Let's say Esoteria really does sell me 100 Jun 5200/5600 Put Spreads.
We both trade live (no hedge).
We cross in Cboe's Complex Order Book
(sorry MBI no bro on this one)
How does each method capture the trade..?
First, naive portfolio construction.
It holds:
» Customers buy puts to hedge
» Customers sell calls to finance hedging
Market makers are therefore:
✓ Short all the Puts in the OI
✓ Long all the Calls in the OI
Dealer position, naive construction:
Short 100 Jun 5600 Puts
Short 100 Jun 5200 Puts
Market impact (dynamic) after our trade:
🔸Short Gamma
🔸Shorter Gamma to downside
🔸Charm influence is bullish until between strikes
🔸Market more volatile on selloffs
Next, Dealer Directional Open Interest (DDOI).
It holds:
» Customers pay the bid/ask to trade.
» Dealers collect the bid/ask (trade for edge).
Market makers are therefore:
✓ Buying the contracts trading closer to the bid
✓ Selling the contracts trading closer to the ask
Esoteria may be a great trader and correct on stuffing me with this June Put Spread.
But when it trades, I'm more likely to work the order below theo to get a decent execution price.
Dealers will see the Jun 5200 5600 PS trading .15 under on the COB.
So will the data boiz.
Dealer position, DDOI:
Long 100 Jun 5600 Puts
Short 100 Jun 5200 Puts
Market impact (dynamic) after our trade:
🔸Long Gamma until ~ 5350-5400
🔸Shorter downside Gamma
🔸Charm bearish > 5600, bullish between 5200-5600 and bearish < 5200
🔸Supportive, then volatile down moves.
Finally, Cboe-signed trade data:
It provides:
» Actual net long (short) per contract, by entity type
Market Makers are therefore:
» Long (short) whatever the Cboe says they are.
Dealer position, Cboe-signed data:
(no change)
Market impact (dynamic) after our trade:
(no change)
#3 is the only correct answer.
You're misled by 90% of the data services.
They use methods (1) or (2) and don't know, or don't care, that they're selling you noise.
We're just getting started.
You know the drill.
Retweet the thread & I'll keep going...
- I don't think we surpass all-time highs without seeing a meaningful reversion in key flows
- the overnight gap was instrumental in moving price OUT of a zone of pressure and retracement (5550-5650) and into a zone of acceleration and levitation (5750-5825)
- pressure will draw us back into this range unless we have another massive stop-in
Going back to subject of the quoted thread:
This morning, a customer bought 20k of the 0DTE 6000 Call for avg $0.50.
We are drawn to big numbers.
A customer buying 20k of anything stands out to us.
The buyer spent $1M in premium...
"they must know something!" is a common, instinctive thought, when you see an outlier like that— especially on the buyside.
But when I'd see an order like this to open the day as a MM, my first thought is SOLD
and my second thought is SELL MORE
Not every flow is smart.
Not every buyer knows something.
They could be forced to buy per their clearing arrangement or internal risk thresholds.
They could be punting, gambling.
...or they could be covering an exposure we're not privy to.
This was a customer order, not a bank or firm trade and exactly the type of order you want to lay into as a market maker.
Compare that premium on this straddle price to any similarly distant trade on any other day, and you'll see why.
Note how fast this premium vanished:
For an option to have any dynamic influence, exerted through the dealer hedging processes, it has to first exist somewhere on the distribution.
Something this small is like a conditional conditional.
The only hedge for the MM is to buy a risk unit near the level for margin coverage.
Hedging a delta of 1 (1%) means the MM is buying 2 ES futures per 100 SPX calls sold.
In this case, a static opening hedge would have been only 400 futures for the entire 20k lot of calls sold to the customer.
And of course then, the unwinding of this hedge (charm/decay) is trivial.
Selling 400 futures throughout the course of the day would do very little to cause any discernable pressure on the index.
When analyzing trades and positions, you need a firm grasp on which types of options create which types of influences on the market- and this is done by viewing the dynamic hedging process for that option or position, through the lens of the market maker tasked with hedging it.
Some positions will cause the market to move, while others cause it to stick.
Some positions cause the market to SLOW DOWN as it moves in one direction, and SPEED UP as it moves in the other.
Some positions will force selling when vol goes bid, and some will force buying.
Some positions will force market makers to bid vega as implied vol goes higher, while other positions pick up vega on vol increases, allowing the market maker to scalp vega just like he would scalp gamma.
Remember- pinning happens due to a combination of Gamma & Charm (sorry Vanna, you're not invited)
Move higher, and dealers sell futures as spot rallies. (Gamma)
Move in the money, and dealers sell futures as time passes.
(Charm)
Move lower, and dealers buy futures as spot declines.
(Gamma)
Remain out-of-the-money, and dealers buy futures as time passes.
(Charm)
Gamma maxes out when the option is ATM
Charm SELLING is the strongest when the dealer long call is ~80 Delta
Charm BUYING is the strongest when the dealer long call is ~20 Delta.
Gamma acts as the range compressor around the strike.
Charm creates the magnetic field around it.
Gamma also counteracts Charm- creating a type of path towards the strike, where dealers recycle their hedges... buying AND selling (or vice versa)... grinding the index towards the strike at expiration.
The JPM Collar Call is highly visible.
Arguably the most famous and oft-cited option at any given time.
But these mechanics are happening every single day.
$1.9 trillion to expire this morning on the serial AM print
(a thread)
Remember- the OPEX "trillions" are always an exaggeration of the risk transfer *actually* taking place-
Forget about all those far OTM strikes - whether they're deep ITM puts or calls, doesn't matter. Real risk is not "premium", that's the easiest thing to manage for an MM or dealer/firm