Three Democrat governors were dragged before Congress—and forced to defend the deadly consequences of their reckless sanctuary state agendas.
Innocent Americans are dead. Violent aliens were protected.
And Kathy Hochul had nowhere left to hide.
🧵 THREAD
It was a hearing meant to expose what many Americans have been living through for years: the real-world consequences of sanctuary state policies.
Three Democrat governors—Kathy Hochul of New York, Tim Walz of Minnesota, and JB Pritzker of Illinois—were called to testify before Congress.
What followed was a high-pressure reckoning that forced them to answer for their roles in a national crisis.
First up, House Oversight Chair James Comer wasted no time dismantling Walz’s excuses.
He flattened Walz on immigration in 60 seconds.
COMER: “Do you believe that the Biden-Harris administration secured the border? … Do you think they did a good job of that?”
WALZ dodged: “I think the border has been broken for a very long time through many administrations. It’s one of the reasons why Vice President Harris was advocating so strongly for the bipartisan bill that—”
But Comer cut straight through the spin.
COMER: “Did she mention her role as the border czar any when you all were out campaigning?”
WALZ: “Not that I can recall. Other than that, we talked about the need to pass the bipartisan border legislation that would have done many of the things that, as a governor, I know would have made our jobs easier.”
That’s when Comer dropped the hammer:
“But President Trump secured the border WITHOUT any legislation. I mean, that was kind of a myth that was in the media and a Democrat talking point that we needed legislation to secure the border. The border is secure.”
Walz tried to scoff: “Everything’s fixed?”
But Comer fired back: “That’s step one. Step two is to deport the criminal illegals. And that’s where we’re facing obstruction in your all’s states.”
Then came the most devastating exchange of the day.
Rep. Elise Stefanik confronted her own governor, Kathy Hochul, and held nothing back.
Hochul was squirming with no where to hide. She just had to take it.
“Governor Hochul, on your first day in office, you signed Executive Order One. Is that correct?”
Hochul confirmed.
Stefanik read from the order: “It is the policy of the state that state officers or employees shall not disclose information to federal immigration authorities for the purpose of federal civil immigration enforcement.”
Then she asked: “Do you know who Sakir Akkan is?”
“Refresh my recollection,” Hochul replied.
That’s when the room got quiet.
“He was an illegal migrant in New York,” Stefanik said.
“He found a 15-year-old girl, threatened her with a metal pole, forced her into the back of his car, and violently raped her in Albany.”
Hochul claimed not to know the case.
So Stefanik gave her another name: Sebastian Zepeta-Calil.
“This is an illegal migrant… He found a sleeping woman on the subway, lit her on fire, and burned her alive.”
Then came the knockout: “ICE issued an order to detain this violent criminal, but that was rejected by New York officials due to sanctuary state laws.”
Yikes. She was caught off guard. This was not the going to be the Democrat dog and pony show that she was used to.
Before we roll the next clip: if you’re not following me, you’re missing out on critical updates.
Hit the bell 🔔 to stay sharp and informed.
→ @VigilantFox
Now, back to the story you came for.
Governor Walz didn’t get much of a break before facing a second round of fire—this time from Florida Rep. Byron Donalds, who wasn’t about to let one of the day’s most outrageous remarks slide.
“You said earlier that the ICE agents under the orders of President Trump are a modern day Gestapo.”
Donalds continued:
“Do you realize how disgusting a phrase that is, considering the history of Nazi Germany?”
Walz tried to backtrack: “I said President Trump was using them as his modern-day Gestapo, not identifying who you are… taking people away…”
But Donalds wasn’t interested in parsing language.
“Is it the responsibility of ICE to actually deport illegal aliens in the United States?” he asked.
Walz agreed, but added, “The Constitution is not an inconvenience.”
Donalds wasn’t having it.
“Nobody said an inconvenience. You have a responsibility to deport illegal aliens and the president is going through that process right now.”
Then he let him have it with both barrels.
“It is SICK to refer to Americans who are ICE agents as Gestapo! Governor, you’re WRONG. You need to apologize to these agents.”
“They’re doing their jobs. They are Americans. They serve this country with honor and decency and respect.”
“DO NOT diminish their work simply because you tried to make a cheap point that you could tweet!”
Then came the most unhinged moment of the hearing—Rep. Rashida Tlaib absolutely melting down over Trump’s immigration policies.
She went from zero to screaming in seconds.
