"The world is facing a new form of climate denial – not the dismissal of climate science, but a concerted attack on the idea that the economy can be reorganised to fight the crisis"
This is not new, it is the story of the last 33 years.
The reason emissions keep rising and no meaningful action has been taken to address the climate and ecological emergency, since the 1992 Rio Earth Summit, is the absurd refusal to change the economic model.
2/
“There are now no non-radical futures. The choice is between immediate and profound social change or waiting a little longer for chaotic and violent social change. In 2023 the window for this choice is rapidly closing.” @KevinClimate
This is why it is absurd and irrational to believe the present economic model can be maintained.
The one think guaranteed to radically alter the economy and our societies i.e. civilization collapse, is trying to carry on with business as usual.
4/
We seem to have economist, politicians, oligarchs, corporate CEOs, who delusionally believe that the economy is more real that the laws of physics and ecology, just because they're scientifically ignorant.
5/
By scientifically ignorant, I don't necessarily mean they are totally ignorant of science, just the science and evidence pertaining to the climate and ecological crisis.
6/
Not one person who justifies carrying on with business as usual, and maintaining the current economic model, can support their position with solid scientific evidence. All ignore the big picture created by that scientific evidence.
7/
They cherry-pick, and selectively ignore evidence like biodiversity and ecological impacts, with their techno-fix fantasies, which are totally unrealistic. They deny it, to maintain, their wealth, power, and status. They're dangerously delusional.
I have been outspoken in my criticism of our political leaders, essentially all of them, for the last 33 years, who made big pledges at the 1992 Rio Earth Summit.
I want to briefly explain my hypothesis about this.
Before going on, I want to make it clear that my claim that our political leaders lied, and have made one broken promise after another on climate change, isn't just my opinion. This is what @antonioguterres the UN Secretary General also says.
2/
In simple terms, this was what happened. The public were very concerned about climate change, and other environmental matters in the late 1980s and early 1990s, and politicians feared the public would stop voting for them, and turn to green parties.
I completely support @johnmcdonnellMP's call. Keir Starmer is a disaster for the Labour Party and the country. It is not just the nasty, neoliberal policy, he is politically incompetent, and gifting Reform an open goal.
1/🧵
Starmer's absurdly callous, position on benefits, and winter fuel payments, has allowed Nigel Farage to position Reform, as more progressive than Labour, which is of course complete and utter BS.
2/
My No.1 issue with Starmer is his climate, environmental and nature, where he is one of the most retrograde governments on these issues, in modern times. But it is much worse than this. He has been a major apologist for genocide in Gaza.
3/
"Tensions rise as superpowers scrap for a piece of the Arctic"
This isn't new. I tried to alert people what was going on, during the Obama regime, with all this prospecting in the Arctic, and what the tacit implications were.
What it told me, was that governments and the big corporations knew, was that climate change was going to be allowed to unfold with any attempt to stop it, and there was going to be an expected gold rush, when the ice melted.
2/
I can't understand why most people, apparently can't see the tacit implications, which are so clear to me.
What this said, was that the COP talks were a charade. That the whole government plans to address the climate crisis since the 1992 Rio Earth Summit were a charade.
3/
It is a nasty fossil fuel industry trope, to try and blame the public for emissions. That it is their fault, because of their consumer demand. This is a massive manipulative lie. It is outright evil, psychopathic manipulativeness.
1/🧵
Firstly, we need to establish a few facts. Only a minority of the world population, are involved in this consumption lifestyle. Less than 18% own a car, and over 80%, have never flown, or not for a long time. So 80% or more have very little to do with the emissions.
2/
Secondly, the emissions from the lifestyles of the top 1% of the richest, dwarves, the rest of consumers in rich countries, as they produce more emissions than the bottom 66%, and do most flying.
Are our leaders, some of the stupidest people in society. Trump has said Putin is acting crazy in Ukraine. You mean it took the thick, lying moron, 3 years to work that out, after saying Putin was smart, invading Ukraine.
1/
Then there was Putin's invasion of Ukraine, where he headed straight to Kiev, in the naive belief he was just going to roll in and take over. That was crazy.
2/
Then we have the genocide in Gaza, when Benjamin Netanyahu, believed he was just going to get away committing genocide and ethnic cleansing, in front of the world. Not realizing, Western leader denial, had limits.
3/
I am not simplistically blaming politicians here. They are the only people with the power in our societies to implement the necessary change, and at the 1992 Rio Earth Summit, and just after, they promised to take that action.
1/🧵
Often, the public gets blamed for not voting for the right politicians. This is not true. There has only very recently been a political divide on addressing the climate crisis, and 30 years ago, there was no difference.
2/
I can't blame people for not remembering how it was in 1992, just before and after, because it is a long time ago. If you were say 18 in 1992, you would be 51, and you would like me, need to be well into your 60s to remember it. What is more, you'd have needed to be engaged.
3/