For the first time, Trump spoke out after Musk blasted the Big Beautiful Bill.
But here’s the twist—Musk was watching live and firing back in real time on X.
What happened next was painful to watch.
Trump said, “Look, Elon and I had a great relationship. I don’t know if we will anymore.”
Then Trump posted on Truth Social—and that’s when the gloves really came off.
🧵 THREAD
📍 And make sure to bookmark this thread—because no matter how this ends, we’re watching one of the greatest political alliances fall apart in real time.
Let’s break it all down and roll the clips.
It came out of nowhere, but it hit like a category five hurricane.
President Trump was hosting German Chancellor Friedrich Merz when a reporter asked a question that immediately changed the energy in the room:
“What’s your reaction to Elon Musk’s criticism of the Big Beautiful Bill?”
The mood shifted.
Trump didn’t hesitate.
It was the beginning of what sounded like a very public political divorce.
“I’ve always liked Elon,” Trump said.
“So I was very surprised… He hasn’t said anything about me that’s bad.”
Trump had stayed quiet for a while, but now, cornered with cameras rolling, he was ready to speak.
“I’d rather have him criticize me than the bill,” Trump continued, praising the legislation as “incredible” and “the biggest cut in the history of our country… about $1.6 trillion.”
Then came the pivot—and the reason for the rift, according to Trump.
“Elon’s upset because we took the EV mandate,” he explained.
“That was a lot of money for electric vehicles.”
The way Trump described it, Musk’s problem wasn’t ideological—it was financial.
“They want us to pay billions of dollars in subsidy. And Elon knew this from the beginning. He knew it a long time ago. That hasn’t changed.”
Musk responded to this immediately:
“Whatever.”
“Keep the EV/solar incentive cuts in the bill, even though no oil & gas subsidies are touched (very unfair!!), but ditch the MOUNTAIN of DISGUSTING PORK in the bill.”
Before we roll the next clip: if you’re not following me, you’re missing out on critical information.
Hit the bell 🔔 to stay sharp and informed.
→ @VigilantFox
Now, back to the story you came for.
But the electric vehicle subsidies weren’t the only flashpoint.
Trump pointed to another moment of quiet friction.
He said Musk had personally pushed for Jared Isaacman to be nominated as NASA administrator. Trump turned him down.
“He recommended somebody that he, I guess, knew very well. I’m sure he respected him,” Trump said. “But I didn’t think it was appropriate.”
Why? “He happened to be a Democrat. Like, totally Democrat.”
Then Trump drew the political line.
“We won,” he said.
“We get certain privileges. And one of the privileges is we don’t have to appoint a Democrat.”
He reiterated that NASA would remain in capable hands.
“General Cain is going to be picking somebody.”
But the implication was clear: Musk had tried to insert his own pick into a key government role—and when he didn’t get his way, the relationship began to fracture.
“He wanted that person. And we said no,” Trump said.
“And I can understand why he’s upset.”
Then came a striking moment of reflection.
“Remember, he was here for a long time. You saw a man who was very happy when he stood behind the Oval Desk.”
That’s when Trump crossed a line you don’t cross unless something’s truly over, and he dropped a line that made it clear.
He started using the past tense.
“Look, Elon and I had a great relationship,” he said.
“I don’t know if we will anymore.”
It was unmistakable.
The phrasing, the delivery—it sounded like someone processing a falling-out in real time.
Trump recalled better days: public events, warm praise, and headlines they once created together.
“I was surprised—because you were here,” he told the room. “Everybody in this room, practically, was here as we had a wonderful sendoff.”
“He said wonderful things about me. You couldn’t have said nicer—said the best things.”
“He’s worn the hat, ‘Trump Was Right About Everything.’”
Then Trump added with a tone of wounded pride: “And I am right about the great, big beautiful bill.”
As the comments continued, the emotion started bleeding through.
Trump reminded everyone just how closely tied Musk had been to his movement.
“Elon endorsed me very strongly,” he said. “He actually went up and campaigned for me.”
But even in that, Trump made something else crystal clear: he believed he didn’t need Musk to win.
“I think I would have won,” he said.
“Susie would say I would have won Pennsylvania easily anyway.”
“Even if the governor ran—the real governor, not the governor from Minnesota… He’s a sick puppy, that guy.”
Then he doubled down: “If they picked him, I would have won Pennsylvania. I won it by a lot.”
