The renaming of the USNS Harvey Milk is such a perfect example of a smarter right-wing that has learned how to set a narrative trap
The Navy "leaks" that they are going to rename the ship, leveraging the volume and scale of the media to spread wide this info /1
The predictable outrage ensues. Nancy Pelosi calls it "shameful, vindictive erasure", which is not a thing she said about people tearing down statues of the founding fathers
The governor of Maryland says this name change is "lying about history" /2
That's where the trap is sprung. The Dem's outrage machine has given the story legs and visibility. The right can leverage that visibility to sabotage Milk's legacy
They can talk about how a 33-year-old Milk was sleeping with teenage boys /3
Or they can talk about how Milk defended Jim Jones and helped keep a father from saving his 6-year-old son from the cult leader who would ultimately kill him /4
If the right tried to bring all these skeletons about Milk up in isolation, they would seem obsessed and creepy
But by using this ship re-name as bait, they got Dems to make praising Harvey Milk a part of their national platform & now Milk's bad behavior is fair game /5
Even if you hate the results of this strategy, you have to admit it's a good strategy. The new right understands how the outrage machine works and how the narratives play out & are leveraging that mechanism. Dem's haven't caught up yet. /end
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Just keep this in mind b/c the defense against the first two is "oh how could we have known?"
You could have known if you had just listened to the people talking sense. Your bubble is too perfect and it is self-destructive. You need to listen to more people.
I am warning those on the left: if you give a single shit about transgender rights, you have to stand up for female athletes and bar m2f athletes from competition
This issue will drag down every other thing you think is important
It is incredibly damning that a Harvard statistics PhD student is so socially isolated from the larger nerd and tech scene that he felt comfortable making this statement
Let me give an example of how I use AI that is transformative
So I've got this project that is scraping out data and putting it haphazardly into a DynamoDb table. I want to screw around with this data in Excel, so I want to export the data as a csv.
None of Amazon's tools are good for this, I google it, stack overflow, probably about an hour of looking for solutions
I ask Claude how to export a DynamoDb table as a csv file. 10 minutes later I have the data loaded into Excel and I'm running various analysis on it
The AI doesn't get in my way. It doesn't tell me what I'm trying to do is stupid. It helps me solve the specific problem I have right in front of me or it can set me on a path to solving that problem very quickly.
I don't know how to solve this problem in a free market but when I signed up for gmail, it was advertised as "free unlimited email forever". That's what I signed up for
Now I have to pay Google or get rid of half my email. I feel tricked.
I can't give up my gmail account, there's 20 years of emails in there!
And Google's interface for clearing up space is intentionally bad. It's intentionally painful so that you will just give up and pay the money.
For people saying "Google always had a storage cap / never promised free storage", here is a screencap of their sign-up in 2005
That number in "Don't throw anything away" is ticking up as you watch it. The promise is that this will increase forever.
Biocraft: "Farmed animals live shorter and more brutal lives today than ever before. In the USA, 25 million of them are killed every single day. We say enough is enough"
Enough is enough, huh? Oh that's probably just harmless rhetoric.
SciFi Foods: "The future is coming soon." "We'll all be able to enjoy our burgers without destroying the planet."
Huh. And what will happen to those planet-destroying farms? Probably nothing, I guess.
Yes, that was certainly the talking point that was used in their defense. It's a bummer that you only know the talking point you were fed and never actually read about the end result
Most people don't know that John McCain was actually involved in this scandal. His staff had a meeting with Louis Lerner b/c he hated the Tea Party groups and wanted to use the IRS to destroy them
Tyler's argument is basically No True Scotsman for intellectual elites
No true intellectual elite would act this way. Sure, most of our elites did act that way, but that just shows that they weren't true intellectual elites, who would never act that way
People in power think they can still talk their way out of it. They think they can make their excuses, write their clever little essays, and cherry pick their way through an argument