I have lefty friends who have said without qualification that Elon Musk is an anti-Semite and a Nazi but then their response to the actual racially targeted murder of Jews is "hey guys, this isn't helping"
They're not vocally pro-Jew-murder. They just kind of shuffle uncomfortably in their seats b/c they're smart enough to know that this violence is being fed by their rhetoric but they don't think they should be held responsible for it.
Which, to be fair, I don't think they should be held responsible for it either
At least I didn't. But you cannot have it both ways. You can't say that Team A engages in dog whistles and Nazi salutes but Team B deserves the benefit of the doubt
Here is Roger Ebert's first paragraph of his review for "The Mummy" and it is why he was the greatest film critic to ever live
Ebert was a gem and I will never hear a word against him. He loved movies. He loved stupid movies and brilliant movies. He loved trash and genius. He loved watching directors pour their heart out onto the screen, even if they failed.
"Ebert was a woke lib" I don't give a shit
Ebert is the guy who pointed me to @MarkSteynOnline b/c he saw that Steyn was a good movie critic. Ebert recognized that in Steyn b/c Ebert wasn't a hack. He was a hard-core liberal but he knew movies and he respected them.
Ta-Nehisi Coates and I agree that there is a line. When people cross the line, conversation between the two sides is no longer possible. That line for both of us is the dehumanization of others.
For me, that means celebrating their death, believing that the world is a better place without them
For Coates, that means "hurling epitaphs" at people
I read through it, scan down to a table where I'd like to investigate the source. I click "Get the data" and I get... the same table, but in Excel format
This account looks like it's run by an unstable schizophrenic but that's just because I'm constantly trying to talk both about what *should* happen and also what *is* happening
Both those things are important but they are very different
There are tons of things that should happen but that won't happen because we've spent years dissolving the preconditions that make the "should" possible
How do we get the "should" back? I don't know.
But I've watched a lot of people over the last 15 years try to get the "should" back and their main strategy is "give something to my opponent to show I'm operating in good faith and then we can barter"
This is disingenuous. Have you been to the Smithsonian museums recently? Almost every exhibit is left-coded and makes constant reference to left-wing politics
They want the GOP to leave all their cultural victories inn place and not complain. No dice.
There is something I don't like about people who can't see the obvious next steps of their own metaphors
Do you really want to set up a world the way you're suggesting? Because other people will follow suit and they will do so with the rationalizations you gave them
All I'm asking is for people to take 30 seconds to think through the implications of their goofy little story
Fake smart people are *terrible* at this. They see the story and think "oh wow, this is powerful and can have only one possible application"
Real smart people see that the principle encased in the metaphor applies to other situations