The Vigilant Fox 🦊 Profile picture
Jun 5, 2025 27 tweets 14 min read Read on X
The Trump/Musk breakup is now official.

For the first time, Trump spoke out after Musk blasted the Big Beautiful Bill.

But here’s the twist—Musk was watching live and firing back in real time on X.

What happened next was painful to watch.

Trump said, “Look, Elon and I had a great relationship. I don’t know if we will anymore.”

Then Trump posted on Truth Social—and that’s when the gloves really came off.

🧵 THREADImage
📍 And make sure to bookmark this thread—because no matter how this ends, we’re watching one of the greatest political alliances fall apart in real time.

Let’s break it all down and roll the clips.
It came out of nowhere, but it hit like a category five hurricane.

President Trump was hosting German Chancellor Friedrich Merz when a reporter asked a question that immediately changed the energy in the room:

“What’s your reaction to Elon Musk’s criticism of the Big Beautiful Bill?”

The mood shifted.

Trump didn’t hesitate.

It was the beginning of what sounded like a very public political divorce.

“I’ve always liked Elon,” Trump said.

“So I was very surprised… He hasn’t said anything about me that’s bad.”

Trump had stayed quiet for a while, but now, cornered with cameras rolling, he was ready to speak.

“I’d rather have him criticize me than the bill,” Trump continued, praising the legislation as “incredible” and “the biggest cut in the history of our country… about $1.6 trillion.”

Then came the pivot—and the reason for the rift, according to Trump.

“Elon’s upset because we took the EV mandate,” he explained.

“That was a lot of money for electric vehicles.”

The way Trump described it, Musk’s problem wasn’t ideological—it was financial.

“They want us to pay billions of dollars in subsidy. And Elon knew this from the beginning. He knew it a long time ago. That hasn’t changed.”
Musk responded to this immediately:

“Whatever.”

“Keep the EV/solar incentive cuts in the bill, even though no oil & gas subsidies are touched (very unfair!!), but ditch the MOUNTAIN of DISGUSTING PORK in the bill.” Image
Before we roll the next clip: if you’re not following me, you’re missing out on critical information.

Hit the bell 🔔 to stay sharp and informed.

→ @VigilantFox

Now, back to the story you came for. Image
But the electric vehicle subsidies weren’t the only flashpoint.

Trump pointed to another moment of quiet friction.

He said Musk had personally pushed for Jared Isaacman to be nominated as NASA administrator. Trump turned him down.

“He recommended somebody that he, I guess, knew very well. I’m sure he respected him,” Trump said. “But I didn’t think it was appropriate.”

Why? “He happened to be a Democrat. Like, totally Democrat.”

Then Trump drew the political line.

“We won,” he said.

“We get certain privileges. And one of the privileges is we don’t have to appoint a Democrat.”

He reiterated that NASA would remain in capable hands.

“General Cain is going to be picking somebody.”

But the implication was clear: Musk had tried to insert his own pick into a key government role—and when he didn’t get his way, the relationship began to fracture.

“He wanted that person. And we said no,” Trump said.

“And I can understand why he’s upset.”

Then came a striking moment of reflection.

“Remember, he was here for a long time. You saw a man who was very happy when he stood behind the Oval Desk.”
That’s when Trump crossed a line you don’t cross unless something’s truly over, and he dropped a line that made it clear.

He started using the past tense.

“Look, Elon and I had a great relationship,” he said.

“I don’t know if we will anymore.”

It was unmistakable.

The phrasing, the delivery—it sounded like someone processing a falling-out in real time.

Trump recalled better days: public events, warm praise, and headlines they once created together.

“I was surprised—because you were here,” he told the room. “Everybody in this room, practically, was here as we had a wonderful sendoff.”

“He said wonderful things about me. You couldn’t have said nicer—said the best things.”

“He’s worn the hat, ‘Trump Was Right About Everything.’”

Then Trump added with a tone of wounded pride: “And I am right about the great, big beautiful bill.”
As the comments continued, the emotion started bleeding through.

Trump reminded everyone just how closely tied Musk had been to his movement.

“Elon endorsed me very strongly,” he said. “He actually went up and campaigned for me.”

But even in that, Trump made something else crystal clear: he believed he didn’t need Musk to win.

“I think I would have won,” he said.

“Susie would say I would have won Pennsylvania easily anyway.”

“Even if the governor ran—the real governor, not the governor from Minnesota… He’s a sick puppy, that guy.”

Then he doubled down: “If they picked him, I would have won Pennsylvania. I won it by a lot.”

