The Vigilant Fox 🦊 Profile picture
Jun 24, 2025 15 tweets 10 min read Read on X
RFK Jr. just walked into Congress and set the place on fire.

They were not ready for this.

Rep. Dingell thought she had Kennedy cornered on drug prices—then he dismantled her argument in one fell swoop.

But the real firestorm came when he called out the one Democrat Rep. who took more Big Pharma money than anyone else on the committee.

🧵 THREADImage
Before you fix a broken system, you have to be honest about how broken it truly is.

That’s how HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. opened his testimony before Congress by offering a brutal assessment of America’s healthcare crisis.

It was a warning shot.

“The United States remains the SICKEST developed nation,” he said.

“And yet we spend $4.5 trillion annually on healthcare—2 to 3 times more per capita than comparable nations.”

Kennedy sounded the alarm: this isn’t just wasteful, it’s unsustainable.

Healthcare costs are growing faster than the economy, yet outcomes are getting worse.

Americans are paying more to stay sick.

“If we don’t stanch this trend, we will ransom our children to bankruptcy, servitude and disastrous health consequences.”

“We won’t solve this problem by throwing more money at it,” he added.

“We must spend smarter.”

His goal?

Strip out bureaucracy, realign incentives, and redirect funds toward things that actually improve health—not just manage disease.
That’s when Kennedy unveiled his historic 7-part budget proposal, a sweeping reform plan designed to flip the healthcare system on its head.

1. Tackle mental health and addiction head-on

“These issues now rival chronic diseases in their impact… HHS will aggressively combat the opioid crisis, especially the spread of synthetic drugs like fentanyl.”

2. Prioritize nutrition and healthy lifestyles

“The president's budget requests $94 billion in discretionary funds to support these priorities, including the Administration for a Healthy America.”

3. Clean up the U.S. food system

“We will equip FDA to remove harmful chemicals from food and packaging and close the GRAS (‘generally recognized as safe’) loophole.”

4. Refocus NIH and CDC research priorities

“We’ll end gain-of-function experiments and eliminate funding for research based on radical gender ideology. At the CDC, we’re returning to core missions—tracking diseases, investigating outbreaks, and cutting waste.”

5. Eliminate DEI funding and fight real poverty

“We will move beyond lip service to communities of color and take meaningful action to address their needs.”

6. Modernize cybersecurity and health IT

“The AI revolution has arrived… We’re using it to manage healthcare data securely and speed up drug approvals.”

7. Rebuild public trust

“Trust that eroded through years of industry capture, waste, and misplaced priorities.”

“We will launch a new era of transparency in public service, creating an honest, science-driven HHS that answers to the president, to Congress and the American people.”
Before we roll the next clip: if you’re not following me, you’re missing out on critical updates.

Hit the bell 🔔 to stay sharp and informed.

→ @VigilantFox

Now, back to the story you came for. Image
Kennedy’s plan landed like a thunderclap and the pushback began almost immediately.

Not everyone in the room welcomed Kennedy’s vision.

Rep. Diana DeGette zeroed in on concerns that NIH scientists could face retaliation for speaking out.

She pressed Kennedy to commit, unequivocally, that no disciplinary action would be taken against those who signed a letter questioning his leadership.

“It should be an easy answer because it's illegal,” she said.

Kennedy insisted his goal was the opposite, that HHS under his direction would “commit that we are absolutely depoliticizing science at NIH for the first time.”

Then he slammed the Biden-era politicization of science across all agencies.

This is what he was working to rid.

“The Biden administration….Ms. Chairwoman, the Biden administration politicized the science and I just gave you three of thousands of examples of how they did that.”

But when asked about the letter directly, he said it was the first he’d heard of it.
Then, Rep. Frank Pallone jumped in. He was visibly rattled over Kennedy’s stance on vaccines.

He launched into a tirade, accusing Secretary Kennedy of shutting the public out of vaccine policy decisions.

“You’ve made a number of major decisions about vaccines,” he snapped.

“There’s been no public comment process. No accountability.”

Then came the outburst: “What are you afraid of?! Are you just afraid of receiving public comments on proposals?!”

Kennedy, unfazed, responded steadily: “We have a public process for regulating vaccines. It’s called the ACIP committee—and it’s a public committee.”

That’s when Pallone lost the plot.

“You fired the committee! You fired the ACIP!” he shouted.

Wrong move.

Kennedy shot back without blinking: “I fired people who had conflicts with the pharmaceutical industry.”

Then he delivered the line that ended it.

“That committee has been a template for medical malpractice for 30 years.”

Pallone tried to recover, but was left stuttering.

“I... I... look, I, I... I can’t…”

And just like that, the credibility gap was laid bare.
Kennedy turned the spotlight back on Pallone and lit a firestorm amongst the Democrats.

It was epic!

“If I can take a minute to respond to something that Congressman Pallone said…”

He reminded Pallone of a conversation they had 15 years ago, when Pallone was a vocal advocate for families harmed by vaccines.

“You were very adamant about it,” Kennedy said.

“You were the leading member of Congress on that issue.”

