Absolutely the only way these powerful vested interests, destroying our natural systems for profit, can get away with it, is because people can't easily see or understand what is happening. It's far away, too subtle to easily see or understand.
2/
As soon as public outcries, could change things, whether it was the polluted rivers in our cities, smog air pollution, clear felling of woodland, hunting species, especially predators to extinction, pressure was brought to bear, to change things.
3/
The problem is many of these harmful actions, can be difficult for people to see. Take anthropogenic climate change. It is caused by relatively low volumes of a clear colourless, odorless gas, and the effects are even more difficult to see.
4/
People, see and directly experience weather. However, seeing climate, the average of those weather patterns in time, can only be seen indirectly, or through statistical analysis of data over time. Making it easy to deny, or minimize.
5/
As I said in response to @GreenJennyJones, if this trawling was happening on land, fleets of tractors just tearing up, beautiful natural land, there would be an outcry. But no one can see the damage left behind, from trawling.
This is how this systematic destruction of the Earth's natural life support systems, continues, simply because people can't see or understand most of it. Vested interests rely on this, to carry on destroying our life support systems, for profit.
7/
We have mainstream (corrupt) politicians, who turn a blind eye, and corporations, industry and oligarchs, who hide their actions from the public eye, and who spend vast sums of money, fostering denial, corrupting our political system.
8/
Those doing this, are evil, conscienceless, amoral, ecociders, pushing our societies toward global suicide, for short term profit. Only indigenous peoples, have consistently seen right through what is happening. They are the only communities who understand this.*
9/
Yes, there are informed and moral climate and environmental activists, who also see it, but they are only ever in the minority in our societies, and our nasty, corrupt politicians, and vested interests put great effort into keeping them in the minority.
10/
* Indigenous cultures are the only peoples who have not wholly had their connection with Mother Nature, broken. Which is why the evil psychopathic people who control the modern culture, have tried to exterminate, indigenous cultures and the people themselves.
11/
@threadreaderapp unroll
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
We seem to be living in the Age of Denial, where things supported by massive evidence, are simply denied by certain politicians and vested interests, even though they are incredibly serious.
The climate crisis, and the ongoing genocide in Gaza, are egregious examples.
1/🧵
This is far more than a post-truth world - we're not talking about subtle distortions of the truth, but outright denial. This is the active and complete and utter denial of the most serious matters that can be imagined. It can't get more serious than ecocide, and genocide.
2/
This is outright denial of events supported by massive evidence, to the extent that a large proportion of the public, just walk around, as if these dire crises, do no exist.
3/
I'm not sure how much of the current situation in Japan, is climate related, but let's get this clear, the rice harvest is seriously threatened by climate change.
However, this is not just about rice, but all harvests and food production.
As I have repeatedly made clear, in the present free market, capitalist system, food supply problems could destroy our societies, as it could create food hyperinflation, which would create societal chaos, and the fall of our present system.
3/
@DoctorVive Exactly. Let me totally support what you say. Modern humans have been around for 2-300,000, and our close relatives, much longer. But the reason civilizations only emerged within the last 10,000 years (really about 5-6,000 years for the very first) is simple.
1/
@DoctorVive Large, complex societies i.e. civilizations, need a constant supply of grain. In other words, every year, they need a predictable harvest, with a predictable yield. Just one bad year, especially more than one, will lead to the collapse of that civilization, and it did.
2/
@DoctorVive This is only possible in a certain type of climate. Where there is an equitable climate, where you get consistent weather patterns, which allow the reliable planting and harvesting of crops. If you get years, with very poor yield, the civilization collapses.
3/
"UK government dropped health push after lobbying by ultra-processed food firms"
I think this raises serious questions about the current Starmer, Labour government, and who is driving its policy, which seems very strange for Labour.
To be quite frank, all Starmer's policy, seems identical to right wing think tank talking points, from its climate policy, or rather lack of it, getting rid of environmental protection Re: development, the attacks on the sick and disabled. Enoch Powell type speeches etc.
2/
Starmer's Labour government, seems identical to what the right wing Tory Press opinion, and it is pursuing this policy, even when it is publicly unpopular, so it is not from public necessity. We need to ask big questions, about from who Starmer is taking instructions.
3/
The points I made here are not really about AI, but about our culture's false view of reality, which wrongly equates, symbolic representation, such as language, as the same as reality. It is at the heart of the climate crisis.
As I've repeatedly explained, the climate crisis is not the same as anthropogenic climate change. It's a crisis, because we have the science, that tells us we are in dire trouble, but our governments/leaders, act as if it is not a real emergency.
2/
What our culture profoundly misunderstands, is that abstract, symbolic representation of things like the natural world/systems, is not the same as the actual natural world. The map is never the territory.
AI, no matter how sophisticated, totally lacks insight into what it is saying. It does not exist, in a sentient, feeling being. John Searle's famous Chinese Room Thought experiment illustrates this. Please read this.