At the G7 in Canada, President Trump made sure every second counted—dropping major revelations on trade, foreign policy, and the future of mass deportations.
But the biggest truth bomb?
He called out Obama and Trudeau directly—for pushing Russia away and triggering a global realignment.
🧵 THREAD
Before the G7 working sessions officially began in Alberta, President Trump and Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney stepped in front of reporters.
It was supposed to be a brief press stop.
Instead, it turned into a revealing exchange that touched on everything from trade and war to the global balance of power—and it didn’t take long for Trump to take control of the spotlight.
First up, the Canadian trade deal.
Asked about the ongoing trade negotiations with Canada, Trump pointed to a basic difference in strategy between himself and Carney.
The issue wasn’t hostility, he explained, but philosophy.
“It’s not so much holding up. I think we have different concepts,” Trump said.
“I have a tariff concept, Mark has different concept, which is something that some people like.”
He made it clear he prefers the direct approach.
“I’ve always been a tariff person. It’s simple, it’s easy, it’s precise and it just goes very quickly.”
Carney, he noted, favors a more intricate model—“also very good,” Trump added—but the goal is to examine both frameworks and find a compromise.
“We’re going to look at both and we’re going to come out with something hopefully.”
When a reporter asked whether a deal could be finalized in a matter of days or weeks, Trump offered a measured yes.
“It’s achievable but both parties have to agree.”
Then the conversation took an unexpected turn.
Trump went off script and exposed the truth.
Without any prompting, Trump pivoted from trade and toward one of the most consequential foreign policy decisions in recent memory: Russia’s expulsion from the G8.
Standing beside Canada’s leader—whose own predecessor played a role in that decision—Trump suggested that the West’s attempt to isolate Moscow may have had catastrophic consequences.
“The G7 used to be the G8,” he said.
He called out Obama and Trudeau directly.
“Barack Obama and a person named Trudeau—didn’t want to have Russia in and I would say that was a mistake because I think you wouldn’t have a war right now if you had Russia in.”
Trump wasn’t just critiquing a past decision—he was linking it directly to the war in Ukraine.
According to him, the moment Russia was pushed out of the room, the chance to avoid future conflict was lost.
“They threw Russia out, which I claimed was a very big mistake even though I wasn’t in politics then, I was loud about it.”
For Trump, diplomacy only works if the major players are at the table—even adversaries.
“It was a mistake in that you spent so much time talking about Russia, but he’s no longer at the table. It makes life more complicated. You wouldn’t have had the war.”
And then, turning the focus to himself, he drew a line between two timelines—one with him as president, and one without.
“You wouldn’t have a war right now if Trump were president four years ago,” he said.
“But it didn’t work out that way.”
Before we roll the next clip: if you’re not following me, you’re missing out on critical updates.
Hit the bell 🔔 to stay sharp and informed.
→ @VigilantFox
Now, back to the story you came for.
Before reporters could even digest that, Trump dropped another geopolitical bombshell—this time about Iran.
Asked whether there had been any signs that Iran wanted to back down from confrontation, Trump didn’t hedge.
“Yeah,” he said. “They’d like to talk.”
That revelation, stated so plainly, marked a significant shift.
For the first time publicly, Trump confirmed that Iran had signaled interest in de-escalating tensions.
But the president made clear that Tehran’s window of opportunity had already narrowed.
“They should have done that before,” he said, recalling a missed 60-day negotiation window.
“On the 61st day I said we don’t have a deal.”
Still, he acknowledged the stakes remain high—for both sides.
“They have to make a deal and it’s painful for both parties but I would say Iran is not winning this war.”
Then came a warning that carried the weight of real urgency.
“They should talk and they should talk IMMEDIATELY before it’s too late.”
It was a signal—a challenge—and perhaps a final opening before escalation becomes the only language left on the table.
The conversation eventually turned back home.
He openly declared war on blue sanctuary cities protecting illegal criminals.
Pressed about his latest directive to ICE, Trump confirmed he’s instructing agents to focus on sanctuary cities—Democrat-run jurisdictions he accuses of shielding violent criminals for political gain.
