Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth just laid out the new Pentagon mission: peace through strength, America First, no more forever wars.
It’s a total reset of the U.S. military.
But there’s one question he couldn’t avoid—Afghanistan.
That’s when he dropped a bombshell.
🧵 THREAD
Don’t forget to bookmark this thread. This isn’t just policy—it’s a turning point in America’s formerly broken military.
Let’s roll the clips and break it all down.
The conversation started with clarity, not slogans.
At the Pentagon, @SecDef Pete Hegseth sat down with @willcain and laid out the new doctrine guiding America’s military reset.
No ambiguity, no hedging—just three objectives that define the mission.
“Three clear goals: We hammer it home every day, every speech,” he said.
“Restore the warrior ethos, rebuild the military, reestablish deterrence.”
It’s more than a strategy. It’s a cultural overhaul. Hegseth explained that the U.S. military had lost its edge, not just in equipment or posture—but in spirit.
“And the warrior ethos is simple—it’s readiness, accountability, lethality, war fighting.”
He said the distractions are over. No more identity politics, no more top-down ideology.
“None of this woke DEI, CRT, gender pronoun, green new scam stuff. That’s all out. Ideology is out.”
The new standard, he said, is performance over politics.
“Capabilities, color blind merit-based, back to basics. It really is a back to basics message.”
And that shift isn’t just theoretical—it’s already underway.
Hegseth pointed to President Trump’s first term as proof that military rebuilding is possible, and promised they’re doing it again.
“President Trump did it in his first term. We’re doing it again.”
This shift isn’t just about restoring power—it’s about using it differently.
When asked what this new military doctrine really looks like, Hegseth didn’t hesitate.
“America First, meets peace through strength.”
He explained that every action taken by the military should serve one purpose: advancing the interests of the American people.
That means walking away from the costly illusions of nation building.
“You’re in the utopian or globalist or naive in your views of remaking human nature, or nation building,” he said.
“These globalist ideas that you’re going to change an entire society through military intervention.”
He wasn’t speaking abstractly. He lived through it—in Iraq, in Afghanistan—and watched the fallout firsthand.
“We’ve seen that movie before. We’re not doing it again.”
Then came the contrast with the current administration. Hegseth described the recent Houthi conflict as a test of American resolve, one Biden failed.
“The president said freedom of navigation is a core national interest. American ships do not get shot at without consequence. Joe Biden let that happen. That’s weakness on the world stage. That stops.”
This time, he said, the focus is narrower—but sharper.
No more chasing foreign regime changes while America’s actual security priorities go ignored.
“If we spend all of our time and effort investing in some sort of regime change war in Yemen, we’re not focusing on the core interest.”
With Trump back in charge, the goal is clear—and the mission isn’t drifting.
“Time and time again we’re focusing on what matters most in advancing American interests with President Trump charting the course.”
@SecDef @willcain Before we roll the next clip: if you’re not following me, you’re missing out on critical updates.
Hit the bell 🔔 to stay sharp and informed.
→ @VigilantFox
Now, back to the story you came for.
That vision is resonating with the next generation of warriors.
Hegseth shared what’s happening behind the scenes at recruitment centers across the country.
The spike in enlistments isn’t just a bump—it’s a wave.
But it’s who’s showing up that matters most.
He called them “the best of America.”
Young men and women, he said, aren’t looking for comfort. They’re looking for a challenge—and for something real.
“Everybody wants to be pushed. They want a challenge, purpose. They don't want to say join the military where it's nice and easy on you. No! How far can I go? Can I excel? Can I meet the standard? Can I be excellent?”
As the political noise fades, the mission itself becomes the draw.
“If they can woke garbage, they can go to college,” he said bluntly.
But if they want meaning, discipline, and purpose—there’s a place for them.
“If they want to train to be a warrior and part of something bigger than themselves… join the U.S. Military. Be a part of it.”
And the numbers back it up. Hegseth described a surge that started the moment Trump returned to power—and hasn’t let up.
“It literally starts at election day for President Trump and the inauguration and what we’ve been building. It’s been a surge.”
“We can barely keep up with the amount of people that want to join the U.S. Military. Which is about the biggest vote of confidence I could conceive of.”
