David Turver Profile picture
Jun 22, 2025 13 tweets 4 min read Read on X
A friend told me I needed to simplify my articles and produce a Net Zero for Dummies. Well, here goes, the folly of Net Zero in eight charts (1/12) Ed Miliband Net Zero for Dummies
Net Zero is sold as a climate fix, but it’s ineffective. UK’s 0.8% of global emissions means our cuts barely dent the climate (2/12) Image
CO2 isn’t the only climate driver—ice cores show temp swings with stable CO2. Net Zero is a futile gesture (3/12) Image
Net Zero spikes energy costs. UK had the priciest industrial & domestic electricity in 2023 (IEA data). EU 2024 stats confirm UK’s industrial power is the most expensive in Europe. Renewables aren’t cheap—they’re driving the surge (4/12) Image
Renewables like wind & solar aren’t the bargain they’re claimed to be. Renewables cost more than gas-fired power (with carbon tax). Grid balancing & backup costs make them pricier still (5/12) Image
Some new renewable projects got “cheap” contracts, but many, like Norfolk Boreas & Hornsea 4, were cancelled or rebid higher. Add grid & backup costs, and they’re still more expensive than gas. Claims of cheap renewables don’t hold up (6/12)
Net Zero is tanking the UK economy. High energy prices cut consumption & emissions & stagnated growth. No rich nation thrives with low per-capita energy. We’re exporting jobs to China & the US, fuelling unemployment & poverty (7/12) Image
“Green jobs” in wind & solar sound nice but cost £220K/year in subsidies per job. We’re swapping market-driven jobs for subsidized ones—a recipe for economic disaster. Net Zero’s job promises are a costly mirage (8/12)
Renewables aren’t green. Wind & solar use huge amounts of land & ocean, scar the environment, and rely on critical minerals mined with child/slave labor. Their energy return is low compared to production & backup needs. (9/12) Image
Net Zero curbs freedom. Gov advisors push propaganda, urge meat cuts, limit driving & flying, and control products like cement & steel. The Energy Act 2023 lets them manage your EV charger, appliances, even your fridge. Non-compliance? Jail. It’s a power grab (10/12) Image
Summary: Net Zero won’t change the weather, jacks up bills, kills jobs, and relies on unsustainable renewables. It’s a costly, controlling policy that harms the economy and personal freedom. A dumb plan pushed by dummies. (11/12)
If you enjoyed this thread please like and share. You can sign up for free to read the full article on the link below (12/12):
open.substack.com/pub/davidturve…Image
HI @threadreaderapp unroll please.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with David Turver

David Turver Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @7Kiwi

Feb 8
One failed turbine at Scroby Sands exposes the scale of the cost of decommissioning offshore wind farms. And there’s precious little cash being set aside to cover it. A thread (1/n) Image
Scroby Sands is a relatively small 60MW offshore windfarm. In 2023 one of the 30 turbines caught fire and owner RWE has decided to decommission that single turbine (2/n) Image
In the accounts up to end 2024, we can see the wind farm is losing money, with pre-tax losses of £4.7m, despite earning ROC subsidies worth £9.8m, or nearly 48% of revenue (3/n)
Read 12 tweets
Feb 1
The data is in, so now we know how much the Feed-in-Tariff (FiT) scheme cost us in 2024/25. A thread 🧵(1/n) Image
First, overall generation under the scheme was down on the year at just under 8TWh. It is beginning to look like a downtrend has been in place since 2020/21 (2/n) Image
The total cost of the scheme fell slightly too to £1.84bn (3/n) Image
Read 8 tweets
Jan 25
If NESO cannot produce a complete set of energy scenarios and we can't rely on the costs, then what is the point of NESO. A thread (1/n) Image
Many green blobbers have got very huffy about my report for the IEA looking into the various estimates of the cost of Net Zero (2/n)
iea.org.uk/publications/t…
Fulminator-in-chief was @ret_ward who even went even went so far as to write to the @iealondon and demand the report was withdrawn (3/n)
Read 13 tweets
Jan 18
Another record year for CfD subsidies with £2.6bn paid out to renewables generators. Where does all the money go? A thread 🧵(1/n) Image
2025 was a record year, with £2.6bn paid out, up from £2.4bn in 2024. Offshore wind took the lion's share of over £2bn, with tree-burning taking £428m, dedicated biomass £118m. Onshore wind took 67m and solar £0.1m. (2/n) Image
September to December 2025 were also the top 4 subsidy months on record, with November 2025 being the highest month taking £311m. (3/n) Image
Read 13 tweets
Jan 15
Yesterday's AR7 results show that Miliband, NESO and the CCC are gaslighting the nation. AR7 is locking in index-linked high electricity prices for decades. A thread 🧵(1/n) Image
So, what happened? A total of 8.4GW of offshore wind was awarded contracts. Of this 8.2GW was fixed-bottom at an average of £91/MWh in 2024 prices, with 0.2GW of floating at £216/MWh. But these prices show the price of offshore wind is rising (2/n) Image
AR7's 20-year index-linked contracts are only about £9/MWh above AR6's Hornsea 4 15-year contract that was cancelled as uneconomic. However, on a like for like basis AR7 would probably have cost about £105/MWh (3/n)
Read 15 tweets
Jan 4
Alastair and Rory caught telling porkies about solar power while shilling for lossmaking Fuse Energy. When facts and truth are ignored, The Rest is Propaganda. A thread 🧵 (1/n) Image
The central claim of their clip was that solar is a “very cheap and affordable way to generate electricity”. But in the UK at least, that claim is manifestly untrue. Solar is in fact very expensive (2/n)

We subsidise solar in 3 ways. The basic cost of solar from feed-in-tariffs is £229/MWh for 2024/25. To that we must add £33/MWh for grid balancing and backup costs, giving a total of £282/MWh, or >3X gas-fired electricity including carbon costs (3/n) Image
Read 14 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(