Five years ago, the world watched America erupt over the death of George Floyd.
The left called it the “summer of love.”
What followed was anything but.
It was chaos. It was violence. It was destruction.
And, according to Victor Davis Hanson, the entire movement was built on a lie—a psychological operation powerful enough to divide a nation and destabilize its foundation.
Only now, half a decade later, are we beginning to see it clearly and reckon with the wreckage it left behind.
🧵 THREAD
Victor Davis Hanson opened with a sober reflection: it’s now been five years since the death of George Floyd—a moment that reshaped America’s conversations around race, crime, and justice.
“This week was the fifth anniversary, May 25th of 2020, of the tragic death of George Floyd,” he said.
It may feel recent, but a half-decade has passed. And according to Hanson, what followed in the wake of that tragedy wasn’t healing—it was devastation.
“Almost everything that has transpired after that in terms of racial relations has been disastrous,” he said.
Only now, he believes, are we beginning to look back with a clearer head and ask the questions no one dared ask at the time.
“Maybe at the end of five years, we can look back with a little bit more circumspection and see what actually happened.”
That reassessment begins with George Floyd himself—not the symbol, but the man.
Hanson challenged the media’s portrayal of Floyd as a saintly martyr, urging people to look at the full context of what happened.
“George Floyd was a career felon,” he said plainly.
At the time of his death, Floyd was attempting to use a counterfeit bill and was reportedly under the influence of powerful narcotics—possibly fentanyl.
He also had a heart condition and may have been suffering from complications related to COVID.
“One of his prior felonies was putting a gun to a woman’s belly in a home invasion,” Hanson noted.
The situation that escalated into tragedy began with a routine police response.
“When he tried to pass this counterfeit bill, the store owner called the Minneapolis police. They tried to arrest him. He resisted arrest. He was a very big man.”
Derek Chauvin, the officer who restrained Floyd, used a controversial tactic that had been authorized by the department—placing a knee on the neck to subdue a suspect.
“Officer Chauvin, who was supposedly an expert in techniques that were institutionalized by the Minneapolis Police Department, unfortunately put his knee on George Floyd’s neck.”
The autopsies offered conflicting views—one pointed to the knee as the cause of death, another suggested it wasn’t the only factor.
But the truth was quickly sidelined by the power of a single image.
“The expression on Officer Chauvin’s face was frozen into eternity,” Hanson said.
“And that sparked the idea that he was a white policeman conducting a typical murder of an unarmed black suspect.”
Before we roll the next clip: if you’re not following me, you’re missing out on critical updates.
Hit the bell 🔔 to stay sharp and informed.
→ @VigilantFox
Now, back to the story you came for.
That image, and the assumptions it carried, ignited months of chaos across the country.
“What followed was near mayhem,” Hanson recalled.
“Officer Chauvin… was sentenced to 20 years.”
But the fallout went far beyond a courtroom.
“This huge riot” wasn’t just a single event—it stretched across the entire summer.
From late May through September, American cities burned.
“Kamala Harris said it wasn’t going to stop, nor should it stop. It’s going to keep going to Election Day.”
Billions in damage followed.
A police precinct in Minneapolis was reduced to ash.
A federal courthouse was torched.
St. John’s Church, just across from the White House, was set on fire.
And at one point, a mob tried to breach the White House grounds.
But Hanson said the unrest wasn’t just physical—it was psychological.
With most of the country still under COVID lockdowns, people were glued to their screens, absorbing the narrative without real-world context.
“People had been in a lockdown… isolated in their own home with no human interaction,” he said.
“And this is their news was from the television.”
The most damaging part, Hanson argued, was the lie at the heart of the outrage—that unarmed black men were being systematically hunted by police.
“George Floyd was iconic or emblematic of young black men… being killed unarmed by the police,” Hanson said. “That was not true.”
Even The Washington Post acknowledged the numbers didn’t support the claim.
“That year there were only 18 black males who were stopped by the police in the entire population of 340 million people. This year, there were only 10!”
Considering that 11 to 12 million people are stopped by police each year, the data just didn’t line up with the narrative.
But that didn’t stop a new ideology from taking root—one that redefined racism itself.
“Professor Kendi and professor D’Angelo… created this idea of systemic racism, and you had to be racist in an anti-racist fashion,” he said.
“The only way to deal with systemic racism was to be pro-black.”
The results were devastating.
“What followed then was a defunding of the police,” Hanson said. “It caused a huge spike in crime—I think 20,000 murders in 2020.”
