Korobochka (コロボ) 🇦🇺✝️ Profile picture
Jun 21, 2025 26 tweets 10 min read Read on X
Bunker Busters and Armageddon /🧵

The war with Iran has been authorised by the psychopath in chief Trump. From the very beginning, at the start of his term, he placed a proverbial Chekhov's gun on the fire place at Diego Garcia: B-2s.

The threat wasn't the stealth but the load. Image
Before I begin, it's important to understand some characteristics of the B-2 bomber. What it can do and what it cannot do.

The B-2 is not a magic stealth bomber, it has a physical extent and is easily detectable by a competent enemy -- it is usually escorted by fighter jets. Image
The F-117 had a much smaller RCS and was shot down by Serbian defenders with ancient SAMs.
The B-2 can be easily targeted unless air supremacy is achieved.

The point of using B-2s is in fact, NOT their stealth capability...

It's their bomb bay capacity! Image
The B-2 bomb bay is so massive that it can carry not one but two Massive Ordnance Penetrators (GBU-57/MOP).
It's actually these bombs that form Chekhov's gun against Iran: these bombs are not what they seem and were redesigned for this mission from 2009 onwards.
20-30 were built. Image
Most of what we know about the MOP is from what is offered as unclassified press statements. The specifications are one of the most highly classified secrets within the US military and government.

Notably, it is the largest/heaviest bomb deployed by any military in the world.
The GBU-57 has never been officially used in combat. This is curious given how many opportunities would have presented themselves over the course of the 13 years of its active service. The small number officially built is also curious.

Its design was proposed right after 9/11.
The bomb's specifications are staggering.
This is a very long bomb at 6.2m, and yet, at least physically it can only penetrate >60 meters of soil but only around 8 meters of reinforced concrete. Payload of 2,700kg*.

This presents a very difficult problem for this mission. Image
Image
Our best intelligence on its supposedly intended target, Fordow, suggests that the target is buried under 800m-1km of mountain granite.

The 2,700kg payload, were it conventional, would merely tickle someone in this facility!

Something is deeply wrong here, let's investigate. Image
Our most recent source of information is an annual (2023) report by the Director Operational Test and Evaluation, signalling modifications done to the MOP.

This particular report slipped by most people's radars but it contained some important information. Fuze and guidance (GPS) Image
Image
The modification, reported in 2023, was completed around February 2025:
It allegedly focused on the bomb's fuze, supposedly a void vacancy detection fuse, suggests that this bomb is designed to bomb deep tunnel entrances and detonate within them.

Keep this in mind for later. Image
Image
The guidance system for the MOP was reported as laser guidance in the past, but there is no evidence of this and the only intelligence we have suggests it is GPS/INS guided, which makes sense for deep targets beyond laser painting reach.

This means the MOP has a CEP of 5-10m. Image
What is a Circular Error Probability?
It's quite a simple concept. If you drop 20 of these, you'll get a pattern like that below. Of the 20 bombs dropped, 10 of them (i.e. 50%), will drop within a circle of 5 meters (or 10 meters at worst).
Even with guidance, there is a scatter. Image
Right now, stenographers/media propagandists are suggesting that the MOP has a purely conventional fill.

The basis is this photograph released by the US airforce. The bomb supposedly has two filling:

AFX-757 - 2000 kg A polymer based insensitive explosive
PBXN-114 - 342 kg (*) Image
Image
This payload and penetration would make it completely useless in this mission. In fact, the most it would be able to do is disable the entrances to the facilities, and we've seen from Iranian tempo that this would only last 24-48 hours before tunnels are operational again.
But the US is not stupid. It just wants you to think it is.
And it also thinks you are stupid. Let's fix that.
I will present the stupidest idea I've ever seen proposed for how this bomb can possibly reach Fordow.
Here is the setup. Let's think about reaching the facility itself: Image
You drop a single GBU-57 into the mountain range, let's say the fins stabilise it and it comes in at an almost vertical angle for deepest penetration and proper bomb operation.

