The Vigilant Fox 🦊 Profile picture
Jun 5, 2025 27 tweets 14 min read Read on X
The Trump/Musk breakup is now official.

For the first time, Trump spoke out after Musk blasted the Big Beautiful Bill.

But here’s the twist—Musk was watching live and firing back in real time on X.

What happened next was painful to watch.

Trump said, “Look, Elon and I had a great relationship. I don’t know if we will anymore.”

Then Trump posted on Truth Social—and that’s when the gloves really came off.

🧵 THREADImage
📍 And make sure to bookmark this thread—because no matter how this ends, we’re watching one of the greatest political alliances fall apart in real time.

Let’s break it all down and roll the clips.
It came out of nowhere, but it hit like a category five hurricane.

President Trump was hosting German Chancellor Friedrich Merz when a reporter asked a question that immediately changed the energy in the room:

“What’s your reaction to Elon Musk’s criticism of the Big Beautiful Bill?”

The mood shifted.

Trump didn’t hesitate.

It was the beginning of what sounded like a very public political divorce.

“I’ve always liked Elon,” Trump said.

“So I was very surprised… He hasn’t said anything about me that’s bad.”

Trump had stayed quiet for a while, but now, cornered with cameras rolling, he was ready to speak.

“I’d rather have him criticize me than the bill,” Trump continued, praising the legislation as “incredible” and “the biggest cut in the history of our country… about $1.6 trillion.”

Then came the pivot—and the reason for the rift, according to Trump.

“Elon’s upset because we took the EV mandate,” he explained.

“That was a lot of money for electric vehicles.”

The way Trump described it, Musk’s problem wasn’t ideological—it was financial.

“They want us to pay billions of dollars in subsidy. And Elon knew this from the beginning. He knew it a long time ago. That hasn’t changed.”
Musk responded to this immediately:

“Whatever.”

“Keep the EV/solar incentive cuts in the bill, even though no oil & gas subsidies are touched (very unfair!!), but ditch the MOUNTAIN of DISGUSTING PORK in the bill.” Image
Before we roll the next clip: if you’re not following me, you’re missing out on critical information.

Hit the bell 🔔 to stay sharp and informed.

→ @VigilantFox

Now, back to the story you came for. Image
But the electric vehicle subsidies weren’t the only flashpoint.

Trump pointed to another moment of quiet friction.

He said Musk had personally pushed for Jared Isaacman to be nominated as NASA administrator. Trump turned him down.

“He recommended somebody that he, I guess, knew very well. I’m sure he respected him,” Trump said. “But I didn’t think it was appropriate.”

Why? “He happened to be a Democrat. Like, totally Democrat.”

Then Trump drew the political line.

“We won,” he said.

“We get certain privileges. And one of the privileges is we don’t have to appoint a Democrat.”

He reiterated that NASA would remain in capable hands.

“General Cain is going to be picking somebody.”

But the implication was clear: Musk had tried to insert his own pick into a key government role—and when he didn’t get his way, the relationship began to fracture.

“He wanted that person. And we said no,” Trump said.

“And I can understand why he’s upset.”

Then came a striking moment of reflection.

“Remember, he was here for a long time. You saw a man who was very happy when he stood behind the Oval Desk.”
That’s when Trump crossed a line you don’t cross unless something’s truly over, and he dropped a line that made it clear.

He started using the past tense.

“Look, Elon and I had a great relationship,” he said.

“I don’t know if we will anymore.”

It was unmistakable.

The phrasing, the delivery—it sounded like someone processing a falling-out in real time.

Trump recalled better days: public events, warm praise, and headlines they once created together.

“I was surprised—because you were here,” he told the room. “Everybody in this room, practically, was here as we had a wonderful sendoff.”

“He said wonderful things about me. You couldn’t have said nicer—said the best things.”

“He’s worn the hat, ‘Trump Was Right About Everything.’”

Then Trump added with a tone of wounded pride: “And I am right about the great, big beautiful bill.”
As the comments continued, the emotion started bleeding through.

Trump reminded everyone just how closely tied Musk had been to his movement.