Trump was saying that Musk’s support was appreciated—but not essential.
And that made the fallout easier to frame.
“I’m very disappointed,” he said.
“Because Elon knew the inner workings of this bill better than almost anybody sitting here. Better than you people. He knew everything about it.”
He circled back to the heart of the disagreement: the subsidies.
“He had no problem with it. All of a sudden he had a problem—when he found out we’re going to have to cut the EV mandate. That’s billions and billions of dollars. And it really is unfair. We want to have cars of all types.”
But Musk was ready and waiting.
He weighed in on the president’s claim about Pennsylvania, and he took it one step further.
Musk said:
“Without me, Trump would have lost the election, Dems would control the House and the Republicans would be 51-49 in the Senate.”
He added:
“Such ingratitude”
And then Musk called out Trump’s claim that he knew the inner workings of the Big Beautiful Bill.
“False, this bill was never shown to me even once and was passed in the dead of night so fast that almost no one in Congress could even read it!”
Back in the Oval Office, the mood darkened again as Trump made a quiet prediction.
“He hasn’t said bad about me personally,” he said.
“But I’m sure that’ll be next.”
There was no mistaking it now. This was a full-blown breakup.
“I’m very disappointed in Elon. I’ve helped Elon a lot,” Trump said, his voice tightening.
A reporter jumped in, asking the obvious: Had Musk brought any of these concerns to him in private before blasting them in public?
Trump didn’t dodge.
“No,” he said flatly. “He worked hard and he did a good job.”
Then came a flash of emotional insight—a glimpse into how Trump sees these departures.
“I think he misses the place,” he said. “
He got out there, and all of a sudden he wasn’t in this beautiful Oval Office.”
“And he was,” Trump added.
“And he’s got nice offices too. But there’s something about this one.”
As the dust settled, Trump zoomed out.
And what he said next felt like the conclusion to a pattern.
“He’s not the first,” he said.
“People leave my administration and they love us. And then at some point, they miss it so badly.”
“Some of them embrace it. And some of them actually become hostile. I don’t know what it is.”
Then, with a knowing smirk: “It’s sort of Trump Derangement Syndrome, I guess they call it.”
It wasn’t just Musk anymore.
Trump was describing a cycle—an emotional shift he believes happens to those who leave his orbit.
“They leave and they wake up in the morning—and the glamor is gone. The whole world is different. And they become hostile. I don’t know what it is.”
And then, he ended with: “Someday you’ll write a book about it and you’ll let us know.”
But after the Oval Office meeting was finished, the real fireworks started.
President Trump took to Truth social and launched an all-out assault on Musk:
“Elon was “wearing thin,” I asked him to leave, I took away his EV Mandate that forced everyone to buy Electric Cars that nobody else wanted (that he knew for months I was going to do!), and he just went CRAZY!”
Trump followed up with:
“The easiest way to save money in our Budget, Billions and Billions of Dollars, is to terminate Elon’s Governmental Subsidies and Contracts. I was always surprised that Biden didn’t do it!”
That’s when Elon Musk blew up the internet with this response:
“Time to drop the really big bomb: @realDonaldTrump is in the Epstein files. That’s the real reason they haven’t been made public.
Have a nice day, DJT!”
@realDonaldTrump Elon added, “Mark this post for the future. The truth will come out.”
SUMMARY
1.) Trump confirmed the breakup and used the past tense to describe their relationship.
• He said, “Elon and I had a great relationship. I don’t know if we will anymore,” signaling a clear end to their alliance.
2.) Trump accused Musk of being upset over losing billions in EV subsidies.
• He claimed Musk’s criticism of the Big Beautiful Bill was financially motivated—not ideological.
3.) Musk immediately fired back on X and called Trump’s claims false.
• He said he was never shown the bill, called Trump ungrateful, and defended the EV/solar incentives while blasting the “disgusting pork.”
4.) Trump revealed Musk tried to get Democrat Jared Isaacman nominated to lead NASA.
5.) Trump added he didn’t need Musk to win and would’ve taken Pennsylvania without him.
• In response, Musk claimed that without his backing, Trump would have lost the election, and Democrats would control Congress.
6.) Trump took off the gloves and posted on Truth Social:
• He said, “Elon was ‘wearing thin,’ I asked him to leave, I took away his EV Mandate that forced everyone to buy Electric Cars that nobody else wanted (that he knew for months I was going to do!), and he just went CRAZY!”
