This is demonstrably true, a verifiable fact, and it should be obvious to anyone who thinks about it.
It also says something profound about our modern world, in that it is the elite, the oligarchs, who fund the propaganda, that fools the public into thinking it's immigrants.
2/
It's a classic diversion, and distraction, to divert attention away, from how much those at the top of our society, are totally detached from the vast majority of the public. The elite are not what Trump tells you they are, Trump is of the elite.
3/
Of course, the upper echelons of our societies, are a spectrum, a continuum, ranging from those a bit better off, the professional classes, right up to the richest billionaires in the world, Royalty etc. It's not elite, or not elite, there are degrees.
4/
However, generally, the further you go up the social ladder, the less integrated the elite are from the rest of society, from those on high salaries living in gated communities, to the super-rich, living in grand houses, with large grounds, security fences and guards.
5/
The relevance of this is the UK PM, @Keir_Starmer's shameful "Stranger's" speech, playing the anti-immigrant card, implying a lot of immigrants aren't properly integrated into our societies, creating a society of strangers. This was outright sophistry.
As I say, it is a demonstrable fact, that the least integrated people in our societies, are actually, Royalty, billionaires/oligarchs, and the better off strata, below them (and Keir Starmer).
7/
Most of the true elite, have very little contact, with ordinary members of society, and the only ordinary people they interact with, are their servants, their bodyguards, maybe waiters in elite restaurants. Hardly a typical cross-section of society.
8/
Those born into the very highest part of the elite, have lived apart from the rest of society all their lives, going to elite schools, universities, and it very likely they have never socialized or interacted with ordinary people, in their whole lives.
9/
This is very different, to those from immigrant backgrounds, and ethnic communities who often live together. I am not speaking hypothetically. I lived in Blackburn for quite a long time, which is quite divided, on ethnic backgrounds.
10/
In say Blackburn, and it is not the only place I've lived, with communities from different ethnic backgrounds, they may have lived in different streets, but I and other white British people, interacted with them every day.
11/
However, whilst I have interacted with people from different ethnic backgrounds, from Asian Muslims, to West Indians, to East Europeans, the demographic, I've had least contact with, same with the majority, are the very rich, Royalty, etc.
12/
In fact, somewhat ironically, one of those people, who have lived apart from the rest of society for a long time, is @Keir_Starmer himself. Not just since he's been PM, but when he was a barrister. I bet he had very little contact with ordinary people during that time.
13/
This is why I call @Keir_Starmer's speech, outright sophistry, because he knows very well, that his own demographic, is the one largely estranged i.e. strangers, from the rest of society.
It is just a divide and conquer diversion.
14/
'Look over there at those Asian Muslims, they don't look or dress the same as you, or even speak the same'.
But then neither do the elite. So where does this trope come from about immigrants.
I've met vastly more immigrants, than I've met Royalty.
15/
In fact, you can see just how much of this, is very contrived and manipulative sophistry. Ironically, ordinary people, notice those from different ethnic backgrounds, because they commonly see them, and interact with them.
16/
When was the last time anyone here, interacted with Royalty, oligarchs, even celebs, judges, senior civil servants, politicians, @Keir_Starmer?
I bet no one here has had a pint with Nigel Farage, down the pub, have they? He only poses in pubs, for photos.
17/
This is why the trope they're peddling, is blatantly racist. Royalty, senior politicians, @Keir_Starmer, oligarchs, may look like other white people, but you never socialize with them.
They are the true aliens in our society. Don't be fooled because they look the same.
18/
This, 'immigrants, don't integrate', is deliberate propaganda, meant to capture ordinary people's thinking, to fool them into believing, that the people who don't mix with us, are just non-whites or those with poor English. No, it's the stuck-up elite.
19/
This really is a very crude, don't look at me living my elite lifestyle, separate from all you filthy plebs - just look at them immigrants, who don't want to mix with you.
Again, when was the last time you chatted with Royalty, oligarchs etc, or met them down the local pub?
20/
@threadreaderapp unroll
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Absolutely the only way these powerful vested interests, destroying our natural systems for profit, can get away with it, is because people can't easily see or understand what is happening. It's far away, too subtle to easily see or understand.
2/
As soon as public outcries, could change things, whether it was the polluted rivers in our cities, smog air pollution, clear felling of woodland, hunting species, especially predators to extinction, pressure was brought to bear, to change things.
3/
We seem to be living in the Age of Denial, where things supported by massive evidence, are simply denied by certain politicians and vested interests, even though they are incredibly serious.
The climate crisis, and the ongoing genocide in Gaza, are egregious examples.
1/🧵
This is far more than a post-truth world - we're not talking about subtle distortions of the truth, but outright denial. This is the active and complete and utter denial of the most serious matters that can be imagined. It can't get more serious than ecocide, and genocide.
2/
This is outright denial of events supported by massive evidence, to the extent that a large proportion of the public, just walk around, as if these dire crises, do no exist.
3/
I'm not sure how much of the current situation in Japan, is climate related, but let's get this clear, the rice harvest is seriously threatened by climate change.
However, this is not just about rice, but all harvests and food production.
As I have repeatedly made clear, in the present free market, capitalist system, food supply problems could destroy our societies, as it could create food hyperinflation, which would create societal chaos, and the fall of our present system.
3/
@DoctorVive Exactly. Let me totally support what you say. Modern humans have been around for 2-300,000, and our close relatives, much longer. But the reason civilizations only emerged within the last 10,000 years (really about 5-6,000 years for the very first) is simple.
1/
@DoctorVive Large, complex societies i.e. civilizations, need a constant supply of grain. In other words, every year, they need a predictable harvest, with a predictable yield. Just one bad year, especially more than one, will lead to the collapse of that civilization, and it did.
2/
@DoctorVive This is only possible in a certain type of climate. Where there is an equitable climate, where you get consistent weather patterns, which allow the reliable planting and harvesting of crops. If you get years, with very poor yield, the civilization collapses.
3/
"UK government dropped health push after lobbying by ultra-processed food firms"
I think this raises serious questions about the current Starmer, Labour government, and who is driving its policy, which seems very strange for Labour.
To be quite frank, all Starmer's policy, seems identical to right wing think tank talking points, from its climate policy, or rather lack of it, getting rid of environmental protection Re: development, the attacks on the sick and disabled. Enoch Powell type speeches etc.
2/
Starmer's Labour government, seems identical to what the right wing Tory Press opinion, and it is pursuing this policy, even when it is publicly unpopular, so it is not from public necessity. We need to ask big questions, about from who Starmer is taking instructions.
3/
The points I made here are not really about AI, but about our culture's false view of reality, which wrongly equates, symbolic representation, such as language, as the same as reality. It is at the heart of the climate crisis.
As I've repeatedly explained, the climate crisis is not the same as anthropogenic climate change. It's a crisis, because we have the science, that tells us we are in dire trouble, but our governments/leaders, act as if it is not a real emergency.
2/
What our culture profoundly misunderstands, is that abstract, symbolic representation of things like the natural world/systems, is not the same as the actual natural world. The map is never the territory.