Bruce Bowman Profile picture
May 24 11 tweets 2 min read Read on X
1/10🧵
For over a decade, the Scottish Government quietly rewrote the legal meaning of “woman” — not through Parliament, but through policy. No law. No debate. Just guidance, data rules and admin tweaks. This was self-ID by stealth. Here’s how they pulled it off.⬇️ Image
2/10
In 2014, the prison service let a trans rights lobbyist help draft its transgender prisoner policy. Male offenders could be housed with women. No vote. No scrutiny. Just a quiet shift, dressed as inclusion. A small policy. Huge consequences.
3/10
In 2018, the Public Boards Act was redefined to count biological males as women — even without legal transition. It took @ForWomenScot and a court ruling to strike it down. The government had tried to rewrite protected characteristics by sleight of hand.
4/10
In 2021, schools were told to let boys identifying as girls use girls’ toilets and changing rooms. The guidance claimed there was no legal obligation for single-sex spaces. No consultation. Just state-sanctioned policy capture.
5/10
Then came the data. Public bodies were told to record identity, not biology. Male rapists could now appear as “female” in crime stats — and did. This wasn’t a system error. It was official guidance from the Scottish Government.
6/10
Scotland’s 2022 census allowed self-ID on the sex question — regardless of birth certificate or legal status. The rest of the UK refused. Holyrood embedded gender ideology into the national record — and called it progress.
7/10
By the time the GRR Bill hit headlines, self-ID had already crept into prisons, schools, the NHS, and official data. The bill failed, but the principles behind it were already policy. Unvoted. Undebated. Unseen.
8/10
Then came Isla Bryson. A male double rapist with post-conviction-onset dysphoria, identifying as female, sent to a women’s prison. Ministers acted shocked — but the policy that allowed it had been in place for years. The public just hadn’t been told.
9/10
In April 2025, the UK Supreme Court ruled that “sex” in the Equality Act means biological sex. The scaffolding collapsed. Much of Scotland’s guidance — on schools, crime, prisons — was now unlawful. And suddenly, silence.
10/10
This wasn’t inclusion. It was deception. Rights were redefined through admin memos. The public was never asked. And now the courts have caught up, the façade is falling. Scotland was ground zero for self-ID by stealth.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Bruce Bowman

Bruce Bowman Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @boswelltoday

Aug 26
1/
Scotland is living through an age of institutional contempt. What was meant to bring power closer to the people has become a system designed to keep them powerless. 🧵 Image
2/
Devolution was supposed to liberate Scotland from Westminster’s decay. Instead it built its own little citadel of power, and taught people the same lesson: your voice does not matter.
3/
The Supreme Court rules. Binding, clear, final. Holyrood shrugs. When governments decide the law is optional, it is not democracy we live under but its shadow.
Read 9 tweets
Aug 25
1/
🚨 Tribunal case: Newman v Commissioner of Police (Met).

Detective Constable Melanie Newman sued the Met for discrimination & harassment, saying she was targeted at work for her gender critical beliefs. She lost — but the story is bigger than one officer. 🧵Image
In March 2023, Newman joined a Trans Day of Visibility event at New Scotland Yard. Guest speaker Eva Echo told the audience that people with gender critical views had “twisted, warped views” and “cult-like behaviour.” The room applauded.Image
3/
Newman, then a probationary detective, was shocked. She logged a complaint. But the Met said: Echo was just an external speaker, not staff. Her grievance was shut down. She felt isolated in an organisation of 55,000 people.
Read 11 tweets
Aug 7
On Tickle v Giggle:
This isn’t satire.
These were real legal submissions - made by the government, the Sex Discrimination Commissioner, or accepted by the Federal Court.
Every word was serious.👇Image
1. That’s a direct quote from the Sex Discrimination Commissioner.
To the Federal Court.
In writing.
Sex, Australia is told, is now contextual, fluid and “non-binary.”
Apparently reality was just a phase. Image
2. Translation:
You can be male in body, male in law, untouched by surgery or hormones - and still legally female.
Why?
Because you said so.Image
Read 12 tweets
Aug 6
1/
🚨Day 3 of Giggle v Tickle is done.
Sall Grover’s case is now in the hands of the judges. Her side delivered clarity, substance, and law.
Equality Australia turned up with vibes, metaphors, and arguments that would not survive a Year 9 debating final.
🧵1/15Image
2/
Equality Australia opened the morning by declaring that “sex” is not biology.
It is a social performance. A designation. A guess.
Apparently, a birth certificate is now hate speech, and reality is just a little bit too rigid for modern equality.
3/
They insisted that “woman” means anyone who feels like one.
That excluding someone, even accidentally, is discrimination.
In their version of law, intent does not matter and definitions are oppressive.
Read 16 tweets
Aug 5
1/
Day 2 of Giggle v Tickle in the Federal Court laid bare the battle lines.
On one side, sex-based rights and legal clarity.
On the other, an ideology that demands submission to things we cannot know, cannot say, and do not believe.
🧵1/15Image
2/
The morning began with Roxanne Tickle’s counsel demanding aggravated damages.
Why?
Because Sall Grover laughed during cross-examination. Because she would not use a name that was not true. Because she said no, and meant it.
3/
Grover’s conduct, we were told, was not simply rude. It was a breach of the “protective purpose” of the Sex Discrimination Act.
In other words: not affirming gender identity is now being framed as unlawful harm.
Read 17 tweets
Aug 4
1/
🚨 Giggle v Tickle – Day 1 of the appeal in Australia’s Federal Court has wrapped.
This is about far more than one app. It’s about whether women are still allowed any space of their own – and whether the law still knows what a woman is.
🧵1/12 Image
2/
Sall Grover’s app, Giggle for Girls, was built to be a female-only digital space.
Roxanne Tickle – a male person identifying as a woman – was removed after selfie verification.
Tickle sued under Australia’s Sex Discrimination Act. The judge ruled in his favour.
3/
Now Grover is appealing.
Her legal team argued that the word “woman” has a plain, binary meaning – and that no Act of Parliament has ever changed it.
Repealing a definition doesn’t abolish biological reality.
That was the core of the day.
Read 12 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(