Inner City Press Profile picture
Jun 10 24 tweets 6 min read Read on X
OK - now US v. Sean Combs Day 20, with "Jane" cross to begin (there will be more days), anonymity, Inner City Press is covering the trial matthewrussellleeicp.substack.com/p/extra-in-sea…
Docs patreon.com/posts/diddy-do… Week 4 book play.google.com/store/books/de… and will live tweet, thread below x.com/innercitypress…
[Before the jury in]
Judge Subramanian: I am ruling that the Government cannot recall Doctor Hughes for more testimony despite the Second Circuit's decision in US v. Larry Ray
[Book on Ray / Sarah Lawrence College sex cult case: amazon.com/gp/product/B09…
Judge Subramanian: On rule that Jane's notes reflecting alleged fraud to induce her into the hotel nights are admissible, despite the defense's arguments
[US reply about inducement: patreon.com/posts/diddy-do…
Combs' Alexandra Shapiro: Ms. Bongolan said clearly the balcony incident took place on September 26. We believed she perjured herself and that they knew. The government elicited that all injured were at the same time
Judge: Couldn't we just say that the Government screwed up, giving Ms. Westmoreland a rare Perry Mason moment in Federal court, that Defense back in its war zone could say, Great job?
Combs' Shapiro: She did do a great job. But they had Ms. Ventura say she saw it
Combs' Shapiro: This is only our second motion for a mistrial, I'm not sure why the Government says it's the third.
AUSA: Perjury is only one prong of a four part test.
Judge: This happened years ago, Ms. Bongolan was taken a lot of drugs, thank God she's sober
AUSA: Mr. Steel also moved for a mistrial
Judge: Well, he said he was going to move...
Combs' Shapiro: We object to Juror 6 being stricken, it's under seal but--
Judge: Everyone will be heard
[Where? Inner City Press filed: storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.usco…
Judge: Bring in Jane, then the jury...
All rise!
Judge: Ms. Geragos, you may proceed with cross examination.
Combs' Geragos: Jane, we met before - then you stopped meeting with the defense, that was your choice, right?
Jane: Correct
Combs' Geragos: You are testifying against Mr. Combs -
Jane: I'm testifying against him?
Geragos: How many times did they prep you on how to be cross examined at this trial?
Jane: Maybe 2 or 3 times.
Geragos: Did you bring in other prosecutors to cross you?
Yes
Combs' Geragos: And they granted you immunity at the grand jury, right?
Jane: Yes.
Geragos: You said you had regret about some of the choices you made with Mr. Combs?
Jane: If you have it, I'd love to look at it with you.
Combs' Geragos: You choice to participate in that lifestyle for many years - and you did not want to break up with him, right?
Jane: I did not want to.
Geragos: You had sex with other men for years
Jane: I resent the emotional control. I was hooked from the start
Jane: There was pressure to perform these acts my lover desired-
Combs' Geragos: You used the word partner again & again on direct, he was your partner?
Jane: Yes.
Geragos: You said you've having trouble answering for yourself why you had sex with these men?
Yes
Combs' Geragos: You are in therapy now?
Jane: Yes.
Geragos: You love Mr. Combs?
Jane: I love to spend time with my partner.
Geragos: You wanted to cuddle with him?
Jane: To give him foot rubs. You said-
AUSA Comey: Objection to counsel making herself a witness
Jane: I love to bathe him and we watch his favorite show
Combs' Geragos: Which show was that?
Jane: Dateline.
Geragos: Did you believe he was not doing this with anyone else?
Jane: During this time period.
Geragos: You'd look at his messages?
Jane: Yes
Jane: He was vulnerable in those hotel rooms and I share that with him. It was conflicting. I was breaking all my boundaries so that he would feel loved.
Combs Geragos: This brought you two together?
Jane: Yes. The lovemaking afterwards. That's why I enjoyed it
Combs' Geragos: You tried to be very sexy to him in those rooms?
Jane: I think I was sexy in those rooms.
Combs' Geragos: Because you are a beautiful woman. Did you choose the wardrobe?
Jane: Initially he did
Geragos: He liked baby oil, it turned him on?
Jane: Yes
Combs' Geragos: How old were you when you started your relationship with Mr. Combs?
Jane: 35.
Geragos: What are examples of your fantasy talk in those rooms?
Jane: He would have me and the entertainer be in a role play. Cheating role play, that Sean left town
Combs' Geragos: How high were your heels?
Jane: Six to seven inches. Usually I wear three to four inch heels.
Geragos: You wanted your child to be closer to your child's father - but did the father see the child?
Jane: What does that have to do with this?
Combs' Geragos: Who you fly weekly to Miami to see Mr. Combs?
Jane: Sometimes.
Geragos: We listed to 5 voice notes in which Mr. Combs sounded angry - but he'd sent you thousands, right?
Jane: Yes.
Geragos: Why did you feel he was larger that life?
A: Bright light
Jane: He introduced me to the Gospel. He had a favorite pastor, he'd watch on TV.
Combs' Geragos: Has that stayed with you?
Jane: Yes
Geragos: Do you watch that pastor today?
Objection
Sustained
Combs' Geragos: How much did he invest in your dress line?
A: $20,000
Combs' Geragos: Why did you join OnlyFans?
Jane: If I could get off it, I would. Financial need.
Geragos: Mr. Combs gave you money throughout the relationship - in three and a half years does $150,000 sound right?
Jane: I would assume.
Combs' Geragos: You told the government you gravitate toward providers?
Jane: Yes. As a woman I like that.
Geragos: You called the house, Our house.
Jane: Later I saw it as My house.
Combs' Geragos: You thought it was important that his staff not know about the entertainers, right?
AUSA: Objection!
Judge: Overruled
Jane: Right
Geragos: And that's a reason you go the house - that and a yard for your son?
Jane: Can you say, My child?
Inner City Press break for now
Trial Week 1 books.google.com/books?id=ZkdeE…
Trial Week 2 play.google.com/store/books/de…
Trial Week 3 play.google.com/store/books/de…
Trial Week 4 play.google.com/store/books/de…
today will be in the Week 5 book on Friday...