Trump was saying that Musk’s support was appreciated—but not essential.

And that made the fallout easier to frame.

“I’m very disappointed,” he said.

“Because Elon knew the inner workings of this bill better than almost anybody sitting here. Better than you people. He knew everything about it.”

He circled back to the heart of the disagreement: the subsidies.

“He had no problem with it. All of a sudden he had a problem—when he found out we’re going to have to cut the EV mandate. That’s billions and billions of dollars. And it really is unfair. We want to have cars of all types.”
But Musk was ready and waiting.

He weighed in on the president’s claim about Pennsylvania, and he took it one step further.

Musk said:

“Without me, Trump would have lost the election, Dems would control the House and the Republicans would be 51-49 in the Senate.”

He added:

“Such ingratitude”Image
And then Musk called out Trump’s claim that he knew the inner workings of the Big Beautiful Bill.

“False, this bill was never shown to me even once and was passed in the dead of night so fast that almost no one in Congress could even read it!” Image
Back in the Oval Office, the mood darkened again as Trump made a quiet prediction.

“He hasn’t said bad about me personally,” he said.

“But I’m sure that’ll be next.”

There was no mistaking it now. This was a full-blown breakup.

“I’m very disappointed in Elon. I’ve helped Elon a lot,” Trump said, his voice tightening.

A reporter jumped in, asking the obvious: Had Musk brought any of these concerns to him in private before blasting them in public?

Trump didn’t dodge.

“No,” he said flatly. “He worked hard and he did a good job.”

Then came a flash of emotional insight—a glimpse into how Trump sees these departures.

“I think he misses the place,” he said. “

He got out there, and all of a sudden he wasn’t in this beautiful Oval Office.”

“And he was,” Trump added.

“And he’s got nice offices too. But there’s something about this one.”
As the dust settled, Trump zoomed out.

And what he said next felt like the conclusion to a pattern.

“He’s not the first,” he said.

“People leave my administration and they love us. And then at some point, they miss it so badly.”

“Some of them embrace it. And some of them actually become hostile. I don’t know what it is.”

Then, with a knowing smirk: “It’s sort of Trump Derangement Syndrome, I guess they call it.”

It wasn’t just Musk anymore.

Trump was describing a cycle—an emotional shift he believes happens to those who leave his orbit.

“They leave and they wake up in the morning—and the glamor is gone. The whole world is different. And they become hostile. I don’t know what it is.”

And then, he ended with: “Someday you’ll write a book about it and you’ll let us know.”
But after the Oval Office meeting was finished, the real fireworks started.

President Trump took to Truth social and launched an all-out assault on Musk:

“Elon was “wearing thin,” I asked him to leave, I took away his EV Mandate that forced everyone to buy Electric Cars that nobody else wanted (that he knew for months I was going to do!), and he just went CRAZY!”Image
Trump followed up with:

“The easiest way to save money in our Budget, Billions and Billions of Dollars, is to terminate Elon’s Governmental Subsidies and Contracts. I was always surprised that Biden didn’t do it!” Image
That’s when Elon Musk blew up the internet with this response:

“Time to drop the really big bomb: @realDonaldTrump is in the Epstein files. That’s the real reason they haven’t been made public.

Have a nice day, DJT!” Image
@realDonaldTrump Elon added, “Mark this post for the future. The truth will come out.” Image
SUMMARY

1.) Trump confirmed the breakup and used the past tense to describe their relationship.

• He said, “Elon and I had a great relationship. I don’t know if we will anymore,” signaling a clear end to their alliance.

2.) Trump accused Musk of being upset over losing billions in EV subsidies.

• He claimed Musk’s criticism of the Big Beautiful Bill was financially motivated—not ideological.

3.) Musk immediately fired back on X and called Trump’s claims false.

• He said he was never shown the bill, called Trump ungrateful, and defended the EV/solar incentives while blasting the “disgusting pork.”

4.) Trump revealed Musk tried to get Democrat Jared Isaacman nominated to lead NASA.

5.) Trump added he didn’t need Musk to win and would’ve taken Pennsylvania without him.

• In response, Musk claimed that without his backing, Trump would have lost the election, and Democrats would control Congress.

6.) Trump took off the gloves and posted on Truth Social:

• He said, “Elon was ‘wearing thin,’ I asked him to leave, I took away his EV Mandate that forced everyone to buy Electric Cars that nobody else wanted (that he knew for months I was going to do!), and he just went CRAZY!”

