Russian blogger “Philologist” considers the connection between newly appointed head of Ukrainian Unmanned Systems Force “Madyar” and HUR head General Budanov to be “very dangerous”.
“The appointment of Madyar as commander of the Ukrainian Armed Forces' Unmanned Systems…
1/
“The appointment of Madyar as commander of the Ukrainian Armed Forces' Unmanned Systems…
1/
“…Forces seems to be a much more symptomatic event than the recent strikes on transport communications, airfields for strategic aviation, and the Crimean Bridge. Symptomatic for our sluggish and clumsy side.
2/
2/
“The enemy's overall systematic approach to the comprehensive conduct of war by all possible means and methods is obvious.
3/
3/
“At the same time, this systematicity is supported by organizational and management decisions and personnel policies that meet military expediency considerations.
4/
4/
“The strikes we are missing are not only direct consequences of the war as such (this is natural), but first and foremost the result of the enemy's very effective military management.
5/
5/
“In this case, I consider the connection between Budanov and Madyar, given the successfully functioning and developing public-private partnership program Brave1, to be very dangerous.
6/
6/
“Strikes at our distant and deep rear areas with the aim of undermining logistics, reducing our military potential and generally whipping up psychosis in our ossified command structures, combined with the development of the ‘Drone Line’ concept, …
7/
7/
“…give the enemy quite good chances, given the slow pace of qualitative transformations in our Armed Forces.
8/
8/
“In addition to the fact that the ‘Drone Line’ in principle appears to be a key element of the enemy's overall defensive strategy in terms of further depletion of our forces, this concept, if fully implemented, creates the preconditions for conducting a deep offensive operation.”
Source t.me/philologist_zo…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
