Sen. John Kennedy just OBLITERATED the Democrats’ narrative on HHS budget cuts with nothing but a few simple questions.
RFK Jr. was under heavy fire.
Then Sen. Kennedy stepped in—and hit a grand slam.
This exchange flipped the whole hearing on its head.
You have to see it.
🧵 THREAD
HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. went head-to-head with Senate Democrats today over major proposed budget cuts, including $18 billion slashed from the NIH and $3.6 billion from the CDC.
But for many Democrats, you’d think it was the end of the world.
Senator Tammy Baldwin (D-WI) led the charge, slamming Kennedy for a $3 billion drop in federally funded biomedical research compared to last year.
Kennedy stood his ground.
“We’re cutting waste, we’re cutting duplicative programs,” he said.
Still, Baldwin wouldn’t let up. She framed the loss of “3,200 fewer grants” as an attack on “life-saving programs.”
Kennedy hit back with a devastating stat.
“We spend 70% of the world’s biomedical research out of NIH. 70%. And we’re the sickest country in the world,” he said.
“We’ve had a 38% increase in our agency growth over the past four years,” he added. “That money has not been well spent.”
The exchange summed up a broader dynamic: Democrats trying to paint RFK Jr. as a villain, slashing life-saving science, while Kennedy pointed out that America’s health is declining because of how this money is being spent, not despite it.
Then came Senator John Kennedy, and he dismantled the entire narrative with a few simple questions.
Before I break it down, you should really watch the full exchange for yourself. It’s nothing short of glorious.
The first line of questioning pointed out that HHS staff went from 82,000 to 62,000, the same level it was at before COVID in 2019.
Sen. Kennedy sarcastically asked, “Is this the first time that an institution in America has ever downsized?”
“I don't think so,” RFK Jr. replied.
Sen. Kennedy kept ramming this point home.
“Microsoft just announced that they were going to reduce their workforce by 6,000 people. You think that’ll be the end of Microsoft?”
“I don’t think so,” RFK Jr. answered.
Sen. Kennedy kept going.
“Meta—I still call them Facebook—just announced they’re going to reduce their workforce by 3,000 people. You think that’ll be the end of Meta?”
“I imagine it will not,” RFK Jr. said.
“Yeah. Think maybe the people at Meta know what they’re doing?” Sen. Kennedy asked.
“I think that they do,” RFK Jr. responded. “They make a lot of money.”
“Do you hate NIH?” Senator Kennedy asked.
“I love NIH,” RFK Jr. said earnestly. “I grew up with NIH. I visited when I was a boy. I loved science, and those were my favorite afternoons visiting the labs.”
Then, the gloves came off.
Senator Kennedy argued the best way to increase medical research funding was to “stop the stealing.” He explained how universities misuse taxpayer dollars:
“Let’s suppose NIH gives a university $100 million for medical research. That university takes $30 million of it, doesn’t spend it on the research, and uses it to subsidize the rest of their university. Does that show a commitment to medical research?” he asked facetiously.
Kennedy pointed to a real-life case, citing Stanford as an example.
He said they were taking 78% in indirect costs, and no one really knew where the money was going.
“That’s theft, isn’t it?” he asked, adding, “In Louisiana… we call that STEALING.”
Sen. Kennedy asked RFK Jr. point-blank:
“Is there any doubt in your mind that a lot of universities are taking this NIH money, which is supposed to be spent on medical research, and using it to fund other parts of their university? Is there any doubt in your mind, Bobby?”
RFK Jr. explained that while private grantmakers like the Gates Foundation or Rockefeller Foundation pay just 10%–15% in indirect costs (overhead expenses that universities charge on top of research grants), the NIH has been paying 50%, 60%, even 70%.
This means taxpayer-funded grant money meant for medical research is being misused and spent far more loosely than it would be under private grantmakers.
With his last question, Sen. Kennedy asked RFK Jr., “ Why do we allow highly processed foods in America?”
“That’s a complicated question,” RFK Jr. replied, “but it’s driven by profits to a food industry that is making money by poisoning American kids.”
He added, “And they don’t do it abroad. They make the same products for Canada and for Europe that do not contain many of those chemicals.”
Before wrapping up, Senator Kennedy took one last shot at the partisan drama:
“You understand, Mr. Secretary, there’s nothing you can do that’s going to make many of my Democratic colleagues happy. You get that, don’t you?”
“I do understand,” RFK Jr. replied. “I’m coming to understand that, Senator. Yes.”
And just like that, Sen John Kennedy not only put a smile on Kennedy’s face, but also torched the “budget cuts kill people” narrative and exposed how bloated spending has failed the very people it’s meant to help.