7.) That’s when Elon blew everything up.

• He responded, “Time to drop the really big bomb:
@realDonaldTrump is in the Epstein files. That’s the real reason they haven’t been made public. Have a nice day, DJT!”Image
@realDonaldTrump This story is still unfolding. I’m tracking every update in real time. Bookmark this post and come back to it later.

Also, share it with a friend who needs a quick catch-up.

There’s no reversing what’s been said. Stay tuned—this story is just beginning.

UPDATE #1: At 4:09 PM Eastern, Elon Musk writes:

“In light of the President’s statement about cancellation of my government contracts, @SpaceX will begin decommissioning its Dragon spacecraft immediately.”

This announcement followed President Trump’s earlier threat to terminate federal subsidies and contracts with Musk’s companies, including SpaceX and Tesla.Image
UPDATE #2: Elon quote-tweets a post linking Trump to Jeffrey Epstein with a raised eyebrow emoji.

The post claims Trump flew on Epstein’s plane at least 7 times, though there’s no proof he visited the island.

It also highlights a 2002 New York Magazine quote where Trump described Epstein as “a terrific guy” who “likes beautiful women… on the younger side.”

(See image for full quote)Image
UPDATE #3: Trump responds to Elon publicly attacking him, saying:

“I don’t mind Elon turning against me, but he should have done so months ago. This is one of the Greatest Bills ever presented to Congress. It’s a Record Cut in Expenses—$1.6 Trillion Dollars—and the Biggest Tax Cut ever given. If this Bill doesn’t pass, there will be a 68% Tax Increase, and things far worse than that. I didn’t create this mess—I’m just here to FIX IT. This puts our Country on a Path of Greatness. MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!”Image
@realDonaldTrump @SpaceX UPDATE #4: At 4:43 PM Eastern, Elon Musk drops another raised eyebrow emoji—this time on a post by @chesschick01 that reads:

“In 1992 Trump partied with Jeffrey Epstein. Just gonna leave this here:”

@realDonaldTrump @SpaceX @Chesschick01 UPDATE #5: Elon Musk replies “Yes” to a post by @stillgray that reads:

“President vs Elon. Who wins? My money’s on Elon.
Trump should be impeached and JD Vance should replace him.” Image
UPDATE #6: Nicole Shanahan agrees with Musk on the need for a “new political party” that “actually represents the 80% in the middle.”

She responded to Musk’s post, saying, “Yes. I’m so sick and tired of the bait and switch BS. America is not a piggy bank that you can keep smashing open and expect it to function.”Image
UPDATE #7: Jesse Watters says Elon Musk doesn’t actually know if Trump is in the Epstein files.

“No one knows what the list is. He didn’t know.”

Watters added the Trump–Musk feud is like a roommate squabble.

“These guys are like roommates. They were living in close quarters for, like, the first six months of the year. They’re just blowing off steam. The issue is donor maintenance. This guy’s the mega donor. So? So you don’t want him accusing you of being a pedophile, and you don’t want him calling for your impeachment.”

Still, Watters tried to strike a hopeful note.

“I hope he [Musk] doesn’t mean that [Trump’s impeachment], but maybe they can patch things up. I mean, Vance called Trump Hitler, and he’s on the ticket.”
UPDATE #8: Elon Musk appears to be relenting—at least partially.

He just reposted a message that urges compromise and reads:

“Elon’s stance is principled. Trump’s stance is practical. Tech needs Republicans for the present. Republicans need Tech for the future. Drop the tax cuts, cut some pork, get the bill through.”Image
@realDonaldTrump @SpaceX @Chesschick01 @stillgray Thanks for reading. Follow me for more updates on this story.

—> @VigilantFox

In other news, Chris Cuomo has a bombshell theory on why Trump is silent after the Epstein accusation.

If he’s right, this feud could explode into something much bigger.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with The Vigilant Fox 🦊

The Vigilant Fox 🦊 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @VigilantFox

May 2
A registered nurse with 30 years of experience treating chronic pain says she saw “TEN TIMES” the positive effects after mixing DMSO with castor oil to treat her peripheral neuropathy.

Castor oil on its own has anti-inflammatory effects, but adding the DMSO is where she says it “got interesting.”

That’s because DMSO “isn’t just a treatment, it’s a carrier,” Danielle Minetti explained.

“It can pull medications and nutrients right through the skin barrier deep into the body.”

That’s why when Danielle mixed DMSO with castor oil, she saw “ten times” the positive results.

