arctotherium Profile picture
Jun 11 4 tweets 2 min read Read on X
The Mexican population of the US Southwest was 83,727 in 1850. This is because we decided against annexing populated areas on the grounds that Mexicans were not fit for self-govt. The modern Mexican pop in the US ~entirely descended from post-1900 immigration, >90% post-WWII. Image
3/4 of this tiny population (outnumbered by more than twice as many Indians, because Mexico did not actually control this territory, hence inviting Anglo settlers) was in New Mexico.
In 1900, Mexicans were 7% of the US Southwest. There was significant Mexican immigration 1900-1930 (followed by mass deportations under Hoover, Roosevelt, and Eisenhower). Even by 1950, it was only 10%. Image
Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with arctotherium

arctotherium Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @arctotherium42

Jun 12
Some excerpts from "India's War: WWII and the Making of Modern South Asia" by Srinath Raghavan, published in 2016. Image
First thing to understand about the Raj is that it was practically an empire of its own within the British one, and with a great of autonomy though not self-government. India was a signatory of the Treaty of Versailles. 30M Indians emigrated to other parts of the Empire. Image
Image
The Viceroy of India declared war without consulting any Indian body. The INC was generally torn between broad opposition to the Nazis and not wanting to cooperate with the Raj without further political concessions. Image
Image
Read 51 tweets
Jun 8
Thread from the 2015 version of "How Long Will South Africa Survive?" (RW Johnson, the author, wrote a book with the same title in 1977). "Once the great change of 1990-94 took place there was a general loss of interest in South Africa in the world at large." Image
South African GDP grew at 8.3% per year from 1945-65 (admittedly, with extremely high black population growth). Image
British entry to the EEC screwed South Africa by damaging SA's biggest export market and more importantly by forcing Portugal into the EEC, which indirectly destroyed the Portuguese Empire in Africa. Image
Read 67 tweets
Jun 8
Thread with excerpts from "The Communist Conquest of China," a 1952 book by a French intelligence officer. I read this because, after reading several books on the diplomatic/political side of things, I wanted a military history of the Chinese Civil War. Image
The map as of the end of WWII. Communists had very strong influence in northern China, not much in southern China or Manchuria. Image
The author identifies the two big CCP advantages as (1) lack of corruption and (2) unity, while the KMT was far more divided, with many disloyal generals. Image
Read 91 tweets
Jun 7
It was not an "oopsie." There was physically not enough food in Europe and not enough transport to get US food to Europe. This is the single most salient thing about 1945-48 Europe. The delusion that resources are limitless and only denied via malice isn't exclusive to Commies. Image
Image
Image
Image
Given sharply limited resources, the Allied occupation authorities did not starve Germany, but did put it behind the rest of Europe on the priority list, for obvious reasons.
Yarvin would make a brilliant Stalinist. He's got all the rhetorical flourishes down.
Read 5 tweets
May 25
Science requires a good deal of both honesty (most results will not be replicated) and intelligence, and so does not work well outside of the white world. This does not apply to manufacturing or engineering (easily checkable) and will be lost through Asianizing US STEM. Image
This is also why, even from a disembodied abstract "civilizationist" perspective, the common cope that Western civilization can be dragged into the mud but it will be OK because East Asia will keep the torch alive is wrong. Image
If the West is fully Brazilified/Lebanonized/Indianized, scientific progress will very nearly stop, though East Asia will still be able to maintain and moderately improve the engineering/manufacturing/physical side of the modern world. Excepting AI or biosingularity, of course. Image
Read 5 tweets
May 23
This terrible historical analogy gets brought up all the time. A couple of thousand world-class geniuses deliberately recruited (/enslaved for Paperclip) is not remotely comparable to "skilled immigration" in the US today, which is millions of mediocrities. Image
Image
Apollo and the Manhattan Project both happened while the United States was the most closed to immigration it had ever been in history. Image
Millions of "skilled immigrants" (scare quotes intended, since most just have degrees) from Asia have enormously negative political, genetic, and cultural impacts that a few thousand geniuses do not. Image
Image
Image
Image
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(