But the most urgent question came at the end.
Will Cain asked what millions of Americans have been wondering since the collapse in Kabul:
When will there be accountability for the disastrous withdrawal from Afghanistan?
Hegseth didn’t flinch. Accountability is coming.
“Great question! We’re all over it in our office.”
Then came the biggest bombshell of the entire conversation.
“In fact, we’ll have an announcement I believe tomorrow. If not later today, tomorrow or Wednesday on the developments of our task force.”
According to Hegseth, the investigation is active and already turning up answers. But the damage runs deep—and some of it is still classified.
“We’re moving, we’re finding, we’re investigating. It’s going to take a little bit of time. Because there’s a lot of things that need to be uncovered, classified aspects.”
Still, he made one thing clear: the clock is ticking on those who got away with it.
“We’ve found the right people to be involved.”
And for those still waiting on justice, he delivered this:
“So more to come on that. It may take into 2026—to really uncover everything, but there will be accountability.”
“We’re committed to it. We will not leave a single stone unturned.”
The Pentagon has changed.
The priorities are shifting. And the people responsible for one of the most humiliating chapters in American military history—may finally have to answer for it.
@SecDef @willcain Thanks for reading. Follow me for more stories that matter.
—> @VigilantFox
Looking for something else to read?
Bernie Sanders just said the quiet part out loud—and Andrew Schulz got it all on tape.
REPORT: The NIH is now funding research into ivermectin as a cancer treatment.
Yes, the same drug they mocked as “horse paste” is now being seriously studied—for its ability to kill cancer cells.
On February 10, the NIH confirmed it’s funding preclinical trials on ivermectin’s anti-cancer properties. Dr. Anthony Letai, head of the National Cancer Institute, said there’s “enough interest” and “enough reports” to take it seriously. Studies are already underway, with results expected in just a few months.
This follows 2024 and 2025 reviews by U.S. scientists showing signs that ivermectin can inhibit tumors. The NIH is now backing that research, pointing to ivermectin’s Nobel Prize-winning legacy and its decades of safe, FDA-approved use in humans.
But instead of welcoming a promising, low-cost treatment, the media doubled down. Outlets like MedPage Today rushed to dismiss the story as “right-wing hype,” ignoring the science and smearing anyone who dared to ask questions.
Why attack a drug that could save lives—unless the real threat is to their bottom line?
If ivermectin works, it won’t just save lives. It’ll shatter the system built to suppress it.
👇 rumble.com/v75mnac-republ…
#ad: The digital ID financial nightmare isn’t coming someday. It’s already here.
Once a single identity becomes the gateway to your money, your work, and your ability to participate in everyday life, compliance is no longer a choice.
That’s why Genesis Gold Group created the free Digital ID Resistance Wealth Guide.
It breaks down the real risks of digital ID and explains how physical gold and silver allow you to operate outside the system.
Digital dollars leave you exposed. Gold and silver can’t be frozen, tracked, or turned off.
Get your free Digital ID Resistance Wealth Guide right now at GoldandFreedom.com, before digital ID becomes the default and your options disappear.
DISCLOSURE: This ad was paid for by Genesis Gold Group. We may earn a small commission when you shop through our sponsors. Thank you for your support.
In other news, Republicans and Democrats are backing a bill that opens the door to mandatory Digital ID for every American.
It’s called the “Kids Off Social Media Act.” But it doesn’t just target kids. It targets you.
The bill bans anyone under 13 from having a social media account. Sounds reasonable—until you realize enforcement means scanning your face, checking your ID, or tracking your device… just to prove you’re old enough to speak online.
The bill doesn’t have to say “Digital ID.” The logic demands it. And once those systems are in place, they won’t stop at children. They’ll be used to control what you can say, see, and share.
Multiple states have already declared these laws unconstitutional. So why are Republicans still pushing them?
This is exactly how it started in the UK. Today, people are getting arrested for memes.
Watch @zeeemedia's report before they normalize this—and your freedom to speak anonymously disappears forever.
👇 rumble.com/v75mnac-republ…
Google why we no longer see crippled kids from polio. You’ll get one answer: vaccines.