Meanwhile, Black Lives Matter raised millions, only for the organization to collapse under the weight of scandal.
“The architects of that movement have ensconced with the money,” Hanson said. “They have nice homes, but it’s an inert group.”
Universities followed suit with their own brand of social justice performance—gutting merit-based admissions and enforcing loyalty to DEI initiatives.
“They dropped the SAT. They dropped the comparative ranking of high school GPAs. They dropped meritocracy.”
And if you didn’t actively prove your allegiance to DEI, you didn’t get hired.
“The universities went into something we could call repertory admissions.”
Five years later, Hanson said, the country is finally beginning to ask what it all really achieved.
“Looking back at all the damage of the downtowns in America—many of them were destroyed. Today, they have not recovered.”
Race relations are worse. Public trust is fractured. And the very institutions that rushed to virtue-signal have been discredited.
“Look at the universities who were chastised by the Supreme Court for using race in a racist fashion in admission. They've been discredited.”
“And the people who capitalized on the death of George Floyd are, for the most part, discredited.”
Now, Hanson believes, the country is starting to sober up.
“We're trying to come to a conclusion,” he said. “Why in the world did we go completely collectively insane?”
The lockdowns, he argued, did more harm than the virus itself.
The idea of defunding police has proven to be a dangerous fantasy.
And the so-called anti-racism movement squandered nearly all the goodwill it once had.
“Professor Kendi… went through $45 million [at] Boston University for an anti-racist center. And apparently the money was squandered.”
“So we’re getting back to the idea that when you use race in any fashion for bias or preference—it’s racist.”
Watch the full episode of The @DailySignal with @VDHanson here:
It turns out antidepressants may have been propped up by deeply flawed science.
“Most clinical drug trials have found the effectiveness of antidepressants is ON PAR with placebo,” wrote Dr. Joseph Mercola.
On the other hand:
“Large-scale meta-analyses show that physical exercise is the most effective remedy — about 1.5 times more effective than antidepressants — for depression.”
You probably never heard that on TV because in 1996, Bill Clinton signed the Telecommunications Act, which allowed Big Pharma to buy off the news.
Here’s what else they’re not telling you about antidepressants. If you or someone you love is taking them, you might want to read to this. 🧵
For decades, antidepressants have been sold as a simple fix for depression. Low serotonin. Take a pill. Problem solved.
But what if that story was never accurate? What if the real picture is far more complicated? And far more disturbing?
SSRIs were marketed as a clean fix for a “chemical imbalance.” But internal trial data shows something far darker—suicide signals, psychotic reactions, violent behavior.
The FDA received 39,000 complaints in the first nine years after Prozac hit the market.
That wasn’t fringe. That was an early warning.
Millions of Americans are on SSRIs right now.
Many were told these drugs are safe, effective, and non-addictive. Many were never warned about emotional numbness, sexual dysfunction, manic episodes, or brutal withdrawals.
If even a fraction of the claims in this report from @MidwesternDoc are true, we’re looking at one of the biggest medical blind spots of our time.
RFK Jr. revealed today that he is “not happy” with Trump’s executive order giving producers of glyphosate (Roundup) a liability shield for the injuries they cause.
Two recent studies found that glyphosate causes 10+ fatal cancers in rats at “safe” doses.
What about humans? RFK Jr. believes “glyphosate causes cancer.”
“Pesticides are poison. They’re designed to kill all life,” he told Rogan today.
Glyphosate is sprayed on nearly everything, from wheat and oats to corn, soy, lentils, and chickpeas.
The only reliable way to avoid it is to eat organic foods, which are often two to three times more expensive than their non-organic counterparts.
The system won’t protect you from cancer-causing agents. And when you get cancer, the “treatments” cost a fortune.
That's a rigged system.
One of the most overlooked “treatments” isn’t expensive at all—it’s prevention. And it’s the part of the cancer conversation you almost never hear about. 🧵
Before acknowledging his frustration today, RFK Jr. was begrudgingly explaining why a chemical he believes causes cancer still needs to be sprayed all over our food.
It’s a reminder that no single person can overhaul a deeply corrupt system overnight. There are political constraints far beyond public view. RFK Jr. can only do so much. That means we have to take control of our own destiny.
Ryan Richardson is a nutrition-first health advocate and second-generation natural health educator focused on prevention, nutrient literacy, and long-term family wellness. He was raised in a family shaped by prevention-first values and the legacy of his grandfather, Dr. John A. Richardson—a pioneering physician who treated patients using a metabolic approach that emphasized nutrition as the foundation of health.