“THEY’RE ARRESTING DISHWASHERS!!!!”
Tlaib erupted over Trump’s immigration policies, accusing him of profiting from a broken system.
“The president of the United States benefited financially and personally by having a broken immigration system…”
“Why? Because that’s cheap labor. Let’s be honest.”
Then she shouted it again—louder this time:
“THEY’RE ARRESTING DISHWASHERS!!!!”
She ranted about donors, detention centers, and corporations.
Then came the full emotional spiral:
“FIX OUR ECONOMIC SYSTEM IN OUR COUNTRY!!!”
“People are starving! People can’t afford basic needs!”
“And you’re ripping our loved ones away from us because you don’t have the courage to fix our broken immigration system.”
Why are the Democrats always screaming? These are not serious people.
Towards the end of the hearing was one of the best moments.
@RepNancyMace closed the with an absolute blitz.
Her target: Tim Walz.
Her goal: expose the insanity behind his sanctuary stance and the Democrat Party in general.
It was rapid fire.
Mace: “Are you calling for ICE agents to be brought to a tribunal under the threat of death by comparing them to the Gestapo?”
Walz dodged: “Everyone is afforded due process.”
But Mace wasn’t playing games.
“What don’t you understand about yes or no?—Do you still want to abolish ICE?”
Walz: “Not that I recall, Congresswoman.”
Then came the jab at Kamala:
“How do you rate Kamala Harris’s job as Border Czar? I want a number between 1 and 10.”
Walz: “I wouldn’t have a way to measure that.”
Mace: “Thank God he’s president and JD Vance is vice president and not you.”
Then she dropped the closer:
“What is a woman? What is a woman is the question?”
Walz fumbled. It was a deer in the headlights moment.
Mace didn’t waste the momentum.
“I want you to say that a woman like me is an adult human female. That men can’t become women!”
“You’re a bigot. You’re a misogynist. You’re a sexist.”
“Mr. Chairman, I yield back.”
@RepNancyMace That’s the face of a man torn between honesty and party loyalty. 2028 was flashing through his mind.
@RepNancyMace Big thanks to @overton_news for helping out with one of the clips in this thread.
If you’re into truth-seeking news accounts like mine, they’re definitely worth a follow!
—> @overton_news
@RepNancyMace @overton_news Don’t forget to join my Substack for daily news stories sent directly to your inbox! vigilantfox.com
@RepNancyMace @overton_news Thanks for reading. For more in-depth stories the mainstream won’t touch, follow me on 𝕏.
—> @VigilantFox
Looking for something else to read?
Karoline Leavitt Drops Hammer on Reporters Defending Riots: “What a Stupid Question”
A new investigation has revealed that Jeffrey Epstein, alongside powerful people like Bill Gates, may have MASTERMINDED the COVID response before it hit.
Internal emails show that in 2017, Epstein was part of an email chain with Bill Gates discussing how “pandemics” could be treated as a PERMANENT funding bucket inside large donor-advised funds — positioned not as a one-time emergency, but as an ongoing area where capital could be organized and directed long term.
And oddly enough, that same year, a close associate in Epstein’s network told him she had been working on “pandemic-related insurance products” designed to automatically pay out when a pandemic is declared.
Coincidence? That’s only scratching the surface of what @sayerjigmi’s report uncovers:
As Kim Iversen put it, “The new investigation and the Epstein files show that this wasn’t about preparedness. This was about control.”
“‘We’ll have these plans in place so that at the opportune moment, we can trigger them and gain all of this power and control.’”
What you’re about to read lays out how this machine actually works, from lab funding and media hype to profit mechanisms that turn every new “threat” into a predictable payday.
Think this ended with COVID? The money didn’t disappear. It just moved to the next “outbreak.” 🧵
The information in this report comes from the work of medical researcher @MidwesternDoc.
For all the sources and eye-opening details, read the full 15,000+ word article below.
REPORT: The NIH is now funding research into ivermectin as a cancer treatment.
Yes, the same drug they mocked as “horse paste” is now being seriously studied—for its ability to kill cancer cells.
On February 10, the NIH confirmed it’s funding preclinical trials on ivermectin’s anti-cancer properties. Dr. Anthony Letai, head of the National Cancer Institute, said there’s “enough interest” and “enough reports” to take it seriously. Studies are already underway, with results expected in just a few months.
