The media spent years covering up the targeted killings of White farmers in South Africa——because it didn't fit their narrative.
He confronted the issue head-on beside President Ramaphosa, under the bright lights of live TV.
What happened next left the press scrambling for cover.
🧵 THREAD
📍You’ll want to bookmark this thread.
This could go down as one of President Trump’s most brilliant 4D chess moves.
Let’s break it all down and roll the clips.
When President Trump welcomed South African President Cyril Ramaphosa to the White House, he didn’t tiptoe around the issue that had been buried for years.
He brought it front and center: the brutal attacks against White Afrikaner farmers.
“A lot of people are very concerned with regard to South Africa,” Trump said.
He made clear this wasn’t just another diplomatic handshake.
“That’s really the purpose of the meeting. And we’ll see how that turns out.”
Trump pointed to the growing number of South African refugees already arriving in the U.S., saying:
“We have many people that feel they are being persecuted, and they are coming to the United States. We take from many locations if we feel there is persecution or genocide going on.”
Then, turning directly to Ramaphosa, he added:
“Generally, they are White farmers and they are fleeing South Africa, and it’s very sad to see, but I hope we can have an explanation of that because I know you don’t want that.”
Right on cue, the press tried to change the subject.
A reporter asked, “Can you explain to Americans why it is appropriate to welcome White Afrikaners here when other refugees like Afghans, Venezuelans, Haitians have all had their protected status revoked?”
Trump wasn’t having it.
“Well, this is a group, NBC that is truly fake news,” he said.
“They ask a lot of questions that are very pointed, where they're not questions, they're statements.”
Then he flipped the script: “We've had tremendous complaints about Africa… they say there's a lot of bad things going on in Africa, and that's what we are going to discuss today.”
And when it came to refugee policy? Trump dropped the hammer.
“When you say that we don't take others, all you have to do is look at the southern border. We let 21 million people become totally unchecked, totally unvetted.”
Before we roll the next clip: if you’re not following me, you’re missing out on critical updates.
Hit the bell 🔔 to stay sharp and informed.
→ @VigilantFox
Now, back to the story you came for.
But then came the moment no one expected.
A reporter asked, “What would it take from you to be convinced that there’s no White genocide in South Africa?”
Before Trump could answer, Ramaphosa jumped in.
He insisted the idea of a genocide was false and claimed Trump needed to talk to South Africans who knew better.
“If there was Afrikaner farmer genocide,” Ramaphosa said, “I can bet you these three gentlemen would not be here, including my minister of agriculture.”
Trump didn’t argue—he pivoted.
“We have thousands of stories talking about it. We have documentaries. We have news stories,” he said.
“I can show you a couple of things. It has to be responded to.”
Then he gave the order: “Turn the lights down and just put this on. It’s right behind you.”
On screen was Julius Malema—the genocidal leader of South Africa’s Economic Freedom Fighters party—shouting pure venom into a microphone.
“We are going to occupy land.”
“Never be scared to kill!”
“A revolution demands that at some point, there must be killing! Because the killing is part of the revolution at hand!”
“Shoot to kill!”
“Kill the Boer, the farmer!”
Ramaphosa turned to Trump. He didn’t have an answer. Because there wasn’t one.
This wasn’t a fringe voice.
Malema leads one of the largest political parties in South Africa.
His speeches aren’t isolated incidents—they’re calls to action.
His supporters echo the message: “Kill the White farmer.”
And it’s working. Attacks are increasing. Families are being driven off their land or worse.
Whether Ramaphosa admits it or not, Malema has influence—and a growing following.
Trump then played the next video.
A roadside memorial. Thousands of white crosses. Cars pulled over on both sides of the road in silent tribute.
“These are burial sites. Right here. Burial sites, over a thousand of White farmers and those cars are lined up to pay love on a Sunday morning,” Trump said.
“Each one of those white things you see is a cross… They're all White farmers, the family of White farmers.”
“And those cars aren't driving, they're stopped there to pay respects to their family member who was killed.”
“It’s a terrible sight, I’ve never seen anything like it.”
Ramaphosa tried to deflect: “Have they told you where that is, Mr. President? I'd like to know where that is because this I've never seen.”
But it was too late. The footage was playing. The truth was undeniable.
This was the footage Trump showed.
The camera panned overhead.
Crosses as far as the eye could see. Cars lined up in silence. The scene stretched for miles.
It was devastating.
