JAPANESE BOMBSHELL: A COVID vaccine database covering 18 million citizens has just been released for the first time.
After reviewing the data, a top professor warned: “The more doses you get, the sooner you’re likely to die.”
The most terrifying finding was a deadly spike just 3 to 4 months after the final shot.
Let’s break down the data.
🧵 THREAD
On June 15th, a group of brave Japanese truth seekers did what their government wouldn’t—they released a bombshell broadcast exposing vaccine data from over 18 million people.
Journalist Masako Ganaha posted on X:
“If the government won’t do it, then the people should investigate the mass deaths of Japanese people! Database of 18 million vaccinated people revealed for the first time!”
The video featured Member of the House of Representatives Kazuhiro Haraguchi, Dr. Yasufumi Murakami, and the Information Disclosure Request Team.
Dr. Yasufumi Murakami isn’t just some fringe voice. He’s a respected professor at the Tokyo University of Science, where he serves as vice director at the Research Center for RNA Science.
He holds a Doctor of Pharmaceutical Science from the University of Tokyo and has authored over 100 scientific publications.
But when the data went public, things got deeply unsettling.
Pharma insider @_aussie17 shared a clip from the broadcast.
Dr. Murakami’s conclusion was blunt: “…the more doses you get, the sooner you’re likely to die, within a shorter period…”
The first graph compared death rates between vaccinated and unvaccinated groups.
According to Dr. Murakami, there was no noticeable spike in deaths among the unvaccinated. But among the vaccinated, a clear peak emerged—especially between 90 and 120 days after the shot.
“A significant peak forms at three or four months,” he said, pointing to the vaccine as the likely cause. “It’s probably due to the vaccine’s influence, with adverse reactions occurring leading to death.”
Then came a graph that was impossible to ignore. It showed a clear pattern: the more vaccine doses a person received, the sooner they died after their final shot.
The title translates to: “Number of days from final vaccination to death and number of deaths.”
The note on the right reads: “As the number of vaccine doses increases, the peak in deaths appears sooner.”
Each line represents people grouped by the final dose they received before death. In other words, those counted under the third dose curve had received three shots and died before receiving a fourth.
What stood out most was the steep green spike representing deaths after the third dose. Not only was it the highest, but it also appeared earlier, around 90 to 120 days.
The trend held across the board: as the number of doses increased, the peak of death consistently moved closer to the time of the last injection.
@_aussie17 As Dr. Murakami noted, “We found that as the number of doses increases, the peak of deaths appears faster, meaning the more doses you get, the sooner you’re likely to die, within a shorter period. So, the risk increases with more doses.”
@_aussie17 He added, “If the vaccine had no toxicity or didn’t induce death, there wouldn’t be a peak. That’s the point.”
@_aussie17 “This is a key discovery,” he continued. “The more doses, the more the peak shifts, indicating that the toxicity accumulates. The toxicity overlaps, and the more doses you receive, the faster people die.”
@_aussie17 While the data is truly alarming, it comes as no surprise to anyone who’s been paying attention. There’s simply no excuse for these shots to still be on the market.
Remember, the swine flu vaccine was pulled in 1976 after just 25 deaths and around 550 cases of Guillain-Barré syndrome—and that was with only a quarter of Americans vaccinated.
Ultimately, 53 deaths were linked to the program, and the government not only shut it down but also issued apologies and compensation to victims.
@_aussie17 As Dr. Peter McCullough (@P_McCulloughMD) stated in the video:
“It’s unacceptable to have anyone take an injection electively and die. It’s absolutely unacceptable. It’s not something that our country has ever thought is okay to do.”
@_aussie17 @P_McCulloughMD Thanks for reading. Big hat tip to @_aussie17 for watching the Japanese broadcast and translating the clip featured in this thread into English.
He’s absolutely worth a follow.
@_aussie17 @P_McCulloughMD And if this evidence wasn’t enough, don’t miss the Senate hearing Pfizer never wanted you to see, led by @SenRonJohnson.
GOP governors are now OPENLY talking about redistricting to COUNTER Democrat gerrymandering SCHEMES.