Then came the bombshell revelation:

“Since then, you’ve accepted $2 million from pharmaceutical companies in contributions—more than any other member of this committee.”

Kennedy didn’t accuse. He simply pointed out what had changed.

“And your enthusiasm for supporting the old ACIP committee, which was completely rife and pervasive with pharmaceutical conflicts, seems to be an outcome of those contributions.”

The room erupted. Democrats tried to shout him down.

Chairman Buddy Carter called for order and asked Kennedy to retract the comment.

Kennedy didn’t argue. He simply smiled and said, “They’re retracted.”

But the damage was done. The cat was already out of the bag.
Bobby sat back and watched the chaos that he had created, with a slight smile. He knew that he had just EXPOSED Pallone. Image
As the hearing resumed, Rep. Debbie Dingell took the floor and steered the conversation toward drug pricing.

She tried to box in Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. with a loyalty test to failed Biden-era drug pricing policies.

“This is why Democrats worked so hard to pass the Inflation Reduction Act and create the Medicare Drug Price Negotiation Program…”

“Do you support the drug price negotiation program and commit to using the tools and authorities provided to you under the law, to drive down prescription drug costs for the American?”

But Kennedy wasn’t playing along. He schooled her.

He pointed to the historic vision laid out by President Trump, one aimed at delivering real, system-wide relief.

“We’re using every tool that’s given to us, and President Trump has ordered me to do something that no other president has, which is to establish across-the-board Most Favored Nations, so that we’re not paying more than Europeans are.”

“We are in negotiations right now, today, with the drug companies over that.”

“We’re going to be able to lower drug prices during this administration—more than any administration in history.”

Trump’s plan isn’t about party politics.

It’s about results and Kennedy made that crystal clear.
Rep. Dingell was left with a fazed expression on her face, as she came to understand that MAHA meant actual change, not Democrat talking points. Image
Then came a topic few in Washington like to revisit: the 340,000+ unaccompanied migrant children lost during the Biden administration.

It was truly heartbreaking what the previous administration allowed HHS to do.

Rep. Kat Cammack didn’t hold back.

She detailed how HHS failed to properly vet sponsors, and how law enforcement was denied access to critical data.

“These kids were sent to unsafe addresses, even non-existent ones,” she said.

“They were exposed to trafficking and exploitation.”

Kennedy didn’t try to shift blame, but he did explain what went wrong.

“They were emphasizing speed over security,” he said.

“There were political reasons for that. They wanted the optics of empty detention centers.”

In horrifying detail, he described traffickers picking up dozens of children with fake IDs and shipping them to parking lots, strip clubs, and container yards.

“One person got 42 kids to one address,” Kennedy said.

He vowed to stop it.

Under his leadership, HHS now requires DNA testing, ID checks, income verification, and background screening for every sponsor.

No exceptions.

This is what accountability looks like when the cameras are gone.
Finally, Rep. John James brought the conversation back to the big picture.

He asked Kennedy how we could dismantle the perverse incentives that reward sickness over health, where every actor in the system profits from disease rather than wellness.

Kennedy agreed completely.

“At every level of the system… it's just a bundle of perverse incentives,” he said.

“That basically put every actor in the system—pharmaceutical companies, providers, hospitals and insurance companies—in an advantageous position to increase the number of sick Americans.”

The way forward, Kennedy said, is to realign incentives around outcomes.

“We want outcome-based medical care.”

“We want value-based medical care,” he explained.

“We’re working through the Center for Medical Intervention—to explore a number of pilot projects that do just that. And then we want to roll them out across the system.”

Kennedy added that he’s already meeting with the nation’s top insurers to make it happen.

“They want to do it too,” he said.
Special thanks @overton_news for helping me put this thread together!

If you’re into truth-seeking news accounts like mine, they’re definitely worth a follow!

—> @overton_news Image
Thanks for reading! This post took time and care to put together, and I did my best to give this story the coverage it deserved.

If you appreciate my work, the most effective way to support it is to sign up for news alerts at vigilantfox.com or subscribe to this page on X.

Your monthly subscription goes further than you think. Thank you so much for your support.
@overton_news For more in-depth stories the mainstream won’t touch, follow me on 𝕏.

—> @VigilantFox

Looking for something else to read?

RFK Jr. Announces “Health Insurance Breakthrough” That Affects Nearly 260 Million Americans

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with The Vigilant Fox 🦊

The Vigilant Fox 🦊 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @VigilantFox

Jun 13
We took Erin Brockovich's map of every data center in America. Then we laid the nation's aquifers on top of it.

We noticed they're not building data centers where the land is cheap. They're building them where the water is.

Farmers near these facilities say their livestock have stopped falling pregnant. Residents say the humming never stops.

And the projects arrive under NDAs, so most towns don't know until the ground is already broken.

The question isn’t where they’re building anymore. It’s why they’re building where they’re building. Tonight, we think we can answer that question.

We’ve been covering the data center issue in great detail on this broadcast, and for good reason. It’s a serious problem in America and worldwide, and it’s one that is uniting people from all sides of the political aisle because, guess what, whether you are a conservative or a liberal, you have human rights that enable you to have access to basic survival needs like water, which was given to us by God, not by the state or Big Tech, by the way.

