RFK Jr. Announces “Health Insurance Breakthrough” That Affects Nearly 260 Million Americans
This is a “monumental accomplishment,” Kennedy said. A breakthrough decades in the making.
Here’s what’s changing—and why it could save you time, stress, and money.
🧵 THREAD
In a press conference hosted today, HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and CMS Administrator Dr. Mehmet Oz announced a landmark agreement with the nation’s largest health insurers to tackle the number one healthcare problem plaguing hundreds of millions of Americans: prior authorization.
Prior authorization is the requirement for doctors and patients to get advance approval from insurance companies BEFORE certain treatments, tests, or procedures are covered. It was meant to control costs, but for 85% of Americans, it’s become a serious barrier to care.
“Doctors like myself are continually struggling with this issue,” Dr. said, explaining how the bureaucratic process not only delays treatment but deeply frustrates both providers and patients.
In 2023 alone, Medicare Advantage (which covers about 32 million people) initially denied 3.2 million prior authorization requests. Dr. Oz made clear these are not just numbers: they represent “individuals who often, in the most vulnerable time in their lives, needed something done and it was denied.”
The burden also falls heavily on physicians. On average, doctors spend 12 hours per week on paperwork, handling about 40 prior authorization cases weekly. Dr. Oz said it contributes to burnout, slows down care, and “erodes public trust in the health care system.”
But under RFK Jr.’s leadership, things are changing for the better.
An HHS press release announced today that “health insurers pledged six key reforms aimed at cutting red tape, accelerating care decisions, and enhancing transparency for patients and providers.”
These changes aim to ensure that patients and their doctors no longer have to battle insurance companies just to access common treatments like imaging, outpatient surgery, or physical therapy.
The cooperating insurers include UnitedHealthcare, Aetna, Blue Cross Blue Shield Association, Humana, Kaiser Permanente, The Cigna Group, Centene Corporation, Elevance Health, Highmark Health, CareFirst BlueCross BlueShield, and GuideWell, along with the industry trade group AHIP.
Participating insurers (which cover nearly 80% of Americans) have committed to:
• Standardize electronic prior authorization submissions using Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (FHIR®)-based application programming interfaces.• Reduce the volume of medical services subject to prior authorization by January 1, 2026.• Honor existing authorizations during insurance transitions to ensure continuity of care.• Enhance transparency and communication around authorization decisions and appeals.• Expand real-time responses to minimize delays in care with real-time approvals for most requests by 2027.• Ensure medical professionals review all clinical denials.
“These commitments represent a step in the right direction toward restoring trust, easing burdens on providers, and helping patients receive timely, evidence-based care,” said Dr. Mehmet Oz.
Eric Dane, best known for playing Dr. Mark “McSteamy” Sloan on Grey’s Anatomy, then took the stage.
Speaking not as an actor but as a patient, Dane revealed he is battling ALS (Lou Gehrig’s disease), a condition where the nervous system progressively breaks down, causing the body’s muscles to weaken and eventually stop working.
Dane described how a diagnosis like ALS brings “great uncertainty” and warned that unnecessary prior authorization only adds more stress to an already devastating situation.
“Anything we can do to give patients more certainty with fewer delays is a worthwhile endeavor,” he said. Though grateful for his ability to access top-tier care, Dane acknowledged, “I’m lucky. Not everyone is in the same position.”
He thanked CMS, HHS, and insurers for taking action, adding, “Today is about all those who need more certainty, faster answers, and more hope for recovery.”
When RFK Jr. stepped up to the podium, he shared that during the presidential transition, he was told the single most important thing he could do to improve the patient experience in America was to “end the scourge of pre-authorization.”
And that’s what Kennedy did by bringing together the nation’s largest health insurers and securing a landmark agreement to overhaul the system.
Kennedy shared a chilling account of what would happen when doctors dared to put patients before insurance company policies.
He described a patient from New Jersey who was suffering from severe heart failure and was transferred to New York-Presbyterian Hospital for a life-saving transplant.