Look at this test and notice how the soil "swallows" it, as though it was going through water.
But it stops at 8 meters and blows its 2.4 ton payload without finding a cavity. Well, you might say, you can just hit that same 'tunnel' and just keep "drilling" into the mountain using these limited number of bombs, until you reach Fordow at 800 meters. Image
Right away, anyone who isn't physically or numerically challenged will spot some impossibilities here:
1. A bomb with a diameter of 0.8 meter and a CEP of 5m is never going to strike the same spot twice.
2. The angle of penetration won't be the same, even for the same plane! Image
3. Gravity won't stop and the soil, rock, etc. will cover up the hole as quickly as an unconventional explosion could.
4. With only 20-30 priceless bombs to play with, and a penetration depth of 8 meters, and say a cratering damage equivalent to the same, you will reach only 480m Image
This means this was never the true purpose of the MOP. It cannot be used for such a stupid mission.
So we have to conclude that the Whiteman AF base photograph release was a PSYOP and a particularly clever one dealing with compartmentalisation.
I'm going to explain what it's for.
There is another payload that is very similar to the 342kg "booster" payload: The B61 Mod 11/12/13, coming in at between 320-350kg. A few dozen of the B61 Mod 13 have been built. Enough for every MOP in service.

The B61 Mod 13 is an Earth Penetrating Weapon (bunker buster)! Image
The B61 Mod 13 was meant to retire the 1 Megaton B83-1 bomb.
The B61 Mod 13 supposedly uses the same physics package as the Mod 7, but in theory, it can pack a much bigger punch (~1 kt/kg through to 6kt/kg ).
Something like ~700kT is plausible -- we can't know until it blows. Image
The timing and urgency of this modification program is quite suspect.

Gravity bombs are utterly useless except for enemies whose air defences have been largely destroyed. This even holds true for the GBU-57 even when carried by the B-2.
The B61Mod13 is rated for very high g's!
Let's say, the B61-Mod 13 can be disassembled (removing its fins) and reassembled into the highly modular BLU-127 (GBU-57's case). What if the 2000 kg filling was instead filled with a shock absorbing material? It can be an inert elastomer rather than the AFX757 filing!
Then you have a bomb that can create a nuclear blast wave THROUGH the tunnel system presumably, past the blast walls, CRUSHING/suffocating everything inside the facility.
In shallower targets, from the shockwave alone, crush it all.
/End
PS This is how Nasrallah was assassinated.
Addendum: What happens if the US fails?
What happens if the Iranian "granite level" reinforced concrete survives this attack? What happens if Iran's air defenses hold?

The US will be exposed for having used nuclear weapons inside Iran. Iran will retaliate, armageddon will begin. Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Korobochka (コロボ) 🇦🇺✝️

Korobochka (コロボ) 🇦🇺✝️ Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @cirnosad

Dec 19, 2025
Fine structure constant.
How strange. Accurate to 0.03%. I don't feel confident enough to include this amazing thing in my paper so I'll share it on here. Has anyone encountered this approximation before?
[My head hurts and I want to finish this thing. I'm sorry I tried my best.] Image
It's bizarre because ln(8R/a) is in the toroid inductance formula. If you identify R/a=1/alpha, then you get something very close to an integer out of the logarithm... What?!

To re-emphasise it's not out of no where. It came from identify the Compton wavelength with R and the classical radius with a. This formula brought out the electron mass to within 3.6% accuracy. The trouble is the R on the outside is different: It has to use a Hopfin fibration and torodial/polodial twists, resulting in Compton wavelength/(4*pi^2).

I can't explain it and my head hurts from all the other stuff which I've worked on (more significant in many ways if I can't close this), so I have to admit defeat and leave this in someone else's hands. Someone smarter than me I hope!Image
Image
Image
The 8 comes pure from ring geometry.

The "a" is saying physically -- if you had a sphere that contained the charge necessary to produce the field of a electron what radius would it be if it also equalled the energy of the electron.
The R comes from the wavelength we've detected.

The 7? I have no idea. Maybe it's just a coincidence.
Read 4 tweets
Nov 30, 2025
Photons do not exist.
Only the field exists.

Einstein with his ret*rded idea has held back physics for more than a century. Even Robert Millikan, who measured the photoelectric effect's frequency dependence, told him to let go of the idea.

ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/…Image
Anti-photon by Willis E. Lamb.
files.catbox.moe/yc2mof.pdfImage
Image
You might ask then, why does E = h f?

I'm going to explain it, for the first time I've seen explained by others and I spent 3 days making sure no one else has thought of such a simple thing before. I was shocked.

It's not a property of the field, it's a boundary condition on the genesis of an electron-positron pair.
Read 6 tweets
Oct 6, 2025
Well, well, @AnthropicAI pulled the rug on all of its users.

It introduced Sonnet 4.5, under the pretense that it was better than Opus 4.1. The benchmarks were all cooked. Opus 4.1 is still superior to Sonnet 4.5.