And just when the weight of it was setting in, NBC’s Peter Alexander tried to hijack the moment.
“Mr. President, the Pentagon announced it would be accepting a Qatari jet to be used as Air Force One—”
Trump snapped.
“What are you talking about?! What are you talking about?”
Even Ramaphosa motioned to the screen, still reacting to what he had seen.
Trump wasn’t done.
“You know, you oughta get out of here. What does this have to do with the Qatari jet?”
Then he lit into NBC.
“We're talking about a lot of other things. It's NBC trying to get off the subject of what you just saw.”
Then came the full takedown.
“You know you're a terrible reporter. Number one, you don't have what it takes to be a reporter. You're not smart enough… You're a DISGRACE. No more questions from you.”
Alexander tried to speak again.
Trump shut him down cold.
“QUIET! QUIET! QUIET!”
Trump wasn’t finished.
He held up stacks of articles for the press to see. Then read them out loud.
“These are articles over the last few days.”
“Death.”
“Death.”
“Death.”
“Horrible death.”
He flipped through story after story:
White South Africans fleeing. Families wiped out. Racist land seizures. Murder.
“White South Africans are fleeing because of the violence and racist laws,” he read.
“This is one after another. This family was wiped out.”
South Africa’s very own @elonmusk watched in silence as the horrors unfolding in his homeland played out before him, one story after another.
Then Trump drove it home.
“A correct and a fair media exposes things. But we have a very corrupt media.”
“They won't even report this. If this were the other way around it would be the biggest story.”
He continued, “Apartheid—terrible. That was reported all the time. This is sort of the opposite of apartheid. What's happening now is never reported. Nobody knows about it.”
“All we know is we are being inundated with people, White farmers from South Africa. It’s a big problem.”
And he wasn’t the only one alarmed.
“Marco Rubio was telling me he's never seen anything like it. The numbers of people who want to leave South Africa because they feel they are going to be dead very soon.”
Trump forced a conversation the world had been ignoring.
And this time, the media couldn’t look away.
@elonmusk Thanks for reading. Follow me for more stories that matter.
—> @VigilantFox
Looking for something else to read?
Trump Unleashes Firestorm at Capitol: Shreds the Media and Asks a Question About Biden No One Will Touch
Over 40 million Americans take statins, not realizing they’re depleting the “most vital nutrient for the heart.”
Statins are pushed to reduce cholesterol, but they also severely deplete CoQ10, a critical compound for energy.
And when the body is starved of CoQ10, your cells begin struggling to produce energy. Muscles weaken. Fatigue sets in. And the heart itself can start losing the fuel it depends on to keep beating efficiently.
Dr. Stephen Sinatra was a “choir boy for cholesterol” until a 1993 study exposed the unsettling CoQ10-depleting effects of statins.
“Didn’t make any sense,” he said.
“How could the most vital nutrient for the heart be knocked out of the box? The heart requires COQ10 for survival.”
In his own practice, Dr. Sinatra began to notice that he “wasn’t seeing a correlation of heart problems with higher cholesterol.”
He eventually concluded everything he thought he knew about cholesterol was a “myth.”
“Cholesterol is not the villain of heart health” we’ve been told. 🧵
The information in this thread comes from the work of medical researcher @MidwesternDoc.
For all the sources and details, read the full report below.
The more you dig into modern medicine, the more you realize how often “settled science” isn’t actually settled. It’s simply been rigged to build an industry.
In the 1960s and ’70s, two scientists squared off over the cause of heart disease.
John Yudkin pointed to sugar while Ancel Keys blamed saturated fat and cholesterol.
Keys won the battle, and his seven countries study became gospel.
But Yudkin didn’t just lose. He was ridiculed into obscurity.
This 75-year-old man, who’s been blind since birth, suddenly regained his eyesight after using DMSO to treat sinusitis.
It cleared his sinuses “instantly,” Murray says, but what it did to his sight was “unbelievable.”
For the first time in his life, he was finally able to see color in his left eye.
And when he kept using DMSO, his vision kept improving: He could make out details and even count fingers, something he “could never do before.”
It might sound like a coincidence, but DMSO has been repeatedly shown to heal eye issues medicine still can’t solve, like blindness, macular degeneration, floaters and cataracts.
It’s Big Pharma’s worst nightmare. And it’s hiding in plain sight for just $20 a bottle. 🧵
This information comes from the work of medical researcher @MidwesternDoc.