The transplant itself had been approved by the insurance company, but shockingly, the mechanical heart pump needed to keep the patient alive until the transplant could take place was denied.
With the patient already in the operating room, the medical team faced an impossible choice: follow the insurer’s decision and let the patient die, or act to save his life, risking their careers. They chose to implant the device.
The patient survived and ultimately received the transplant. But Kennedy revealed that “my friend—the doctor—was then sued by the insurance company” for defying the denial.
That lawsuit was later dropped, but Kennedy said the ordeal highlights the madness of a system that punishes doctors for putting patients ahead of insurance companies.
In case health insurers decide to flake out, Kennedy outlined the safeguards in place to ensure they follow through on their new prior authorization reforms—something he acknowledged they’ve failed to do in the past.
“This time is very, very different,” he said. One reason is scale: “257 million patients are covered by the group that we met with this morning,” Kennedy noted, calling it “unprecedented.”
But what truly sets this effort apart, Kennedy explained, is structure. “We have standards this time. We have deliverables. We have specificity on those deliverables. We have metrics. We have deadlines. And we have oversight.”
Kennedy ended his speech by calling the prior authorization reform a “monumental accomplishment”—a breakthrough decades in the making.
He highlighted that Congressman Greg Murphy has been fighting to address this issue for 35 years, and now, real change is underway.
Kennedy thanked the insurance companies and hospital systems for stepping up, and gave special credit to President Trump for providing the leadership that made the agreement possible.
“We hope to see the dividends of this success story immediately materialize, as a better experience for the American, for millions, hundreds of millions, literally, of American patients,” Kennedy said.
SUMMARY:
• 85% of Americans have been affected by prior authorization delays, making it the top complaint from both patients and doctors, according to Dr. Oz.
• In 2023, Medicare Advantage denied 3.2 million prior authorization requests—often for urgent, life-saving care.
• Doctors spend an average of 12 hours a week handling about 40 prior authorization cases, contributing to burnout and delayed treatment.
• RFK Jr. secured a landmark agreement with insurers covering 257 million Americans to overhaul the prior authorization system.
• Six major reforms were pledged: standardizing electronic submissions, reducing services requiring approval by 2026, honoring authorizations during plan changes, improving transparency, expanding real-time decisions by 2027, and ensuring clinical denials are reviewed by medical professionals.
• Unlike past efforts, this deal includes clear metrics, deadlines, and CMS oversight to hold insurers accountable. “We have standards… and we have oversight,” Kennedy said.
• Kennedy called it a “monumental accomplishment” and a long-overdue fix for a broken system.
Watch the full press conference below:
Thanks for reading! This post took time and care to put together, and I did my best to give this story the coverage it deserved.
If you appreciate my work, the most effective way to support it is to sign up for news alerts at vigilantfox.com or subscribe to this page on X.
Your monthly subscription goes further than you think. Thank you so much for your support.
A little bit about me: I spent over a decade working as a licensed healthcare professional. But when the Biden administration rolled out its vaccine mandates, I couldn’t stay silent. My conscience simply wouldn’t let me.
That’s when I started this page.
Since then, I’ve shared thousands of clips featuring doctors and scientists who were brave enough to question the official COVID narrative.
Along the way, we’ve reached billions of views and helped millions of people understand the other side of the COVID story that the government didn’t want out.
If you’re looking for clear, honest information without corporate spin, you’re in the right place. Follow me for straight-to-the-point clips and threads that challenge the narrative.
Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) is a natural solvent derived from trees. It penetrates the skin, delivers drugs deep into tissues, and even across the blood-brain barrier.
It’s powerfully anti-inflammatory, pain-relieving, and boosts circulation.
A true “umbrella remedy” capable of treating a wide range of challenging ailments.
Grok AI says COVID vaccines are “absolutely safe and effective.”
Meanwhile, other bots are literally telling people how to end their lives.
This isn’t a glitch—it’s part of the plan. A look inside the mindset of the people designing the systems that will soon decide what you’re allowed to say, believe, and do.
