RFK Jr. just walked into Congress and set the place on fire.
They were not ready for this.
Rep. Dingell thought she had Kennedy cornered on drug prices—then he dismantled her argument in one fell swoop.
But the real firestorm came when he called out the one Democrat Rep. who took more Big Pharma money than anyone else on the committee.
🧵 THREAD
Before you fix a broken system, you have to be honest about how broken it truly is.
That’s how HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. opened his testimony before Congress by offering a brutal assessment of America’s healthcare crisis.
It was a warning shot.
“The United States remains the SICKEST developed nation,” he said.
“And yet we spend $4.5 trillion annually on healthcare—2 to 3 times more per capita than comparable nations.”
Kennedy sounded the alarm: this isn’t just wasteful, it’s unsustainable.
Healthcare costs are growing faster than the economy, yet outcomes are getting worse.
Americans are paying more to stay sick.
“If we don’t stanch this trend, we will ransom our children to bankruptcy, servitude and disastrous health consequences.”
“We won’t solve this problem by throwing more money at it,” he added.
“We must spend smarter.”
His goal?
Strip out bureaucracy, realign incentives, and redirect funds toward things that actually improve health—not just manage disease.
That’s when Kennedy unveiled his historic 7-part budget proposal, a sweeping reform plan designed to flip the healthcare system on its head.
1. Tackle mental health and addiction head-on
“These issues now rival chronic diseases in their impact… HHS will aggressively combat the opioid crisis, especially the spread of synthetic drugs like fentanyl.”
2. Prioritize nutrition and healthy lifestyles
“The president's budget requests $94 billion in discretionary funds to support these priorities, including the Administration for a Healthy America.”
3. Clean up the U.S. food system
“We will equip FDA to remove harmful chemicals from food and packaging and close the GRAS (‘generally recognized as safe’) loophole.”
4. Refocus NIH and CDC research priorities
“We’ll end gain-of-function experiments and eliminate funding for research based on radical gender ideology. At the CDC, we’re returning to core missions—tracking diseases, investigating outbreaks, and cutting waste.”
5. Eliminate DEI funding and fight real poverty
“We will move beyond lip service to communities of color and take meaningful action to address their needs.”
6. Modernize cybersecurity and health IT
“The AI revolution has arrived… We’re using it to manage healthcare data securely and speed up drug approvals.”
7. Rebuild public trust
“Trust that eroded through years of industry capture, waste, and misplaced priorities.”
“We will launch a new era of transparency in public service, creating an honest, science-driven HHS that answers to the president, to Congress and the American people.”
Before we roll the next clip: if you’re not following me, you’re missing out on critical updates.
Hit the bell 🔔 to stay sharp and informed.
→ @VigilantFox
Now, back to the story you came for.
Kennedy’s plan landed like a thunderclap and the pushback began almost immediately.
Not everyone in the room welcomed Kennedy’s vision.
Rep. Diana DeGette zeroed in on concerns that NIH scientists could face retaliation for speaking out.
She pressed Kennedy to commit, unequivocally, that no disciplinary action would be taken against those who signed a letter questioning his leadership.
“It should be an easy answer because it's illegal,” she said.
Kennedy insisted his goal was the opposite, that HHS under his direction would “commit that we are absolutely depoliticizing science at NIH for the first time.”
Then he slammed the Biden-era politicization of science across all agencies.
This is what he was working to rid.
“The Biden administration….Ms. Chairwoman, the Biden administration politicized the science and I just gave you three of thousands of examples of how they did that.”
But when asked about the letter directly, he said it was the first he’d heard of it.
Then, Rep. Frank Pallone jumped in. He was visibly rattled over Kennedy’s stance on vaccines.
He launched into a tirade, accusing Secretary Kennedy of shutting the public out of vaccine policy decisions.
“You’ve made a number of major decisions about vaccines,” he snapped.
“There’s been no public comment process. No accountability.”