7.) That’s when Elon blew everything up.
• He responded, “Time to drop the really big bomb:
@realDonaldTrump is in the Epstein files. That’s the real reason they haven’t been made public. Have a nice day, DJT!”
@realDonaldTrump This story is still unfolding. I’m tracking every update in real time. Bookmark this post and come back to it later.
Also, share it with a friend who needs a quick catch-up.
There’s no reversing what’s been said. Stay tuned—this story is just beginning.
“In light of the President’s statement about cancellation of my government contracts, @SpaceX will begin decommissioning its Dragon spacecraft immediately.”
This announcement followed President Trump’s earlier threat to terminate federal subsidies and contracts with Musk’s companies, including SpaceX and Tesla.
UPDATE #2: Elon quote-tweets a post linking Trump to Jeffrey Epstein with a raised eyebrow emoji.
The post claims Trump flew on Epstein’s plane at least 7 times, though there’s no proof he visited the island.
It also highlights a 2002 New York Magazine quote where Trump described Epstein as “a terrific guy” who “likes beautiful women… on the younger side.”
(See image for full quote)
UPDATE #3: Trump responds to Elon publicly attacking him, saying:
“I don’t mind Elon turning against me, but he should have done so months ago. This is one of the Greatest Bills ever presented to Congress. It’s a Record Cut in Expenses—$1.6 Trillion Dollars—and the Biggest Tax Cut ever given. If this Bill doesn’t pass, there will be a 68% Tax Increase, and things far worse than that. I didn’t create this mess—I’m just here to FIX IT. This puts our Country on a Path of Greatness. MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!”
@realDonaldTrump @SpaceX UPDATE #4: At 4:43 PM Eastern, Elon Musk drops another raised eyebrow emoji—this time on a post by @chesschick01 that reads:
“In 1992 Trump partied with Jeffrey Epstein. Just gonna leave this here:”
@realDonaldTrump @SpaceX @Chesschick01 UPDATE #5: Elon Musk replies “Yes” to a post by @stillgray that reads:
“President vs Elon. Who wins? My money’s on Elon.
Trump should be impeached and JD Vance should replace him.”
UPDATE #6: Nicole Shanahan agrees with Musk on the need for a “new political party” that “actually represents the 80% in the middle.”
She responded to Musk’s post, saying, “Yes. I’m so sick and tired of the bait and switch BS. America is not a piggy bank that you can keep smashing open and expect it to function.”
UPDATE #7: Jesse Watters says Elon Musk doesn’t actually know if Trump is in the Epstein files.
“No one knows what the list is. He didn’t know.”
Watters added the Trump–Musk feud is like a roommate squabble.
“These guys are like roommates. They were living in close quarters for, like, the first six months of the year. They’re just blowing off steam. The issue is donor maintenance. This guy’s the mega donor. So? So you don’t want him accusing you of being a pedophile, and you don’t want him calling for your impeachment.”
Still, Watters tried to strike a hopeful note.
“I hope he [Musk] doesn’t mean that [Trump’s impeachment], but maybe they can patch things up. I mean, Vance called Trump Hitler, and he’s on the ticket.”
UPDATE #8: Elon Musk appears to be relenting—at least partially.
He just reposted a message that urges compromise and reads:
“Elon’s stance is principled. Trump’s stance is practical. Tech needs Republicans for the present. Republicans need Tech for the future. Drop the tax cuts, cut some pork, get the bill through.”
@realDonaldTrump @SpaceX @Chesschick01 @stillgray Thanks for reading. Follow me for more updates on this story.
—> @VigilantFox
In other news, Chris Cuomo has a bombshell theory on why Trump is silent after the Epstein accusation.
If he’s right, this feud could explode into something much bigger.
Are flavor enhancers used by nearly every major food brand being developed with cells derived from an aborted baby?
Tonight’s special report presents shocking evidence tracing the dark history of these additives and the powerful companies operating behind the label.
Most people have never heard of HEK293 cells. And two reassuring words—“natural flavors”—are concealing a disturbing story the food industry hoped you would never uncover. 🧵
HEK293 is a human cell line originally derived in the early 1970s from kidney tissue taken from a single fetus, believed to have come from an aborted pregnancy.
The cells are used as laboratory tools, not food ingredients.