Now, those same people want to guide you through mass unemployment with “universal high income.”
So ask yourself: is this really who you want in charge of your money, your voice, and your children’s future?
🧵 THREAD
To give you a brief overview, the UN, WEF, international bankers, and technocrats are planning to collapse the world as we know it through a planned demolition.
Their goal is to rebuild into the digital age. You may have heard it called the Great Reset, the Fourth Industrial Revolution, or the Golden Age—all the names that are far more palatable than the coming reality, which will see everyone locked in a digital prison of 24/7 surveillance, monitoring, and slavery. And it will indeed be slavery, because after the AI takeover, humans will be left with no work, no money, and no purpose.
The proposed solution to this is “free” money. A universal basic income—or universal high income, as Elon Musk calls it. It will be a nominal amount of digital currency paid to you by the powers that be, as long as you comply with what they tell you. If their plan succeeds, you won’t be able to survive without their digital currency. That is their plan and they’ve clearly outlined it in multiple texts.
@zeeemedia reported on this in depth two years ago. You can watch that report here. It’s vitally important.
So, how when can we expect this plan to come to fruition? What would you say if we told you it’s already here?
Today, we’re digging into the worldwide rollout of universal basic income, what that means for humanity, and what you can do to prepare and fight back.
Tonight’s report opened with a look back at Andrew Yang’s push for universal basic income (UBI).
In 2019 and 2020, the public wasn’t ready to embrace something so sweeping. But once technocrats gained serious influence over global policy and the digital future, the landscape changed. What was once dismissed as a fringe idea has quietly moved into the mainstream, reshaped as part of a broader global transformation.
That shift became easier to grasp after hearing how many tech elites envision humanity’s future. Yuval Noah Harari, for example, once said people will be drugged and distracted because their lives will be “meaningless.” Remarks like that revealed how the architects of the coming system view the average person—not as empowered individuals, but as managed subjects.
The pandemic years only intensified that picture. What had long been called a conspiracy—including the Great Reset—became visible in plain sight, embedded in the proposals and language of global institutions. A “mass awakening” followed.
One idea connected it all: digital ID. Once identity is tied to behavior and access to money, control isn’t imposed—it’s embedded. The result is a shift toward a social-credit-style model, where participation depends on compliance.
In 2005, Joe Scarborough said something you would never hear on TV news today.
Speaking with RFK Jr., he legitimized the belief that vaccines CAN cause autism.
“Something happened in 1989!” Scarborough declared firmly.
In his own words, he said: “Parents would CONSTANTLY come to [him], and they’d bring [him] video tapes of their [formerly healthy] children. And they’re all about the age of [Scarborough’s] son or younger. Something happened in 1989!”
Twenty years later, it’s hard to ignore that the mainstream media never airs segments like this anymore.
Did the evidence change... or something else? 🧵
Most people have absolutely no idea how much public-relations machinery shapes what they believe about health.
PR campaigns don’t just change opinions, they change language in the process.
And when language changes, memories and ideas seem to disappear—including things we used to openly acknowledge, like vaccine-induced brain inflammation and neurological injury.
Today, those concepts barely exist in public vocabulary, but just decades ago they were recognized everywhere.
The shift happens slowly. That’s how the tactic is so successful. Most people don’t even realize it’s happening.
For example, take a look at this 1983 debate that took place on the largest talk show in America. A conversation like this would never, ever happen on TV today.
This information comes from the work of medical researcher @MidwesternDoc.
For all the sources and details, read the full report below.
A long-awaited vaccine reversal has just sent shockwaves through the US medical establishment after 34 long years.
ACIP just voted 8–3 to end the universal Hepatitis B birth-dose recommendation.
For the first time since 1991, parents (not a blanket federal recommendation) will decide whether their newborn receives this shot in the first hours or days of life.
Here are the three voting members who still insist every child needs a hepatitis B shot at birth. Remember their names. 🧵
Voting YES to end the universal mandate: Retsef Levi and seven other members.