Because DMSO acts as the delivery system, carrying the castor oil deeper into the areas where she needs relief most.

DMSO is a naturally occurring compound that is primarily derived as a byproduct of the wood pulp and paper industry, which makes it widely and affordably available.

But that also creates a problem...

Because if a treatment can’t be patented, Big Pharma can’t profit.

And that simple reality is where the DMSO story takes a dark turn.

So what happened to DMSO, and why is a substance that is so medically promising still relatively unknown to this day?

Let’s take a closer look. 🧵
The real story isn’t whether or not DMSO worked.

The real story is how a low-cost, widely available substance became an early case study in medical distrust.

Regulators suddenly restricted it. Doctors dismissed it.

But patients kept using it.

And once that happened, official medicine no longer controlled the story.Image
DMSO was discovered in 1866 by a Russian chemist, then largely forgotten.

In the 1950s, the paper industry needed new solvents. Dimethyl sulfide from wood pulping could be oxidized into DMSO.

That industrial turn set up one of the most unusual medical controversies of the 20th century!Image
Read 34 tweets
May 1
The FDA knew the COVID shots would kill and maim countless Americans.

They kept injecting anyway.

One government employee tried to sound the alarm about “49 examples” of deadly side effects that conventional safety analyses weren’t detecting.

She was shut down.

Her name was Dr. Ana Szarfman.

On March 1, 2021, less than three months after the rollout of the COVID-19 injections, Dr. Ana Szarfman, an employee at CDER and safety data mining developer, warned that the FDA’s existing system could hide vaccine safety signals due to a flaw called “masking.”

She proposed a newer method developed by statistician Dr. William DuMouchel that corrected for this issue and, when applied, detected “49 examples of extreme masking” that the standard system did not.

These “49 examples of extreme masking” include not “minor” but serious adverse events:

• Bell’s palsy

• Cardiac failure

• Acute left ventricular failure

• Agonal rhythm (severe end-of-life arrhythmia)

• Pulmonary infarction

• Cerebral artery occlusion

• Aortic stenosis

• Sudden cardiac death

• Hypertensive emergency

• Basal ganglia stroke

When Dr. Szarfman proposed a new method, she was told to “hold off on creating and sending data mining reports and analyses.”

Later, they “made it clear” that she “needs to focus on her assigned work” and “should not be discussing or providing internal analyses externally.”

As Dr. Szarfman puts it, her work became a “pest” for raising concerns about safety signal masking.

In September 2021, Dr. Peter Marks, the FDA's top vaccine official, decided that Dr. Szarfman’s COVID vaccine data-mining days were over.

He informed Dr. Patrizia Cavazzoni, the then director of CDER, that Dr. Szarfman “has been asked to cease and desist conducting her data analysis.”

Dr. Marks complained that Dr. Szarfman’s work had become “a major distraction” and that her efforts could “create erroneous conflicts that feed into anti-vaccination rhetoric.”

Dr. Szarfman went on to retire from the FDA in 2025 after more than 35 years of service.

She raised concerns about safety signal masking. The FDA essentially told her to shut up.

Because in their eyes, “49 examples of extreme masking” could create “erroneous conflicts” and fuel “vaccine hesitancy.”

Unfortunately, this is not a one-off instance. It’s part of a much deeper problem: the gap between what’s known internally and what’s allowed to reach the public. 🧵
For years, Americans were told the COVID vaccines were “safe and effective.”

Not mostly safe.

Not partially effective.

Not still being studied.

Safe. Effective. Full stop.

The message was absolute, repeated by government officials, doctors, media outlets, hospitals, employers, schools, and nearly every major institution in the country.

But internal records now suggest something very different was being discussed behind the scenes.

The story is no longer just about whether the COVID vaccines caused harm.

That debate has been raging for years.

The bigger question is what federal health agencies knew, when they knew it, and why the public was told a much different story than the one officials were discussing behind closed doors.

Senator Ron Johnson’s Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations obtained thousands of pages of subpoenaed HHS records.

The investigation and subpoenaed records suggest that the CDC and FDA were aware of serious safety signals involving myocarditis and strokes, yet continued pushing the vaccines while downplaying the risks.

That’s the part we can’t ignore.Image
Vaccine trust was built on a very simple promise.

The government said the products had been carefully tested, monitored, and transparently evaluated.

If a serious safety issue appeared, the public would be told.

But according to the records Johnson released, that isn’t how the COVID vaccine rollout worked. Not even close.Image
Read 31 tweets
Apr 30
Republicans are once again teaming up with Democrats to ram Digital ID through at the federal level.