Governor DeSantis says he even caught Obama trying to RIG Florida’s map.
Then he dropped the numbers that could CHANGE the Midterms:
“In 2018, there were 300,000 more registered Democrats than Republicans. Today there are 1.3 million more registered Republicans than Democrats.”
🧵 THREAD
No more sitting on the sidelines to get steamrolled by Democrats.
Florida Governor Ron DeSantis joined Sean Hannity on Fox to talk about Florida’s potential redistricting plans.
But before the conversation even got to that, he went straight for the heart of Democrats’ playbook.
DeSantis EXPOSED a long-running, nationwide Democrat gerrymandering operation, dating back to the Obama days.
According to DeSantis, President Barack Obama and Attorney General Eric Holder oversaw a coast-to-coast effort to manipulate election maps during the last census.
It was so pervasive that it didn’t just solidify blue strongholds….he says they even tried to rig Florida’s congressional lines and he caught them.
“Obama and Holder gerrymandered BRUTALLY across the country in this decade’s census.”
“They actually even got into Florida and I had to veto the legislature’s map and I ended up proposing one which was a much fairer map and much better.”
He pointed to California as a case study in how the game is played.
On paper, the state uses an independent redistricting commission.
In reality, he says, it’s stacked with Democrats, liberal independents, and liberal Republicans.
The result….a heavily gerrymandered map and Governor Gavin Newsom is already looking to push it further.
Once the groundwork was laid, DeSantis turned to what Florida is doing now to address the gerrymandering problem.
He revealed he’s already working directly with Trump’s Commerce Department to secure the state an additional congressional seat…one he believes Florida should have received in the last census.
“Florida, we got shortchanged in the census.”
This alone could be HUGE.
The governor said that new population data clearly shows Florida’s growth was underestimated, and if the Commerce Department agrees, it would trigger an automatic redraw of congressional districts.
“That would obviously force us to have to redistrict. So we’re working with the Commerce Department to see how that’s going to shake out.”
But even if the new seat doesn’t happen, DeSantis beleives there’s still a strong case for a remap now.
“There’s some racial gerrymandering that’s still lingering that we have to correct, per our recent Florida Supreme Court decision.”
The bottom line is that Florida’s current maps don’t reflect the state’s explosive growth over the past five years.
“Florida in 2020 vs. Florida in 2025, you are talking about a BIG change.”
“Our districts are not properly apportioned and if we were to do new districts, it would be a much fairer representation for the people of Florida.”
EXCLUSIVE: RFK Jr-Backed “Safer” Vaccine Hides a Dangerous Secret
RFK Jr. announced NIH is developing a “universal vaccine” that “mimics natural immunity.”
But once the backlash kicked in, the official MAHA account that shared the news quietly deleted the post.
Once you see who’s connected to this vaccine, you can’t unsee it.
And the deeper you dig, the darker it gets…
🧵 THREAD
You might have heard this week’s announcement from RFK Jr. and the MAHA Action account on X about a new universal vaccine being developed—with his blessing. If you didn’t, it may be because, after racking up nearly half a million views and an enormous backlash, MAHA Action deleted the post.
That’s strange. Here’s the announcement they didn’t feel confident leaving up:
“Right now we're developing a universal vaccine at NIH, which is a vaccine that addresses the entire phylum of viruses. And so it's a vaccine that mimics natural immunity, and it is effective against any kind of mutation, so it doesn't drive the virus to mutate and it could be effective. We believe it's going to be effective, against not only coronaviruses, but also flu. And it's going to be a much more, much safer and much more effective vaccine.”
— RFK Jr.
The backlash was intense. More vaccines are clearly not what the public wants. The comments rebuked the announcement, and the post was deleted.
Beyond the odd commitment from RFK Jr. to introduce more vaccines after years of warning about their dangers, this announcement comes with even more surprises.
Dig deeper, and you might be horrified by what you find. The trail leads to a product already listed as “reasonably anticipated to be a human carcinogen”—meaning more cancer. A product that is funded by none other than Bill Gates and linked to Anthony Fauci.
