🧵 What SDA Actually Tries to Do: The Strategic Goals Behind the Noise

#DeceptionByDesign4

Beyond Operation Doppelgänger (Pamment & Tsurtsumia, 2025)
mpf.se/psychological-…
SDA doesn’t push random content.

Its campaigns have clear strategic aims—shaped by client goals, audience vulnerabilities, and geopolitical context.

Here’s what their storytelling actually targets.

#DeceptionByDesign4
SDA’s narrative strategy isn’t ideological.

It’s instrumental.

Its goals shift based on what weakens its adversary the most.

The objectives?

Sow division
Erode trust
Undermine institutions
Fracture alliances
Push disengagement
Target 1: NATO and the EU

Campaigns focus on:

– Painting NATO as aggressor
– Highlighting “Western hypocrisy”
– Amplifying narratives of internal EU decay
– Suggesting abandonment of Eastern members

Tactic: Dissonance through plausible critique
Target 2: Ukraine

Key themes include:

– “Ukraine fatigue” in the West
– Corruption allegations
– Framing Ukrainian resistance as extremist
– Pushing peace through surrender narratives

Tactic: Emotional exhaustion, not argument

#DeceptionByDesign4
Target 3: Domestic trust in institutions

SDA works to degrade confidence in:

– Elections
– Public health
– Media credibility
– Judiciary independence

Method: small distortions, emotional framing, volume over evidence
Target 4: Social cohesion

Many campaigns don’t aim to promote Russia.

They aim to amplify internal fractures:

– Migration tensions
– Religious or linguistic division
– Urban–rural resentment
– Cultural identity anxiety

The point is to turn civic cracks into political rifts.
SDA’s content often avoids direct lies.

Instead, it piles on contradictory, demoralizing, or cynical takes until nothing feels trustworthy.

Goal: confusion > conviction
Civic withdrawal > opposition

#DeceptionByDesign4
The strategy isn’t to persuade.

It’s to pollute.

To make shared understanding feel impossible.

To make withdrawal from democratic life seem safer than participation.

It’s disinformation through disengagement.
Source:
Pamment & Tsurtsumia (2025) - Beyond Operation Doppelgänger



#DeceptionByDesign4 #ForumThreads #Disinformation #NarrativeWarfare #InformationThreatsmpf.se/psychological-…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Gavril Ducu 🇷🇴🇩🇪🇺🇲🇳🇱🇪🇺@🇺🇦

Gavril Ducu 🇷🇴🇩🇪🇺🇲🇳🇱🇪🇺@🇺🇦 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @DucuGavril

May 19
🧵 How Disinformation Became a Service Industry — and Why It Matters Now

#DeceptionByDesign
This series unpacked how Russia’s Social Design Agency (SDA) isn’t a troll factory.

It’s a strategic influence firm—planning, packaging, and delivering disinformation campaigns like commercial PR.

Here’s what we learned.

#DeceptionByDesign
Thread 1: The Big Misunderstanding

Troll farms were chaotic.

SDA is deliberate.

It builds influence like an agency—with briefs, timelines, and metrics.

#DeceptionByDesign1
Read 12 tweets
May 19
NAFO Forum - This Election Was Brought to You by the Algorithm: How Russia Used Romania to Perfect Its Influence Playbook nafoforum.org/magazine/this-…Image
In the spring of 2025, Romanians went to the polls not once, but twice.
The first presidential election was annulled amid a storm of allegations—foreign meddling, TikTok brainwashing, cyberattacks, undeclared money sloshing around campaign coffers like it was Black Friday in St. Petersburg.
Read 6 tweets
May 18
🧵 What Really Moves Voters? A Research-Based Look at Campaign Influence
#VoteFocus

Today’s elections in Romania, Poland, and Portugal—each under the shadow of relentless Russian influence operations—are once again putting the fate of democracy to the test.
I wanted to understand what’s under the hood of voter decision-making.

So I looked at the latest research.

#VoteFocus
The myth: voters are locked in, facts don’t matter, and big moments like debates swing everything.

But the data tells a more complex—and more hopeful—story.

It’s not about flipping beliefs.

It’s about attention, timing, and framing.
Read 9 tweets
May 17
🧵 Not Just Which News Site—But Which Story: A Better Map of What People Share Online

#InfoTerritories1
We often blame media bias on people trusting the “wrong” outlet.

But what if the real divide isn’t where people get their news—

It’s which stories they share, and how those stories are told?

A new study built a better map.
Most research stops at the headline:
Left shares this outlet, right shares that one.

But that misses the deeper question:
What kinds of stories do people actually share?

What do they pay attention to—and promote to others?
Read 12 tweets
May 16
🧵 Beyond Externalities – The Ethics of a Designed Outcome

Most people treat disinformation like a side effect.

A spillover. A bug.

But what if it’s not a glitch in the ad system—

What if it’s the outcome it was designed to produce?

Let’s talk about overflow.
An externality is a cost imposed on others, outside the intent of a transaction.

Like secondhand smoke.
Or a traffic jam.

Advertisers say:

“We didn’t mean to fund fake news.”
“That was a byproduct.”

But Diaz Ruiz says: that excuse no longer holds.
He argues disinformation should be seen as an overflow, not an accident.

Why?

Because:

The system knows how it performs
The actors see where the ads land
The harms are repeated, documented, and monetized

This is planned ignorance.
Read 8 tweets
May 16
🧵 The Hidden Link Between Ads and Disinformation

Disinformation doesn’t just spread because people believe it.
It spreads because it’s profitable.

And what fuels that profit?
Your clicks. Your data.

And the digital ad system running quietly in the background.
Source:
Disinformation and fake news as externalities of digital advertising.
Carlos A. Diaz Ruiz (2024), Journal of Marketing Management



This series will break down the argument:
Digital ads don’t just enable disinfo—they incentivize and sustain it.doi.org/10.1080/026725…
The problem isn’t just bad actors.

It’s the ad tech infrastructure itself:

Programmatic systems that place ads automatically.
Metrics that reward engagement, not credibility.

A financial ecosystem that doesn’t care if a site is lying—as long as it performs.
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(