The bill they’ve just introduced is, if you can believe it, worse than all the others before it.

HR 8250, deceptively named the Parents Decide Act, doesn’t just force everyone to link their identity to use apps on their phones, it mandates that they must do it to use ANY operating system. That means Apple, iOS, Windows, Google, Android, even Samsung—basically everything.

And once that’s in place, there’s nowhere to step outside of it.

But one brave group is refusing to go along.

GrapheneOS has made a statement saying: GrapheneOS will remain usable by anyone around the world without requiring personal information, identification, or an account.

@glennmeder from PrivacyAcademy.com/Pulse has been working to educate people on how to escape the digital control grid, including how to put GrapheneOS on your phone—for free. And they have a solution to Digital ID right now.

He joins us to discuss. 🧵
You’ve seen this pattern before.

When the same thing starts appearing everywhere at once, it’s usually not random.

A new push for Digital ID laws isn’t happening in just one place. With bills like the Parents Decide Act (HR 8250), it’s now moving directly into the systems we use every day. It’s happening in a very coordinated way across countries, across platforms, and now, at the operating system level.

This isn’t about regulating a few apps anymore. The focus has moved underneath them—to the operating system itself—the software that runs your phone and computer. @GlennMeder described it plainly, they’re trying to “lock it down on an operating system level,” because that’s the one layer you can’t avoid.

Apps can be swapped. Accounts can be deleted.

But if access to the operating system requires Digital ID, there’s nowhere left to step outside of it.

That’s the inflection point.

Glenn called it “the hill to die on,” not because of how it looks today, but because of what it enables once it’s in place. In his words, this isn’t just verification, it’s the foundation for removing privacy and building a system that monitors “everything we say.”

He warned it would “change instantly,” the kind of shift you only recognize after it’s already locked in.

Access to your phone. Your apps. Your accounts. All tied to one digital identity.

And once that becomes the standard, stepping outside of it stops being an option.
Your phone is a surveillance Trojan Horse.

Big Tech and Big Brother have colluded together to create a spyware monopoly.

Your phone tracks your location at all times, who you text, what you read, whether you’re skeptical person or not, how you spend your money and where your finances are stored... This list could go on forever.

Privacy Academy is hosting a FREE webinar on Thursday, May 7th at 7pm CT (8pm ET / 6pm MT / 5pm PT) where you can learn how to escape the cell phone surveillance state.

PrivacyAcademy.com/Pulse 👈

You’ll discover:

• How brands like Apple use privacy as a selling point (even though it’s not true).

• Why phone surveillance is much more insidious then you’d imagine.

• How phone surveillance has gotten MUCH worse since Edward Snowden revealed that the NSA is spying on us.

• How you can easily create a “De-Googled” privacy phone yourself!

• A live Q/A.

And much more!

👉 Register now: PrivacyAcademy.com/Pulse
Read 8 tweets
Apr 29
For four years, Ron Johnson has wondered how US health officials could ignore “overwhelming evidence of harm” from the COVID vaccine.

“Now I know,” he says.

The truth is, health officials didn’t “ignore” safety signals. They buried them instead.

And now we have the receipts:

The US Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations investigated what federal health officials knew and when they knew it—and dug out a timeline that would make any American furious.

This is not a fringe “conspiracy theory.” It was revealed by the government’s own investigation—and it’s a story they don’t want you to read.

(Post 1 of 7)
According to VAERS, the US’s vaccine adverse event reporting system, more adverse events and deaths have been reported following COVID vaccines than from all other vaccines combined over the system’s 30+ year history.

More dangerous than ivermectin. More dangerous than hydroxychloroquine (which turned out not to be so dangerous after all).

It was 55 times more deadly than the flu vaccine (0.46 deaths vs 25.5 deaths per million doses).

And even more dangerous than Remdesivir, which earned the nickname “Run Death Is Near” after it wreaked havoc on the kidneys and livers of tens of thousands of COVID patients in the hospital.

But still the question remains. How did US health officials miss a safety signal this big?

(Post 2 of 7)Image
Image
The U.S. Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations investigated what federal health officials knew and when they knew it.

It turns out they knew the safety signal was there. But they didn’t see it as a warning sign. They saw it as “pest.”

So much of a “pest” that they decided it was better to ignore the devastating safety signals and let people die than to deal with the data head-on because it could stoke “vaccine hesitancy.”

Keep reading to see the timeline that proves it.