@zeee_media opened the episode by taking viewers back to RFK Jr.’s blistering book The Real Anthony Fauci, where he accused Fauci of violating federal law by using children in dangerous drug experiments.
Recall his description of the moment in 2000 when Fauci shook hands with Bill Gates inside his $140 million mansion—a meeting that, according to Kennedy, cemented a plan to control a $60 billion vaccine empire.
Now, as HHS Secretary, critics say Kennedy’s actions haven’t matched the sweeping reform he once promised. Some vaccines linked to fatalities have been pulled, but others are being approved for infants, and Gates-backed food products are entering the market.
The irony, Maria warned, is that RFK Jr. often appears aligned with the very people he once fought to expose.
For FAR too long, violent crime has been allowed to fester in once-great American cities.
That ENDS TODAY—starting in D.C.
President Trump stood in the White House briefing room and dropped a NUKE on pro-crime Democrat cities:
He’s invoking the D.C. Home Rule Act to take DIRECT federal control of the Metropolitan Police Department
and deploying the NATIONAL GUARD to the streets to SQUASH criminals and protect law-abiding citizens.
“This is Liberation Day in D.C., and we’re going to take our capital back.”
🧵 THREAD
It was a rare sight.
The President of the United States, standing in the James S. Brady Press Briefing Room at the White House first thing on a Monday morning, flanked by top members of his cabinet.
That alone signaled something BIG was about to drop.
Alongside President Trump were Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, Attorney General Pam Bondi, FBI Director Kash Patel, and other high-profile officials.
Trump wasted no time.
He declared for all of the media to hear:
“This is Liberation Day in D.C., and we’re going to take our capital back.”
The president announced that he would be invoking the D.C. Home Rule Act to place the Metropolitan Police Department under direct federal control...an unprecedented move to crack down on crime in the nation’s capital.
“And we’re here for a very serious purpose. Very serious purpose. Something’s out of control. But we’re going to put it in control very quickly, like we did on the southern border.”
“I’m announcing a HISTORIC action to rescue our nation’s capital from crime, bloodshed, bedlam and squalor and worse.”
“We’re taking it back under the authority vested in me as the President of the United States, I’m officially invoking section 740 of the District of Columbia Home Rule Act. And placing the D.C. Metropolitan Police Department under direct federal control.”
Trump isn’t messing around on crime. No more third-world cities in America.
That all ENDS today.
But the president made clear this was only the beginning.
In addition to federalizing the D.C. police, Trump revealed he was deploying the National Guard to the streets...pointing out that D.C.’s crime rates now surpass those of cities infamous for violence.
Beyond shameful for an American city.
“In addition, I’m deploying the National Guard to help reestablish law, order and public safety in Washington, D.C., and they’re going to be allowed to do their job properly.”
Then came the numbers.
“Now, the murder rate in Washington today is higher than that of Bogota, Colombia, Mexico City—some of the places that you hear about as being the worst places on Earth, much higher. This is much higher.”
“The number of car thefts has doubled over the past five years, and the number of carjackings has more than tripled.”
“Murders in 2023 reached the highest rate, probably ever. They say 25 years, but they don’t know what that means because it just goes back 25 years, can’t be worse.”
“Our capital city has been overtaken by violent gangs and bloodthirsty criminals, roving mobs of wild youth, drugged out maniacs and homeless people. And we’re not going to let it happen anymore. We’re not going to take it.”
Medicine has been standardized, which is unfortunate when each person is different and also surrounded and affected by entirely different variables.
Medicine shouldn’t be one-size-fits all, but that’s exactly how the industry is run because it’s not about healing people. The same treatment that heals one person can completely wreck another.
This is exactly why certain people get completely wrecked by vaccines.
It was a COUP—and Rudy Giuliani just tore the case WIDE OPEN.
He named WHO he believes was behind its origins—and said it has “all the earmarks of a CIA kind of conspiracy.”
But it’s what he said about President Obama that could lead to an INDICTMENT:
“You’re not immune for the rest of your life as president.”
🧵 THREAD
He hit the ground running.
Rudy Giuliani has a unique perspective on the Democrats’ Russia Coup against President Trump.
Not only is he a lawyer and American legal heavyweight, but he’s also experienced Democrat lawfare aimed directly at him.
