Putrino Lab Profile picture
Jun 13, 2025 25 tweets 5 min read Read on X
Wanted to put forward a thread about #PEM since there have been some new developments and also because I just need to get some of this out of my head and work through it. Folks with infection- and exposure-associated chronic illnesses (IACIs) like #LongCOVID, #MECFS, 1/
chronic #lyme and other tick- and vector-borne illnesses will often experience post-exertional malaise (PEM). In fact, it is often thought of as a cardinal hallmark of many of these diagnoses. To start, a simple working definition of PEM: it is a condition that emerges when 2/
somebody physically, mentally or emotionally exerts themselves beyond a certain point, causing a delayed worsening of symptoms that can last days, weeks or even months. NB: There is much more to PEM than this definition, and one of my favorite explainers is @LongCOVIDPhysio's 3/
work: :

PEM also has some other names that are used interchangeably. We're going to stick with PEM as it is the most commonly used, but people also use Post- Exertional Symptom Exacerbation (PESE) and Post-Exertional Neuroimmune Exhaustion (PENE) to 4/
discuss PEM. So let's dig into some physiology and history. PEM is a controversial topic: not because people with IACIs haven't been explaining PEM consistently and patiently to clinicians and researchers for decades, but because many clinicians and researchers have not had 5/
the scientific tools, the intellectual curiosity or (I'll say it) the general decency to look beyond our internalized biases and work the problem beyond prescribing anti-depressants and graded exercise. Decades of this, all the while with patients suffering, worsening under 6/
our care and being medically traumatized and gaslit to boot. A truly shameful history that continues to this day. Characterizations of PEM as "functional" (previously known as 'hysteria' before the rebrand) or psychological (unhelpful illness beliefs) have done more damage to 7/
more people with IACIs over the years than I care to imagine. So lets shed some light. Firstly, lets transparently name the fact that PEM is not a well-characterized condition. Again this is not due to patients not being consistent about what is happening or good-faith 8/
researchers not working admirably on the topic over the years, it is just largely misunderstood or conflated with other symptoms. For instance, PEM is NOT THE SAME as fatigue, exercise intolerance, or excessive sleepiness but when PEM is triggered, it can certainly cause these 9/
things. If you're a clinician reading this, and you have a patient in front of you describing symptoms that sound like PEM, you need to disambiguate PEM from other symptoms - **not all fatigue is PEM**. Use gold-standard patient reported instruments such as the DePaul Symptom 10/
Questionnaire PEM short form (DSQ-PEM) to screen for PEM, the FUNCAP27 to measure the impact of PEM on daily life, the Fatigue Severity Scale to measure the impact and presence of fatigue and the Epworth Sleepiness Scale to measure for presence and severity of sleepiness. We 11/
also have objective measures that should not be undertaken lightly, since I want to transparently name that some patients have reported worsened symptoms after undertaking them and also they are unsuitable for severe or very severe folks, but 2-day CPET and invasive CPET have 12/
both been used to objectively measure the presence and severity of PEM and potential mechanisms related to PEM, respectively. Since we brought up CPET, let's talk about the relationship between exercise and PEM. People try to make this complicated, but it isn't. Let's dive in 13/
In this thread, 'exercise' will be defined as: physical activity that is being performed with the intention of improving cardiovascular fitness or muscle strength. 'rehabilitation' will be defined as physical activity that is being performed with the intention of safely 14/
restoring function and reducing impairment. When PEM is present: prescription of exercise is inappropriate, prescription of rehabilitation *may* be appropriate. This is the point where a lot of folks who treat patients with postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS) 15/
will tell me that exercise helps their patients with PEM, and this is the point where I reiterate: not without rehabilitation first. POTS and other dysautonomias can frequently drive PEM, and according to the AAPMR and others, as many as 70% of people with IACIs may meet 16/
diagnostic criteria for POTS, so it is something we must screen for in every IACI patient. Here's what is accurate. If you:
- have POTS that causes PEM
- have PEM that is *solely driven* by autonomic nervous system dysfunction
- are rehabilitated carefully
you may be able to 17/
progress to exercise after successful rehabilitation. Unfortunately, many folks with IACIs have PEM that is driven not just by POTS alone, but by other biological factors. This means that rehab alone is not suitable for them and this also means that trying to push them into 18/
exercise before they are ready will invariably cause harm. In 2021 we started publishing and distributing educational guidelines about this because folks were identifying a lot of POTS in #LongCOVID patients and they were using existing POTS rehabilitation protocols: Levine 19/
protocol, Modified CHOP, Buffalo Protocol. All fine protocols that have helped POTS patients in the past (that our team has used frequently, btw!) who don't have some of the additional immunological, environmental and microbial drivers to their PEM that folks with IACIs do. 20/
Before we move on from POTS and PEM into some of the other drivers, the main difference we made to the traditional POTS rehabilitation paradigms was shifting to what we called "symptom-titrated physical activity" - so rather than following a traditional protocol that says: 21/
"maintain workload at x% of max heart rate for y minutes for z days/weeks and then progress to a/b/c", we personalize the intensity of the POTS rehabilitation protocol to symptoms occurring during rehabilitation and that may be triggered after the session. This simple shift 22/
has allowed us to safely rehabilitate many folks who would have failed to complete more traditional, rigid clinical protocols that are not symptom-titrated. But what about other drivers of PEM? What if you don't have POTS but still have PEM? What is going on there? Our most 23/
likely next culprit is your energy production infrastructure. I don't tend to just think of this as your mitochondria, but also think of this as the way your body distributes energy (blood vessels) and takes out the trash (lymphatic/glymphatic system), and this is where 24/
research into the physiology of PEM is starting to get really interesting. As I write this, I realize I'm now at 25 tweets which appears to be the limit. I'll leave you hanging for a moment, but hope this has explained some of the thinking around PEM and physical activity.🙏/end

