Cognition/Modeling, 2d cybernetics & enaction, techno-hermeneutics, epistemic & creative cognition, self-design & lived bio-logic. Meaning & sense making.
1 subscribed
1 subscribed
1 subscribed
which are nevertheless crucial for understanding cognition and the mind, that is to say, consciousness and our own perceptions of ourselves.
The keystone of cognition is precisely its capacity to express meaning and regularities; information must appear not as an intrinsic order but as an emergent order of cognitive activities themselves.
Where behaviorist science is condemned to accumulate occurrences to infinity in order to generalize them, a phenomenologist can also simply study a psychological/cognitive phenomenon *directly* through its voluntary repression.
thereby becoming more dependent on the social productive logics that in return mechanize us, in an endless, systemic and deadly positive feedback loop.
1. Regulatory and homeostatic: 
There is not distinction possible (the most elementary analytical form of knowledge production), formally/spacially, without the implicit of a common background, which disappear in the process of *transduction* (trans-formation of the real process into a seizable cognitive form).
Ref: 
1. Hui's Cosmotechnics: This concept challenges the idea of a universal technology, arguing that different cultures develop unique technological approaches rooted in their cosmologies and ethics.
second-order logic, explaining how this Dia-Logical Dialectics is an extension of classical conceptions, not surprisingly in resonance with actual Western (Enactive "Linguistic bodies") and Eastern (Kyoto School) views, even if I didn't knew them at that time. 
The first, classical, consists in perceiving something that is not there. This is our usual way of understanding an “illusion”. A classic example is the mirage in the desert: a thirsty man sees a lake in the distance while there is only an optical illusion generated by
but with highly productive capitalist consequences. This bifurcation must be understood as in a quasi-bidimensional/quasi-orthogonal relationship relative to that of nature (cf. Whitehead about this last one).
(dualities, dichotomies, dialectical opposites) such as parts/whole, inside/outside, explanation/understanding, localized/distributed, intentionality/agency, episteme/techne, form/process... leading to my finally enacted prototypical concept of "quasi-bidimensionality".
