🧵 Good Law Project's Misrepresentation of the Supreme Court's FWS Ruling: A Legal Reality Check

1️⃣ Good Law Project (GLP) recently published an FAQ on trans inclusion following the UK Supreme Court's For Women Scotland (FWS) ruling. Let’s clarify what the Court actually said—and what GLP wishes it had said. 2️⃣ GLP correctly states: after FWS, 'sex' in the Equality Act 2010 means biological sex. This is significant. The Supreme Court explicitly confirmed that, under the Equality Act, a "woman" is biologically female—no exceptions, not even with a Gender Recognition Certificate (GRC).

1/11
BREAKING: The UK Supreme Court ruled that sex means biological sex.

Clarity. Sanity. A legal breath of fresh air.

But Labour took one look at that and said:
“Hold my app.” 📲 #DigitalID 2/11
Enter: the Digital ID Bill.
A bold new way to prove who you are — unless who you are is... complicated.
Because now, if your passport says “female,” the government wants everyone to believe it.
Even if you’re a dude with a beard and a baritone.

Folks, I just read Good Law Project’s critique of the Supreme Court’s recent ruling on trans rights in the UK. It’s bold, it’s fiery, it’s...kinda missing the point entirely. Buckle up—time for some truthiness.👇

https://twitter.com/GoodLawProject/status/1919026729659547976

2/12
They argue the Supreme Court is "undermining rights." Interesting claim, considering the court simply clarified existing laws. Apparently, interpreting the law as written now counts as a hot take. Who knew?

1/5
The NHS in Scotland now has a “fundamental directive” to treat anyone as whatever gender they say—instantly. No surgery. No paperwork. No questions. Just vibes. Obey or else. 2/5
This isn’t inclusion. It’s forced belief. A bloke changes his name and staff are legally bound to play along—or get disciplined. No hormones, no legal process, not even a convincing lie. Just say the magic words.