In today’s Vatnik Soup, I’ll introduce a Ukrainian-born former State Duma deputy, Vladimir Medinsky. He is best known as one of the ideologues of the “Russkiy Mir”, for his close ties to Vladimir Putin, and for leading the “peace talks” in Turkey in 2022 and 2025.
1/20
During the late 1980s and early 1990s, Medinsky interned as a correspondent on the international desk of the TASS news agency, learning the ways of propaganda at an early age. Some time later, he earned two PhDs – one in political science and the other in history.
2/20
As is tradition in Russia, Medinsky’s academic work was largely pseudo-scientific and plagiarized. Dissernet found that 87 of 120 pages in his dissertation were copied from his supervisor’s thesis. His second dissertation was also heavily plagiarized.
3/20
Many Russian academics focus solely on spreading pro-Kremlin propaganda, and academic titles still carry weight in Russian society. That’s why they also use Western academics like Glenn Diesen and Tuomas Malinen to amplify Kremlin's bullshit narratives.
4/20
From his early days as a tobacco lobbyist to his current role as a presidential aide, Medinsky has consistently shown a knack for crafting narratives that serve the state. His political career began in the early 2000s, when he joined the State Duma…
5/20
…as a member of the United Russia party. He focused on tightening ad laws and pushing “conservative values.” In 2012, Putin made him Minister of Culture, signaling a shift toward a more controlled and ideologically driven cultural narrative in Russia.
6/20
As Minister from 2012 to 2020, he transformed the ministry into an ideological tool. One of Medinsky’s most significant, and dangerous, contributions has been within Russia itself, where he spent years reshaping the cultural sector to serve nationalist goals.
7/20
The plan was simple: produce films that glorify Tsarist Russia, and Soviet victories – while punishing anyone who dares to question Nazi collaboration, the gulags, Stalin-era purges, or the Chechen wars, branding them as enemies of the state.
Medinsky essentially followed Goebbels’ playbook: during his time as minister, he championed state-sponsored films that glorified Russian history and actively discouraged any works critical of the government, labeling dissenting voices as “unpatriotic”.
9/20
Medinsky’s most significant impact has been in the realm of historical revisionism. He has authored several books intended to debunk what he sees as myths about Russia, often downplaying or outright ignoring inconvenient historical truths.
10/20
His approach to history is less about academic accuracy and more about reinforcing a narrative that portrays Russia as a victim of Western aggression. One of his most controversial projects is the development of new history textbooks for schools.
These books promote a revisionist history that justifies Russia’s aggression in Ukraine,framing the 2014 annexation of Crimea & the 2022 invasion as necessary steps to defend Russian interests.They also portray the West as a constant threat seeking to destabilize Russia.
12/20
After Russia launched its full-scale invasion in February 2022, Medinsky was recast as the Kremlin’s chief negotiator in talks with Kyiv. His role wasn’t to seek peace, but to stage political theatre, framing the Ukrainians as the “bad guys”.
13/20
Medinsky, who was born in Ukraine, claimed in an interview with RBC Russia in 2023 that he had no hatred for Ukrainians and that Russia had no conflict with Ukraine. Yet, in Mar 2022, he wrote on his Telegram channel that Ukraine was allegedly preparing an offensive…
14/20
…in Donbas and that the Bucha massacre was staged by the Ukrainian government. He also claimed that “Russia wanted peace.” This has been Russia’s strategy all along: deny all wrongdoing, insist on peaceful intentions, and continue the barbaric invasion.
15/20
In 2025, when Putin called for direct negotiations between Russia and Ukraine, but then failed to appear in Istanbul to meet with Zelenskyy, it was Medinsky and his team who were sent instead. Zelenskyy rightly dismissed the talks as a “sham.”
16/20
According to The Economist correspondent Oliver Carroll, Medinsky stated during the negotiations: “We don’t want war, but we’re ready to fight for a year, two, three—however long it takes. We fought Sweden for 21 years. How long are you ready to fight?”
17/20
Medinsky also allegedly said, “Maybe some of those sitting here at this table will lose more of their loved ones. Russia is prepared to fight forever.” The Russian negotiators further threatened to seize the Kharkiv and Sumy regions in northeastern Ukraine.
18/20
The negotiations themselves were indeed a sham. Russia reportedly made “unrealistic” demands that went “far beyond anything ever discussed,” including the withdrawal of Ukrainian troops from their own territory as a condition for a ceasefire.
19/20
To conclude, Vladimir Medinsky is a prominent Russian political figure, historian, and a loyal workhorse within Putin’s inner circle. He plays a unique role: the Kremlin’s playwright, rewriting history to fit their narrative.
