Jake Scott, MD Profile picture
Jun 13 12 tweets 3 min read Read on X
It’s understandable to have questions about aluminum in vaccines. Here are the key facts:
🧵
1⃣ Why is aluminum there?

A tiny amount of aluminum salt acts as an adjuvant - a helper that tells your immune system, “Pay attention!” This lets the vaccine work better with less antigen (the piece of virus or bacteria that trains immunity). In this sense, it's dose-sparing: less antigen per shot.
2️⃣ Nearly a century of safe use

Aluminum adjuvants have been part of routine vaccines since 1926. After billions of doses and decades of monitoring, regulators worldwide (CDC, WHO, EMA, etc.) still consider them safe.
3️⃣ How much aluminum are we talking about?

A typical shot contains ~0.2–0.5 mg of aluminum (never more than 0.85 mg).
An adult eats or drinks ~5–10 mg of aluminum every day from food and water, most of which passes straight through the gut.
4️⃣ “But injection isn’t swallowing!”

Correct. When you swallow aluminum, only about 0.1–1% enters your bloodstream; the rest exits in stool.
Injected aluminum starts in the body, but the dose is thousands of times smaller than your yearly dietary intake.
5️⃣ Same exit ramp
Once aluminum reaches the blood (from diet or a shot), it binds to proteins like transferrin, circulates briefly, and the kidneys filter it out over days to weeks. People with normal kidney function clear it efficiently.
6️⃣ Depot & signal boost

Aluminum forms a tiny “depot” at the injection site: the aluminum particles adsorb (attach to) the vaccine antigens and hold them at the injection site, releasing them slowly.
This prolonged presence gives the immune system more time to recognize the antigen and respond, which helps stimulate a stronger immunity. Result: stronger antibodies, well-trained helper T-cells, and often fewer doses needed for protection.
7️⃣ Expected side effect

Because it revs up immunity, aluminum can cause temporary redness or soreness where you got the shot (a sign the immune system is working - "no pain, no gain"). That fades quickly and is usually the only noticeable effect.
8️⃣ Placebo design in trials

To keep studies truly blinded, some trials use an aluminum “placebo.” If the real vaccine causes a sore arm, the control shot needs to feel similar; otherwise participants could guess their group and bias the results.
9️⃣ Safety data in special groups

Extensive studies - including in infants, pregnant people, and older adults - show no link between vaccine-level aluminum and chronic illness, neurological disease, or developmental problems.

The only known risk group is people with severe kidney failure (they already limit dietary aluminum).

Why kidneys matter
Healthy kidneys filter the small amount of aluminum that reaches the bloodstream - half of it is gone in ~24 h and most is gone within a couple of weeks. When kidney function is severely impaired (e.g., patients on long-term dialysis), this clearance slows way down. That’s why very high aluminum exposures - like years of aluminum-contaminated dialysis fluid or mega-doses of antacids - caused bone and brain problems before dialysis water was purified.

Historical context
The classic “aluminum toxicity” cases were dialysis patients who got hundreds of milligrams of aluminum every week from IV fluids, or people taking large antacid tablets (~200 mg Al per tablet) daily for months. Both the huge dose and poor kidney clearance had to be present to cause harm.

Vaccines ≠ high-dose exposures
A full childhood vaccine schedule delivers about 4 mg of aluminum total in the first 6 months of life - spread over many shots. A single adult vaccine dose tops out at ≤ 0.85 mg. Even if someone’s kidneys clear aluminum slowly, these tiny, infrequent doses are orders of magnitude below the amounts that ever caused trouble. Modeling studies show blood-aluminum doesn’t meaningfully rise after vaccination, even in infants.

No contraindication - vaccines are still recommended
Because infection risk is high in chronic kidney disease, CDC actually prioritizes certain aluminum-adjuvanted vaccines for dialysis patients (e.g., high-dose hepatitis B). Real-world surveillance has not shown vaccine-related aluminum problems in this group. The benefit of preventing serious infections outweighs the theoretical risk from a micro-dose of aluminum.

Take-home

Aluminum toxicity requires large, chronic exposure plus severely reduced kidney function.

The micro-grams in vaccines don’t reach toxic thresholds - even if kidneys are impaired.

People on dialysis already watch high-aluminum meds and IV fluids; vaccines aren’t in that category.

Bottom line: even for patients with severe kidney failure, the aluminum in vaccines is too small and too infrequent to cause harm, while the protection vaccines give is crucial.
🔟 Bottom line

Tiny dose

Long safety record

Cleared by the same pathways that handle dietary aluminum

Makes vaccines work better, often with less vaccine needed

Questions welcome - science thrives on curiosity and good evidence. Thanks everyone for caring about all this! It's complicated stuff!
CC: @FoxNews @SpecialReport @ABC @YouriBenadjaoud @NBCNews @andersoncooper @jaketapper @ashishkjha @nytimes @ReporterGoodman @CNN @CNBC

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Jake Scott, MD

Jake Scott, MD Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @jakescottMD

Jun 13
RFK Jr. went on national TV and spouted egregious, dangerous falsehoods about vaccines. As a parent and infectious diseases doctor, I couldn't stay silent. @FoxNews might not fact-check him, but I will. I've reviewed the trials. I've catalogued them. I have receipts. 🧵
❌CLAIM 1: "97% of people on [ACIP] had conflicts of interest"

✅REALITY: Only 41% received any industry payments, mostly under $55k over 6 years
This is flatly false. Reuters reviewed all 17 voting members of the outgoing ACIP panel:
6 received $80 or less TOTAL over 6 years

7 received between $4k-$55k total over 6 years (mostly travel, meals, occasional consulting)
4 had no reported industry payments at all
That's 7/17 = 41%. Not 97%.