Trump defended the move, saying the worst offenders are concentrated in major blue cities:
“I look at New York, I look at Chicago. I mean you got a really bad governor in Chicago and a bad mayor, but the governor is probably the worst in the country, Pritzker.”
He just kept going...
“I look at how that city has been overrun by criminals and New York and L.A., look at L.A. Those people weren’t from L.A. They weren’t from California most of those people. Many of those people.”
Trump said the surge in crime, particularly in urban areas, isn’t accidental—it’s the direct result of border bloodbath caused by Biden administration.
“Biden allowed 21 million people to come into our country. Of that, vast numbers of those people were murderers, killers, people from gangs, people from jails. They emptied their jails into the U.S. Most of those people are in the cities.”
“All blue cities. All Democrat-run cities.”
Trump ended on a concrete vow.
He will never allow the Democrats to run their illegal alien election playbook.
“They think they’re going to use them to vote. It’s not going to happen.”
Just as the press corps seemed ready for more, Prime Minister Carney stepped in.
The momentum had unmistakably swung toward Trump—and Carney knew it.
With a measured smile and raised hands, he brought the impromptu briefing to a close.
“If you don’t mind—just—I’m going to exercise my role, if you will, as the G7 Chair,” he said.
“Since we have a few more minutes with the president and his team. And then we actually have to start the meeting to address these big issues, so…”
Trump didn’t push back. He didn’t need to.
He’d already made his mark—dropping headline after headline, shifting the center of gravity before the summit had even started.
By the time Carney took control, it was already clear who owned the moment.
Wherever Trump goes, he becomes the conversation.
Special thanks @overton_news for helping me put this thread together!
If you’re into truth-seeking news accounts like mine, they’re definitely worth a follow!
—> @overton_news
Thanks for making it to the end.
For more content like this, join my email list at , where every thread is delivered straight to your inbox.
If censorship strikes again, you’ll still find me there. It’s an easy way to stay connected and never miss a post.vigilantfox.com
@overton_news For more in-depth stories the mainstream won’t touch, follow me on 𝕏.
—> @VigilantFox
Looking for something else to read?
Trump Drops Two New Army Videos That Hit Like a Sledgehammer
Yale Study Quietly Confirms COVID Vaccine Nightmare
They told you the shot would stay in your arm. That was a lie.
They said the spike protein would degrade quickly. That was a lie.
Yale researchers tracked vax-injured patients over time—and they were shocked to learn that some individuals were still producing spike protein 709 days after vaccination.
That’s almost two years!
But that wasn’t all they found. This study should alarm every vaccinated person.
🧵 THREAD
This wasn’t a fringe study. It was led by Yale scientists, including immunologists who originally supported the vaccine rollout.
Their findings should be front-page news. But the media’s silent.
Retired Green Beret @DocPeteChambers just announced he’s running for Texas Governor, vowing to issue arrest warrants for those who have committed crimes against humanity—starting with Anthony Fauci.
He says he witnessed vaccine injuries firsthand among his own soldiers and is determined to hold the architects of the COVID pandemic accountable, no matter how powerful they are.
“They will be afraid to come into Texas,” he warned.
🧵 THREAD
Doc Pete Chambers is a retired U.S. Army Lieutenant Colonel, Special Forces Green Beret and physician who has dedicated his life to defending freedom and serving others from combat zones to the Texas border.
Doc has always shown up where leadership is needed most. Over the weekend, he stunned the country and the world when he announced that he's running for governor of Texas.
If elected governor, he promises to go after those who have committed crimes against humanity. His first target? Anthony Fauci.
Needless to say, people are very keen to hear from Doc Pete Chambers. He joins us to detail why Texas desperately needs a new governor, and why he is the only man for the job.
Chambers didn’t hold back, warning of an “invasion on the border” that he said was destabilizing Texas and threatening the entire nation.
He called Texas “the first domino” in a crisis spreading north, driven by cartels, gangs, and a public that had lost all trust in government.
