🚨🚨🚨Garcia's attorneys are not happy and they likely have a judge willing to play along. They now want discovery to learn what Trump Administration did to facilitate Garcia's return so allow court to hold Administration in contempt. 1/
2/ Garcia's attorney's seem to think they also have a "get out of jail free card" because SCOTUS ordered Trump to treat Garcia as if he hadn't been wrongfully removed & they only discovered evidence of his crime after that.
3/ And they think they can now challenge what happens to Garcia AFTER the criminal case. That is not ripe, however, because it depends on the outcome of that case.
4/ By law, Judge can still hold contempt proceedings but she'd be foolish to do so because most of the conversations and decision making would be protected by executive privilege or attorney-client privilege and she won't win that battle.
5/ But Judge Boasberg opted for the torch the executive approach so I doubt this judge will be any more reasons.
For those investigating or trying to under the "Prohibited Access" scandal, ICYMI below I highlight how SC John Durham defined "close hold" differently from "Prohibited Access," while IG Report indicated "close hold" to Crossfire Hurricane team meant "Prohibited Access." 1/
2/ This suggests to me that SC Durham was not told Crossfire Hurricane material had been coded Prohibited Access which limited ability of agents searching for it to see the existence of the information. NOR would you understand that from how the IG described "prohibited" or "close hold."
3/ I'd also add that from Brian Auten's deposition, it appears not everyone on Crossfire Hurricane team could view the Prohibited Access documents, raising even more questions.
🚨THREADETTE: Yesterday, I emailed the attorney of record, Niels Frenzen @MigrantsAtSea, a media inquiry concerning his client Susanna Dvortsin, who petitioned as Next of Friend of wife & children of terrorist who set Jews on fire & obtained an ex parte order barring their removal from Colorado. 1/
2/ I asked two basic questions but received no response. I should add a third: What good faith basis did he have that there was jurisdiction to file a habeas case in a district court in an immigration case?
3/ Here's the order & the point re jurisdiction. Lawyers have an obligation not to file knowingly frivolous claims and I am hard pressed to understand what possible good faith basis there was to file a habeas case in the district court.
3/ And here's the injunction court entered. He showed more restraint this time by asking DOJ how they will facilitate allowing aliens to seek habeas relief. Doesn't mean he hasn't overstepped (more on that), but at least he didn't say put them on an airplane now. storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.usco…
3/ Hey @FBIDirectorKash @dbongino and @EagleEdMartin here are some basic questions Americans need answers to ASAP to understand if the breadth and depth of the Prohibited Access scandal. thefederalist.com/2025/06/04/the…