Voting NO: Dr. H. Cody Meissner, Dr. Joseph R. Hibbeln, and Dr. Raymond Pollak.
Two of the three issued grave warnings, insisting the decision to end the universal hepatitis B recommendation will “cause harm” and that the panel will have to “accept this responsibility when this harm is caused.”
Video: @Holden_Culotta
The decision to end the universal hepatitis B vaccination recommendation is a huge deal because the three-shot series is required for public school attendance in nearly every state, and most states base their mandates directly on ACIP recommendations.
Today’s decision instantly places the decades-old school requirement on unstable ground.
The Hepatitis B vaccine is mandated for children to attend public school in virtually every state.
Hepatitis B is transmitted through needles or sexual contact, so why is this vaccine pushed on babies their first day of life?
Doctors don’t have a valid answer. If you ask them why your child needs the Hep B shot on the first day of life, they give you the lame excuse that there could be a hepatitis B-infected needle on the playground.
Mothers are tested for Hep B beforehand, so the disease poses no risk to the baby, as long as the mother is negative. However, the US still recommends that every child be injected on the first day of life.
Make it make sense.
Many questions about the safety of the hepatitis B vaccine have been raised by figures such as Robert Kennedy Jr., Dr. Sherri Tenpenny, Dr. Casey Means, and countless concerned parents.
But one CDC contractor, Dr. Cynthia Nevison, walked into the ACIP meeting and raised another critical question: has universal Hepatitis B vaccination, after 34 long years, even lowered Hepatitis B cases on a population level?
Dr. Nevison’s answer to that question might surprise you. 🧵
The first slide Dr. Nevison presented showed acute Hepatitis B cases over time.
At first glance, it looks like universal vaccination in 1991 is the reason for the downtrend, but if you look closer, you’ll notice that acute Hepatitis B cases were already falling sharply compared to when they peaked in 1985.
Moreover, if you look at the 20–24 (light blue) and 15–19 (orange) age groups, you’ll notice that the rates of acute hepatitis B were falling long before the vaccination could ever be given credit, because the vaccine would not have an impact on 20–24-year-olds until around 2011–2012, or until 2006–2007 for 15–19-year-olds, Dr. Nevison noted.
Did you know that you can have somebody murdered for their organs if you pay for an organ transplant in China?
It sounds far too dark, but it’s true.
Hop on a plane, pay for a transplant, and you’ll receive an organ with an impossibly short wait time.
But here’s the catch: chances are that organ came from a murdered prisoner.
China denies this is happening, but mounting evidence, whistleblower testimonies, and impossible transplant timelines tell a very different story.
And if that’s happening in China with organ transplants, what’s being swept under the rug here in America?
This is the dark side of organ transplants nobody had the integrity to tell you about. 🧵
Most people think organ donation is a simple act of generosity. Check the box. Save a life. End of story.
But behind the scenes, a series of federal investigations has exposed something far more disturbing. And there’s no generosity in sight.
The system meant to protect those barely clinging to life is failing—and in some cases, it’s a catastrophic failure.
Take Jenny’s story for example. Jenny was declared brain dead when she wasn’t at all. Terrifyingly, she was stuck inside her body, fully aware of everything that was happening—and being said—around her.
Including a doctor telling med students that her husband was “unreasonable” for not signing her organs—and her life—away.
Thankfully he didn’t or Jenny wouldn’t be here today to share her story.
What is brain death? There is no standard.
The ethical line between life and death is not where you think it is.
Modern medicine has slowly reshaped how we think—and feel—about death.
Tools like CPR, ventilators, and organ transplantation have created the belief that death is negotiable—something to be delayed, managed, or “conquered.”
That belief built enormous trust. And with that trust came enormous profit.
Organ transplants can cost a staggering $446,000–$1.9 million each. In the US, healthcare now consumes 17.6% of the economy.
Where scarcity meets profit, exploitation always follows.