For all the sources and details, read the full report below:
A registered nurse with 30 years of experience treating chronic pain says she saw “TEN TIMES” the positive effects after mixing DMSO with castor oil to treat her peripheral neuropathy.
Castor oil on its own has anti-inflammatory effects, but adding the DMSO is where she says it “got interesting.”
That’s because DMSO “isn’t just a treatment, it’s a carrier,” Danielle Minetti explained.
“It can pull medications and nutrients right through the skin barrier deep into the body.”
That’s why when Danielle mixed DMSO with castor oil, she saw “ten times” the positive results.
Because DMSO acts as the delivery system, carrying the castor oil deeper into the areas where she needs relief most.
DMSO is a naturally occurring compound that is primarily derived as a byproduct of the wood pulp and paper industry, which makes it widely and affordably available.
But that also creates a problem...
Because if a treatment can’t be patented, Big Pharma can’t profit.
And that simple reality is where the DMSO story takes a dark turn.
So what happened to DMSO, and why is a substance that is so medically promising still relatively unknown to this day?
Let’s take a closer look. 🧵
The real story isn’t whether or not DMSO worked.
The real story is how a low-cost, widely available substance became an early case study in medical distrust.
Regulators suddenly restricted it. Doctors dismissed it.
But patients kept using it.
And once that happened, official medicine no longer controlled the story.
DMSO was discovered in 1866 by a Russian chemist, then largely forgotten.
In the 1950s, the paper industry needed new solvents. Dimethyl sulfide from wood pulping could be oxidized into DMSO.
That industrial turn set up one of the most unusual medical controversies of the 20th century!
The FDA knew the COVID shots would kill and maim countless Americans.
They kept injecting anyway.
One government employee tried to sound the alarm about “49 examples” of deadly side effects that conventional safety analyses weren’t detecting.
She was shut down.
Her name was Dr. Ana Szarfman.
On March 1, 2021, less than three months after the rollout of the COVID-19 injections, Dr. Ana Szarfman, an employee at CDER and safety data mining developer, warned that the FDA’s existing system could hide vaccine safety signals due to a flaw called “masking.”
She proposed a newer method developed by statistician Dr. William DuMouchel that corrected for this issue and, when applied, detected “49 examples of extreme masking” that the standard system did not.
These “49 examples of extreme masking” include not “minor” but serious adverse events:
• Bell’s palsy
• Cardiac failure
• Acute left ventricular failure
• Agonal rhythm (severe end-of-life arrhythmia)
• Pulmonary infarction
• Cerebral artery occlusion
• Aortic stenosis
• Sudden cardiac death
• Hypertensive emergency
• Basal ganglia stroke
When Dr. Szarfman proposed a new method, she was told to “hold off on creating and sending data mining reports and analyses.”
Later, they “made it clear” that she “needs to focus on her assigned work” and “should not be discussing or providing internal analyses externally.”
As Dr. Szarfman puts it, her work became a “pest” for raising concerns about safety signal masking.
In September 2021, Dr. Peter Marks, the FDA's top vaccine official, decided that Dr. Szarfman’s COVID vaccine data-mining days were over.
He informed Dr. Patrizia Cavazzoni, the then director of CDER, that Dr. Szarfman “has been asked to cease and desist conducting her data analysis.”
Dr. Marks complained that Dr. Szarfman’s work had become “a major distraction” and that her efforts could “create erroneous conflicts that feed into anti-vaccination rhetoric.”
Dr. Szarfman went on to retire from the FDA in 2025 after more than 35 years of service.
She raised concerns about safety signal masking. The FDA essentially told her to shut up.
Because in their eyes, “49 examples of extreme masking” could create “erroneous conflicts” and fuel “vaccine hesitancy.”
Unfortunately, this is not a one-off instance. It’s part of a much deeper problem: the gap between what’s known internally and what’s allowed to reach the public. 🧵
For years, Americans were told the COVID vaccines were “safe and effective.”
Not mostly safe.
Not partially effective.
Not still being studied.
Safe. Effective. Full stop.
The message was absolute, repeated by government officials, doctors, media outlets, hospitals, employers, schools, and nearly every major institution in the country.
But internal records now suggest something very different was being discussed behind the scenes.
The story is no longer just about whether the COVID vaccines caused harm.
That debate has been raging for years.
The bigger question is what federal health agencies knew, when they knew it, and why the public was told a much different story than the one officials were discussing behind closed doors.
Senator Ron Johnson’s Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations obtained thousands of pages of subpoenaed HHS records.