That legacy gives Ryan a rare long-view perspective on how nutrition culture—and the narratives surrounding health—have evolved over time. He joins us now.
Ryan Richardson opened the interview by tracing his mission back to where it truly began—not in a laboratory or a clinic, but at his family dinner table.
He grew up hearing his grandfather, Dr. John Richardson, repeat one line over and over: “An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure.” It wasn’t just a catchy phrase. In their home, it was a principle. A lens through which they viewed health, illness, and responsibility.
His grandfather treated patients with stage three and stage four disease. He understood how devastating it is to fight something once it has already taken root. Ryan said that if his grandfather could address people today, the message would be simple: don’t wait until you’re sick. Because once illness sets in, everything changes. It becomes harder. More expensive. More exhausting. A full-scale battle you never wanted to fight.
Ryan acknowledged that their company has spent years working with people who were already facing serious illness. But over time, he realized something was missing.
Prevention.
The goal, he said, shouldn’t be surviving disease. It should be avoiding it in the first place. As he put it, “prevent it from happening in the first place, and you won’t have to do all this nasty stuff.”
EXCLUSIVE: Iowa Funeral Board Member Blows Whistle on COVID Clot Cover-Up
White fibrous clots are still turning up in corpses—and the media refuses to talk about it.
For 37 years, Dana Goodell embalmed 40–50 bodies a month and never saw anything like this—until 2021. What he started pulling from the bodies of vaccinated people is nothing short of horrific.
These clots aren’t rare. Major Tom Haviland recently conducted his annual survey, and as of 2025, 29% of embalmers are still seeing these eerie white fibrous clots.
This comes as the FDA reverses course and reconsiders approval of Moderna’s new mRNA flu vaccine.
Yes—more of the mRNA technology that caused sudden deaths, cancer, infertility, white fibrous clots, and God knows what else during the COVID era.
Dana Goodell and Major Tom Haviland join us to answer the questions the FDA won’t touch. 🧵
The interview opened with a question that carried enormous weight: had Dana Goodell ever seen anything like these white fibrous clots before 2020?
He didn’t pause to think about it.
“Never.”
Dana has been licensed since 1989. For decades, he embalmed 40 to 50 bodies a month, handling everything from trauma victims to natural deaths. In all those years, he said he had never encountered anything “white and fibrous” like what began showing up after the COVID era.
Then something changed.
The calls started coming in. Embalmers were reaching out to each other, sending photos back and forth, asking, “What do you think this is?” At the same time, Dana said they were seeing more sudden cardiac deaths. People who were “doing fine” would suddenly “drop over dead.”
The only common factors he kept hearing about were prior COVID infection or vaccination.
For him, it didn’t feel random. It felt like the beginning of a chilling pattern.
DISCLOSURE: This post contains affiliate links. If you make a purchase through them, we may earn a small commission at no extra cost to you. This helps keep our work independent. Thank you for your support.
It’s been about a month since more than 3 million Epstein files were released, and what they exposed makes one thing painfully clear: we’ve been living under an illusion of government and politics for years, if not decades.
Anyone who has spent time in the conspiracy world already understands that the real power structure stretches far beyond the political theater fed to us on TV.
So who is actually at the top? Who is really pulling the strings? And what is their ultimate goal?
One person who has spent years trying to answer those exact questions is @Jay_D007, and he joins us today to dig into what feels like a real-life “Eyes Wide Shut” conspiracy. 🧵
Jay Dyer began by dismantling the idea that Jeffrey Epstein was merely a well-connected criminal who happened to brush shoulders with the powerful.
In his view, that narrative doesn’t stand up to scrutiny.
He reminded viewers that Epstein openly admitted being recruited into the Trilateral Commission by “the Kissinger circles and David Rockefeller,” and even referred to himself as Rockefeller’s “legate.” That’s not the résumé of a random trafficker. It suggests proximity to “the top of the pyramid.”
From there, he linked the Epstein files to the broader power structure long discussed in alternative circles: the Rothschilds, Rockefeller interests, Bilderberg, Chatham House, British intelligence. The emails, he argued, reveal an “untouchable class” shielded by agencies including Mossad, the CIA, and British intelligence.
For Jay, this wasn’t partisan theater. This was evidence of a steering committee operating above governments, quietly shaping outcomes behind the curtain.
