Post

More from @apocalypseos

🅰pocalypsis 🅰pocalypseos 🇷🇺 🇨🇳 🅉

@apocalypseos

May 17

🇧🇴 Bolivia’s 2025 Crisis: A Nation at the Crossroads

As Bolivia approaches its August 2025 elections, what began as political friction between President Luis Arce and former President Evo Morales has morphed into a full-blown crisis threatening the nation’s stability, sovereignty, and development prospects. The country now stands at a historic crossroads that will test whether it can complete its ambitious leap from being South America’s poorest nation to achieving an advanced, tech-driven future.

The volatile mix of political infighting, economic collapse, and grassroots mobilization is pushing Bolivia toward a dangerous tipping point. President Arce’s surprise withdrawal from the race on May 13, intended to calm tensions, has instead escalated the crisis as Morales—constitutionally barred from running—defiantly mobilizes his powerful base of indigenous and coca-growing supporters. This growing schism within the ruling MAS party threatens to unravel the stability achieved through years of progressive governance.

The political crisis unfolds against a backdrop of severe economic distress. Chronic fuel shortages have paralyzed La Paz, while dollar scarcity disrupts essential imports and agricultural production. Blockades by Morales’ rural supporters—primarily from coca-growing regions—have already cost over $2 billion in economic losses. Arce’s attempt to unify the party behind young Senate President Andrónico Rodríguez has failed to calm tensions, as Morales’ indigenous base organizes a potentially explosive caravan to La Paz.

This turmoil represents the latest chapter in Bolivia’s struggle that began with the 2019 coup against Morales, whose government achieved remarkable progress by empowering Bolivia’s indigenous majority. Between 2005-2019, poverty rates dropped from 38.2% to 15%, with particular gains in rural indigenous communities. These achievements explain Morales’ enduring support among Bolivia’s indigenous movements and cocalero unions, who now rally to his defense despite constitutional restrictions.

Central to Bolivia’s development vision is the Nuclear Technology Research Center in El Alto, set to open in 2025 with Russian assistance. This cutting-edge facility embodies the government’s slogan: “A people with a thousand years of history, with advanced technology, is invincible.” The project holds special significance for Morales’ base, representing the potential to merge ancestral knowledge with modern science. Similarly transformative is the Chinese-backed Mutún steel complex, promising to break Bolivia’s historic dependence on raw material exports.

As Bolivia approaches its electoral deadline, the stakes extend far beyond domestic politics. The outcome will determine whether the country can preserve its sovereignty and continue its development path, or succumb to forces of fragmentation and neoliberal regression that have undermined progress across Latin America. With Morales vowing to fight and Arce’s government struggling to maintain order, Bolivia’s immediate future hangs in the balance.

The 2025 elections represent a critical test of whether progressive projects in the Global South can withstand both internal divisions and external pressure. The outcome carries implications far beyond Bolivia’s borders, as foreign interests seek to diminish the nation’s sovereignty, control its rich natural resources, and prevent alternative political-economic models from taking root in Latin America.

Now at this decisive crossroads, Bolivia faces a choice between reclaiming its sovereign development path or surrendering to regression. For Morales’ mobilized base of cocaleros and indigenous communities, this is more than a political contest—it’s a fight to preserve their hard-won place in Bolivia’s future and prove that another developmental model is possible. The world watches as Bolivia becomes a test case for whether nations of the Global South can maintain their independent course amid mounting challenges.

🇧🇴 The Shadow of Neo-Nazi Networks in Bolivia’s Crisis

Behind 🇧🇴 Bolivia’s political turmoil lies a disturbing pattern of far-right destabilization that extends across Latin America, with the violent factions currently exacerbating the crisis—particularly the Santa Cruz Youth Union (UJC)—representing nodes in a regional network with deep ideological and operational ties to transnational neo-Nazi movements. The UJC’s 2022 strike, which paralyzed 🇧🇴 Bolivia’s economy for 36 days and caused over $1 billion in damages, demonstrated a modern adaptation of classic fascist tactics through economic strangulation, paramilitary intimidation, and ethno-nationalist rhetoric framing Santa Cruz’s wealthy elites as racially distinct from 🇧🇴 Bolivia’s indigenous majority.