The investigation and subpoenaed records suggest that the CDC and FDA were aware of serious safety signals involving myocarditis and strokes, yet continued pushing the vaccines while downplaying the risks.
That’s the part we can’t ignore.
Vaccine trust was built on a very simple promise.
The government said the products had been carefully tested, monitored, and transparently evaluated.
If a serious safety issue appeared, the public would be told.
But according to the records Johnson released, that isn’t how the COVID vaccine rollout worked. Not even close.
Republicans are once again teaming up with Democrats to ram Digital ID through at the federal level.
The bill they’ve just introduced is, if you can believe it, worse than all the others before it.
HR 8250, deceptively named the Parents Decide Act, doesn’t just force everyone to link their identity to use apps on their phones, it mandates that they must do it to use ANY operating system. That means Apple, iOS, Windows, Google, Android, even Samsung—basically everything.
And once that’s in place, there’s nowhere to step outside of it.
But one brave group is refusing to go along.
GrapheneOS has made a statement saying: GrapheneOS will remain usable by anyone around the world without requiring personal information, identification, or an account.
@glennmeder from PrivacyAcademy.com/Pulse has been working to educate people on how to escape the digital control grid, including how to put GrapheneOS on your phone—for free. And they have a solution to Digital ID right now.
He joins us to discuss. 🧵
You’ve seen this pattern before.
When the same thing starts appearing everywhere at once, it’s usually not random.
A new push for Digital ID laws isn’t happening in just one place. With bills like the Parents Decide Act (HR 8250), it’s now moving directly into the systems we use every day. It’s happening in a very coordinated way across countries, across platforms, and now, at the operating system level.
This isn’t about regulating a few apps anymore. The focus has moved underneath them—to the operating system itself—the software that runs your phone and computer. @GlennMeder described it plainly, they’re trying to “lock it down on an operating system level,” because that’s the one layer you can’t avoid.
Apps can be swapped. Accounts can be deleted.
But if access to the operating system requires Digital ID, there’s nowhere left to step outside of it.
That’s the inflection point.
Glenn called it “the hill to die on,” not because of how it looks today, but because of what it enables once it’s in place. In his words, this isn’t just verification, it’s the foundation for removing privacy and building a system that monitors “everything we say.”
He warned it would “change instantly,” the kind of shift you only recognize after it’s already locked in.
Access to your phone. Your apps. Your accounts. All tied to one digital identity.
And once that becomes the standard, stepping outside of it stops being an option.
Your phone is a surveillance Trojan Horse.
Big Tech and Big Brother have colluded together to create a spyware monopoly.
Your phone tracks your location at all times, who you text, what you read, whether you’re skeptical person or not, how you spend your money and where your finances are stored... This list could go on forever.
Privacy Academy is hosting a FREE webinar on Thursday, May 7th at 7pm CT (8pm ET / 6pm MT / 5pm PT) where you can learn how to escape the cell phone surveillance state.
For four years, Ron Johnson has wondered how US health officials could ignore “overwhelming evidence of harm” from the COVID vaccine.
“Now I know,” he says.
The truth is, health officials didn’t “ignore” safety signals. They buried them instead.
And now we have the receipts:
The US Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations investigated what federal health officials knew and when they knew it—and dug out a timeline that would make any American furious.
This is not a fringe “conspiracy theory.” It was revealed by the government’s own investigation—and it’s a story they don’t want you to read.
(Post 1 of 7)
According to VAERS, the US’s vaccine adverse event reporting system, more adverse events and deaths have been reported following COVID vaccines than from all other vaccines combined over the system’s 30+ year history.
More dangerous than ivermectin. More dangerous than hydroxychloroquine (which turned out not to be so dangerous after all).
It was 55 times more deadly than the flu vaccine (0.46 deaths vs 25.5 deaths per million doses).
And even more dangerous than Remdesivir, which earned the nickname “Run Death Is Near” after it wreaked havoc on the kidneys and livers of tens of thousands of COVID patients in the hospital.
But still the question remains. How did US health officials miss a safety signal this big?
(Post 2 of 7)
The U.S. Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations investigated what federal health officials knew and when they knew it.
It turns out they knew the safety signal was there. But they didn’t see it as a warning sign. They saw it as “pest.”
So much of a “pest” that they decided it was better to ignore the devastating safety signals and let people die than to deal with the data head-on because it could stoke “vaccine hesitancy.”