20/20
The 2nd edition of “Vatnik Soup — The Ultimate Guide to Russian Disinformation” is officially out!
In this 5th Debunk of the Day, we’ll discuss something that sounds great in theory, but was completely turned upside-down by the tankie kind of vatnik: anti-imperialism. More consistent anti-imperialists call this the “anti-imperialism of idiots”. 1/5
“Anti-imperialism” was popularized by Lenin, who saw imperialism as the ultimate stage of capitalism. Ironically, the largest empire is now… Putin’s Russia, proud heir to both Lenin’s Soviet Union and to the Tsarist Empire. 2/5
Indeed, Russia is an empire that is still ruled by a de facto all-powerful Tsar, that still proudly flies its imperial flag, that still dreams of expanding its already huge territory through brutal conquest and colonization. 3/5
In this 4th Debunk of the Day, we’ll refute an absolute classic of vatnik BS, the crown jewel of peak dishonesty: whataboutism.
Now, not everything that looks like whataboutism is wrong. Seeking consistency or comparing actions or responses is normal. 1/5
But when someone pulls some completely unrelated event, that happened to completely different people, a long time ago, in a galaxy far, far away, you know what you’re dealing with: a crass denial of the problem at hand, a bad-faith attempt to derail the topic. 2/5
Logic or chronology plays no role here, nor your opinion on these other topics. You could be the staunchest critic or supporter of these other actions thrown into the discussion, it doesn’t matter. It is irrelevant whether these other things are true or not, or bad or not. 3/5
In this 3rd Debunk of the Day, we’ll talk about… “ending” the war by surrendering or ceding territory.
Nearing four years of the 2-day “special military operation”, Russia is desperate to obtain through other means what they failed to conquer on the battlefield. 1/5
An endless army of vatniks therefore tries to demoralize both Ukrainians and supporters.
They sound noble: “anti-war” or concerned about the fate of Ukraine’s civilians, soldiers and cities. They claim that if we just stop fighting or helping, this horror would magically end. 2/5
What they never mention is… WHO started the war, WHO murders Ukrainians, WHO destroys Ukrainian cities: the same monsters they suggest Ukrainians be at the mercy of. Surrendering wouldn’t end the atrocities of the occupation, it would enable them. Surrendering wouldn’t even…3/5
In today’s Debunk of the Day (2), we’ll look at… nuclear blackmail. Vatniks love using Russia’s nuclear threats as a reason for surrendering or for not lifting a finger to help Ukraine: “see, they have nukes, we have to give them whatever they want”.
The argument is absurd: 1/5
Nuclear deterrence has been a reality for decades. Both the US and Russia have lost wars without resorting to nukes. We are not submitting to the whims of Pakistan or North Korea either. For vatniks, it’s just an insidious way of siding with Putin. 2/5
We can’t just give in to the Kremlin’s nuclear blackmail, to the threats their officials and propagandists make five times a day to scare us into letting them have something they know perfectly well is not theirs, with no limit to their appetite. 3/5 vatniksoup.com/en/nuclear-thr…
In today’s Vatnik Soup, we introduce a Ukrainian “scholar” and social media activist, Marta Havryshko (@HavryshkoMarta). She’s best known for spreading anti-Ukraine and pro-Kremlin narratives online, along with a habit of spotting neo-Nazis everywhere in Ukraine.
1/20
Marta hails from Ukraine, where she studied history at Ivan Franko National University of Lviv. She received her PhD in history in 2010. Her academic work focused on gender-based violence and wartime atrocities, including publications on sexual crimes in occupied Ukraine.
2/20
She is currently working as a visiting Assistant Professor at the Strassler Center for Holocaust & Genocide Studies at Clark University in the US. According to the center’s website, Marta teaches courses on antisemitism, racism, and gender-based violence in armed conflicts.
In today’s (first) Debunk of the Day, we’ll talk about… “realistic expectations”.
Russia has the GDP of Italy. NATO — which Russia claims to be fighting — has 20 times their GDP, and a much stronger and more modern military. 1/5
Russia’s full scale invasion was supposed to take 2 days, but we’re nearing 4 years. They’ve lost a million men. Their economy is in shambles.
And yet we're letting them set their red lines instead of massive sanctions, strong support for Ukraine, and an immediate sky shield. 2/5
Russia thought their war was “realistic” because we’d let them get away with it. It wouldn’t be “realistic” to invade a European nation and redraw borders by force if the West had a strong and united response.
What’s “realistic” is what public opinion tolerates and accepts. 3/5