This follows 2024 and 2025 reviews by U.S. scientists showing signs that ivermectin can inhibit tumors. The NIH is now backing that research, pointing to ivermectin’s Nobel Prize-winning legacy and its decades of safe, FDA-approved use in humans.
But instead of welcoming a promising, low-cost treatment, the media doubled down. Outlets like MedPage Today rushed to dismiss the story as “right-wing hype,” ignoring the science and smearing anyone who dared to ask questions.
Why attack a drug that could save lives—unless the real threat is to their bottom line?
If ivermectin works, it won’t just save lives. It’ll shatter the system built to suppress it.
👇 rumble.com/v75mnac-republ…
#ad: The digital ID financial nightmare isn’t coming someday. It’s already here.
Once a single identity becomes the gateway to your money, your work, and your ability to participate in everyday life, compliance is no longer a choice.
That’s why Genesis Gold Group created the free Digital ID Resistance Wealth Guide.
It breaks down the real risks of digital ID and explains how physical gold and silver allow you to operate outside the system.
Digital dollars leave you exposed. Gold and silver can’t be frozen, tracked, or turned off.
Get your free Digital ID Resistance Wealth Guide right now at GoldandFreedom.com, before digital ID becomes the default and your options disappear.
DISCLOSURE: This ad was paid for by Genesis Gold Group. We may earn a small commission when you shop through our sponsors. Thank you for your support.
In other news, Republicans and Democrats are backing a bill that opens the door to mandatory Digital ID for every American.
It’s called the “Kids Off Social Media Act.” But it doesn’t just target kids. It targets you.
The bill bans anyone under 13 from having a social media account. Sounds reasonable—until you realize enforcement means scanning your face, checking your ID, or tracking your device… just to prove you’re old enough to speak online.
The bill doesn’t have to say “Digital ID.” The logic demands it. And once those systems are in place, they won’t stop at children. They’ll be used to control what you can say, see, and share.
Multiple states have already declared these laws unconstitutional. So why are Republicans still pushing them?
This is exactly how it started in the UK. Today, people are getting arrested for memes.
Watch @zeeemedia's report before they normalize this—and your freedom to speak anonymously disappears forever.
👇 rumble.com/v75mnac-republ…
Google why we no longer see crippled kids from polio. You’ll get one answer: vaccines.
But Dr. Suzanne Humphries says that’s not what the facts show—and when you dig into the history, the real story is jaw-dropping.
First off, polio never actually disappeared. “Polio is still here. Polio is still alive and well,” Humphries says.
What changed? The definition. Once the vaccine was introduced, the medical establishment redefined what counted as “polio.”
Humphries explains: “Polio is called different things today. Whereas back in the 1940s, 1950s, the criteria for diagnosing polio were completely different to the year that the vaccine was introduced. The playing field, the goalposts—everything was changed… they were able to show a complete cascading drop of paralytic polio simply because of the way they changed the definitions of what polio is and what could cause it.”
Suddenly, cases that would’ve been labeled polio were now called Guillain-Barré syndrome, coxsackievirus, echovirus—or simply chalked up to heavy metal poisoning. “They didn’t have virus, or they had coxsackievirus or echovirus, or they were lead poisoned or mercury poisoned, which was—the mercury and lead were the leading treatments of the day,” she said.
But it gets worse.
The rise of polio, she says, directly mirrored the use of toxic pesticides like DDT. “The tonnage of production of DDT absolutely mirrored the diagnosis for polio.” And even today, “the countries that still make DDT today is where we’re still seeing this paralytic polio situation happen.”
So what about the virus?
Polio virus, according to Humphries, is what’s known as a commensal—a normal virus that lives in most people without causing problems. In fact, “95 to 99% of all polio is asymptomatic.” She described a study of the Javante Indians where “98 to 99% of every person they tested… had evidence of immunity to all three strains of polio.”
When asked where all the paralyzed children were, she recalled: “They were like, ‘We don’t have any of that problem.’”
Humphries also points to a 1916 Rockefeller lab in Manhattan that, in her words, had “the specific stated goal… to try to create the most pathological, neuropathological strain of polio possible.” By injecting monkey brains and human spinal serum into monkeys, “there was a big problem with that, which was released into the public by accident. And the world experienced the worst polio epidemic on record. 25% mortality.”
Bottom line? According to Dr. Humphries, polio didn’t disappear because of vaccines. It disappeared behind a curtain of redefinitions, misdiagnoses, manmade disasters—and a whole lot of propaganda.
