When we zoom in on the wallet, we see the label "Saint Laurent Paris," a French luxury fashion house that became popular about ten years ago when Kanye started wearing the label. This was also when Hedi Slimane was at the company's creative helm.
For many young men at the time, Saint Laurent was their entry into designer fashion, partly because the designs were conceptually approachable (LA rocker, Hot Topic), while the Kanye co-sign made them cool and the prices signaled status (and for the uninformed, suggested quality)
Indeed, we see this card case retails for $350. On Saint Laurent's website, they describe it as "crocodile embossed" calfskin. Calfskin is the most basic type of material for leather goods. But this was put through a machine stamp to imitate the look of a pricier exotic leather.
IMO, the stamp is not particularly attractive. On the left, we see genuine Nile crocodile from the Hermes-owned tannery HCP. Note how the scales are very clean. Saint Laurent choose a stamp to imitate the look of a lower-grade exotic of a bad part of the hide (e.g. tail, sides).
When we zoom in closer, we see something peculiar: there are small holes between each stitch. This indicates this item was machine-sewn.
There are two main ways to make leather goods: machine sewing vs a hand sewing technique known as saddle stitching.
In saddle stitching, a worker gently marks the leather by punching it about halfway through with an awl, then passing two needles from both sides, stretching their arms wide like a bird stretching its wings. The thread is commonly waxed to give it strength.
This creates a more durable seam. Whereas a machine-sewn lock stitch can unravel if only one stitch breaks, a hand-sewn saddle stitched seam has to be picked apart with a special tool. This is why it was traditionally used to make horse riding equipment — it's failsafe.
To the untrained eye, it can be hard to spot a machine vs hand sewn seam, esp since many companies try to imitate the look of the second. But you can sometimes tell when there are no holes between the stitches. See the tight, neat stitching on this Dast briefcase
IG victordast
The most famous purveyor of saddle-stitched goods is Hermes, but even they don't do everything by hand nowadays. Instead, if you want this sort of quality, you typically have to go to small, independent workshops run by craftspeople. Serge Amoruso tours Japan:
IG serge_amoruso
There's just a handful of these artisans nowadays, most of them based in or around Paris: Victor Dast, Serge Amoruso, Peter Charles, Bertrand Montillet and Louis Chelli.
My favorite is Chester Mox, co-founded by Bellanie Salcado, who trained under a former Hermes artisan.
Everything here is done by hand, which means no machines are involved. Since everything is made-to-order, you can choose your own leathers and thread, as well as ask for a monogram. The leathers are often from Hermes-owned tanneries.
IG chestermox
To me, this represents better value. The machine-made stamped calfskin Saint Laurent wallet on the left is $350. The fully handmade Chester Mox wallet on the right is $260 for calfskin. Exotics start at $330, depending on the configuration.
To be sure, there's nothing wrong with buying designer goods or getting something because of a celebrity (although many celebs now are paid to wear things). IMO, the purest fashion experience is being a teen and trying to dress like your favorite musician.
Nas in Polo Sport:
But I think you should be clear-eyed about it. Brands often use flagship items — a $50k coat or haute couture dress — to create a halo. Profits then depend on a sprawling array of perfumes, sunglasses, and leather goods. These are more accessible and have bigger profit margins.
Personally, I think it's more interesting to shop from skilled, independent artisans who make things the old way. Many represent a dying breed of craftspeople who have turned their back on machines. Not only are their products more affordable, they're higher quality.
When you pull out that bag or wallet, you're reminded not of celebrities or designers, but the skill, patience, and time it took for someone to keep a craft alive. IMO, this is more satisfying. And as a matter of price-to-quality ratio, represents a better financial decision.
Don't know why Twitter has messed up the ordering of my thread, but if you've arrived here through a retweet or something, you can read the rest of the thread here.
I disagree that this is an aesthetically pleasing photo. Tristan's outfit ruins it and I'll tell you why. 🧵
I'll assume Tristan is telling the truth when he says he used Photoshop and not AI. If so, this is a very impressive Photoshop job. By removing the scaffold tarp, you reveal more of the building. By removing the other cars, you also achieve more aesthetic coherence.
What is aesthetic coherence? It's the idea that things based on shared history or spirit go together. For instance, I've long said that the Cybertruck could look very cool if you wore certain outfits (futuristic techwear) and lived in a Brutalist home.
Some people are incredulous that you can wear certain shoes without socks, such as leather loafers. Much depends on your body and climate. But I'll tell you one reason why you find this difficult to believe: you buy low quality footwear. 🧵
It's absolutely possible to wear certain shoes without socks. As mentioned in an earlier thread, men have been doing this for over a hundred years. Going sockless makes sense if the outfit is semi-casual (not business clothes).
In fact, if you wear socks with certain footwear styles, such as espadrilles, you will look like you don't know what you're doing.
Tim is right and wrong here. I'll tell you where he's right and where he's wrong. 🧵
It's perfectly fine to wear slip-on shoes without socks. Those who suggest otherwise are simply ignorant and unaware about the history of men's dress.
You don't have to take my word for it. We can go back to Apparel Arts.
Apparel Arts was an early 20th century trade publication that taught men how to dress well. It was sent to clothiers and tailors so they could smartly advise their clients, but it later became a public-facing publication under the title "Esquire."
I get this sort of comment all the time, often about bespoke suits or mechanical watches. "These things are boring," "This is only for rich people," or "Who cares?"
Let me tell you a story. 🧵
Before the age of ready-to-wear, men had clothes made for them, either in the home or, if they could afford one, by a tailor. Ready-made clothing was limited to simple workwear, such as what was worn by sailors or miners.
Tailoring shop, 1780:
In this older method, a tailor would measure you, sometimes using a string (before the invention of tailor's tape). Then they'd use those measurements to draft a pattern, cut the cloth, and produce a garment. This process is called bespoke.
As I've stated many times, suit jackets and sport coats are made from many layers of material, including haircloth, canvas, and padding. These layers give the garment its structure so it doesn't fall on you like a t-shirt or dress shirt.
For the chest and lapels, these layers can be attached to each other using a single-needle roll-padding machine, such as you see here. This is what you'll typically see on factory-made suits (this is a Strobel KA-ED machine). Happens both on the low- and high-end.
I found this reply interesting ("Can those foreign companies open shop in the US?")
I don't think Japanese or South Korean menswear can be made in the US. At least, not without losing something. Let's explore why. 🧵
I should state at the outset that no thread will do Japanese or South Korean fashion justice because these countries are fashion powerhouses. Japan alone covers everything from Yohji Yamamoto to And Wander to WTAPS.
It's Impossible to generalize, but we can discuss aspects.
Let's set the stage: Trump announced that he wants to tax Japanese and South Korean goods 25% starting August 1st. That means if you're a menswear shop in the US importing $1,000 worth of clothes made in Japan or South Korea, you owe the US government $250.