And when he cited emails referencing “hunting people,” he suggested it exposed something even more revealing: a belief in total immunity. They behaved as though nothing could touch them.
As @Jay_D007 put it, “You’re not David Rockefeller’s legate if you’re just some random criminal.”
#ad: The digital ID financial nightmare isn’t coming someday. It’s already here.
Get your free Digital ID Resistance Wealth Guide right now at GoldandFreedom.com, before digital ID becomes the default and your options disappear.
Once a single identity becomes the gateway to your money, your work, and your ability to participate in everyday life, compliance is no longer a choice.
That’s why Genesis Gold Group created the free Digital ID Resistance Wealth Guide.
It breaks down the real risks of digital ID and explains how physical gold and silver allow you to operate outside the system.
Digital dollars leave you exposed. Gold and silver can’t be frozen, tracked, or turned off.
DISCLOSURE: This ad was paid for by Genesis Gold Group. We may earn a small commission when you shop through our sponsors. Thank you for your support.
*Data based on how often children visited the doctor for each condition*
Instead of investigating the findings, the Oregon Medical Board suspended Dr. Thomas’s license—just days after the study was published. Months later, the study was retracted.
Dr. Paul Thomas isn’t the only one who faced swift punishment for publishing inconvenient science.
Other doctors have faced similar consequences for exposing the same pattern.
The question is: Why are doctors being punished simply for comparing vaccinated and unvaccinated kids? 🧵
This information comes from the work of medical researcher @MidwesternDoc.
For all the sources and details, read the full 20,000-word report below.
Things are heating up fast in the Texas Governor’s race—and what happened over the weekend is raising eyebrows.
Turning Point USA publicly endorsed Governor Greg Abbott. Yes, that Greg Abbott—the one critics say failed to close the border under Joe Biden despite having the authority to do so, and in some cases may have even hindered efforts to secure it.
This is also the governor accused of signing off on legislation that would have created a de facto Digital ID in Texas by January 1st, 2026, had a law firm not successfully challenged it as unconstitutional. And despite that ruling, we’re now hearing the decision is being appealed—raising concerns that Abbott is still determined to push Digital ID forward.
But it gets worse.
Tyler Bowyer of Turning Point USA publicly dismissed what many see as the most viable challenger in the race: @DocPeteChambers. The backlash was immediate and intense. So intense that “Tyler Bowyer’s dismissal fuels support for Texas outsider Doc Chambers” began trending on X.
Then things escalated.
Over the same weekend, Doc Pete Chambers’ social media pages were suddenly attacked. Supporters couldn’t see where he would be speaking. Event locations disappeared. Voters had no idea where to show up.
In the middle of a heated primary, cutting off a candidate’s communication with the public isn’t insignificant.
Some would call it tampering. Others would call it something even more serious.
If this were happening in any other high-profile race, every major outlet would be covering it.
@DocPete4Texas joins us now to break down exactly what happened... 🧵
Maria set the tone immediately. She said they “basically called an emergency interview” after @DocPete4Texas's campaign was hit with what she described as serious attacks. The urgency was clear from the first sentence.
Chambers then laid out what happened. As his team was posting daily campaign locations, they were suddenly locked out of Facebook. They couldn’t log in. Supporters couldn’t see where he would be speaking. Voters wouldn’t know where to show up.
Then came the detail that shifted everything: another statewide campaign experienced the exact same issue at the exact same time.
At that point, it no longer felt like a glitch.
He said he activated what he called a military “net call,” switching to an alternate communications plan so supporters could manually spread event details and “stop the bleed.” In the middle of a heated primary, shutting down a candidate’s ability to reach voters doesn’t look random.
Next, Maria dismantled the claim that @DocPeteChambers “has no shot” at winning because he lacks establishment funding. She wasn’t buying it.
She pointed to the floods. When Texans were stranded, Chambers didn’t wait for institutional backing or campaign cash. He stepped in, organized rescue efforts, and coordinated resources with limited funds. He explained that relief money flowed straight to victims, including $1 million brought in by a supporter from North Carolina after Chambers had previously helped there.
That’s when he sharpened the argument. Nine other candidates are in the race against Abbott, yet only one is facing coordinated dismissal and public attacks.
He said they’re running “the most efficient campaign in the history of Texas,” and after the backlash, fundraising didn’t weaken. It exploded.
If he truly had “no shot,” none of this would be necessary.
Which is why his question lands the way it does: “Why are they not being attacked?”