Researchers can engineer them to express human taste receptors. When a chemical compound activates one of those receptors, the cells produce a measurable signal showing whether a person may perceive it as sweet, bitter, salty, or cooling.
That allows laboratories to screen thousands of potential flavor compounds without putting each one through a human tasting panel.
Senomyx, a biotechnology company that developed flavor enhancers and taste modulators, described this process in its patents. The patents shown in the report identify HEK293 as a preferred cell line for assays designed to find compounds that produce or modify sweet taste.
The cells remain in the laboratory.
“The cells themselves were not added to food products,” Maria explained. Senomyx maintained that no fetal cells or tissue entered finished consumer products.
That distinction answers what a food physically contains.
It does not settle whether the process used to develop it is ethically acceptable.
Supporters argue that HEK293 has been reproduced in laboratories for decades and is now far removed from the original abortion. They point to its value in medical and scientific research, especially when no suitable alternative exists.
@zeeemedia rejects that calculation.
“It doesn’t matter how many years it’s been since that point, that child was still murdered.”
For people who share that conviction, the question is not simply whether fetal material remains in a soda, cereal, vaccine, or medication.
It is whether that product was created using knowledge obtained through a cell line they believe should never have existed.
The dispute does not end with the final ingredient list.
It begins inside the research process—and the next problem is where that process disappears.
Health insurance in America is broken.
Over 200,000 Americans go bankrupt because of medical bills every year—and many of them already had insurance. On average, 20% of claims are denied, leaving families stuck paying massive out-of-pocket costs after spending thousands on premiums.
But there’s an alternative.
CrowdHealth is a community-powered model that has helped members fund over 40,000 medical bills at a fraction of the cost of traditional insurance.
So far, 30,000+ members have been helped, saving an estimated $73 million in medical costs.
CrowdHealth isn’t insurance. It’s a way to step outside the broken system and take control of your healthcare.
Get started today for $99 per member per month for the first three months.
Joe Rogan fell into stunned silence as Dr. Casey Means rattled off one disturbing health stat after another.
“We are getting destroyed, and it’s very recent, and it’s accelerating,” she warned.
• “74% of Americans are overweight or obese.”
• “Young adult cancers are going up 79% in the last 10 years.”
• “25% of men now under 40 have erectile dysfunction.”
• “50%, now, of American adults have type 2 diabetes or prediabetes. These were diseases where there was 1% of Americans in 1950 had type 2 diabetes. Now it’s 50% of Americans have prediabetes or type 2 diabetes.”
• “Alzheimer’s, dementia are going through the roof.”
• “Young adult dementias have increased, like, three times since 2012. So early onset dementias.”
• “One in two Americans are expected to have cancer in their lifetime now, one in two.”
• “One in [31] children has autism now, in the United States. That was one in 150 in the year 2000.”
• “In California, where I live, [Autism rates are] one in 22. One in 22 with a lifetime neurodevelopmental disorder.”
• “Infertility going up 1% per year.”
• “77% of young Americans can’t serve in the military because of obesity or drug abuse.”
• “Autoimmune diseases. Some studies are saying they’re going up 13% per year.”
• “Heart disease, which is almost totally preventable, is the leading cause of death in the United States, killing around 800,000 people per year.”
“It’s basically like all of us are a little bit dead while we’re alive,” Dr. Means said.
These aren’t unrelated crises. They share the same biological pattern — a body stuck in survival mode.
And once you understand what’s keeping your body there, the path to real healing finally makes sense. 🧵
What if what triggers chronic disease isn’t actually a malfunction?
Cells aren’t dead.
Or mutated.
Or broken beyond repair.
They’re just shut down.
What if our cells do that because they’re just trying to survive?
That single shift in perspective changes everything.
And it explains far more than modern medicine will ever admit.
It could even mean that modern medicine is going about healing all wrong.
When cells are exposed to overwhelming stress—things like toxins, infection, trauma, and immune overactivation—they do something deeply intelligent.
They conserve energy.
They reduce output.
They enter a low-function survival mode.
In the short term, this saves you.
But if your cells get stuck here, it becomes disease.
Because survival mode is not the same thing as health.
For several years now, embalmers in multiple countries have reported unusual white fibrous structures being found inside the deceased.
The reports began appearing after the COVID injection rollout. Yet despite the public concern, there has been little visible effort from major health authorities to explain what these structures are, how common they may be, or what they could mean for the living.