“Elon endorsed me very strongly,” he said. “He actually went up and campaigned for me.”

But even in that, Trump made something else crystal clear: he believed he didn’t need Musk to win.

“I think I would have won,” he said.

“Susie would say I would have won Pennsylvania easily anyway.”

“Even if the governor ran—the real governor, not the governor from Minnesota… He’s a sick puppy, that guy.”

Then he doubled down: “If they picked him, I would have won Pennsylvania. I won it by a lot.”

Trump was saying that Musk’s support was appreciated—but not essential.

And that made the fallout easier to frame.

“I’m very disappointed,” he said.

“Because Elon knew the inner workings of this bill better than almost anybody sitting here. Better than you people. He knew everything about it.”

He circled back to the heart of the disagreement: the subsidies.

“He had no problem with it. All of a sudden he had a problem—when he found out we’re going to have to cut the EV mandate. That’s billions and billions of dollars. And it really is unfair. We want to have cars of all types.”
But Musk was ready and waiting.

He weighed in on the president’s claim about Pennsylvania, and he took it one step further.

Musk said:

“Without me, Trump would have lost the election, Dems would control the House and the Republicans would be 51-49 in the Senate.”

He added:

“Such ingratitude”Image
And then Musk called out Trump’s claim that he knew the inner workings of the Big Beautiful Bill.

“False, this bill was never shown to me even once and was passed in the dead of night so fast that almost no one in Congress could even read it!” Image
Back in the Oval Office, the mood darkened again as Trump made a quiet prediction.

“He hasn’t said bad about me personally,” he said.

“But I’m sure that’ll be next.”

There was no mistaking it now. This was a full-blown breakup.

“I’m very disappointed in Elon. I’ve helped Elon a lot,” Trump said, his voice tightening.

A reporter jumped in, asking the obvious: Had Musk brought any of these concerns to him in private before blasting them in public?

Trump didn’t dodge.

“No,” he said flatly. “He worked hard and he did a good job.”

Then came a flash of emotional insight—a glimpse into how Trump sees these departures.

“I think he misses the place,” he said. “

He got out there, and all of a sudden he wasn’t in this beautiful Oval Office.”

“And he was,” Trump added.

“And he’s got nice offices too. But there’s something about this one.”
As the dust settled, Trump zoomed out.

And what he said next felt like the conclusion to a pattern.

“He’s not the first,” he said.

“People leave my administration and they love us. And then at some point, they miss it so badly.”

“Some of them embrace it. And some of them actually become hostile. I don’t know what it is.”

Then, with a knowing smirk: “It’s sort of Trump Derangement Syndrome, I guess they call it.”

It wasn’t just Musk anymore.

Trump was describing a cycle—an emotional shift he believes happens to those who leave his orbit.

“They leave and they wake up in the morning—and the glamor is gone. The whole world is different. And they become hostile. I don’t know what it is.”

And then, he ended with: “Someday you’ll write a book about it and you’ll let us know.”
But after the Oval Office meeting was finished, the real fireworks started.

President Trump took to Truth social and launched an all-out assault on Musk:

“Elon was “wearing thin,” I asked him to leave, I took away his EV Mandate that forced everyone to buy Electric Cars that nobody else wanted (that he knew for months I was going to do!), and he just went CRAZY!”Image
Trump followed up with:

“The easiest way to save money in our Budget, Billions and Billions of Dollars, is to terminate Elon’s Governmental Subsidies and Contracts. I was always surprised that Biden didn’t do it!” Image
That’s when Elon Musk blew up the internet with this response:

“Time to drop the really big bomb: @realDonaldTrump is in the Epstein files. That’s the real reason they haven’t been made public.

Have a nice day, DJT!” Image
@realDonaldTrump Elon added, “Mark this post for the future. The truth will come out.” Image
SUMMARY

1.) Trump confirmed the breakup and used the past tense to describe their relationship.

• He said, “Elon and I had a great relationship. I don’t know if we will anymore,” signaling a clear end to their alliance.

2.) Trump accused Musk of being upset over losing billions in EV subsidies.

