Margot Cleveland Profile picture
Jun 20 9 tweets 3 min read Read on X
🚨LIVE COVERAGE here of Preliminary Injunction hearing before Judge Breyer on Newsom's lawsuit to commander National Guard from Trump. Trump Administration had requested stay of proceedings pending 9th Cir. decision but Breyer refused. 1/
2/ Breyer claimed facts on ground and changes would be relevant to PI hearing. Watch for him to sidestep 9th Cir. slap down by framing changes on ground as so substantial that no matter how much deference Trump gets he couldn't federalize troops.
3/ Hearing was suppose to start at 10 PT. Hasn't started yet. Here's link as DH has me picking up a plumbing part so I might not be able to cover depending on when it starts. (At least it's at an old hardware store which has new old stock--which I love--not Lowe/Home Depot.
4/ Actually starting momentarily...crowd is flocking courtroom doors.
5/ You can access here: cand.uscourts.gov/judges/breyer-…
6/ Hearing starting and attorneys providing appearances.
7/ Breyer: Everyone had a late night. Let me review where we are as that informs where we go. Court granted TRO and 9th admin. stayed and then stayed pending appeal. In order 9th cir. is an effectively PI and thus it has appellate jurisdiction. I'm a district court my decisions are reviewed by 9th, just as you can't ignore my decisions I can't ignore 9th Cir. Issue is precisely "how to do that." Did not challenge posse comatatis...B/f d.ct. Plaintiff argued certain points violate posse commatis, 9th cir. said disputes are not before us. It is not clear to me that the 9th Cir. stay divests this court per to grant/modify by posse commatiatis (sp?), d.ct. has authority to modify. Asks for briefing on whether to modify injunction under posse commatatis by June 23 (I missed that was it ). Depending on what you say, I'll decide what to do next.
Me: Holy CRAP he's going to do posse commatatis.
8/ Newsom Attorney wants to speak.
Judge: Question is what to do re posse commitatus.
Newsom Attorney: We believe another issue is live, which is the length of federalization.
Judge: TRO ends in 14 days. "That's the difference."
Me: No, that's only ONE difference.
Judge: Now that has been converted to PI and so I don't have jurisdiction over PI, the 9th cir. does. You're asking what is duration of National Guard. I had understood nationalized for 60 days.
DOJ: 60 day time limit, but with flexibility for that time to change, or at the discretion of Secretary of Defense.
Newsom Attorney: Because it is renewable, we believe another issue is when it should end. We also want court to issue the duration of the order.
Judge: You can address that in your briefing.
He said sorry to ruin peoples' weekends so I take it briefing is due on Monday.
9/ Final Thought: Judge Breyer is going to hold Trump is violating Posse Comitatus Act, but wants to pretend he is being open minded so is asking parties to brief whether he has jurisdiction to do so.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Margot Cleveland

Margot Cleveland Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ProfMJCleveland

Jun 17
🔥🔥🔥Grassley letter reviews FBI ordered records destroyed in September 2020. This does NOT conform to records preservation requirements...you know thing FBI raided Mar-a-Lago for! 1/ Image
3/ Still trying to put puzzle together but letter of 5/5 provides solid hints. It'd seem that the destroyed record was related to Biden-Ukraine corruption & to fake briefing Dems had FBI do to falsely frame Grassley & Johnson as peddling Russian disinfo. grassley.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/…
Read 4 tweets
Jun 13
🚨🚨🚨BREAKING: Trump is still Commander-in-Chief. Image
2/ And will be for at least 5 more days. Image
Read 4 tweets
Jun 12
🚨Hearing in Newsom v. Trump re National Guard starts in ~15 minutes. I'll be live-posting in this 🧵. 1/
2/ Hearing starting:
Judge Preliminary Comments: Entered scheduling order directing file of briefs & appreciative of that. It is necessary to have briefing & I have always have done it, even though styled as ex parte, sufficient cooperation to allow complete record as possible given, important--issues significance, and urgency so I need to act expeditiously but takes into consideration the arguments of the parties. That's the fair way to do it and way I've done it over the year and parties have been extremely helpful in this regard.
3/ Judge: Asks to start w/ federal government & wants feds to address several issues: It seems to me that it is necessary to understand whether the president complied with the statute 10406, which has a number of requirements. When Judge acted on desire to nationalized California National Guard he sited this statute.
Read 17 tweets
Jun 11
🚨BREAKING: Trump files a response in opposition to Newsom's Motion for a TRO re National Guard troops. 1/
3/ Great line: "There is no rioters' veto to enforcement of federal law." Image
Read 9 tweets
Jun 10
🚨I began researching this deep-dive at @FDRLST soon after @SenGrassleyIA broke news of the "Prohibited Access" functionality of Sentinel. Inspector General conducted TEN audits of Sentinel & details buried in those report blow-open scandal. 1/ Image
3/ Some key points: Sentinel has not been audited in more than a decade AND the "prohibited access" function has never been audited. Image
Read 12 tweets
Jun 8
🚨🚨🚨Garcia's attorneys are not happy and they likely have a judge willing to play along. They now want discovery to learn what Trump Administration did to facilitate Garcia's return so allow court to hold Administration in contempt. 1/
2/ Garcia's attorney's seem to think they also have a "get out of jail free card" because SCOTUS ordered Trump to treat Garcia as if he hadn't been wrongfully removed & they only discovered evidence of his crime after that. Image
3/ And they think they can now challenge what happens to Garcia AFTER the criminal case. That is not ripe, however, because it depends on the outcome of that case. Image
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(