Then came the outburst: “What are you afraid of?! Are you just afraid of receiving public comments on proposals?!”
Kennedy, unfazed, responded steadily: “We have a public process for regulating vaccines. It’s called the ACIP committee—and it’s a public committee.”
That’s when Pallone lost the plot.
“You fired the committee! You fired the ACIP!” he shouted.
Wrong move.
Kennedy shot back without blinking: “I fired people who had conflicts with the pharmaceutical industry.”
Then he delivered the line that ended it.
“That committee has been a template for medical malpractice for 30 years.”
Pallone tried to recover, but was left stuttering.
“I... I... look, I, I... I can’t…”
And just like that, the credibility gap was laid bare.
Kennedy turned the spotlight back on Pallone and lit a firestorm amongst the Democrats.
It was epic!
“If I can take a minute to respond to something that Congressman Pallone said…”
He reminded Pallone of a conversation they had 15 years ago, when Pallone was a vocal advocate for families harmed by vaccines.
“You were very adamant about it,” Kennedy said.
“You were the leading member of Congress on that issue.”
Then came the bombshell revelation:
“Since then, you’ve accepted $2 million from pharmaceutical companies in contributions—more than any other member of this committee.”
Kennedy didn’t accuse. He simply pointed out what had changed.
“And your enthusiasm for supporting the old ACIP committee, which was completely rife and pervasive with pharmaceutical conflicts, seems to be an outcome of those contributions.”
The room erupted. Democrats tried to shout him down.
Chairman Buddy Carter called for order and asked Kennedy to retract the comment.
Kennedy didn’t argue. He simply smiled and said, “They’re retracted.”
But the damage was done. The cat was already out of the bag.
Bobby sat back and watched the chaos that he had created, with a slight smile. He knew that he had just EXPOSED Pallone.
As the hearing resumed, Rep. Debbie Dingell took the floor and steered the conversation toward drug pricing.
She tried to box in Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. with a loyalty test to failed Biden-era drug pricing policies.
“This is why Democrats worked so hard to pass the Inflation Reduction Act and create the Medicare Drug Price Negotiation Program…”
“Do you support the drug price negotiation program and commit to using the tools and authorities provided to you under the law, to drive down prescription drug costs for the American?”
But Kennedy wasn’t playing along. He schooled her.
He pointed to the historic vision laid out by President Trump, one aimed at delivering real, system-wide relief.
“We’re using every tool that’s given to us, and President Trump has ordered me to do something that no other president has, which is to establish across-the-board Most Favored Nations, so that we’re not paying more than Europeans are.”
“We are in negotiations right now, today, with the drug companies over that.”
“We’re going to be able to lower drug prices during this administration—more than any administration in history.”
Trump’s plan isn’t about party politics.
It’s about results and Kennedy made that crystal clear.
Rep. Dingell was left with a fazed expression on her face, as she came to understand that MAHA meant actual change, not Democrat talking points.
Then came a topic few in Washington like to revisit: the 340,000+ unaccompanied migrant children lost during the Biden administration.
It was truly heartbreaking what the previous administration allowed HHS to do.
Rep. Kat Cammack didn’t hold back.
She detailed how HHS failed to properly vet sponsors, and how law enforcement was denied access to critical data.
“These kids were sent to unsafe addresses, even non-existent ones,” she said.
“They were exposed to trafficking and exploitation.”
Kennedy didn’t try to shift blame, but he did explain what went wrong.
“They were emphasizing speed over security,” he said.
“There were political reasons for that. They wanted the optics of empty detention centers.”
In horrifying detail, he described traffickers picking up dozens of children with fake IDs and shipping them to parking lots, strip clubs, and container yards.
“One person got 42 kids to one address,” Kennedy said.
He vowed to stop it.
Under his leadership, HHS now requires DNA testing, ID checks, income verification, and background screening for every sponsor.
No exceptions.