From that moment on, the Democratic outrage fell apart. The narrative had already been flipped, and everyone in the room knew it.
Thanks for reading. For more in-depth stories the mainstream won’t touch, follow me on 𝕏.
—> @VigilantFox
Looking for something else to read? Bernie Sanders just backstabbed Democrats in his most brutally honest interview yet. This was a shocker.
A little bit about me: I spent over a decade working as a licensed healthcare professional. But when the Biden administration rolled out its vaccine mandates, I couldn’t stay silent. My conscience simply wouldn’t let me.
That’s when I started this page.
Since then, I’ve shared thousands of clips featuring doctors and scientists who were brave enough to question the official COVID narrative.
Along the way, we’ve reached billions of views and helped millions of people understand the other side of the COVID story that the government didn’t want out.
If you’re looking for clear, honest information without corporate spin, you’re in the right place. Follow me for straight-to-the-point clips and threads that challenge the narrative.
Joe Rogan fell into stunned silence as Dr. Casey Means rattled off one disturbing health stat after another.
“We are getting destroyed, and it’s very recent, and it’s accelerating,” she warned.
• “74% of Americans are overweight or obese.”
• “Young adult cancers are going up 79% in the last 10 years.”
• “25% of men now under 40 have erectile dysfunction.”
• “50%, now, of American adults have type 2 diabetes or prediabetes. These were diseases where there was 1% of Americans in 1950 had type 2 diabetes. Now it’s 50% of Americans have prediabetes or type 2 diabetes.”
• “Alzheimer’s, dementia are going through the roof.”
• “Young adult dementias have increased, like, three times since 2012. So early onset dementias.”
• “One in two Americans are expected to have cancer in their lifetime now, one in two.”
• “One in [31] children has autism now, in the United States. That was one in 150 in the year 2000.”
• “In California, where I live, [Autism rates are] one in 22. One in 22 with a lifetime neurodevelopmental disorder.”
• “Infertility going up 1% per year.”
• “77% of young Americans can’t serve in the military because of obesity or drug abuse.”
• “Autoimmune diseases. Some studies are saying they’re going up 13% per year.”
• “Heart disease, which is almost totally preventable, is the leading cause of death in the United States, killing around 800,000 people per year.”
“It’s basically like all of us are a little bit dead while we’re alive,” Dr. Means said.
These aren’t unrelated crises. They share the same biological pattern — a body stuck in survival mode.
And once you understand what’s keeping your body there, the path to real healing finally makes sense. 🧵
What if what triggers chronic disease isn’t actually a malfunction?
Cells aren’t dead.
Or mutated.
Or broken beyond repair.
They’re just shut down.
What if our cells do that because they’re just trying to survive?
That single shift in perspective changes everything.
And it explains far more than modern medicine will ever admit.
It could even mean that modern medicine is going about healing all wrong.
When cells are exposed to overwhelming stress—things like toxins, infection, trauma, and immune overactivation—they do something deeply intelligent.
They conserve energy.
They reduce output.
They enter a low-function survival mode.
In the short term, this saves you.
But if your cells get stuck here, it becomes disease.
Because survival mode is not the same thing as health.
A new investigation has revealed that Jeffrey Epstein, alongside powerful people like Bill Gates, may have MASTERMINDED the COVID response before it hit.
Internal emails show that in 2017, Epstein was part of an email chain with Bill Gates discussing how “pandemics” could be treated as a PERMANENT funding bucket inside large donor-advised funds — positioned not as a one-time emergency, but as an ongoing area where capital could be organized and directed long term.
And oddly enough, that same year, a close associate in Epstein’s network told him she had been working on “pandemic-related insurance products” designed to automatically pay out when a pandemic is declared.
Coincidence? That’s only scratching the surface of what @sayerjigmi’s report uncovers:
As Kim Iversen put it, “The new investigation and the Epstein files show that this wasn’t about preparedness. This was about control.”
“‘We’ll have these plans in place so that at the opportune moment, we can trigger them and gain all of this power and control.’”
What you’re about to read lays out how this machine actually works, from lab funding and media hype to profit mechanisms that turn every new “threat” into a predictable payday.
Think this ended with COVID? The money didn’t disappear. It just moved to the next “outbreak.” 🧵
The information in this report comes from the work of medical researcher @MidwesternDoc.
For all the sources and eye-opening details, read the full 15,000+ word article below.
REPORT: The NIH is now funding research into ivermectin as a cancer treatment.
Yes, the same drug they mocked as “horse paste” is now being seriously studied—for its ability to kill cancer cells.