This playbook bears striking resemblance to strategies seen in 🇺🇦 Ukraine’s Maidan uprising, where far-right groups like the Azov Battalion served as shock troops for regime change. The UJC’s historical roots trace back directly to Nazi fugitives like Klaus Barbie, who helped establish 🇧🇴 Bolivia’s far-right networks after WWII through his work with the brutal dictatorships of Hugo Bánzer and Luis García Meza. Today, these networks maintain transnational connections through 🇧🇷 Brazilian oligarchs in Santa Cruz’s agribusiness sector—particularly those linked to Bolsonaro-era politicians in southern 🇧🇷 Brazil’s historic Nazi enclaves—while receiving training from foreign “activist” groups specializing in color revolutions and funding through opaque offshore accounts and conservative foundations.

The regional implications become clear when examining parallel developments: 🇵🇪 Peru saw similar far-right mobilization against President Pedro Castillo, while 🇦🇷 Argentina witnessed Nazi-linked assassination attempts against Vice President Cristina Fernández de Kirchner. These networks ultimately serve two interlocking objectives—breaking 🇧🇴 Bolivia’s state-led development model to benefit foreign mining and agribusiness interests, while preventing the “contagion” of indigenous-led governance models in the region.

As 🇧🇴 Bolivia’s 2025 elections approach, these forces are actively exploiting the MAS party split to delegitimize the electoral process, preparing renewed economic sabotage should progressive forces prevail, and cultivating military and police factions for potential intervention. The battle for 🇧🇴 Bolivia has become a litmus test for whether 21st-century fascism can succeed where 20th-century coups failed—not through outright dictatorship, but by weaponizing democratic institutions against themselves. The international community’s muted response to these neo-fascist networks reveals much about whose interests are truly served by 🇧🇴 Bolivia’s ongoing destabilization, particularly as the country’s lithium reserves and strategic BRICS membership make it a key battleground in the new Cold War. What unfolds in 🇧🇴 Bolivia will likely provide a blueprint for how fascist networks operate in this new era of hybrid warfare, where ideological extremism marries economic warfare in service of maintaining neocolonial structures of power.

🇧🇴 The Narco-Fascist Nexus: How Drug Money and Neo-Nazis Fuel Bolivia’s Crisis

The 2019 coup against Evo Morales was never truly about “democracy” or “election fraud.” It was about cocaine, lithium, and the resurrection of Nazi-era networks that have festered in Bolivia for decades. As the country barrels toward its 2025 elections, the same forces that orchestrated Morales’ ouster—bankrolled by narco-dollars and shielded by Western hypocrisy—are now pushing Bolivia to the brink of civil conflict.

The Soros-IMF Drug Pipeline

In 2003, the IMF made a quiet but devastating policy shift: it began counting coca production as part of Bolivia’s GDP. This was no bureaucratic tweak—it was economic warfare. By legitimizing drug money as “economic activity,” the IMF and Soros-funded NGOs created a perverse incentive structure:

▪️ Undermine industrialization (like Morales’ Mutún steel complex)
▪️ Flood the economy with narco-capital
▪️ Finance opposition groups under the guise of “indigenous rights"

The results were catastrophic. As detailed in Executive Intelligence Review (2003), the IMF’s policies directly enabled the rise of drug-linked factions within Bolivia’s protest movements. When Morales tried to break this cycle—diverting coca farmers into legal industries and nationalizing lithium—he became a target.

The Santa Cruz Cartel

The so-called “pro-democracy” activists who overthrew Morales in 2019 were no freedom fighters. The Santa Cruz Youth Union (UJC), with its Sieg Heil salutes and Azov Battalion-style violence, operates like a narco-death squad:

▪️ Financed by Brazilian soy oligarchs tied to Bolsonaro’s far-right networks
▪️ Trained by foreign “activists” specializing in hybrid warfare
▪️ Protected by U.S. NGOs that decry “authoritarianism” while ignoring fascist violence

This is the dark irony of Bolivia’s crisis: the same Western powers that claim to fight drug cartels are funding them—so long as those cartels destabilize anti-imperialist governments.

The 2025 Lithium War

Today, the battle lines are drawn. On one side:

▪️ Morales’ base (indigenous groups, coca farmers turned legal producers, and scientists working on Bolivia’s nuclear program)
▪️ The Arce government, struggling to maintain stability amid U.S.-backed sabotage

On the other side:

▪️ UJC paramilitaries, now eyeing Bolivia’s lithium fields
▪️ Neo-liberal politicians pledging to “open markets” (i.e., sell lithium to Western corps)
▪️ The IMF, waiting to impose austerity the moment MAS falls

The 2025 elections aren’t just a political contest—they’re a battle for Bolivia’s soul. Will the country complete its journey from poverty to nuclear-powered sovereignty? Or will it descend into a narco-fascist nightmare, where lithium is looted and dissent is crushed by UJC thugs?

