TVL keeps climbing, new assets are being listed & $HYPE is pumping.
The HyperEVM is coming alive with new protocols are being deployed.
Here’s a full breakdown of what’s going on, on HyperCore and HyperEVM. 👇👇
2/ Over the past month, Hyperliquid has shown clear growth, not just through the rise in $HYPE price but also across key performance indicators within both HyperCore and HyperEVM.
3/ Key indicators are breaking records across Hyperliquid Core.
Open interest, both in absolute and relative terms, are at all-time highs. This indicates that traders are comfortable holding positions and reflects maturity.
4/ Fees are steadily rising, pushing revenue close to previous all-time highs.
5/ HLP is making a comeback, increasing its TVL by more than 50% in 30 days and 100% since the bottom following the HLP attack.
Its annualized yield for the month is on track to be the second highest so far in 2025.
6/ Unit is quietly becoming a key part of HyperCore, generating more than $4.5b in cumulative volume across all its supported assets. This demonstrates clear product-market fit.
7/ The HyperEVM side is also gaining momentum, showing consistent growth in its ecosystem, with new projects launching and significant gains in TVL over the past month.
8/ The rise in activity is reflected not only in TVL but also in cumulative DEX volume, which has grown over 100% compared to a month ago, reaching nearly $200 million.
9/ The data shows strength in usage, retention, and capital movement. Those are the core signals that define where it makes sense to deploy and where it makes sense to build.
The signals are here. What comes next depends on who executes.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
HyperEVM is shifting the way we define stablecoins.
With multiple stablecoin models available, traders, institutions, and builders can choose the right dollar for the job, unlocking efficiency and stability to their portfolios.
2/ Every stablecoin in the market shares the same goal of keeping its price anchored to the USD.
However, the way they achieve this varies, and understanding these differences plays a crucial role in making smarter choices while optimizing your liquidity.
3/ Fiat-backed stablecoins like USDT0 or HUSD are the go-to for institutions.
These coins park dollars or short-dated Treasuries with a custodian, ensuring regulatory clarity and predictable stability.
But HUSD takes things further, offering passive yield through treasury bill-backed rebasing.
1/ Hyperliquid Core only supports USDC as quote asset. But as Jeff hinted, multi-collateral support is on the roadmap.
If it arrives, builder code exchanges will be able to launch quote markets in new stablecoins ahead of the Core frontend.
2/ A builder choosing HUSD as the quote asset could potentionally unlock a new source of income to the ecosystem.
Idle balances might generate daily yield, and that growth could be reinvested into operations, product incentives, or even used to subsidize part of the traders’ funding rates.
3/ For traders, that same yield enhances capital efficiency.
Balances left on the exchange could continue growing even when no position is open, rather than leaving capital idle.
Hyperliquid changed what it means to launch an exchange by removing the hard parts
Instead of building matching engines, sourcing liquidity or maintaining custody infra, builders can plug directly into a shared stack where liquidity is already live & execution already works🧵👇
2/ The standard model forces every new exchange to recreate the wheel. Teams spend months building infrastructure and paying for depth that quickly decays. Liquidity spreads across too many venues, and all participants pay the cost in form of slower growth, higher friction and worst trading experience.
3/ Builder Codes eliminate the need to rebuild.
Teams gain access to Hyperliquid’s core infrastructure, including matching, custody, routing, and deep liquidity from the moment they go live.
This means exchanges can launch faster, operate leaner, and offer competitive execution without waiting for critical mass.
Redemption throughput defines peg integrity for $feUSD.
On HyperEVM, small-block gas ceilings cap how much collateral clears in a single block.
Redeemers either slice transactions or migrate to big blocks, introducing latency, slippage, and routing competition. 🧵👇
2/ Lower minimum debt lifts Trove count, forcing redemptions to iterate across larger lists and burn more gas per operation.
At ~200k daily redemptions, a one-block clear is already marginal. Breaching 300k forces redemptions into multiple transactions, amplifying latency risks.
3/ In reality, the protocol prefers smaller redemption chunks.
Because redemptions trigger a dynamic base fee that rises after each event, many small, incremental pulls incur less cumulative cost than a single large sweep.
On HyperEVM, where gas is cheap, this effect is amplified even further.
The failure of a price feed means the collapse of the entire system.
Since Felix is a fork of Liquity, we inherited a strong foundation for price feeds.
Today I want to walk you through how we utilized @liquity protocol model for liquid staked assets like stHYPE and kHYPE. 🧵
1/🔎 The core challenge:
Liquid staking tokens like stHYPE and kHYPE are not pegged 1:1 with HYPE.
They accrue staking rewards over time, meaning their value naturally diverges from HYPE.
This requires a more careful approach to price feeds.
2/🛠 How Felix handles LST price feeds:
We combine two inputs:
HYPE/USD from a decentralized oracle
stHYPE/HYPE or kHYPE/HYPE exchange rate from the staking contracts
Market-based LST/USD price (via oracle)
We compute both and compare them:
If the prices deviate <2%, we take the max for redemptions and min for all other operations.
If deviation >2%, we default to the min to stay conservative.