• He claimed Musk’s criticism of the Big Beautiful Bill was financially motivated—not ideological.

3.) Musk immediately fired back on X and called Trump’s claims false.

• He said he was never shown the bill, called Trump ungrateful, and defended the EV/solar incentives while blasting the “disgusting pork.”

4.) Trump revealed Musk tried to get Democrat Jared Isaacman nominated to lead NASA.

5.) Trump added he didn’t need Musk to win and would’ve taken Pennsylvania without him.

• In response, Musk claimed that without his backing, Trump would have lost the election, and Democrats would control Congress.

6.) Trump took off the gloves and posted on Truth Social:

• He said, “Elon was ‘wearing thin,’ I asked him to leave, I took away his EV Mandate that forced everyone to buy Electric Cars that nobody else wanted (that he knew for months I was going to do!), and he just went CRAZY!”

7.) That’s when Elon blew everything up.

• He responded, “Time to drop the really big bomb:
@realDonaldTrump is in the Epstein files. That’s the real reason they haven’t been made public. Have a nice day, DJT!”Image
@realDonaldTrump This story is still unfolding. I’m tracking every update in real time. Bookmark this post and come back to it later.

Also, share it with a friend who needs a quick catch-up.

There’s no reversing what’s been said. Stay tuned—this story is just beginning.

UPDATE #1: At 4:09 PM Eastern, Elon Musk writes:

“In light of the President’s statement about cancellation of my government contracts, @SpaceX will begin decommissioning its Dragon spacecraft immediately.”

This announcement followed President Trump’s earlier threat to terminate federal subsidies and contracts with Musk’s companies, including SpaceX and Tesla.Image
UPDATE #2: Elon quote-tweets a post linking Trump to Jeffrey Epstein with a raised eyebrow emoji.

The post claims Trump flew on Epstein’s plane at least 7 times, though there’s no proof he visited the island.

It also highlights a 2002 New York Magazine quote where Trump described Epstein as “a terrific guy” who “likes beautiful women… on the younger side.”

(See image for full quote)Image
UPDATE #3: Trump responds to Elon publicly attacking him, saying:

“I don’t mind Elon turning against me, but he should have done so months ago. This is one of the Greatest Bills ever presented to Congress. It’s a Record Cut in Expenses—$1.6 Trillion Dollars—and the Biggest Tax Cut ever given. If this Bill doesn’t pass, there will be a 68% Tax Increase, and things far worse than that. I didn’t create this mess—I’m just here to FIX IT. This puts our Country on a Path of Greatness. MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!”Image
@realDonaldTrump @SpaceX UPDATE #4: At 4:43 PM Eastern, Elon Musk drops another raised eyebrow emoji—this time on a post by @chesschick01 that reads:

“In 1992 Trump partied with Jeffrey Epstein. Just gonna leave this here:”

@realDonaldTrump @SpaceX @Chesschick01 UPDATE #5: Elon Musk replies “Yes” to a post by @stillgray that reads:

“President vs Elon. Who wins? My money’s on Elon.
Trump should be impeached and JD Vance should replace him.” Image
UPDATE #6: Nicole Shanahan agrees with Musk on the need for a “new political party” that “actually represents the 80% in the middle.”

She responded to Musk’s post, saying, “Yes. I’m so sick and tired of the bait and switch BS. America is not a piggy bank that you can keep smashing open and expect it to function.”Image
UPDATE #7: Jesse Watters says Elon Musk doesn’t actually know if Trump is in the Epstein files.

“No one knows what the list is. He didn’t know.”

Watters added the Trump–Musk feud is like a roommate squabble.

“These guys are like roommates. They were living in close quarters for, like, the first six months of the year. They’re just blowing off steam. The issue is donor maintenance. This guy’s the mega donor. So? So you don’t want him accusing you of being a pedophile, and you don’t want him calling for your impeachment.”

Still, Watters tried to strike a hopeful note.

“I hope he [Musk] doesn’t mean that [Trump’s impeachment], but maybe they can patch things up. I mean, Vance called Trump Hitler, and he’s on the ticket.”
UPDATE #8: Elon Musk appears to be relenting—at least partially.