The world is watching. And the silence of Western governments speaks volumes.

Read 8 tweets

🅰pocalypsis 🅰pocalypseos 🇷🇺 🇨🇳 🅉

@apocalypseos

Apr 27

British Israelism is a syncretic cult ideology claiming the Anglo-Saxon-Celtic peoples are the biblical “Lost Tribes of Israel,” that the British monarchy descends from King David, and that Britain is destined for global rule. Its modern influence is no accident—it was cultivated.

The roots trace to Venetian psychological warfare. Paolo Sarpi, a 17th-century strategist, manipulated religion to divide Europe and suppress Renaissance science. Venice fueled the Protestant Reformation, hardened Catholic counter-reforms, and kept the continent in perpetual conflict.

British elites later adopted these tactics. Figures like John Dee (Elizabeth I’s occult adviser) and Francis Bacon (who framed science as esoteric “secret knowledge”) blended mysticism with imperialism. Rosicrucians and Freemasons spread the idea of Britain as a new “chosen” nation.

Read 8 tweets

🅰pocalypsis 🅰pocalypseos 🇷🇺 🇨🇳 🅉

@apocalypseos

Apr 9

Adam Smith was a fraud. His “pleasure-pain” economics enslaves you to bankers. The oligarchy hates progress—they want depopulation, decay, and dumbed-down serfs. Humanity’s destiny is anti-entropic—or it is nothing.

Humanity’s future depends on one question: Will we embrace anti-entropic progress—great infrastructure, advanced energy, and true scientific discovery? Or will we let the oligarchy’s fake economics drag us into collapse? There is no third option. Break their system—or perish with it.

Adam Smith was no economist—he was a British intelligence asset. His Theory of Moral Sentiments (1759) laid the groundwork for a fraud: the idea that humans are irrational animals, driven only by “hunger, thirst, and the dread of pain.”

Read 11 tweets

🅰pocalypsis 🅰pocalypseos 🇷🇺 🇨🇳 🅉

@apocalypseos

Mar 24

The Bank for International Fascism
by John Hoefle, EIR (2013)

In the aftermath of World War I, fascist movements sprang up all over Europe, and also in the United States. Considerable effort has been spent to portray these fascist movements as outgrowths of rampant nationalism, but that is a deliberate lie. The truth is that fascism is a political movement created and financed by the rentier/financier oligarchs of the Anglo-Dutch Liberal Empire, for the purpose of replacing the nation-state system with a global technocratic dictatorship.

Adam LeBor’s Tower of Basel sheds a useful light on how this process works, by telling the story of the Bank for International Settlements, known more commonly by its acronym, BIS. His book presents a detailed picture of the relationships between the Nazis and top international financiers, and the intelligence agencies. Along the way, we meet the leaders of the Bank of England, the titans of Wall Street, British and American spooks, and other financiers and industrialists, all of whom collectively made Hitler and Mussolini possible, and unleashed horror upon the world.

Some readers may be puzzled why such seemingly respectable institutions and individuals would work so closely with the Hitler regime, and wonder if they were somehow secret Nazis or Nazi sympathizers. But it is actually the inverse that is true. The Nazis were agents of the Empire!

A Bank Above Nations

The BIS was founded in 1930, nominally for the purpose of handling the reparations payments imposed upon Germany after World War I. The founding members of the bank were the central banks of Britain, France, Germany, Italy, and Belgium, with Japan and the United States each represented by a consortium of domestic banks. In the U.S., the consortium consisted of three banks: J.P. Morgan & Co., the First National Bank of New York, and the First National Bank of Chicago.

The driving forces behind the founding were Montagu Norman, the Governor of the Bank of England, and Hjalmar Schacht, the head of the German central bank, the Reichsbank. While Schacht liked to refer to the BIS as “my bank,” the Dutch banker Johan Willem Beyen—himself a president of the BIS—put it more clearly: “Norman’s prestige was overwhelming. As the apostle of central bank cooperation, he made the central banker into a kind of archpriest of monetary religion. The BIS was, in fact, his creation.”