And if they went that far to deceive you about the polio vaccine, what else are they lying about? 🧵
Did you know the original smallpox vaccine caused serious injuries—and was often contaminated with pus, bacteria, and fungus?
We’ve been told it saved humanity from a deadly disease, but what if that’s a lie?
Dr. Suzanne Humphries explained to Joe Rogan what happened to children who received the vaccine. They developed large ulcers, high fevers, and widespread infections. With no antibiotics available, treatments were limited to mercury, arsenic, bloodletting, or isolation in dark rooms.
These severe reactions weren’t considered rare. In fact, they were referred to as “a good take.”
What made matters worse was how the vaccine was produced. According to Dr. Humphries, it was made by infecting animals and harvesting the resulting pus.
“They would take pus from other animals, scratch it into the belly of a cow, then take the pus off of the big pimples that would form,” she said. The material—called “pure lymph”—often came from cadavers, horses, or ulcerating cow udders, mixed with glycerin, and scratched into the surface of the skin.
Even decades later, contamination was an issue. “There was more bacteria and fungus in the smallpox vaccines than there was smallpox virus.” One widely used version, Dryvax, was eventually considered so problematic that health authorities ordered all remaining specimens destroyed around 2009.
Living conditions at the time were “a disaster.” Streets were filled with human and animal waste, there was no running water, and sanitation was nearly nonexistent. Poor hygiene and co-infections absolutely made smallpox far more deadly than it might have been otherwise.
Despite all this, the smallpox vaccine is still presented as a flawless triumph.
But for those who experienced the injuries firsthand, and for those who study its full history, the story isn’t so simple.
“This is the one vaccine that eliminated, eradicated a disease,” Dr. Humphries said sarcastically. “Can you believe that fairytale?”
We’ve all been taught that the smallpox vaccine was one of medicine’s greatest triumphs.
But when you read the actual clinical observations recorded by doctors who lived through its rollout, a far more unsettling picture emerges.
It’s not propaganda, and it’s not hindsight. It’s primary-source medicine.
There’s a reason doctors love pushing vaccines. The more they inject, the more money they make.
The foot traffic alone brings in big money, but there’s another perverse incentive, and once you hear it, it will make you angry.
RFK Jr. explains: “Pediatricians who vaccinate 80-85% of the kids in their office, get these giant bonuses... And that's why they throw you out of the office if you fight back…You'll lose them their bonuses.”
Sadly, these perverse financial incentives aren’t limited to vaccines but across many areas of medicine.
Dig a little deeper, and another disturbing pattern appears. Once you see it, you’re left gobsmacked by just how far the corruption runs beyond money. 🧵
The video below is haunting—not because the doctor in it is malicious, but because she genuinely believes she’s helping.
She’s an MD with a Master’s in Public Health, a Fellow of the American Academy of Pediatrics, and a former leader at Georgetown. Her language is warm. Her intentions seem pure.
Yet this interview perfectly captures how public health has lost its way.
After conquering most deadly contagious diseases, it turned toward chronic illness—and failed.
Instead of questioning why children are getting sicker, it doubled down on vaccinating more, earlier, and without dissent, often dismissing safety concerns as heresy.
Watch this video. Then ask yourself what matters more in modern medicine: children’s outcomes—or institutional certainty.
A lawsuit filed several years ago exposed something far more disturbing than a single act of medical misconduct.
It revealed how, during COVID, core medical ethics quietly collapsed—how consent became optional, coercion was reframed as care, and vulnerable people were treated as obstacles rather than patients.
This isn’t about ideology. It’s about what happens when fear, authority, and institutional pressure override conscience.
The real cause of heart disease has been buried for decades in favor of the lie about cholesterol.
40 million Americans take statins to lower their cholesterol, thinking it’s the best way to protect their hearts.
But what doctors never tell them is that statins interfere with the body’s natural repair system, weakening the very cells that rely on cholesterol to function.
In trying to prevent disease, they’re paradoxically fueling it.
This report exposes what really happens to the body when you take a statin every day.
For years, doctors have been taught that high cholesterol causes heart attacks. They’ve passed the warning along to their patients, and most of us have believed them.
But that idea came from one man: Ancel Keys.
Keys cherry-picked data to make fat and cholesterol look deadly while ignoring the real culprit: sugar.
John Yudkin tried to warn the world that sugar—not fat—was driving heart disease. But no one listened. He was ridiculed, silenced, and erased from history.