On February 10, the NIH confirmed it’s funding preclinical trials on ivermectin’s anti-cancer properties. Dr. Anthony Letai, head of the National Cancer Institute, said there’s “enough interest” and “enough reports” to take it seriously. Studies are already underway, with results expected in just a few months.
This follows 2024 and 2025 reviews by U.S. scientists showing signs that ivermectin can inhibit tumors. The NIH is now backing that research, pointing to ivermectin’s Nobel Prize-winning legacy and its decades of safe, FDA-approved use in humans.
But instead of welcoming a promising, low-cost treatment, the media doubled down. Outlets like MedPage Today rushed to dismiss the story as “right-wing hype,” ignoring the science and smearing anyone who dared to ask questions.
Why attack a drug that could save lives—unless the real threat is to their bottom line?
If ivermectin works, it won’t just save lives. It’ll shatter the system built to suppress it.
👇 rumble.com/v75mnac-republ…
#ad: The digital ID financial nightmare isn’t coming someday. It’s already here.
Once a single identity becomes the gateway to your money, your work, and your ability to participate in everyday life, compliance is no longer a choice.
That’s why Genesis Gold Group created the free Digital ID Resistance Wealth Guide.
It breaks down the real risks of digital ID and explains how physical gold and silver allow you to operate outside the system.
Digital dollars leave you exposed. Gold and silver can’t be frozen, tracked, or turned off.
Get your free Digital ID Resistance Wealth Guide right now at GoldandFreedom.com, before digital ID becomes the default and your options disappear.
DISCLOSURE: This ad was paid for by Genesis Gold Group. We may earn a small commission when you shop through our sponsors. Thank you for your support.
In other news, Republicans and Democrats are backing a bill that opens the door to mandatory Digital ID for every American.
It’s called the “Kids Off Social Media Act.” But it doesn’t just target kids. It targets you.
The bill bans anyone under 13 from having a social media account. Sounds reasonable—until you realize enforcement means scanning your face, checking your ID, or tracking your device… just to prove you’re old enough to speak online.
The bill doesn’t have to say “Digital ID.” The logic demands it. And once those systems are in place, they won’t stop at children. They’ll be used to control what you can say, see, and share.
Multiple states have already declared these laws unconstitutional. So why are Republicans still pushing them?
This is exactly how it started in the UK. Today, people are getting arrested for memes.
Watch @zeeemedia's report before they normalize this—and your freedom to speak anonymously disappears forever.
👇 rumble.com/v75mnac-republ…
Google why we no longer see crippled kids from polio. You’ll get one answer: vaccines.
But Dr. Suzanne Humphries says that’s not what the facts show—and when you dig into the history, the real story is jaw-dropping.
First off, polio never actually disappeared. “Polio is still here. Polio is still alive and well,” Humphries says.
What changed? The definition. Once the vaccine was introduced, the medical establishment redefined what counted as “polio.”
Humphries explains: “Polio is called different things today. Whereas back in the 1940s, 1950s, the criteria for diagnosing polio were completely different to the year that the vaccine was introduced. The playing field, the goalposts—everything was changed… they were able to show a complete cascading drop of paralytic polio simply because of the way they changed the definitions of what polio is and what could cause it.”
Suddenly, cases that would’ve been labeled polio were now called Guillain-Barré syndrome, coxsackievirus, echovirus—or simply chalked up to heavy metal poisoning. “They didn’t have virus, or they had coxsackievirus or echovirus, or they were lead poisoned or mercury poisoned, which was—the mercury and lead were the leading treatments of the day,” she said.
But it gets worse.
The rise of polio, she says, directly mirrored the use of toxic pesticides like DDT. “The tonnage of production of DDT absolutely mirrored the diagnosis for polio.” And even today, “the countries that still make DDT today is where we’re still seeing this paralytic polio situation happen.”
So what about the virus?
Polio virus, according to Humphries, is what’s known as a commensal—a normal virus that lives in most people without causing problems. In fact, “95 to 99% of all polio is asymptomatic.” She described a study of the Javante Indians where “98 to 99% of every person they tested… had evidence of immunity to all three strains of polio.”
When asked where all the paralyzed children were, she recalled: “They were like, ‘We don’t have any of that problem.’”
Humphries also points to a 1916 Rockefeller lab in Manhattan that, in her words, had “the specific stated goal… to try to create the most pathological, neuropathological strain of polio possible.” By injecting monkey brains and human spinal serum into monkeys, “there was a big problem with that, which was released into the public by accident. And the world experienced the worst polio epidemic on record. 25% mortality.”
