Did you know that Moskovians only started calling themselves “Russians” (Русские) about 100 years ago?
Before that, they were Velikorosy (великоросы), while “Russkiy” referred to all East Slavs — including Ukrainians (Malorosy) and Belarusians.
1/n
2/ You can see this in the 1897 Russian Empire census:
Velikorosy, Malorosy, and Belarusians were shown as three distinct groups in the pictures — but lumped together in one row in the table under “Russkiye.”
Only later did Moskovians claim that word for themselves.
3/ Before the 1700s, they simply called themselves Moskovians.
Meanwhile, Ukrainians called themselves Rusyns or Ruthenians. (In the Carpathians, some still do.)
Because the real Rus? It started in Kyiv — when Moscow was still a swamp of frogs and bears.
4/ Even in the 1600s, Hetman Bohdan Khmelnytskyi called himself “Hetman of Rus.”
To this day, in Ukrainian:
•“руський” [ruskyi] = ancient Ukrainian
•“росіянин” [rosiyanyn] = Russian (i.e. Moskovian)
Names matter. History matters.
5/ Moskovians hijacked the name Rus in the 1700s — and have been rewriting history ever since.
Now they call 10th-century Kyivan princes “Russian” — when Russia didn’t even exist.
Their first political entity? Grand Principality of Vladimir, 1125.
6/ For comparison:
Russia claiming it began in Kyiv is like the U.S. saying it began in the 6th century with the Kingdom of Wessex.
Yes, there’s a connection — but no, Alfred the Great wasn’t an American king.
Volodymyr the Great wasn’t Russian either.
7/ Moskovians are, at best, a spin-off of Kyivan Rus.
Not its core. Not its founder.
And certainly not its rightful heir.
Let’s not let historical theft become accepted truth.
Credit: Volodymyr Kukharenko
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The U.S. has quietly begun dismantling its military support for Ukraine.
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth confirmed the Trump administration’s move to stop any support of Ukraine, suggesting that the administration prefers a “diplomatic settlement” over continued weapons aid.
1/n
2/ In practice, it’s capitulation.
By cutting aid while Ukrainian cities are bombed nightly, the U.S. isn’t promoting peace — it’s enabling terror. It’s asking a hostage to “talk it out” with their captor, while the captor reloads.
3/ The consequences are historic:
U.S. credibility crumbles, teaching allies that American promises mean nothing.
Dictators are emboldened, learning that violence wins and democracy bends.
The world becomes more unstable.
Trump spoke with Putin today. The conversation lasted about 50 minutes.
It is so refreshing to spend an hour of your time on your birthday in the company of your friend who is a war criminal.
Right after, russia launched drones at Ukraine from 5 different directions.
1/n
2/ It should be obvious by now that there will be no mediated “peace agreement” between russia and Ukraine.
Instead of stopping the war, Trump helped russia invade more of Ukraine. And he continues to do so.
3/ In May 2025, russia captured more Ukrainian territory than in any single month since late 2022 — and it’s no coincidence this happened under Trump’s watch.
In May 2025, russia captured more Ukrainian territory than in any single month since late 2022 — and it’s no coincidence this happened under Trump’s watch.
1/n
2/ Since Trump returned to office, russian attacks have skyrocketed. His pro-russian rhetoric and refusal to hold Putin accountable have emboldened the Kremlin to escalate its war of aggression.
3/ The U.S. has slashed arms supplies to Ukraine, leaving them without enough air defense missiles to stop russian rockets and drones. Civilian deaths have surged.
A greeting from Marco Rubio on “russia day” — a country waging a genocidal war against Ukraine — is an insult to the millions of Ukrainians who suffer daily from russian aggression. And it’s coming from the U.S. Secretary of State.
1/n
2/ Let’s be clear: this isn’t about “supporting the russian people.” It’s about legitimizing a regime that kills, deports, tortures, and bombs civilians every day. A regime that is still committing genocide.
3/ To me personally, Marco Rubio has been one of the greatest disappointments of this administration. I once saw him as pragmatic and principled. But he’s revealed himself to be inconsistent, opportunistic — and, ultimately, for sale.
The U.S. is now literally run by Kremlin propagandists.
How else do you explain a blatant Kremlin propaganda video coming from the Director of American Intelligence?
Tulsi Gabbard repeats Moscow’s talking points almost verbatim:
1/n
2/ laming the West for global instability, casting russia as a victim just “defending itself,” and claiming Western elites don’t fear nuclear war because they have bunkers. These aren’t fringe theories — they’re lifted straight from Putin’s speeches since 2022.
3/ Gabbard accuses “political elites and warmongers” of dragging the world toward nuclear annihilation — exactly as Putin framed it when he warned that the West is playing a “dangerous, bloody, and dirty game.”