This is what accountability looks like when the cameras are gone.
Finally, Rep. John James brought the conversation back to the big picture.
He asked Kennedy how we could dismantle the perverse incentives that reward sickness over health, where every actor in the system profits from disease rather than wellness.
Kennedy agreed completely.
“At every level of the system… it's just a bundle of perverse incentives,” he said.
“That basically put every actor in the system—pharmaceutical companies, providers, hospitals and insurance companies—in an advantageous position to increase the number of sick Americans.”
The way forward, Kennedy said, is to realign incentives around outcomes.
“We want outcome-based medical care.”
“We want value-based medical care,” he explained.
“We’re working through the Center for Medical Intervention—to explore a number of pilot projects that do just that. And then we want to roll them out across the system.”
Kennedy added that he’s already meeting with the nation’s top insurers to make it happen.
“They want to do it too,” he said.
Special thanks @overton_news for helping me put this thread together!
If you’re into truth-seeking news accounts like mine, they’re definitely worth a follow!
—> @overton_news
Thanks for reading! This post took time and care to put together, and I did my best to give this story the coverage it deserved.
If you appreciate my work, the most effective way to support it is to sign up for news alerts at vigilantfox.com or subscribe to this page on X.
Your monthly subscription goes further than you think. Thank you so much for your support.
@overton_news For more in-depth stories the mainstream won’t touch, follow me on 𝕏.
—> @VigilantFox
Looking for something else to read?
RFK Jr. Announces “Health Insurance Breakthrough” That Affects Nearly 260 Million Americans
#10 – CIA whistleblower exposes how intelligence agencies gather blackmail on politicians without them even suspecting it.
You’ll see how this connects to Epstein.
John Kiriakou reveals his superior got a promotion and a medal when he recruited a copy machine repairman.
At first, Kiriakou laughed, but then he realized the brilliance of the plan when he learned that the repairman secretly sent every document from a prime minister’s office straight to the CIA.
How did he do it? By planting a tiny device on the copy machine.
“He [my trainer] said, all of us want to recruit the prime minister. We’re not going to recruit the prime minister. We’re not even going to have access to the prime minister. But the prime minister’s got a copy machine in his office.
“And every once in a while, that machine is going to need to be cleaned and serviced. So you recruit the copy machine repairman. And when he goes in there to make his repair or to clean the drums or whatever, he installs a little device that we give him so that every time somebody makes a copy, it transmits a copy back to the CIA.”
What happened next?
He said, “I got a promotion. I got a medal. I got a photo op with the director. It made my career…”
Because this flow of information was pure leverage for the CIA:
“You know what they’re thinking. You know their next move. You know who their enemies are and who their allies are. Maybe it’s their position on trade negotiations. Maybe the prime minister has a health problem you need to plan for. You never know what might come through,” Kiriakou explained.
“That ONE critical nugget is all it takes.”
That, he says, is EXACTLY what Epstein was to intelligence agencies: someone with access (like the copy machine repairman) who quietly delivered leverage on the world’s elite.
*SEE THE NEXT 9 STORIES BELOW*
🧵 THREAD
#9 - Bill Nye “The Science Guy” says RFK Jr.’s claims about vaccines and autism have been “DEBUNKED up and down.”
Nye made these remarks after BLOCKING Kennedy, who was sending him “page after page” of material claiming vaccines cause autism.
“He was relentless.”
“I just told him he’s confused causation with correlation,” Nye said.
“Just because somebody got a vaccination and then somebody else got autism doesn’t mean one caused the other. This is science.”
#8 - Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene says Ghislaine Maxwell’s “little black book” has over 2,000 names of rich, powerful people, sealed by the court.
Scott Jennings just took on an entire CNN panel of Democrats—and won.
This was a reckoning.
One New York Times reporter tried to frame Republicans as the “party of taking things away” like healthcare.