Now he says Barack Obama will attempt to hide behind “presidential immunity” in the Russia Coup investigation....but there’s one major problem that could open the door to an indictment.
“You’re not immune for the rest of your life as president,” Giuliani said.
Speaking with David Harris Jr., he laid out Obama’s potential legal risk.
“Obama becomes a problem because he will invoke presidential immunity,” Giuliani explained.
“The decision the Supreme Court made that that helped Trump. The acts are kind of different… but there’s a problem for Obama.”
That problem, according to Giuliani, is the timeline.
“It continues after he’s president. So starting on January 1st, 2017, any participation of him in the conspiracy is not immune. You’re not immune for the rest of your life as president.”
In other words, immunity only applies to actions within a president’s term.
“So he’ll be immune if whatever allegations against him are contained within his presidency,” Giuliani said.
“But if he’s helping to assist over that three-year period that they pushed Russian collusion into 2017 and 2018, then he’s… of course, he could be indicted for that.”
Giuliani then pointed out that the Supreme Court’s ruling on presidential immunity is not a free pass for criminal conduct...and that Obama’s alleged involvement in the Russia Coup is FAR MORE serious than anything alleged against Trump.
David Harris Jr. pressed the point: “If a president is literally directly breaking the law, he just doesn’t just get to go away with it. Walk away scot-free.”
“I think you’re right, David,” Giuliani replied.
“I think, you know, we’re all talking about an interpretation of the Supreme Court decision. The Supreme Court did not actually—didn’t give ABSOLUTE immunity to a president.”
He added, “And the acts alleged here are far more serious than the allegations against Trump, which were, first of all, false, but even if they were true, they weren’t nearly as serious as this. So I don’t know if it holds up.”
Victor Davis Hanson says Trump has cut off the head of the SNAKE.
The president saw that the emperor had NO clothes.
Hanson laid out the three IRREFUTABLE reasons the entire system is COLLAPSING.
Then came his prediction—one the Left WON’T want to hear:
“Donald Trump is going to win this war to abolish something that has turned NIGHTMARISH.”
🧵 THREAD
Victor Davis Hanson didn’t waste time.
He opened with a direct hit to the “progressive” left:
“DEI, the acronym for diversity, equity and inclusion is dying.”
Just a few years ago these race-based policies were everywhere, pushed by institutions and corporate boards at the peak of their influence.
But Trump’s return to power changed everything.
Through executive orders, Hanson explained, Trump cut off DEI’s lifeline: federal funding.
If an organization wanted to keep getting government money, it had to drop the program.
“And why did Donald Trump not like it? Because he said the emperor has no clothes.”
In Hanson’s view, DEI is nothing more than legalized discrimination, where skin color [not ability] determines who gets hired, promoted, or tenured.
And opposition to it isn’t only coming from one group.
“When you look at the polls, it’s not just that 60% of so-called White people who often feel they’re victimized by DEI oppose it, but Hispanics and Blacks also poll that they are against it and that’s baffled people.”
It’s not baffling at all, he said, when you think about it.
Many minorities don’t want the stigma of being labeled a “DEI hire” when they’ve earned a job through merit and hard work.
Hanson then went on to masterfully break down the three reasons he believes DEI is IMPLODING...and why Trump will emerge victorious in the fight to abolish it.
The first reason, he said, is historical distance.
DEI grew out of affirmative action in 1965, which was meant to address the Jim Crow South and the legacy of slavery.
At the time, America was about 89% white and 11% Black, and African Americans, on average, were far poorer than whites.
The thinking was to boost opportunities based on skin color, even if that meant implementing quota-like systems.
But, Hanson as pointed out, that was three generations ago.
“First of all, from 1965—if you think about it, we're 35 years in the 20th century and 25 in the 21st. We're 60 years behind that.”
“We’ve had three generations who grew up without Jim Crow and no knowledge of systemic racism, essentially.”
Today, he said, young Americans haven’t lived through the era DEI was meant to address.
“But the point is flagrant racial prejudice—three generations haven't seen it, but they have seen bias predicated on race through DEI.”