“We have a demoralized if you will, or disenfranchised populace that doesn't believe in their government anymore,” he explained.
If elected governor, Chambers vowed to act on day one with an executive order—refusing to wait on Washington—to enforce “constitutionally driven” state policies designed to stop the chaos.
He insisted there was a “myriad of things” he could do immediately to secure Texas, framing his plan as a decisive stand against federal inaction.
If you thought what they did to ivermectin was bad, wait till you hear what they did to this drug.
In the 1960s and 70s, DMSO was hailed as a medical breakthrough for its ability to erase chronic pain and heal debilitating injuries.
But there was one problem…
Because DMSO couldn’t be patented, it threatened to replace lucrative NSAIDs and painkillers with a cheap cure.
Later, the FDA declared DMSO “dangerous” and let Big Pharma keep selling toxic painkillers instead.
DMSO has been shown to treat everything from pain and arthritis to nerve damage, inflammation, and even cataracts.
Find out how this one cheap cure became medicine’s best-kept secret.
🧵 THREAD
DMSO (dimethyl sulfoxide) isn’t just a chemical solvent—it’s a medical game-changer.
It can erase chronic pain, speed up healing, calm autoimmune flares, and treat arthritis, strokes, spinal cord injuries, and more.
No wonder it once swept through America like wildfire.
The information in this thread comes from the work of medical researcher @MidwesternDoc. For all the sources and details, read the full report below. midwesterndoctor.com/p/the-remarkab…
Victor Davis Hanson just DISMANTLED the so-called “experts” who’ve been wrong about Trump’s policies at every turn.
He dropped three brutal examples that leave no room for doubt—and ended with this warning to the media elites:
“You should try to shed your Trump Derangement Syndrome, because it's really affecting your powers of judgment and analysis, and you're going to lose readers.”
🧵 THREAD
Victor Davis Hanson has a message for the media and the self-anointed “experts” who’ve spent years forecasting disaster under Trump: look at the record.
In his eyes, their failures weren’t honest miscalculations but an unwillingness to admit they simply didn’t understand the country, or the president that they were so eager to condemn.
“I want to talk about our so-called experts,” he began, setting the tone for his argument with a reference to the infamous letter signed by intelligence veterans.
“We know they've been wrong when they sign these collective letters, 51 intelligence authorities assured us Hunter's laptop was pretty much made up in Russia.”
It wasn’t, he argued, an isolated misfire.
Hanson accused major outlets of embracing analyses that fell apart under the weight of real events.
“Recently, in some of the marquee newspaper sites, Wall Street Journal, Bloomberg, of course, the New York Times, they made a series of statements by so-called experts that are absolutely confounded by reality.”
He was setting the stage for a bigger argument: that these repeated failures weren’t simply about being wrong.
They were about refusing to see what was right in front of their own eyes.
That stubbornness, Hanson argued, was especially obvious when it came to Iran.
The recent strikes on uranium enrichment facilities provided a textbook case of the media seizing on convenient narratives while ignoring evidence that didn’t fit.
“Let's take Iran,” he said, describing how reports downplayed the strikes’ effectiveness.
“We get all of these stories that the combined Israel and the later United States strikes on the three key sites of uranium enrichment and around may not have done very much.”
Much of that spin, he claimed, came from a single Pentagon leak describing “marginal damage”—a version of events many outlets picked up without question.
But the reality, he insisted, was harder to deny for anyone who looked at the photos.
“Anybody who looked at the post operation panel, photographs could see that there was substantial damage.”
It wasn’t just his opinion.
“David Albright, one of the most prestigious, an analyst of nuclear proliferation. He said there was serious damage.”
He cited similar assessments from the IAEA’s Mr. Grossi and Israeli intelligence, while the press clung to the one leak that fit their angle.
And the real twist? Hanson highlighted what he saw as absurd hypocrisy in how the threat was framed before and after the strikes.
“The left told us before there was no need to strike Iran because they were months or years away from developing a bomb,” he said.