Now, two peer-reviewed papers have pushed the issue into a more serious category. One documented survey reports from embalmers across multiple countries. The other analyzed the material itself and reported evidence consistent with amyloid-like, misfolded protein structures using Raman spectroscopy and other testing methods.
The unsettling part is not only that these structures may exist. It is that the question has been sitting in plain view for years while the institutions with the power, funding, and equipment to investigate it have largely stayed silent.
For tonight's special report, we are joined by journalist Wayne Crouch, U.S. embalmer Richard Hirschman, Major Tom Haviland, and organic chemist Greg Harrison. Together, they bring a rare mix of frontline embalming observations, multi-year survey work, investigative persistence, and analytical chemistry to one of the strangest unresolved questions of the post-COVID era. 🧵
The first major issue was the magnitude of the problem being ignored.
The embalmer survey paper did not treat the white fibrous clot phenomenon as a one-off claim from a single funeral home or a small group of activists. It gathered multi-year responses from embalmers in five countries, including the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, Australia, and New Zealand.
Across four years of surveys, 808 embalmers reportedly took part. Of those, 608 said they had seen the white fibrous structures. That’s more than 75% of respondents.
Even more striking was the reported frequency. These were not described as rare findings showing up once in a while under unusual circumstances. The average reported occurrence was around 23% of corpses.
That number is the kind of figure that should immediately trigger serious follow-up. Even if the exact cause remains disputed, even if some findings require further confirmation, even if additional controls are needed, the claim being raised is too large to ignore. When experienced embalmers say they began seeing something unfamiliar in bodies after 2021, the responsible response is not silence. It is investigation.
The timing also mattered. Some embalmers reported seeing unusual clotting in 2020, during the COVID era but before the vaccine rollout. However, the larger reported increase appeared in 2021, after the rollout began.
That distinction is important because it keeps the question broader than a single theory. The issue being raised is not only whether the injections played a role, but whether spike protein exposure from infection, injection, or both may be connected to abnormal clotting and protein misfolding.
At this stage, the survey did not prove causation. But it did document a pattern that many embalmers said they had not seen during decades of prior work.
And that is exactly why the matter should not be left to online debate alone.
Unless you have explicitly told your financial advisor to pull your money out of tech, you are fully invested in the AI bubble right now.
Nobody asked for your permission. Nobody had to.
Your 401(k) is on autopilot, and autopilot means the biggest names on Wall Street get to use your retirement to fund their AI bets. Larry Fink’s BlackRock alone manages $12 trillion of money just like yours.
If it pays off, they take the fees. If it pops, you hold the bag.
But there’s a way to opt out of the AI bubble, and Genesis Gold shows you how.
They put together a free guide with the whole picture. How exposed your retirement really is. What happens after the crash. And how to get your hard-earned money out before the bomb goes off.
A New York Times reporter did the unthinkable and exposed the “worst test in medicine” — the one that five decades of evidence says doesn’t work.
The research is damning: continuous fetal monitoring raises C-sections by 66% and instrumental deliveries by 16%, with no drop in infant deaths or disability.
It flags a problem that usually isn’t one, and doctors rush to cut the baby out.
It’s not just a false flag problem; it’s a money incentive. Sarah Kliff says the quiet part out loud:
“Nobody gets sued for doing the C-section. You only get sued for not doing the C-section.”
Doctors are so terrified of legal consequences that they’ll push unnecessary surgery on their patients, not for the baby’s health, but to protect their pocketbooks.
That’s how the cascade starts. In a hospital delivery, one intervention triggers the next. It’s like an avalanche that can’t be stopped.
Next thing you know, you’re recovering for weeks from a major surgery you never needed.
If someone you love is about to have their first baby, share this before they ever set foot in a labor and delivery unit.
@MidwesternDoc investigated what hospitals don’t tell you about birth outcomes, and it only gets worse from here. 🧵
For most of human history, childbirth happened at home, guided by a midwife who had already done this hundreds of times.
Today it’s one of the most heavily monitored, medicated, and surgical events in modern medicine.
Something clearly changed, and it’s not women’s bodies. They’re just as capable today as they were thousands of years ago.
But today, most parents walk into a delivery room having no idea what may happen next—or why.
This information comes from the work of medical researcher @MidwesternDoc. For all the sources and details, read the full report below. midwesterndoctor.com/p/the-hidden-d…