VolSignals Profile picture
Flows move markets. Learn how THE Newsletter for SPX flows & volatility 👉 https://t.co/MjicKYuQQO Career Index MM (15 years) | Education, not advice 🍻
4 subscribers
May 12 4 tweets 3 min read
My view is best stated as:

- I don't think we surpass all-time highs without seeing a meaningful reversion in key flows
- the overnight gap was instrumental in moving price OUT of a zone of pressure and retracement (5550-5650) and into a zone of acceleration and levitation (5750-5825)
- pressure will draw us back into this range unless we have another massive stop-in

Going back to subject of the quoted thread:
This morning, a customer bought 20k of the 0DTE 6000 Call for avg $0.50.

We are drawn to big numbers.

A customer buying 20k of anything stands out to us.
The buyer spent $1M in premium...
"they must know something!" is a common, instinctive thought, when you see an outlier like that— especially on the buyside.

But when I'd see an order like this to open the day as a MM, my first thought is SOLD

and my second thought is SELL MORE

Not every flow is smart.
Not every buyer knows something.
They could be forced to buy per their clearing arrangement or internal risk thresholds.
They could be punting, gambling.
...or they could be covering an exposure we're not privy to.

This was a customer order, not a bank or firm trade and exactly the type of order you want to lay into as a market maker.

Compare that premium on this straddle price to any similarly distant trade on any other day, and you'll see why.

Note how fast this premium vanished:Image For an option to have any dynamic influence, exerted through the dealer hedging processes, it has to first exist somewhere on the distribution.

Something this small is like a conditional conditional.

The only hedge for the MM is to buy a risk unit near the level for margin coverage.

Hedging a delta of 1 (1%) means the MM is buying 2 ES futures per 100 SPX calls sold.

In this case, a static opening hedge would have been only 400 futures for the entire 20k lot of calls sold to the customer.

And of course then, the unwinding of this hedge (charm/decay) is trivial.
Selling 400 futures throughout the course of the day would do very little to cause any discernable pressure on the index.
Feb 2 16 tweets 6 min read
What are the core hedging flows, and why are they important?

Let's start with Gamma.

As a MM, Gamma tells me how my position's Delta will change with the index. (dDelta/dSpot)

Gamma doesn't tell us about direction- it tells us about MM behavior.

(a thread) Image Broadly we know that Gamma can be one of three things:

Positive = MMs sell futures on rallies, buy on declines

This doesn't in and of itself influence direction-

but it creates stabilityImage
Oct 18, 2024 8 tweets 3 min read
WELCOME TO OPEX

$1.9 trillion to expire this morning on the serial AM print

(a thread) Remember- the OPEX "trillions" are always an exaggeration of the risk transfer *actually* taking place-
Sep 15, 2024 9 tweets 4 min read
CTAs aren't recklessly puking futures back and forth through triggers...

—obviously.

But they ARE a concentrated expression of synthetic negative gamma embedded in the S&P's market structure.

What's "GAMMA" again?

Simple.

(short thread) bingo-

gamma is NOT about UP or DOWN, strictly speaking.

There are some neat consequences arising from the presence of gamma on the books that feed into bullish positioning downstream-

but fundamentally, gamma has nothing to do with direction.

First- options...
Jul 28, 2024 40 tweets 9 min read
Sunday night data dump.

...time for no context derivatives memesplaining.

new meme every 5 minutes.
will go until the folders are dry 👀

retweet the good ones

disclaimer: no offense Image Image
Apr 26, 2024 7 tweets 3 min read
SPX dealer options inventory...
What's the setup into next week...?Image h/t GS...

"The gamma cushion that supported markets for first 3 mos of the yr is no longer there-

We've sold off through gamma support... dealers flip short gamma lower... long gamma lives higher"

"-SPX can freely move lower/ potentially meet resistance higher"

my notes nextImage
Jan 19, 2024 5 tweets 2 min read
Welcome to SPX AM OPEX...

A little thread to explain why squeezes are more likely in the AM vs the PM expirations... A lot of factors come into play in these preopen sessions- and they all happen against the backdrop of low liquidity

If market makers are short gamma on a strike and we start moving through it —their gamma hedging algos before the open *have to buy delta* to hedge this.
Oct 28, 2023 5 tweets 2 min read
Important week ahead...

Chart below suggests VIX is underperforming on the selloff... not as "sensitive" to spot as we should expect, especially as SPX tests important levels

ES 4125 seems like a reasonable buy entry...

But what may flows be telling us? Image Muted VIX on the way down was *the story* of 2022.

This happens when...

1) Funds degrossing/taking down nets (cutting positions)
Less hedge demand→ IV⤵️

2) Funds/HFs *already* well-hedged.. monetizing (selling options).
More vol supply→ IV⤵️
Oct 22, 2023 25 tweets 7 min read
For those who missed the newsletter, and the closing of the SPX Whale Call Spread chapter:

In its entirety→

The SPX Whale Finally gets *beached*. . .
After 10 days of stormy waters...
...the tide finally went out 👀

A Quick Recap from the Week Prior→

Despite the "HOT" October 12 CPI...

SPX pressed higher for most of the morning session...
Sep 3, 2023 10 tweets 5 min read
What matters more than what you "think" should happen?

Positioning- along with mechanical and systematic flows.

Bookmark this thread!

Every mini case study we produce over time will be catalogued here.Image December of 2022 (low liquidity/JHEQX Pin) Image
Apr 25, 2023 10 tweets 4 min read
As the rally stalls into earnings, end-of-month rebal, & May FOMC rate decision...

Let's have a look at where the systematics stand.

Is this bull getting tired? Image Vol has been CRUSHED. So what?

These days... IV is more a function of supply & demand across a fragmented & reflexive marketplace

As fewer participants are willing (able) to hold risk (*positions*), IV no longer fairly reflects an equilibrium expectation of forward variance Image