He just reposted a message that urges compromise and reads:

“Elon’s stance is principled. Trump’s stance is practical. Tech needs Republicans for the present. Republicans need Tech for the future. Drop the tax cuts, cut some pork, get the bill through.”Image
@realDonaldTrump @SpaceX @Chesschick01 @stillgray Thanks for reading. Follow me for more updates on this story.

—> @VigilantFox

In other news, Chris Cuomo has a bombshell theory on why Trump is silent after the Epstein accusation.

If he’s right, this feud could explode into something much bigger.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with The Vigilant Fox 🦊

The Vigilant Fox 🦊 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @VigilantFox

Jun 16
Erica Drum was told her son Jackson would never breathe on his own again.

A hockey hit launched him headfirst into the boards. Broken neck & spine. Doctors said he’d be paralyzed for life.

Jackson is now walking and has recovered every fine motor skill he lost.

What happened?

His loving mother took a chance on a substance called DMSO. And what followed was nothing short of a miracle.

ERICA DRUM: “[Doctors] said there was no hope of recovery… He is vent-dependent, feeding tube-dependent. We were told he is never going to eat or drink or be able to breathe independently.”

“I had a friend, and she’s like, ‘Hey, I know of this thing [DMSO] that’s supposed to help spinal cord injuries, and it helps reduce the swelling.’ And I’m like, ‘Okay, well maybe we can try that.’ Because at this point, we didn’t have any options.”

“We decided to try [DMSO] topically. We bought like a little rollerball one… We started that on day four or five, and by day seven, I would poke his feet or his legs, and he would open his eyes [despite being on intense painkillers].”

“And then there was a PT working with him, and she felt his hip flexor fire. And they’re like, ‘Oh my gosh.’ He went from an Asia A to an Asia C, which usually is not supposed to happen.”

“You’re either a severe spinal cord injury with no sensation, nothing, like an Asia A. You don’t go from an A to a C. From there, he was Asia C. And I’m still rubbing this stuff on him every chance I get.”

“I mean, I would rub that thing on him probably ten times a day. What’s interesting is I was able to rub it on the left side of his body more than his right side. His left side is definitely stronger.”

“The right side is slowly coming back. His hand grip on this side was like 1 pound probably four months ago. And now it’s up to 20 pounds. He literally has every single fine motor skill. It’s a matter of us now strengthening them.”

“He hasn’t used his wheelchair in three weeks… We moved to the arm crutches. And now in therapy, he’s working on walking without the arm crutches.”

“We were like ventilator-dependent, medication-dependent… And now we’re down to just the baclofen.”

“My son is one of the only people I’ve met that does not have the nerve pain with his condition. So he is off of all nerve pain meds.”

Jackson’s doctors can’t explain how he went from a quadriplegic to a walking, self-sufficient person again.

But his mother attests it was the DMSO.

The thing is, Jackson isn’t the only person with a story like this. 🧵
Jackson’s story is an incredible example of exactly why DMSO is so hard to dismiss.

A nerve injury recovery that looks impossible on the surface starts to make more sense when you look at what DMSO appears to do inside damaged tissue.

It doesn’t behave like a normal painkiller.

It acts more like a cellular reset.

And once you see what it can do… you can’t unsee it.Image
This information comes from the work of medical researcher @MidwesternDoc. For all the sources and details, read the full report below.

midwesterndoctor.com/p/how-dmso-hea…
Read 25 tweets
Jun 15
It’s hard to believe this ever made TV news.

But a sleeping pill study found you are “almost FIVE TIMES more likely to die [prematurely] if you pop the pills.”

“And at a certain dosage, 35% likelier to get cancer.”

“I don’t think there’s any dose which is safe,” said Dr. Daniel Kripke, one of the study’s leading researchers.

The local news reporter noted: “This is not the first study to associate sleeping pills with a higher rate for mortality. Eighteen other studies have also established the link.”

Sleeping pills “stop our brain cells from firing” to get us to sleep.