That's when @ScottJenningsKY unloaded:
“My rebuttal to that would be Democrats have become the party of EXPLODING government benefit programs... and then saying, 'Gee whiz, now people are trying to take things away.'”
He followed up with something about Obamacare that ended the debate on the spot.
Watch all 4 savage takedowns. This is Jennings at his best.
🧵 THREAD
Scott Jennings didn’t wait for introductions before lighting a fuse on CNN’s panel.
He went directly after Senator Thom Tillis, dismissing his criticism of the GOP’s Big Beautiful Bill as not just wrong, but politically clueless.
“I think he's wrong,” Jennings said without blinking.
“And most—virtually every Republican thinks he's wrong.”
His argument was clear: this was no time for Republicans to apologize for enforcing work requirements or limiting benefits to people in the country illegally.
“There's nothing politically devastating about trying to bar 1.4 million illegal aliens from getting welfare,” he explained.
“There's nothing politically devastating about encouraging 4.8 million people....who choose not to work....to try to work a little in order to get government benefits.”
He reminded the panel that the bill wasn’t just about cuts. It also included a $50 billion fund for rural hospitals, something Tillis himself had raised as a concern.
Jennings laid it out clearly: the GOP had delivered, and they shouldn’t act ashamed of it.
“So I don't agree with his political analysis, nor does virtually every other Republican who helped to craft and ultimately pass this bill,” he said.
“And I think Republicans ought to lean into these things: work requirements are good. Encouraging work instead of welfare is a good thing and it will work in campaigns.”
It didn’t take long for the tension to spike.
Axios reporter Alex Thompson zeroed in on what he thought was a potential vulnerability: the bill’s Medicaid changes wouldn’t kick in until after the midterms.
It was a classic “gotcha” moment—except Jennings didn’t take the bait.
“You say, Republicans should lean in, but most of these Medicaid cuts don't come until after the midterms. Why is that?” Thompson pressed.
Jennings was ready and waiting.
“Well, I mean, states run the Medicaid program,” he replied.
“I do think it's reasonable to give them time to prepare to enact changes to the program.”
Then he turned the tables, accusing Democrats of preparing to weaponize the issue with fear campaigns rather than talk policy.
“But it doesn't matter, because Democrats are obviously going to go all in on this hysteria campaign,” Jennings warned.
His message to Republicans was crystal clear: don’t expect a polite debate....be ready to fight for the argument.
“So if you're running a Republican campaign out there, you're going to have to debate the issue,” he said.
This was his advice to fellow Republicans:
“And I'm telling you as a debating point, if Democrats want to run on giving Medicaid to illegal aliens and people who won't work or choose not to work, Republicans have a counter-message that will work if they are willing to courageously defend it.”
#10 - Tucker Carlson has two theories why Pam Bondi won’t release the Epstein Files.
Theory #1: “Trump is involved.”
But Tucker thinks this explanation is not very likely.
That brings us to Theory #2, which is that Tucker believes the “intel services are at the very center of this story—US and Israeli—and they’re being protected.”
“I think that seems like the most plausible explanation,” Carlson said.
His guest Saagar Enjeti agreed. “That’s the most obvious explanation.”
He explained that the CIA has a long history of “multiple documented cases of ped*philia inside the CIA perpetrated by CIA officers.”
“The only time they actually prosecuted somebody for child p*rnography was when he was already being prosecuted for mishandling classified information,” he added.
“Well, when they want to crush you, they put kiddie p*rn on your computer,” Carlson replied.
The clip ended with a reference to a chilling quote by Former CIA Counterintelligence Official Daniel Payne, in which he said:
On government devices, “the amount of child p*rn I see is just unbelievable.”
*SEE THE NEXT 9 STORIES BELOW*
🧵 THREAD
#9 - Pam Bondi changes the story on the “tens of thousands of videos of Epstein WITH children.”
BEFORE: Tens of thousands of videos of Epstein WITH children.