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Putrino Lab

Putrino Lab Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @PutrinoLab

Jan 5
Great win early in the year to receive notification that our case series looking into Dr Pridgen’s Valacyclovir, Celecoxib and Paxlovid protocol seems to really help some folks with #LongCOVID. This paper is a start, not the be-all and end-all:


1/frontiersin.org/journals/immun…
It is a small, open-label case series, but there are some interesting things that are worth noting that give me hope that what we are seeing is real and will hold up in a larger trial
1) People got to choose between Val/Cel only (called ‘IMC-2’ in the paper) and Val/Cel + Pax
2/
The people who chose the latter reported greater benefit. 2) The subset of people who started with Val/Cel only but then chose to retry the protocol with Paxlovid added experienced more benefit with the three drugs together than they did with the two drugs
3) The follow-up
3/
Read 6 tweets
Jan 1
Wishing everyone a happy new year and we will be forging ahead in 2026 with renewed energy to find answers for people living with #LongCOVID, #MECFS, chronic #lyme and other infection-associated chronic conditions and illnesses. Speaking for myself, here are some questions I
1/
hope we can answer this year. Since it isn’t my first time on the internet let me explicitly state: there are other questions that we will be chasing equally aggressively, but these are the ones that I most want to answer to up-level my own understanding of the scientific and
2/
clinical problems that we face.
1) Why do some people test positive on certain persistence assays and negative on others? How can we use all of the commercially and scientifically available assays to create a unifying test for persistence that helps us to understand when and
3/
Read 10 tweets
Dec 29, 2025
Respectfully @jonstewart, you were wrong on the @weeklyshowpod to mock people who mask. ICYMI: there are tens of millions of Americans who have been disabled by #LongCOVID and must do everything in their power to prevent further infections that make them vulnerable to further
1/
worsening of their symptoms. There are countless millions more who are immunocompromised or love someone who is and must therefore mask to protect themselves from a virus that continues to spread without mitigation due to its novel ability amongst viruses to persist in the
2/
body and drive immune dysregulation, hypercoagulation, oncogenic processes, nervous system dysfunction, cognitive decline and other terrible long-term effects. Furthermore, after hearing all the things that this virus drives, there are those of us who are perfectly healthy who
3/
Read 9 tweets
Oct 20, 2025
This paper was published last week about #COVID, #LongCOVID and its parallels. First, despite the provocative title, I urge people to read the paper the whole way through, rather than making assumptions about what you presume the paper will conclude.
1/ajpmfocus.org/article/S2773-…
The purpose of the paper is to answer a direct question: Is use of the term "Airborne AIDS":
a) justifiable
b) overly provocative and wrong, or
c) is the truth somewhere in between

The paper (IMO) does a good job of exploring the available literature that we have to answer
2/
this question. I wanted to focus my comments on this thread on some of the discourse that has emerged around this paper. The first is that it is valuable to learn from analogy and metaphor. Whether it is an entirely novel illness or a variant of an existing illness, creating
3/
Read 21 tweets
Oct 18, 2025
Great to see this published and out there. It's a simple paper that shows us that folks with #LongCOVID, #MECFS and other complex chronic illnesses can benefit from using symptom tracking apps like @visible_health, designed FOR patients, BY patients.


1/frontiersin.org/journals/digit…
Let's break down some of the findings:
- The survey was sent to 2636 active users on the Visible platform, and 1301 responded. This translates to a roughly 50% response rate, which is very high for app-based consumer surveys (average usually sits around 5-10%), which means
2/
the chance of non-response bias (the risk that there is a silent majority not answering your questions in the way that the responders are) will be much lower than most consumer surveys that are conducted.
- The breakdown of respondents:
- 42% #MECFS
- 31% #LongCOVID
3/
Read 12 tweets
Sep 27, 2025
A few days out from #UNGA80, I wanted to reflect on the session we took part in and the media responses since. Mount Sinai was one of the 150 organizations that signed the global pledge to advocate for healthy indoor air. The event itself featured four panels of speakers who
1/
came from all walks of life, all ages, all levels of experience, expert academics and people with boots on the ground experience in helping communities and all came to the same conclusion: access to clean air is not just a priority, it is a fundamental human right. Violet also
2/
took the stage. Why was she there? As @MaxPemberton was so willing note: "...just 19. She's no doctor or scientist..."
No, she isn't but she is a member of a generation that has been fundamentally failed by the "adults", "doctors" and "scientists" that Pemberton seems to
3/
Read 21 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(