And if they can increase our risk of death, what are the other risks that no one is talking about? 🧵
Jordan Peterson disappeared from public view last year.

When his daughter finally broke her silence, her video got 10 million views in a matter of days. What she revealed: he was experiencing a devastating relapse from a previous benzodiazepine injury—triggered by stress and mold exposure.

Most people watching had never heard of anything like this. And some refused to believe it was possible.

But it is.

What she described is far more common than medicine will ever admit.
Anxiety is now the defining condition of modern life.

Take a moment to let that really sink in.

In the early 2000s, roughly 1 in 5 American adults had a diagnosable anxiety disorder. By 2023, more than half of young adults aged 18 to 26 reported suffering from anxiety. Forty-three percent had experienced panic attacks. A third were already on anxiety medications.

Despite spending $36.8 billion on anxiety and mood disorder care in 2007 alone, the problem has gotten measurably worse with every passing year.

That’s not a treatment failure. That’s a business model.Image
Read 29 tweets
Jun 13
The most powerful healing molecule you’ve never heard of can cure common ailments faster than anything Big Pharma ever made.

It’s great for:
• Chronic pain
• Burns
• Sinus infections and more.

You’d think something this potent would cost thousands, but it only costs about $20 online.

Like ivermectin, this forbidden remedy belongs in everyone’s medicine cabinet.Image
This information comes from the work of medical researcher @MidwesternDoc.

For all the sources and details, read the full report below:

midwesterndoctor.com/p/dmso-mixture…
DMSO (dimethyl sulfoxide) penetrates the body like nothing else. It passes through biological membranes without damaging them.

Once applied, it spreads everywhere. Depending on how you use it, it can deliver vitamins, herbs, or painkillers right where they’re needed.

It’s literally medicine’s missing transport system.Image
Read 29 tweets
Jun 13
We took Erin Brockovich's map of every data center in America. Then we laid the nation's aquifers on top of it.

We noticed they're not building data centers where the land is cheap. They're building them where the water is.

Farmers near these facilities say their livestock have stopped falling pregnant. Residents say the humming never stops.

And the projects arrive under NDAs, so most towns don't know until the ground is already broken.

The question isn’t where they’re building anymore. It’s why they’re building where they’re building. Tonight, we think we can answer that question.

We’ve been covering the data center issue in great detail on this broadcast, and for good reason. It’s a serious problem in America and worldwide, and it’s one that is uniting people from all sides of the political aisle because, guess what, whether you are a conservative or a liberal, you have human rights that enable you to have access to basic survival needs like water, which was given to us by God, not by the state or Big Tech, by the way.

Erin Brockovich joined the data center fight recently. She launched a site including a map that shows data centers either completed, under construction, planned, or community reported, likely due to all those pesky NDAs in place stopping us from knowing they’re coming to our area. But the public isn’t stupid.

So Maria thought she’d do something a little bit different. She created a series of maps using Erin Brockovich’s data center data, then superimposed aquifer maps onto those maps, then superimposed smart city locations onto those maps. What Maria found was pretty mind-blowing and, she says, lends credence to her theory that those in charge are purposely making rural areas unlivable for the purpose of pushing people into smart cities, where they will be under constant surveillance and on a short leash.
The main reason for this continued investigation is because data centers are destroying rural communities by siphoning natural resources, contaminating and consuming water for surrounding communities, driving up power costs, creating noise and light pollution, destroying habitats, wildlife, animal health, human health, and impacting fertility, as discussed in one of the show’s recent reports.

The list goes on. For many, it’s making it impossible to continue living in the rural communities they fled to during COVID because they could see the playbook coming down the pipeline. But if you live in the city, these developments are going to impact you too, possibly in ways you can’t even begin to imagine yet.

Maria’s theory, what she calls a common-sense one, is that there is a direct correlation between data centers and the AI control grid. Furthermore, she believes there is a direct correlation between data centers and smart cities.

Before presenting the evidence, we want to walk you through key information on Erin Brockovich’s website, BrockovichDataCenter.com.

