention concerning cases of persistent non-compliance by a mandate-holder...’”Astonishingly, in violation of his duties and of the prescribed legal procedure, the President refused to do so. Likewise, the Council violated its own duty to “consider such information” and to “act upon it as appropriate.”
STUNNING REVERSAL: 🇺🇸 U.S. Department of Justice Strips UNRWA of Immunity. “The complaint alleges atrocious conduct on the part of UNRWA. The Government believes they must answer these allegations in American courts. The prior Administration’s view that they do not was wrong.”
🧵
2-3: “UNRWA has not been designated by the President under the International Organizations Immunities Act of 1945. UNRWA is not subject to the Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the United Nations, and is not immune from suit under that treaty or current U.S. law.”
4-5: Even assuming that “subsidiary organs” also qualify as part of the “United Nations,” and are thus entitled to immunity under the General Convention, UNRWA still falls outside the ambit of that protection because it is not a subsidiary organ.
BREAKING: The President of the UN Human Rights Council is reportedly planning to evade his legal duty to convey to the plenary our objection to the reappointment of Francesca Albanese (per HRC 8/PRST/2) by claiming that her violations of the Code of Conduct are not “persistent.”
2/ Any refusal to convey our objection to Albanese’s reappointment by claiming her violations aren’t “persistent” would be a specious excuse. The President's duty under 8/PRST/2 is to transmit, not judge. In any case, our 60-page dossier shows clear persistent misconduct.
3/ Here are 60 pages of Francesca Albanese's grave, numerous and indeed non-stop violations of the Code of Conduct from the moment she took office in May 2022 until October 2024:
Antisemitism Leads to Madness: Leftist Irish politician Clare Daly, an avowed feminist, covers herself in Islamic garb to join pro-Iran Jihadis at Houthi conference in Yemen that repeatedly called for “Death to America! Death to Israel! A Curse Upon the Jews! Victory to Islam.”
You can also see Clare Daly in front row on the far left joining the Jihadi crowd to shake her fist in approval as the speaker, a former ANC MP who converted to Islam to marry his fourth wife, chants “Viva Hamas” & “Viva Hezbollah.”
3/ For a feminist, Irish left-wing politician Clare Daly seems to repeatedly enjoy covering herself in religious Islamic garb. Here she is falsely praising Iraq's Popular Mobilisation Forces for their “egalitarian nature” and “inclusiveness”: