In today’s Vatnik Soup, I’ll introduce a Russian movie director, propagandist, and former priest: Ivan Okhlobystin. He’s best known for his strong support for the war on Ukraine and for his radical views, which are often used as a testbed for the domestic Russian audience.
1/20
Ivan was born in 1966 from a short-lived marriage between a 62-year-old chief physician and a 19-year-old engineering student. She later remarried, and the family moved from Kaluga province to Moscow. Ivan kept the surname Okhlobystin from his biological father.
2/20
After moving to Moscow, Ivan began studying at VGIK film school. He soon became a playwright for theatre productions and also wrote for Stolitsa magazine, which he later left because, as he put it, “it had become a brothel.”
3/20
In 2000, he directed Demobbed, a film inspired by his brief stint in the army. Ivan then chose a religious path, becoming a ROC priest. But then something serious must have happened, as in 2010 Patriarch Kirill expelled him, forbidding him from wearing the robe again.
4/20
Okhlobystin then became one of the main actors in the TV series Interns, best described as a rip-off of the American sitcom House. It gained some popularity and made him a public figure. A little later, he was even named Actor of the Year.
5/20
In 2011, Ivan turned to politics, announcing a presidential run. His nationalistic, far-right beliefs were radical even by Russia’s nationalistic, far-right political standards. He envisioned a new isolationism with an “Iron Wall” around Russia.
6/20
When Russia started its war on Ukraine in 2014, Ivan voiced full support. As a result, his events in Ukraine were cancelled, and he was later banned from entering Ukraine altogether. The Donetsk People’s Republic, however, welcomed him, even granting him a passport.
7/20
In Donetsk, Okhlobystin promoted Novorossiya — the idea of uniting former Tsarist territories in Ukraine. Popularized by Aleksandr Dugin and echoed by Putin, it briefly served as the Kremlin’s main domestic narrative to justify aggression against Ukraine.
8/20
As is tradition in Russia, Ivan was constantly drunk. In his alcohol-induced delirium, he frantically called friends to declare he would join the war — just after he got some dental work done, so that if he returned wounded, he could still chew his own food.
9/20
When Russia launched its full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022, Okhlobystin quickly went to the Luhansk People’s Republic to donate helmets to Storm-Z troops. During this time, Russian celebrities who didn’t support the war effort were branded traitors.
10/20
Okhlobystin’s radical rants serve several strategic purposes for the Kremlin: they act as test cases for extreme rhetoric, they help seed future propaganda and, most importantly, they make Putin appear more moderate and reasonable by contrast. A bit like Drunk Dima.
11/20
For example in 2022, Okhlobystin delivered a menacing speech at a Kremlin-organized propaganda rally in Moscow, calling for a “holy war” against the West. Drawing on his acting background, he appeared to channel Hitler, mimicking his tone, rhetoric, and theatrical gestures.
12/20
The “holy war” Okhlobystin shrieked for seemed to be testing the waters on behalf of the Kremlin. By Mar 2024, the idea had spread and the Russian Orthodox Church’s Patriarch Kirill officially called the SMO a “holy war” to conquer all of Ukraine.
13/20
Ivan also urged women to have as many children as possible and compared them to “mycelium”. Stalin and Hitler (Mother’s Cross award for 8 or more children) had made similar appeals and Putin himself reinstated the “Mother Heroine” award in 2022 for women with 10 children.
14/20
Ivan’s rhetoric resembles that of his fellow over-the-top propagandist Solovyov. The West — referred to as the “Old World” — is full of satanic perverts and crazy Nazi drug addicts. Stirring up hatred is a calculated strategy to prepare the public for war and sacrifices.
15/20
Okhlobystin also produced a cartoon titled “The ABC of the SMO”, warning soldiers not to get killed. In a Tom & Jerry/Nu, pogodi!-style animation, Russians kill Ukrainians, even featuring a knockoff of The Mask. It’s another effort to normalize the war through pop culture.
16/20
It’s clear that Okhlobystin is fascist in his views—but there’s also literal proof: photos of him giving the Nazi salute, skull tattoos resembling the SS symbols & outfits disturbingly similar to those worn by the SS officers during the reign of the failed Austrian painter.
17/20
Like Dugin, Ivan is also extremely homophobic and has a deep hatred towards Ukrainians: He’s called for gays to be “put in ovens” and for genocide of Ukrainians — Nazi traditions. And of course none of that has stopped him for calling Ukrainians nazis.
18/20
Ivan is also a great example of how in Russia the imperialistic mindset penetrates the whole society — one day you can be a celebrated actor in a House rip-off, and the next you are calling for a “holy war” and the genocide of another country. Comply or die.
19/20
To conclude, Ivan is a propagandist who tests the limits of public tolerance in Russia — pushing how much obscenity or cruelty can be said before backlash occurs. He serves as both a propaganda testbed and the Kremlin’s canary in the coal mine.
20/20
The 2nd edition of “Vatnik Soup — The Ultimate Guide to Russian Disinformation” is officially out!
In this 5th Debunk of the Day, we’ll discuss something that sounds great in theory, but was completely turned upside-down by the tankie kind of vatnik: anti-imperialism. More consistent anti-imperialists call this the “anti-imperialism of idiots”. 1/5
“Anti-imperialism” was popularized by Lenin, who saw imperialism as the ultimate stage of capitalism. Ironically, the largest empire is now… Putin’s Russia, proud heir to both Lenin’s Soviet Union and to the Tsarist Empire. 2/5
Indeed, Russia is an empire that is still ruled by a de facto all-powerful Tsar, that still proudly flies its imperial flag, that still dreams of expanding its already huge territory through brutal conquest and colonization. 3/5
In this 4th Debunk of the Day, we’ll refute an absolute classic of vatnik BS, the crown jewel of peak dishonesty: whataboutism.
Now, not everything that looks like whataboutism is wrong. Seeking consistency or comparing actions or responses is normal. 1/5
But when someone pulls some completely unrelated event, that happened to completely different people, a long time ago, in a galaxy far, far away, you know what you’re dealing with: a crass denial of the problem at hand, a bad-faith attempt to derail the topic. 2/5
Logic or chronology plays no role here, nor your opinion on these other topics. You could be the staunchest critic or supporter of these other actions thrown into the discussion, it doesn’t matter. It is irrelevant whether these other things are true or not, or bad or not. 3/5
In this 3rd Debunk of the Day, we’ll talk about… “ending” the war by surrendering or ceding territory.
Nearing four years of the 2-day “special military operation”, Russia is desperate to obtain through other means what they failed to conquer on the battlefield. 1/5
An endless army of vatniks therefore tries to demoralize both Ukrainians and supporters.
They sound noble: “anti-war” or concerned about the fate of Ukraine’s civilians, soldiers and cities. They claim that if we just stop fighting or helping, this horror would magically end. 2/5
What they never mention is… WHO started the war, WHO murders Ukrainians, WHO destroys Ukrainian cities: the same monsters they suggest Ukrainians be at the mercy of. Surrendering wouldn’t end the atrocities of the occupation, it would enable them. Surrendering wouldn’t even…3/5
In today’s Debunk of the Day (2), we’ll look at… nuclear blackmail. Vatniks love using Russia’s nuclear threats as a reason for surrendering or for not lifting a finger to help Ukraine: “see, they have nukes, we have to give them whatever they want”.
The argument is absurd: 1/5
Nuclear deterrence has been a reality for decades. Both the US and Russia have lost wars without resorting to nukes. We are not submitting to the whims of Pakistan or North Korea either. For vatniks, it’s just an insidious way of siding with Putin. 2/5
We can’t just give in to the Kremlin’s nuclear blackmail, to the threats their officials and propagandists make five times a day to scare us into letting them have something they know perfectly well is not theirs, with no limit to their appetite. 3/5 vatniksoup.com/en/nuclear-thr…
In today’s Vatnik Soup, we introduce a Ukrainian “scholar” and social media activist, Marta Havryshko (@HavryshkoMarta). She’s best known for spreading anti-Ukraine and pro-Kremlin narratives online, along with a habit of spotting neo-Nazis everywhere in Ukraine.
1/20
Marta hails from Ukraine, where she studied history at Ivan Franko National University of Lviv. She received her PhD in history in 2010. Her academic work focused on gender-based violence and wartime atrocities, including publications on sexual crimes in occupied Ukraine.
2/20
She is currently working as a visiting Assistant Professor at the Strassler Center for Holocaust & Genocide Studies at Clark University in the US. According to the center’s website, Marta teaches courses on antisemitism, racism, and gender-based violence in armed conflicts.
In today’s (first) Debunk of the Day, we’ll talk about… “realistic expectations”.
Russia has the GDP of Italy. NATO — which Russia claims to be fighting — has 20 times their GDP, and a much stronger and more modern military. 1/5
Russia’s full scale invasion was supposed to take 2 days, but we’re nearing 4 years. They’ve lost a million men. Their economy is in shambles.
And yet we're letting them set their red lines instead of massive sanctions, strong support for Ukraine, and an immediate sky shield. 2/5
Russia thought their war was “realistic” because we’d let them get away with it. It wouldn’t be “realistic” to invade a European nation and redraw borders by force if the West had a strong and united response.
What’s “realistic” is what public opinion tolerates and accepts. 3/5