Share this page!

Enter URL or ID to Unroll

You can paste full URL like: https://x.com/threadreaderapp/status/1644127596119195649
or just the ID like: 1644127596119195649

How to get URL link on X (Twitter) App

  1. On the Twitter thread, click on or icon on the bottom
  2. Click again on or Share Via icon
  3. Click on Copy Link to Tweet
  4. Paste it above and click "Unroll Thread"!
  5. More info at Twitter Help
Christophe Rigon / Soto² 🪸 - Scybernethician Profile picture
@ki_cog
Jun 14 • 5 tweets • 2 min read • Read on X
[ Meta-Duality: no Ontology without Epistemology, no Epistemology without Ontology ]

My enacted "middle-way²"/scybernethics bidimenTional (quasi-bidimensional) view: there is no "form" ontology without epistemology.

Being and knowing are two faces of the same coin

1/ Image
but also needs to be clearly collectively distinguished, as the synthesis is for me personal and embodied, complex, ineffable, in no way normative.

2/
Ontology (recursivity, being, awareness)
<-co-determination->
Epistemology (interaction, knowing, con-science)

= epistemo-ontology or onto-epistemology.

Both² are necessary for a viable future. This is "crucial" (cf. crux).

3/
Meta-Dualism: scybernethics.org/overcoming-dua…

For a distinction² between false (illusion) vs erroneous (appearance taken for reality) in my thread, see:

x.com/search?q=from%…
@threadreaderapp unroll

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
　

Keep Current with Christophe Rigon / Soto² 🪸 - Scybernethician

Christophe Rigon / Soto² 🪸 - Scybernethician Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ki_cog

Christophe Rigon / Soto² 🪸 - Scybernethician Profile picture
Jun 14
[ Key Distinction: Appearance//Illusion ]

"To mistake appearance for illusion is to undercut the very grounds on which intelligibility rests."

A very important distinction² that binary "realist" & techno-transjective polarizations (true/false, 1/0) tends to confuse by

1/
flattening (mono-dimensionality) BOTH the environment (objectivist 3PP polarity)/Umwelt (subjectivist 1PP) AND the action/sensation-perception, which are key co-determining distinctions for meaning-making & intelligibility in a complex world.

2/ Image
The actual convergence between naive (non-phenomenological) realism & transjective (confusion object/subject) technologies is, in its excess, a collective poison leading socially to a loss of embodied know-how (proletarianization, cognitive today with digital psycho-techs)

3/
Read 5 tweets
Christophe Rigon / Soto² 🪸 - Scybernethician Profile picture
Jan 11
[ What is Science: 1. Origin: Collectively Enacting a First-order Perspective ]

Here's an initial objectivist first-order* description of the nature & constitution of modern scientific inquiry from an enactive point of view:

* 3P-only description without the observer-actor

1/3 Image
It could be complemented, to have a better grasping about the form/process complex dialectics, with the famous Varela"s paper "Not one, not two": the "it" (form) and the process leading to "it".

A new discussion on the subject (not seen yet):


2/3
I will follow this initial intro with a more scybernethic and second-order style of representation that will help to give more meaning, I hope, to second-order logic², to the importance of the initial suspension of judgment and more generally to second-order rationality².

3/3
Read 4 tweets
Christophe Rigon / Soto² 🪸 - Scybernethician Profile picture
Jan 7
[ Logic²: from Morin's Complex Thinking to Ancient Catuṣkoṭi Logic ] 🧵🪡

I'm happy because yesterday I have finally academically sourced (G. Priest) my second order logic, or exploration heuristic and hermeneutic logic, the other complementary, Image
implicit and hidden face of classical normative and propositional logic (Aristotle, Russell, Frege, etc). Image
Both define what I call a bidimenTional formal space: one linear classical Cartesian representational dimension coupled orthogonally with a recursive self-referencial imaginary/complex (math. sense), "fractal" one. Image
Read 15 tweets
Christophe Rigon / Soto² 🪸 - Scybernethician Profile picture
Jan 6
[ "Metaphysics": Formal Worldview vs Processual Method ] 🧵

I don't like the old term "metaphysics" because of its lack of analytical discrimination: do we speak politely about the subjective preconceptions of a view (so critically about its hidden & implicit political agenda), Image
or about its transcendental (Kant) a priori conditions of possibility?

Moreover, even if physics has historical precedence as a prototype of the objective study of the world-out-there, i.e. of a materialist so-called "realist" formal view,
science is today much broader, even if restricted to the sciences of nature (not so "natural"...), and physics much more fluffy.
Read 10 tweets
Christophe Rigon / Soto² 🪸 - Scybernethician Profile picture
Jan 5
[ Scybernethics & Neurophenomenology ] 🧵🪡

Both shares the same influences (enaction) and objectives: to exceed the mind-mind problem (extension of the traditional mind-body problem, Jackendoff), i.e. relating computational & phenomenological aspects of the mind. Image
While neurophenomenology is polarized on the traditional first order of science, coupling the rational dimension with experimental empiricism, scybernethics is more philosophically polarized and aimed at the active transformation of the observer-actor himself.
In short, neurophenomenology is more normative while scybernethics is more heuristic and hermeneutical. Two faces of enactive science.
Read 12 tweets
Christophe Rigon / Soto² 🪸 - Scybernethician Profile picture
Jan 2
[ Hacking the Machine (in Ourself) ] 🧵💉

People should stop blaming or adulating robotic machines and understand that they are just an objectified mirror of *our own automatism and conventions*. Image
It is important to see that this reflection can be used in a cognitive reverse engineering perspective (cognitive hacking) to better understand our own habitual and therefore uncontested *unconscious* habits of the body (concrete mechanics) and mind (abstract computations). Image
This is why it is essential to understand in depth, in a practical (know-how) and historical (evolutionary epistemology) way, what it means to "code" and design "functions".
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

Send Email!

:(