(Post 3 of 7)Image
Read 9 tweets
Apr 28
Mikhaila Peterson says she went through “two years of pure hell” when she decided to stop taking SSRIs.

She didn’t need the drugs anymore. Her paleo/keto diet had put her depression into remission.

The first few days off the medication, she felt “on top of the world.”

But once week two hit, her life “turned upside down.”

For years, she blamed her “intolerable symptoms” on what she ate.

Little did she know… she was actually experiencing severe antidepressant withdrawal.

One of the symptoms Mikhaila experienced during her own SSRI withdrawal is the same condition her dad is suffering from right now: akathisia.

Akathisia is an extremely distressing neurological condition that makes you feel an unbearable inner restlessness and agitation.

This condition, she describes as “the worst thing I’ve ever seen anyone go through…”

When Mikhaila experienced it, she described it as being “overwhelmed with a sense of impending doom that was stronger than anything you can naturally feel.”

“It felt like I was falling into a volcano while being chased by a bear,” she said.

@MikhailaFuller’s gut-wrenching anti-depressant story is available to read in full here: prescribed-harm.com/stories/story-…

But as bad as her experience was, her dad is currently going through a form of akathisia that’s even worse. 🧵
Last week, Mikhaila shared an emotional update on her father, Jordan Peterson’s health.

He is dealing with a recurrence of akathisia stemming from an old psych med–induced neurological injury.

Mikhaila explained that this is a flare-up of a neurological injury caused by benzodiazepines, primarily clonazepam, that he took around 2019–2020. He has been completely off all psychiatric medications since January 2020.

The recent symptoms intensified last summer after he was diagnosed with Chronic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (CIRS) from mold exposure. About a month later, he developed pneumonia and sepsis, which further worsened the condition and triggered the akathisia.

“Dad’s been suffering from an old neurological injury that’s more recently been causing akathisia,” Mikhaila said.

“Akathisia is the worst thing I’ve ever seen anyone go through… it’s catastrophic.”

She stresses that this is a neurological injury from past psychiatric medication use, not from any current medications. Her dad has been psych med-free for six years.

But for the past 8–9 months, akathisia has taken over his life without warning or relief, making this an extremely difficult time for the entire family.

x.com/mikhailafuller…
The serotonin theory worked because it was simple.

It gave patients a clear explanation, doctors a straightforward framework, and the pharmaceutical system a powerful way to communicate value. Depression became something measurable, correctable, and treatable with a targeted intervention.

But simplicity can also obscure complexity.

Because the brain isn’t a system governed by a single chemical variable—it’s a dynamic network of interacting pathways, feedback loops, and adaptive responses that change over time.

And when you try to reduce that system to one variable, you risk misunderstanding what your intervention is actually doing.
Read 40 tweets
Apr 25
The food crisis isn’t coming. It’s already here.

70% of U.S. farmers can’t afford fertilizer for 2026, and the damage is set.

That means shortages haven’t hit yet… but they’re about to.

At the same time, food, fertilizer, and energy facilities are “spontaneously combusting” across the globe.

@ChrisMartenson has been tracking it closely, and the pattern is clear: this isn’t random.

So why isn’t anyone talking about it? 🧵
Food hasn’t been treated like the center of the story… but suddenly everything keeps pointing back to it.

Chris Martenson cuts through the noise in a way that’s hard to ignore. What looks like separate problems isn’t separate at all. It’s a “poly crisis”—multiple systems breaking at once. And it’s not just oil—it’s “liquefied natural gas,” fertilizer inputs, and supply chains all getting hit together.

You’ve heard about the energy disruptions. What hasn’t been made clear is how directly that flows into what ends up on your plate.

Martenson warns of a “gigantic blow to fertilizer production” and says we’re already past the point in the season where it can be fixed. That means yields drop. Not later, not hypothetically, but in the next cycle.

And that’s where the disconnect hits hardest.

You’re living through rising prices now, but what he’s describing explains why the system underneath those prices is starting to weaken. The part that grows the food isn’t being supported, it’s being strained.

That’s why it feels like something bigger is coming… even if no one says it outright.
Markets can freeze fast, and when they do, access to your own money can slow or disappear.

That’s why more investors are moving a portion of their savings into physical gold and silver.

DailyPulseGold.com 👈

Genesis Gold Group helps you roll over an IRA or 401k into a gold IRA with real, securely stored assets. They walk you through the process step by step and currently offer a free Financial Survival Report to help you decide if it fits your strategy.

Visit DailyPulseGold.com to learn more.
Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(