Yet they used this as an excuse to lower usage limits on Opus!Image
@AnthropicAI If you subscribe to their non-API plan they're not even transparent about how much usage you're getting.

They got people hooked to this and now they're raising the price by 10x as layoffs continue. This is the expert squeeze happening live.
@AnthropicAI Zero accountability from the so-called government who is meant to regulate this sort of scam.

We will be contacting the @acccgovau, over this rug pull. What a load of sh*t @AnthropicAI. You sell people onto Max x20, you announce an inferior LLM, then reduce their usage by 10x?
Read 8 tweets
Oct 4, 2025
There was never a "chosen people" if the context is God.
You're likely thinking of Satan (Yahweh) and the "divine council" where Elohim (plural) got to divide up humanity and Yahweh got assigned the most evil bloodline in the world.

(it's in the Torah lol, several places too) Image
The funniest thing about arguing with Torah believers is using their own material against them.

The real purity is in the gospel and nothing else but the true words of Jesus Christ our only saviour.
Just wait until you find out what Deutoronomy says Moses's last words were (people were complaining about Yahweh's treatment towards them so he was like, look this was the Elohim assigned to us... don't blame me, then Yahweh killed him. He had just killed his brother)
Read 6 tweets
Sep 15, 2025
AI Economic Meltdown: The Coming Expert Squeeze /🧵

There is a frenzy today that is seemingly unstoppable -- the process of replacing human workers with AI. On another front, the idea that AI has now reached a level beyond the smartest human beings is promoted by CEOs like Sam Altman, Dario Amodei and Elon Musk. In cases where humans aren't replaced, they're expected to augment themselves with AI models to increase their productivity.

On the opposing side, there are people who speak of the technology as impractical, overhyped or down right dangerous. This thread is going to take a different angle to these people: I will demonstrate not only this replacement will become a self-fulfilling prophecy, but why we are locked into this process (which has become an inescapable ponzi scheme) and it will culminate in the destruction of western economies.

In this short thread I'm going to show you why, starting with the economic feedback loops, the limitations of the technology, and finally human psychological dependency and the incentive process. To bring it all together, I will explain why the entire western economy is now dependent on this hype, and why the alternative is also collapse of a different kind.

I will start with the main driver of this trend: the economy.Image
The economic feedback loop

Tech companies and other firms all over the world are in a frenzy to fire as many employees as possible in order to minimise their payroll, keeping investors happy and increasing their stock price even as the real economy around them collapses.

Excluding algorithmic trading, the economy ultimately involves exchange between humans and groupings of humans (i.e. human run entities). The fewer people you have working, the fewer people you have buying things, the less money ultimately flows into large corporations without the public being forced to subsidise them via government grants.

It also goes the other way around, the lower the demand for people with certain skills, the less money groupings of people will offer, and the fewer people will develop these skills. The incentive is thus a feedback loop, the more successful the companies, the more successful the workers, the more both grow upwards.

The promise of AI is to cut this loop open, allowing companies to theoretically lower their payroll to near zero, moving that line item to either data centre costs or the cost of AI models hosted by other companies. This has flow-on effects too: the fewer individual contributors you have, the fewer managers, HR representatives and middle managers you need. Companies are also incentivised to disintermediate and flatten their hierarchies.

With all the hype this seems like a risk-free gamble until you break apart the assumptions and consequences. There are two main assumptions:

1. The cost of using AI models will remain cheap.
2. AI will be able to continuously fulfil the duties of humans in all domains that they replace or augment.

I will disprove assumption (1) later in this section and disprove assumption (2) in the next section.

The up-front cost is seemingly sending many people into unemployment, and driving down the consumer economy. Of course, it is never that simple and rarely linear or even reversible. In taking this gamble, these companies will lose centuries of inherited experience both at the individual contributor and the management level.

This has already been done before. Entering the late 1970s, the United States had a tight grip on world exports and industries with very few exceptions. This was all off-shored over the next few decades until the US was deindustrialised. Today, the US struggles to produce tanks and artillery shells, as the last few workers that still know how retire and the economic incentive for their replacement disappears.