The key concerns include energy consumption, water usage, e-waste, location risks, scalability and efficiency, and noise. Anecdotal evidence suggests the noise itself may be impacting fertility, with farmers near data centers reporting that their livestock are no longer falling pregnant or giving birth.

The website also highlights:

• 15+ moratoria and pauses passed at the local, county, or state level.

• 66% voter approval for Port Washington’s nation-first referendum.

• 4 council members ousted in Festus, Missouri, after a data center vote.

• 19% of community submissions mentioning NDAs, secret deals, meetings, or no public voice.

• 25+ projects canceled due to local opposition in 2025 alone.

• 69 active moratoriums across U.S. jurisdictions as of April 2026.

•$156 billion in investment stalled by community opposition since 2025.
This is where things start to look overwhelming.

According to the data center map, there are currently 33 operational data centers, 67 under construction, and 39 proposed.
Read 12 tweets
Jun 12
A Fox News guest just said out loud what the “conspiracy theorists” have been screaming into the shadowbanned void for years:

The AI Big Tech and Big Government have is distinctly separate from the AI the public gets access to, because the AI they have is a weapons system that will be used against us.

Take a listen. (See clip below)

The only question that remains now is, if it’s being admitted on Fox News at this point, is it already too late to protect ourselves against it? For many people, it is. But not for those listening to this broadcast.

You see, we consider that we have a fairly sound understanding of where this is all heading, we’ve been reporting on it for years. You are talking about not just a social credit system, but something far more sinister, far more pervasive, the type of system that will deny you access to basic needs like food, power, even water, based on your behavior.

And you need not take our word for it; there are countless speeches at the World Economic Forum telling you they will do just that.

So what can we do about it? One of the key things is to cut off the machines food source at its knees. Your data is what the beast needs to grow.

Every single person can take action to end the incessant spying on every inch of their lives today, and they can learn how for free.

Glenn and Eric Meder join us today to discuss. 🧵
You've driven past one this week and probably never noticed it. 100,000 Flock cameras now line America's roads — and thousands more go up every month.

They don’t just film traffic. They read faces. They carry microphones. Once the system knows who you are, everything it captures gets attached to your profile — where you went, when, how often.

“It’s like the Truman show, but if it was 1984,” Eric said.

Want proof? Go to deflock.me and pull up your own city. The map is stunning.Image
What makes this even more concerning is that people have hacked these cameras on video. So it’s not just the government watching you. It’s potentially anyone.

You’re being spied on constantly. And the home tech is the biggest spy of them all.

Your Alexa, your smart TV, your phone — every one is a microphone you paid for. The WEF was publishing articles back in 2017 about how a single camera lets a computer understand you “on a very deep level.”

Smart city plans in Australia include “street furniture” that monitors public sentiment — AI reading your mood, 24/7. Feel the wrong way in the wrong place, and you get flagged.

Flagged by whom, for what? That’s where it gets dark.
Read 8 tweets
Jun 4
Remember Aduhelm? It was Biogen’s $56,000/year Alzheimer’s drug that didn’t even work.

Worse, it caused brain swelling, brain bleeding, and sudden falls in patients—and the FDA approved it anyway.

But the truth is, you don’t need deep pockets to treat Alzheimer’s. You just need to look at what Big Pharma can’t monetize.

This report exposes the real causes behind Alzheimer’s—and the cheap treatment options you should explore instead.
This information comes from the work of medical researcher @MidwesternDoc. For all the sources and details, read the full report below.

midwesterndoctor.com/p/why-isnt-the…
Modern medicine is addicted to the biochemical model of disease because it creates a pipeline for expensive, patentable drugs, and it often leaves patients and their families in the dark, rather than empowered and in control.

It’s not about finding root causes. It’s about finding something you can bill for.

That’s why the industry has spent decades treating Alzheimer’s like a “chemical imbalance” in the brain caused by amyloid plaques—even though hundreds of trials targeting amyloid have failed.

The more the theory collapsed, the harder the system doubled down. Just like cholesterol and heart disease, the medical machine kept pushing the failed model long after it broke.Image
Read 27 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(