AFTER: Tens of thousands of videos of child p*rn were DOWNLOADED by Jeffrey Epstein.
Credit: @Ultrafrog17
#8 - Trump says it is “unbelievable” that people are still talking about Jeffrey Epstein after all these years.
“Are you still talking about Jeffrey Epstein? This guy’s been talked about for years… That is unbelievable. Do you want to waste the time [answering this, Pam Bondi]?… I can’t believe you’re asking a question on Epstein at a time like this.”
Pam Bondi added, “THAT’S IT on Epstein.”
This two-minute clip shared by @DiligentDenizen captured the full context, and Trump supporters aren’t happy.
Democrat Party rhetoric against ICE and Border Patrol finally boiled over....and turned violent.
Agents were ambushed in McAllen, Texas today, just as Tom Homan had warned.
But Stephen Miller just EXPOSED the irrefutable reason Democrats are at war with ICE and enforcing immigration laws.
🧵 THREAD
What happened in McAllen, Texas, on Monday wasn’t just another isolated shooting.
It was the culmination of months of inflamed Democrat rhetoric finally crossing a dangerous line.
Authorities say a 27-year-old man, equipped with a rifle and tactical gear, ambushed Border Patrol agents at the entrance of their sector annex.
The attacker, later identified as Ryan Luis Mosqueda, exchanged fire with agents and local police before being killed.
According to the Department of Homeland Security, two officers....including one shot in the knee....and a Border Patrol employee were injured in the chaos.
This was the direct result of relentless anti-ICE messaging from the Democrats and the media, that have portrayed Border Patrol agents as villains rather than public servants.
But just hours later, White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt was asked about Democrat calls for violence which led to this very incident.
A reporter brought up the ambush: citing radical Democratic Congresswoman Pramila Jayapal’s recent comment that she gets “inspired” when activists obstruct ICE, he asked whether the administration wanted Democrats to moderate their language.
Karoline Leavitt’s answer was direct and unapologetic.
“We certainly call on Democrats to tone down their rhetoric against ICE and Border Patrol agents, who again, are everyday men and women,” she said.
It wasn’t just a call for civility, but for understanding.
All Americans have a job to do.
“I would encourage it AOC and other Democrats to actually meet with the United States Border Patrol.”
“These are honorable Americans who are just simply trying to do their job to enforce the law. They go home to their families every night just like we all do, and they deserve respect and dignity for trying to enforce our nation's immigration laws and to remove public safety threats from our communities.”
Leavitt confirmed that the White House was following developments in McAllen closely, working with federal agencies to understand exactly what led to the shooting.
EXCLUSIVE: Rescue Pilot Exposes the Horrific Truth About Texas Floods
Something is deeply wrong in Texas. Officials won’t tell you how bad it really is.
We spoke to the rescue pilot who watched families beg for help.
What he revealed will leave you outraged.
🧵 THREAD
Over the 4th of July weekend, Central Texas was hit with catastrophic flash floods—the worst of it being in Kerrville.
First, we want to offer our heartfelt condolences to everyone who lost loved ones. Our prayers are with the families, emergency services, volunteers, and everyone involved in the recovery efforts across this battered region.
There have also been questions about weather modification operations in the area, which we’ll be discussing later in the broadcast.
Joining us first is private helicopter pilot Gary Heavin, who has been on the ground helping with the response. He’ll share what he’s seen firsthand and explain how it compares to the prior tragedy in North Carolina, which he also assisted in.
The conversation began with Heavin sharing a haunting story about piloting a search and rescue mission with a grieving father as they combed the riverbank for the body of his 17-year-old daughter.
“To see this man's courage… was just a terrible thing,” he said, his voice breaking. “It was tough for me to hold it together,” he added. Just an hour before the interview, he received the devastating news that they had finally found her body.
The exchange was raw and deeply emotional, laying bare the unimaginable pain these families are enduring.
It was a stark reminder of the devastating human toll these deadly floods have left behind.