Software engineers, spreadsheet jockeys and other service economy workers will soon be facing the same calculus as industrial workers did during that time. They will quickly move on, or move out of the United States and other western nations. Ironically, these are the very skills needed to keep data centres running smoothly, AI models fed with data (after all it's the information technology that is upstreaming these data feeds and data creation events) and even the AI models developed. Albeit, the full effect of this will not be felt for the time being.Image
Image
The worst thing is even if decision makers are fully aware of the gamble, they cannot change the trajectory because it has become a multi-level ponzi scheme. The software and hardware companies that are currently leading the economy like Microsoft and NVIDIA are dependent on the hype surrounding AI. If that hype is undermined even a little, as we saw in early January when the open source model DeepSeek R1 was released, the western economies fall into turmoil.

For the moment, AI is subsidised to a degree most people are unaware of. OpenAI is supported by Microsoft, and operates its models at a loss. Anthropic is likewise supported by Amazon and operates its expensive (and somewhat slower) model at a loss. It only gets worse for other players like Perplexity which has to spend 164% of its revenue on cost.

The gamble is as companies become dependent on this technology, and humans are replaced, the companies will be able to afford the real cost. It's like a "trial edition" right now. You can confirm this yourself, sign up to Anthropic's Claude for example, e.g. the Max account for $200USD/month, and watch how you can easily spend $40USD of their money in 5 hours. That should tell you something is seriously wrong.

What's happening is the speculation from both governments and large corporations that are speculating on the end game, gambling their bottom line and also a future without expertise.

Worse yet, to make meaningful gains, they've had to escalate the kind of hardware they use to host these AIs. Terabytes of RAM, insane and exotic networking equipment, brand new architectures, 100s of billions of dollars in one time engineering costs to impedance match currently popular mathematical models that may change dramatically in the near future.

AI is not getting cheaper. On the upper end, where businesses are concerned, it's actually getting more expensive. If you're a gamer you already know this, with the price of RTX3090s, RTX4090s and RTX5090s going through the roof over time. Moore's law is very much dead and inflation has caught up with the otherwise deflationary electronics economy.

But... maybe, despite all these trends, it will eventually work? What if they make it cheaper or cheap enough somehow and the AI exceeds human abilities even without data? Is that even possible in today's technology? That takes us to the next section and assumption (2).Image
Image
Read 10 tweets
Sep 13, 2025
White Christian values explained #1
Why you should never speak ill of the dead. /🧵

Have you ever punched your fist in the air when you're really energetic or angry? Notice how it hurt your muscles almost the same way as making contact with something? Sometimes more, even though it's an empty punch? Every action has a reaction, and of course, your muscles, bones and joints will ultimately have to absorb the energy you used to throw your fist outwards.

When something comes out of you, especially when you attack someone, unless you are fundamentally broken, it's the same deal. If you attack someone and they don't fight back, a normal empathic person would back away or even try to make it up to the person attacked. This is part of why turning your other cheek, to a brother, is the most powerful answer to someone who has wronged you.

[Note: When I speak of "people" here I mean specifically white people. I don't believe neurology, physiology and spiritual essence is universal. In this work I hope to make us more relatable to those who do not understand why we do and say certain things.]Image
Those who keep attacking after the other side backs away or doesn't respond, are fundamentally broken. Their empathic unit is gone. Without empathy you will not be able to relate to people around you, or even understand yourself. It's an isolated hell that I don't want to even imagine. You can be surrounded by the entire world, but you will always feel alone, even on your interior.

This is why people flee a guilty conscience, often why even murderers turn themselves in or leave clues hoping to get caught. They want that part back after realizing what they have lost. Often, they will even yearn for punishment, feeling that in making a penance perhaps their soul will be redeemed.

Some even take their own lives over this, it is that strong of a force, much like an open punch, when you commit a crime that cannot be reversed, the force of your bloodied hand will ultimately come towards yourself -- inwards.Image
This is why you'll often see us get enraged when someone harms a small or helpless animal. This is a transference of empathy and a detection of a dangerous person. You see, these animals cannot respond back to whatever we do to them. It's much like an empty punch. None of us could forgive ourselves if we harmed them.

So when we see someone actively harming such animals, that have largely entrusted their safety unto us, we do get enraged for them. We become that inwards force, socially.

It's not "weird", it's actually perfectly predictable given how we think at a fundamental level: a person without empathy is a danger to the rest of us. They must be removed from society for our safety. They'd have no qualms about running us over or murdering us later.

In our experience, quite often, those who harm animals end up turning into sociopaths, serial murderer and worse. I've been to enough third world locations to see the lack of empathy and respect shown towards animals and for me, it is the main litmus test for the true value of a people.

Yet it isn't the only one...Image
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(