Beyen’s quote goes to the deeper motive behind the founding of the BIS, the creation of the bank as a base from which to create a new form of what was euphemistically called “transnational finance.” The archpriests of the Empire were laying the foundation for what became the globalized financial system of today, a system of financier-run corporate cartels and markets which is essentially a rerun of the methods of the British East India Company, combined with modern technology.

Under the treaty which founded the BIS, the bank was granted virtual sovereignty—although under the circumstances, it might be more accurate to say that it was granted immunity from the sovereignty of others. No nation was to have any say over how the bank conducted its affairs, nor would their laws apply. Although the BIS is located in Switzerland, it is exempt from Swiss laws, and Swiss authorities cannot enter its premises without permission.

According to LeBor, “[T]he BIS enjoys similar protections to those granted to the headquarters of the United Nations, the International Monetary Fund (IMF), and diplomatic embassies. . . . The BIS has the right to communicate in code and send and receive correspondence in bags covered by the same protection as embassies, meaning they cannot be opened.”

“The bank’s extraordinary legal privileges also extend to its staff and directors,” LeBor writes. “Senior managers enjoy a special status, similar to that of diplomats, while carrying out their duties in Switzerland, which means that their bags (unless there is evidence of a criminal act), and their papers are inviolable. The central bank governors traveling to Basel for the bimonthly meetings enjoy the same status while in Switzerland. All bank officials are immune under Swiss law, for life, for all the acts carried out during the discharge of their duties.”

This protected position was carefully crafted. If your goal were to take control of nations and incorporate them into a new corporatist dictatorship, you would take steps to protect against counterattack by the targets.

An Oligarchic Cabal

As a conduit for war reparations payments, the BIS was explicitly set up to work with Germany, as the Nazis were coming to power. But the Nazis were themselves a tool of the people behind the bank, led by Montagu Norman and the Bank of England, the mother lodge of fascism. The Brits and the Dutch provided financial and political aid to the Nazi Party, as did their allies on Wall Street. The Wall Street crowd, led, as always, by J.P. Morgan, had organized its own fascist movement in the U.S., under the banner of the American Liberty League. The Morgan networks pumped money into Germany and Italy, aided by the Rockefeller interests, the Warburgs’ Kuhn Loeb, the Brown Brothers Harriman crowd, and Prescott Bush, whose son and grandson each became President of the United States.

Having launched this fascist movement, it was to be expected that the bankers would support it—and they did. The BIS served as a conduit to the banking and corporate interests on both sides of the war, The giant German industrial cartel, IG Farben—notorious for providing the Zyklon B gas used in the concentration camps—had a seat on the BIS board. IG Farben’s U.S. subsidiary, General Aniline and Film (GAF), was a major business partner with the Rockefellers’ Standard Oil. Standard Oil President Walter Teagle, Ford Motor Co. President Edsel Ford, National City Bank of New York Chairman Charles Mitchell, and Paul Warburg all sat on GAF’s founding board of directors. Sosthenes Behn, the head of ITT—which had substantial holdings in Germany—also sat on the National City Bank board, National City being a successor to the First National Bank of New York, one of the original BIS shareholders. New York banks led the way in raising money for Germany in the 1920s, as did the City of London. Time put the Morgan-sponsored Il Duce on its cover eight times between 1923 and 1943, presenting Mussolini and his corporatist policies as worthy of emulation in the U.S.

This is just a sample of the interlocking financial and business arrangements. Right in the middle of this nest were the Dulles brothers of the Wall Street law firm Sullivan & Cromwell, which represented a Who’s Who of Wall Street, including J.P. Morgan, Kuhn Loeb, Brown Brothers, the Harriman interests, Goldman Sachs, and GAF. John Foster Dulles was a fixture at the international conferences which established the post-World War I order. His brother Allen Dulles was the OSS station chief in Switzerland during the war, and later became head of the CIA, while John Foster became Secretary of State under President Eisenhower. Their sister, Eleanor Dulles, was also part of the family treason, involved in international diplomacy, and writing a book promoting the BIS.

Foremost among the British banks aiding the Nazis in the City of London was J. Henry Schröder & Co., which set up a trust to invest in German firms, including IG Farben, Siemens, and Deutsche Bank. Schröder partner Frank Tiarks—a director of the Bank of England—set up a subsidiary in New York, Schrobanco, in 1923. Schrobanco was run by a friend of John Foster Dulles, and its board would include not only Allen Dulles, but Gates McGarrah, a director of the New York Fed, a Rockefeller banker, and the first president of the BIS. Another American (and Rockefeller banker), Thomas McKittrick, was president of the BIS when the U.S. entered World War II.