Bottom line? According to Dr. Humphries, polio didn’t disappear because of vaccines. It disappeared behind a curtain of redefinitions, misdiagnoses, manmade disasters—and a whole lot of propaganda.
And if they went that far to deceive you about the polio vaccine, what else are they lying about? 🧵
Did you know the original smallpox vaccine caused serious injuries—and was often contaminated with pus, bacteria, and fungus?
We’ve been told it saved humanity from a deadly disease, but what if that’s a lie?
Dr. Suzanne Humphries explained to Joe Rogan what happened to children who received the vaccine. They developed large ulcers, high fevers, and widespread infections. With no antibiotics available, treatments were limited to mercury, arsenic, bloodletting, or isolation in dark rooms.
These severe reactions weren’t considered rare. In fact, they were referred to as “a good take.”
What made matters worse was how the vaccine was produced. According to Dr. Humphries, it was made by infecting animals and harvesting the resulting pus.
“They would take pus from other animals, scratch it into the belly of a cow, then take the pus off of the big pimples that would form,” she said. The material—called “pure lymph”—often came from cadavers, horses, or ulcerating cow udders, mixed with glycerin, and scratched into the surface of the skin.
Even decades later, contamination was an issue. “There was more bacteria and fungus in the smallpox vaccines than there was smallpox virus.” One widely used version, Dryvax, was eventually considered so problematic that health authorities ordered all remaining specimens destroyed around 2009.
Living conditions at the time were “a disaster.” Streets were filled with human and animal waste, there was no running water, and sanitation was nearly nonexistent. Poor hygiene and co-infections absolutely made smallpox far more deadly than it might have been otherwise.
Despite all this, the smallpox vaccine is still presented as a flawless triumph.
But for those who experienced the injuries firsthand, and for those who study its full history, the story isn’t so simple.
“This is the one vaccine that eliminated, eradicated a disease,” Dr. Humphries said sarcastically. “Can you believe that fairytale?”
We’ve all been taught that the smallpox vaccine was one of medicine’s greatest triumphs.
But when you read the actual clinical observations recorded by doctors who lived through its rollout, a far more unsettling picture emerges.
It’s not propaganda, and it’s not hindsight. It’s primary-source medicine.
There’s a reason doctors love pushing vaccines. The more they inject, the more money they make.
The foot traffic alone brings in big money, but there’s another perverse incentive, and once you hear it, it will make you angry.
RFK Jr. explains: “Pediatricians who vaccinate 80-85% of the kids in their office, get these giant bonuses... And that's why they throw you out of the office if you fight back…You'll lose them their bonuses.”
Sadly, these perverse financial incentives aren’t limited to vaccines but across many areas of medicine.
Dig a little deeper, and another disturbing pattern appears. Once you see it, you’re left gobsmacked by just how far the corruption runs beyond money. 🧵
The video below is haunting—not because the doctor in it is malicious, but because she genuinely believes she’s helping.
She’s an MD with a Master’s in Public Health, a Fellow of the American Academy of Pediatrics, and a former leader at Georgetown. Her language is warm. Her intentions seem pure.
Yet this interview perfectly captures how public health has lost its way.
After conquering most deadly contagious diseases, it turned toward chronic illness—and failed.
Instead of questioning why children are getting sicker, it doubled down on vaccinating more, earlier, and without dissent, often dismissing safety concerns as heresy.
Watch this video. Then ask yourself what matters more in modern medicine: children’s outcomes—or institutional certainty.
A lawsuit filed several years ago exposed something far more disturbing than a single act of medical misconduct.
It revealed how, during COVID, core medical ethics quietly collapsed—how consent became optional, coercion was reframed as care, and vulnerable people were treated as obstacles rather than patients.
This isn’t about ideology. It’s about what happens when fear, authority, and institutional pressure override conscience.
The real cause of heart disease has been buried for decades in favor of the lie about cholesterol.
40 million Americans take statins to lower their cholesterol, thinking it’s the best way to protect their hearts.
But what doctors never tell them is that statins interfere with the body’s natural repair system, weakening the very cells that rely on cholesterol to function.
In trying to prevent disease, they’re paradoxically fueling it.
This report exposes what really happens to the body when you take a statin every day.
For years, doctors have been taught that high cholesterol causes heart attacks. They’ve passed the warning along to their patients, and most of us have believed them.
But that idea came from one man: Ancel Keys.
Keys cherry-picked data to make fat and cholesterol look deadly while ignoring the real culprit: sugar.
John Yudkin tried to warn the world that sugar—not fat—was driving heart disease. But no one listened. He was ridiculed, silenced, and erased from history.