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Inner City Press

Inner City Press Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @innercitypress

Aug 6
OK- now in US v. Roman Storm, verdict watch Day 4 - now post-pedicure of juror, Qs of wallet(s) matthewrussellleeicp.substack.com/p/extra-analys… Unsealing bid storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.usco… Inner City Press 1st book on the case amazon.com/dp/B0FHXTCNCR [2d soon] & will live tweet, thread below Image
9:18 am
At defense table, Storm's lawyers Klein, Patton and Axel. Prosecutors' table is empty, like courtroom gallery. Updates in this thread as jury notes emerge: questions - and verdict? Book 2 90% ready to go. Watch this feed
9:35 am
All rise!
Judge Failla: The jury has sent us a note: Despite progress yesterday, and four days of deliberations, we are deadlocked on some -
What do the parties want me to answer?
AUSA Arad: We would like an Allen charge [telling the jury to try again
Read 37 tweets
Aug 5
OK- now in US v. Roman Storm, verdict watch Day 3 - to be cut short at 12:30pm by juror's pedicure matthewrussellleeicp.substack.com/p/extra-analys… Unsealing bid storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.usco… Inner City Press 1st book on the case amazon.com/dp/B0FHXTCNCR [2d soon] & will live tweet, thread below Image
As of 9:06 pm, Storm's lawyer Axel and another at defense counsel's table, courtroom gallery behind them empty
Inner City Press daily vlog coming, this thread will be updated as things happen - notes? verdict? Manicure?
Watch this feed
9:35 am
The prosecutors have come into the courtroom; also Storm's lawyers Patton and Klein.
AUSA Mosley reads out loud, "do the sanctions," then voice trails off.
It would appear there has been another note, but it has not been read into the record yet
Read 19 tweets
Aug 4
OK - now in US v. Roman Storm, verdict watch Day 2 - Storm w/ Klein & Patton, Rehn at other table matthewrussellleeicp.substack.com/p/extra-in-rom… Unsealing bid storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.usco… Inner City Press 1st book on the case amazon.com/dp/B0FHXTCNCR [2d soon] & will live tweet, thread below Image
As counsel on both side sit at their table waiting for the next jury note, here's letter that the defense put in about the transcripts jurors have request so far: "transcripts therefore should reflect exactly what the jury heard" - including sealed Dragonfly Q&A? Image
Still waiting on jury, only Axel and Storm at defense table; Judge Failla has ruled for US on transcript redactions except "regarding a portion of Mr. Werlau's testimony, the response "It wasn't me" should not be redacted because objection [was on] another issue" Image
Read 23 tweets
Jul 31
OK - now in US v. Roman Storm, verdict watch - Judge Failla drafting a response to juror note matthewrussellleeicp.substack.com/p/extra-in-rom… Unsealing bid storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.usco… Inner City Press 1st book on the case amazon.com/dp/B0FHXTCNCR [2d soon] & will live tweet, thread below Image
[Judge's courtroom deputy came out with a draft of Judge's proposed response to jury. Storm's lawyer Axel: Can I can a photo? Roman Storm reads over her shoulder. Unlike his lawyers (other than Axel) he is not in a suit jacket. Big day...
All rise!
Judge: The jury has asked, Did the Gov't have to submit proof of the charges to get indictment? I don't think this is something they should be asking about. I propose to answer, You are not to consider how the US got the indictment
Read 15 tweets
Jul 30
OK - now at Liner Freedman v. Blake Lively, case about Lively's subpoena on Bryan Freedman's firm which represents Justin Baldoni (and is trying to quash the subpoena). Inner City Press wrote the book  and will live tweet, thread belowamazon.com/dp/B0DWC8BH55
2:10 pm
All rise!
Judge: I'll hear on the motion to quash the subpoena.
For Liner Freedman, Ellyn S Garofalo: The Lively parties cite cases where opposition counsel was involved in resolved lawsuits or were involved in the matters are issue. Not the case here
Liner Freedman's Garofalo: Here, they allege an "untraceable" smear campaign. Whether the Liner firm has any relevant documents about communications with content creators is in dispute-
Judge: One might say if there's a dispute, there can be discovery, if relevant
Read 32 tweets
Jul 30
OK - now in US v. Roman Storm, closing arguments matthewrussellleeicp.substack.com/p/extra-in-rom… Unsealing bid in storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.usco… Inner City Press put out book on the case, Crypto Tornado amazon.com/dp/B0FHXTCNCR & will live tweet, thread below Image
[After yet another sidebar, Storm's lawyer Axel is talking to the prosecutors. At defense table, Klein tells Patton (who's doing the closing), No pressure. They laugh.
Still waiting for kick-off
9:35 am
Jury entering!
Judge: We begin with the Government.
AUSA Gianforti: You have had a front row seat to the world of international crime. Roman Storm knew what he was doing and he made millions of dollars. He found the real money was not in privacy but crime
Read 58 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(