But Dr. Suzanne Humphries says that’s not what the facts show—and when you dig into the history, the real story is jaw-dropping.
First off, polio never actually disappeared. “Polio is still here. Polio is still alive and well,” Humphries says.
What changed? The definition. Once the vaccine was introduced, the medical establishment redefined what counted as “polio.”
Humphries explains: “Polio is called different things today. Whereas back in the 1940s, 1950s, the criteria for diagnosing polio were completely different to the year that the vaccine was introduced. The playing field, the goalposts—everything was changed… they were able to show a complete cascading drop of paralytic polio simply because of the way they changed the definitions of what polio is and what could cause it.”
Suddenly, cases that would’ve been labeled polio were now called Guillain-Barré syndrome, coxsackievirus, echovirus—or simply chalked up to heavy metal poisoning. “They didn’t have virus, or they had coxsackievirus or echovirus, or they were lead poisoned or mercury poisoned, which was—the mercury and lead were the leading treatments of the day,” she said.
But it gets worse.
The rise of polio, she says, directly mirrored the use of toxic pesticides like DDT. “The tonnage of production of DDT absolutely mirrored the diagnosis for polio.” And even today, “the countries that still make DDT today is where we’re still seeing this paralytic polio situation happen.”
So what about the virus?
Polio virus, according to Humphries, is what’s known as a commensal—a normal virus that lives in most people without causing problems. In fact, “95 to 99% of all polio is asymptomatic.” She described a study of the Javante Indians where “98 to 99% of every person they tested… had evidence of immunity to all three strains of polio.”
When asked where all the paralyzed children were, she recalled: “They were like, ‘We don’t have any of that problem.’”
Humphries also points to a 1916 Rockefeller lab in Manhattan that, in her words, had “the specific stated goal… to try to create the most pathological, neuropathological strain of polio possible.” By injecting monkey brains and human spinal serum into monkeys, “there was a big problem with that, which was released into the public by accident. And the world experienced the worst polio epidemic on record. 25% mortality.”
Bottom line? According to Dr. Humphries, polio didn’t disappear because of vaccines. It disappeared behind a curtain of redefinitions, misdiagnoses, manmade disasters—and a whole lot of propaganda.
And if they went that far to deceive you about the polio vaccine, what else are they lying about? 🧵
Did you know the original smallpox vaccine caused serious injuries—and was often contaminated with pus, bacteria, and fungus?
We’ve been told it saved humanity from a deadly disease, but what if that’s a lie?
Dr. Suzanne Humphries explained to Joe Rogan what happened to children who received the vaccine. They developed large ulcers, high fevers, and widespread infections. With no antibiotics available, treatments were limited to mercury, arsenic, bloodletting, or isolation in dark rooms.
These severe reactions weren’t considered rare. In fact, they were referred to as “a good take.”
What made matters worse was how the vaccine was produced. According to Dr. Humphries, it was made by infecting animals and harvesting the resulting pus.
“They would take pus from other animals, scratch it into the belly of a cow, then take the pus off of the big pimples that would form,” she said. The material—called “pure lymph”—often came from cadavers, horses, or ulcerating cow udders, mixed with glycerin, and scratched into the surface of the skin.
Even decades later, contamination was an issue. “There was more bacteria and fungus in the smallpox vaccines than there was smallpox virus.” One widely used version, Dryvax, was eventually considered so problematic that health authorities ordered all remaining specimens destroyed around 2009.
Living conditions at the time were “a disaster.” Streets were filled with human and animal waste, there was no running water, and sanitation was nearly nonexistent. Poor hygiene and co-infections absolutely made smallpox far more deadly than it might have been otherwise.
Despite all this, the smallpox vaccine is still presented as a flawless triumph.
But for those who experienced the injuries firsthand, and for those who study its full history, the story isn’t so simple.
“This is the one vaccine that eliminated, eradicated a disease,” Dr. Humphries said sarcastically. “Can you believe that fairytale?”
We’ve all been taught that the smallpox vaccine was one of medicine’s greatest triumphs.
But when you read the actual clinical observations recorded by doctors who lived through its rollout, a far more unsettling picture emerges.