Yet once the facilities were hit, the same voices panicked about the danger of rapid enrichment.
“They said, oh my gosh, there might be uranium that could be quickly enriched.”
Even some of Trump’s own supporters, Hanson argued, weren’t immune to overreaction.
“The same thing, the same inexactitude, is true of the reaction to the, around war,” he said, recalling grim forecasts of “30,000 people killed, could cause World War Three.”
But the real story was anticlimactic in a way no one seemed eager to admit.
“We were in Iranian airspace for about 25 minutes. No Americans were killed. Probably very few if any Iranians were killed.”
Trump negotiated a ceasefire almost immediately.
And when Iran retaliated by launching missiles at a US base in Qatar, Hanson noted it was “22 year old, 23 year old skeleton crews” manning Patriot batteries who intercepted them without issue.
“Trump did not reply. End of story. No World War Three, no 30,000 killed, no endless wars.”
#10 - New pre-print study finds 43% INCREASE in fetal loss when vaccinated early in pregnancy for COVID.
Expected baseline: 9 fetal losses per 100 pregnancies.
Observed result: 13 fetal losses per 100 pregnancies.
That means that 3.85 ADDITIONAL unborn babies resulted in stillbirth or miscarriage than what was expected.
Study co-author @joshg99 confirmed the results to @Johnincarlisle:
“There are about four (3.85) additional fetal losses per 100 pregnancies for women who vaccinated with a COVID vaccine for the first dose from weeks 8 to 13.”
What’s even more alarming is @joshg99 warns the stillborn or miscarriage risk could even HIGHER when accounting for healthy vaccine bias.
He explains: “If the women vaccinated early for Covid are similar to the women vaccinated for influenza ... then that means that it’s not 3.85 or 4 additional. It’s almost 9 additional fetal losses.”
This is a catastrophic and downright criminal result.
#9 - RFK Jr. tells Tucker Carlson the CDC buried its own internal study showing a 1135% INCREASE in autism risk from hepatitis B vaccination.
The researchers were alarmed and shocked by the results before deciding to cover it up.
How did they do it?
“They got rid of all the older children essentially and just had younger children who are too young to be diagnosed [with autism],” Kennedy explained.
Imagine discovering evidence of catastrophic harm and making sure no one ever found out.
Evil.
#8 – @charliekirk11 exposes Zohran Mamdani as the ultimate fake populist and leftist fraud.
He writes:
“Zohran Mamdani has an Ivy [League] professor dad and a famous director mom. He knows how to eat with utensils. But he chooses to eat rice with his bare hands to signal that he is from the Third World and isn't Western. It's a calculated stunt, just like him constantly changing his accent. Honestly, that's a lot worse and more disturbing than if he just authentically ate that way. One is backwards. The other shows his contempt for our culture.”
RFK Jr. Unloads Disturbing Vaccine Secrets on Tucker—And Surprises Everyone on Trump
This conversation will shock you, challenge what you thought you knew, and then lift your spirits.
Kennedy’s three-minute take on Trump is among the most compelling things you’ll watch today.
🧵 THREAD
It’s not every day an active HHS Secretary sits down for 90 minutes straight with Tucker Carlson.
But that’s exactly what happened, and Kennedy instantly seized Carlson’s attention with a chilling story of CDC corruption.
He revealed that the health agency buried a 1999 internal study led by researcher Thomas Verstraten, which showed an alarming 1135% increase in autism risk from the hepatitis B vaccine.
Kennedy said the researchers were “shocked” by the findings.
So what did they do? They covered it up, according to Kennedy.
“They got rid of all the older children essentially and just had younger children who are too young to be diagnosed [with autism].”
RFK Jr. then explained the real reason why your pediatrician will kick you out of their practice for refusing vaccines.
“There’s a published article out there now that says that 50% of revenues to most pediatricians come from vaccines.”
It’s all about the money. The higher the vaccination rate, the bigger the bonus.
“And that’s why your pediatrician, if you say I want to go slow on the vaccines… will throw you out of his practice because you’re now jeopardizing that bonus structure.”