J. Henry Schröder & Co., in turn, was the British arm of the Schröder banking dynasty in Germany, where Kurt Freiherr von Schröder was one of the most powerful and influential bankers, and a staunch Hitler supporter. Von Schröder hosted the infamous meeting between Chancellor Fritz von Papen and Adolf Hitler, which led to Hitler’s appointment as Chancellor of Germany in 1932. Kurt von Schröder was a partner in J.H. Stein in Cologne, which held the slush funds for Heinrich Himmler, the head of the Nazi SS. Schacht personally appointed Schröder to the board of the BIS.

One could go on almost endlessly, but this is sufficient to show how the international bankers see themselves as part of an elite. As LeBor put it: “Nationalities were irrelevant. The overriding loyalty was to international finance.”

Read 6 tweets

🅰pocalypsis 🅰pocalypseos 🇷🇺 🇨🇳 🅉

@apocalypseos

Mar 22

Sergey Glazyev: The world has changed. Irreversibly. What we wrote about a decade and a half ago has come to pass. This publication is a continuation of the article “What is happening?” previously published on this channel. 1/84

Pax Americana is crumbling before our eyes, three decades after the collapse of the USSR. The transition to a new global economic order has been completed. 2/84

The center of the world economy has shifted to East and South Asia, where a bipolar core of the integral global economic order has formed, as expected, with two poles: communist China and democratic India. 3/84

Read 84 tweets

🅰pocalypsis 🅰pocalypseos 🇷🇺 🇨🇳 🅉

@apocalypseos

Feb 28

“How British Financial Elites Fueled the Rise of Hitler: The Hidden Geopolitical Agenda Behind Nazi Germany’s Ascent” by Mike Billington (EIR)

Let’s look back to where the original Nazis came from. In the 1920s and 1930s, there was the mobilization of various forces in Germany responding to the hideous impositions placed on Germany after World War I, where they were essentially burdened with massive reparations that destroyed any chance of their economic recovery from the war. This fostered the rise of radical institutions. The head of the Bank of England, Montague Norman, openly sponsored the rise to power of Adolf Hitler. He was a close personal friend of Hjalmar Schacht, Hitler’s economic minister, who became the Reichsminister under Hitler and implemented the Nazi policy of giving all economic power to the banks themselves. This policy diverted credit from anything other than the buildup of military forces to prepare for the onslaught, for Operation Barbarossa, and for what became the Second World War.

They were so close—Montague Norman and Hjalmar Schacht—that Schacht’s children had Montague Norman, the head of the Bank of England, as their godfather. Norman was even passing gold to the Nazis after the war began. So, why did they give rise to the Nazis? Well, you could say a lot of things. You could say they basically agreed with the Malthusian idea that certain lesser races should be exterminated. Maybe they didn’t say it was the Jews; maybe they said it was the Blacks or the Indians. Keep in mind, the British believed emphatically, publicly, and openly in eugenics and race science—that there were lesser races and superior races—and guess who the superior race was. So, maybe that was why. But in geopolitical terms, they were anxious to see Germany and Russia destroy each other. This was the geopolitics of Mackinder and Haushofer and the people who knew that you did not want to allow any force in the East or West to control the heartland, so that the British Empire—which was based on the financial institutions controlling world trade and finances—could continue their looting and genocidal policies against the colonies around the world. So, they supported Hitler and put him in power.

Read 10 tweets

Share this page!

Enter URL or ID to Unroll

🅰pocalypsis 🅰pocalypseos 🇷🇺 🇨🇳 🅉

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

More from @apocalypseos

🅰pocalypsis 🅰pocalypseos 🇷🇺 🇨🇳 🅉

🅰pocalypsis 🅰pocalypseos 🇷🇺 🇨🇳 🅉

🅰pocalypsis 🅰pocalypseos 🇷🇺 🇨🇳 🅉

🅰pocalypsis 🅰pocalypseos 🇷🇺 🇨🇳 🅉

🅰pocalypsis 🅰pocalypseos 🇷🇺 🇨🇳 🅉

🅰pocalypsis 🅰pocalypseos 🇷🇺 🇨🇳 🅉

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Send Email!