It’s not propaganda, and it’s not hindsight. It’s primary-source medicine.
There’s a reason doctors love pushing vaccines. The more they inject, the more money they make.
The foot traffic alone brings in big money, but there’s another perverse incentive, and once you hear it, it will make you angry.
RFK Jr. explains: “Pediatricians who vaccinate 80-85% of the kids in their office, get these giant bonuses... And that's why they throw you out of the office if you fight back…You'll lose them their bonuses.”
Sadly, these perverse financial incentives aren’t limited to vaccines but across many areas of medicine.
Dig a little deeper, and another disturbing pattern appears. Once you see it, you’re left gobsmacked by just how far the corruption runs beyond money. 🧵
The video below is haunting—not because the doctor in it is malicious, but because she genuinely believes she’s helping.
She’s an MD with a Master’s in Public Health, a Fellow of the American Academy of Pediatrics, and a former leader at Georgetown. Her language is warm. Her intentions seem pure.
Yet this interview perfectly captures how public health has lost its way.
After conquering most deadly contagious diseases, it turned toward chronic illness—and failed.
Instead of questioning why children are getting sicker, it doubled down on vaccinating more, earlier, and without dissent, often dismissing safety concerns as heresy.
Watch this video. Then ask yourself what matters more in modern medicine: children’s outcomes—or institutional certainty.
A lawsuit filed several years ago exposed something far more disturbing than a single act of medical misconduct.
It revealed how, during COVID, core medical ethics quietly collapsed—how consent became optional, coercion was reframed as care, and vulnerable people were treated as obstacles rather than patients.
This isn’t about ideology. It’s about what happens when fear, authority, and institutional pressure override conscience.
The real cause of heart disease has been buried for decades in favor of the lie about cholesterol.
40 million Americans take statins to lower their cholesterol, thinking it’s the best way to protect their hearts.
But what doctors never tell them is that statins interfere with the body’s natural repair system, weakening the very cells that rely on cholesterol to function.
In trying to prevent disease, they’re paradoxically fueling it.
This report exposes what really happens to the body when you take a statin every day.
For years, doctors have been taught that high cholesterol causes heart attacks. They’ve passed the warning along to their patients, and most of us have believed them.
But that idea came from one man: Ancel Keys.
Keys cherry-picked data to make fat and cholesterol look deadly while ignoring the real culprit: sugar.
John Yudkin tried to warn the world that sugar—not fat—was driving heart disease. But no one listened. He was ridiculed, silenced, and erased from history.
In 2015, Scott Adams made a “crazy” prediction that most people thought was impossible.
He said Trump had a 98% chance of becoming president, and he made that call on a single observation.
The winning attribute that made Scott confident in Trump’s victory was his one-of-a-kind persuasion skills.
While political betting markets dismissed Trump’s chances, Adams argued—using his background in persuasion and hypnosis—that Trump was the most psychologically effective candidate in the race and therefore favored to win.
He built a massive following by showing how persuasion, not policy, drives political outcomes.
That insight proved correct. But it also revealed something darker. 🧵
After Trump’s victory, Adams pivoted to punditry—and during COVID, even he struggled to see the truth.
Scott strongly endorsed the vaccines, vaccinated himself, and publicly belittled followers who refused. Many later derisively called him “Clot Adams.”
In January 2023, Adams admitted—on video—that he’d been wrong and that the anti-vaxxers were correct. But he framed it as luck: the right people just happened to distrust the government, while “all the data” supposedly pointed intelligent analysts toward vaccination.
That framing matters. It reveals how even skilled observers of persuasion can mistake marketing consensus for truth—and how the same system that manufactures medical certainty also hides the limits of medicine, until reality forces a reckoning.
Last May, Scott told the world something most people never say out loud until it’s unavoidable: he had terminal, metastatic prostate cancer.
He openly stated he planned to use California’s medically assisted dying to reduce suffering.
He also shut down speculation—saying he had already tried fenbendazole and ivermectin and had no interest in continuing them.
The reaction was explosive.
People weren’t just debating treatment choices—they were watching, in real time, what a protracted, modern death actually looks like.
For many, it shattered comforting abstractions about both cancer and mortality.