CDC rules require recusal for any vote tied to a relevant conflict. Meeting minutes show ONE recusal in the reviewed period.
ACIP members are unpaid volunteer experts. They don't get royalties, don't keep pharma stock, don't get flown to golf courses.
A published review found <5% of ACIP votes over the past decade involved a declared conflict.
reuters.com/business/healt…
❌ CLAIM 2: "We've gone from 11 vaccines in 1986 to 69-92 vaccines today"
✅ REALITY: About 48-51 shots today (including annual flu). The "92" comes from creative accounting.
The 1986 schedule:
DTP x5

OPV (oral polio) x4
MMR x1 = 10 injections + 4 oral doses
Today's routine schedule (2025), using lowest-dose brands, excluding Covid:
48-51 total injections

2-3 oral doses (rotavirus)

Where does "92" come from? Creative accounting - counting each flu shot separately over 18 years, adding optional vaccines, even counting combination shots multiple times. It's dishonest math.
"Mandatory"? Mandates are state-determined, not ACIP-mandated:

Covid required in ZERO states
HPV required in 3 states (DC, RI, VA)

Flu required in 2 states (CT, MA)
Most states require ~30-32 total shots
cdc.gov/vaccines/hcp/i…
Read 12 tweets
May 7
I’ve been getting a lot of questions about what it really means for a vaccine trial to be “placebo-controlled” - and how that differs from other control groups.

It’s a great question, and clarity here really matters.

Let’s break it down. 🧵

CC @EricTopol @angie_rasmussen @PeterHotez @trvrbImage
3 control types:

1. Placebo (saline/inert)

2. Active comparator (e.g., alum-only or licensed vax)

3. No-intervention (observed only)

2/
Placebo

Used when no licensed vax exists & ethics allow.

Peru cholera ’99: 85 % VE vs saline

3/
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10569747/
Read 5 tweets
Dec 1, 2023
“White lung syndrome” is a made-up term. Any pneumonia appears as a white opacity on an x-ray or CT, which is partly how the diagnosis of pneumonia is made. But it’s not specific to pneumonia, and it’s certainly not specific to Mycoplasma pneumoniae, which is not “mysterious”. 🧵
Mycoplasma pneumoniae is a bacterium, not a virus. (It’s one of the smallest free-living organisms.) It can cause pneumonia in kids age 5-17 and can be severe but is very uncommonly fatal. Radiographic findings vary but can look worse than anticipated from the physical signs. 2/3
Because Mycoplasma pneumoniae lacks a cell wall, it’s insensitive to penicillin or other beta-lactam antibiotics. It’s generally susceptible to fluoroquinolones and tetracyclines (doxycycline), but macrolide (azithromycin)-resistant strains have become increasingly common. 3/3
Read 7 tweets
Sep 27, 2023
Urinalyses (UAs) are widely used, yet are often ordered inappropriately, and the results are not as meaningful as one might think.

Pyuria (WBCs in urine) is nonspecific (although the absence of pyuria should call into question a diagnosis of UTI).
🧵
1/5
Leukocyte esterase is a screening test for pyuria (see above).

Hematuria can occur in patients with UTIs, but is also not specific, and generally doesn’t change management. (If there are clinical signs of obstructive pyelo in a patient with sepsis, check a noncontrast CT.)

2/5
White cell casts in a patient with other signs/symptoms of infection can indicate an upper tract infection, but they’re rarely present, and their absence doesn’t rule it out (and other clinical signs are much more useful and important).

3/5
Read 5 tweets
Jan 23, 2023
I disagree with this statement:

“…protection against severe disease may only last about four to six months.”

I think that the vast majority of people can expect protection against severe COVID-19 to last much longer than 6 months. 🧵
1/

npr.org/sections/healt…
As I’ve previously mentioned, accurately determining the duration of vaccine-induced immune protection is challenging, for many reasons:

1. Many who were vaccinated earlier were at highest risk, which could confound results.

2/
2. Older people generally develop some degree of immunosenescence - an age-dependent “progressive deterioration of innate and adaptive immune responses,” as discussed in this great review article by Drs. Goronzy & Weyand

3/

nature.com/articles/ni.25…
Read 9 tweets
Jan 8, 2023
Antibodies continue to get all the attention.

This @washingtonpost piece gives them too much credit, and leaves out the critical role of cellular immunity.

1/

washingtonpost.com/health/2023/01…
The main reason why most people need not worry about severe illness caused by XBB.1.5 or any other Omicron subvariant is because non-neutralizing antibodies, memory B cells, & CD4+/CD8+ T cells provide longlasting protection against all variants to date.

onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/im…
Great review above - “Correlates of Protection against SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19”, by David Goldblatt, Gali’s Alter, @profshanecrotty, & Stanley Plotkin.

“Swiss cheese” model of immunity graphic inspired by @MackayIM.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(