Erin Brockovich joined the data center fight recently. She launched a site including a map that shows data centers either completed, under construction, planned, or community reported, likely due to all those pesky NDAs in place stopping us from knowing they’re coming to our area. But the public isn’t stupid.

So Maria thought she’d do something a little bit different. She created a series of maps using Erin Brockovich’s data center data, then superimposed aquifer maps onto those maps, then superimposed smart city locations onto those maps. What Maria found was pretty mind-blowing and, she says, lends credence to her theory that those in charge are purposely making rural areas unlivable for the purpose of pushing people into smart cities, where they will be under constant surveillance and on a short leash.
The main reason for this continued investigation is because data centers are destroying rural communities by siphoning natural resources, contaminating and consuming water for surrounding communities, driving up power costs, creating noise and light pollution, destroying habitats, wildlife, animal health, human health, and impacting fertility, as discussed in one of the show’s recent reports.

The list goes on. For many, it’s making it impossible to continue living in the rural communities they fled to during COVID because they could see the playbook coming down the pipeline. But if you live in the city, these developments are going to impact you too, possibly in ways you can’t even begin to imagine yet.

Maria’s theory, what she calls a common-sense one, is that there is a direct correlation between data centers and the AI control grid. Furthermore, she believes there is a direct correlation between data centers and smart cities.

Before presenting the evidence, we want to walk you through key information on Erin Brockovich’s website, BrockovichDataCenter.com.

The key concerns include energy consumption, water usage, e-waste, location risks, scalability and efficiency, and noise. Anecdotal evidence suggests the noise itself may be impacting fertility, with farmers near data centers reporting that their livestock are no longer falling pregnant or giving birth.

The website also highlights:

• 15+ moratoria and pauses passed at the local, county, or state level.

• 66% voter approval for Port Washington’s nation-first referendum.

• 4 council members ousted in Festus, Missouri, after a data center vote.

• 19% of community submissions mentioning NDAs, secret deals, meetings, or no public voice.

• 25+ projects canceled due to local opposition in 2025 alone.

• 69 active moratoriums across U.S. jurisdictions as of April 2026.

•$156 billion in investment stalled by community opposition since 2025.
This is where things start to look overwhelming.

According to the data center map, there are currently 33 operational data centers, 67 under construction, and 39 proposed.
Read 12 tweets
Jun 12
A Fox News guest just said out loud what the “conspiracy theorists” have been screaming into the shadowbanned void for years:

The AI Big Tech and Big Government have is distinctly separate from the AI the public gets access to, because the AI they have is a weapons system that will be used against us.

Take a listen. (See clip below)

The only question that remains now is, if it’s being admitted on Fox News at this point, is it already too late to protect ourselves against it? For many people, it is. But not for those listening to this broadcast.

You see, we consider that we have a fairly sound understanding of where this is all heading, we’ve been reporting on it for years. You are talking about not just a social credit system, but something far more sinister, far more pervasive, the type of system that will deny you access to basic needs like food, power, even water, based on your behavior.

And you need not take our word for it; there are countless speeches at the World Economic Forum telling you they will do just that.

So what can we do about it? One of the key things is to cut off the machines food source at its knees. Your data is what the beast needs to grow.

Every single person can take action to end the incessant spying on every inch of their lives today, and they can learn how for free.

Glenn and Eric Meder join us today to discuss. 🧵
You've driven past one this week and probably never noticed it. 100,000 Flock cameras now line America's roads — and thousands more go up every month.

They don’t just film traffic. They read faces. They carry microphones. Once the system knows who you are, everything it captures gets attached to your profile — where you went, when, how often.

“It’s like the Truman show, but if it was 1984,” Eric said.

Want proof? Go to deflock.me and pull up your own city. The map is stunning.Image
What makes this even more concerning is that people have hacked these cameras on video. So it’s not just the government watching you. It’s potentially anyone.

You’re being spied on constantly. And the home tech is the biggest spy of them all.

Your Alexa, your smart TV, your phone — every one is a microphone you paid for. The WEF was publishing articles back in 2017 about how a single camera lets a computer understand you “on a very deep level.”

Smart city plans in Australia include “street furniture” that monitors public sentiment — AI reading your mood, 24/7. Feel the wrong way in the wrong place, and you get flagged.

Flagged by whom, for what? That’s where it gets dark.
Read 8 tweets
Jun 4
Remember Aduhelm? It was Biogen’s $56,000/year Alzheimer’s drug that didn’t even work.

Worse, it caused brain swelling, brain bleeding, and sudden falls in patients—and the FDA approved it anyway.

But the truth is, you don’t need deep pockets to treat Alzheimer’s. You just need to look at what Big Pharma can’t monetize.

This report exposes the real causes behind Alzheimer’s—and the cheap treatment options you should explore instead.
This information comes from the work of medical researcher @MidwesternDoc. For all the sources and details, read the full report below.

midwesterndoctor.com/p/why-isnt-the…
Modern medicine is addicted to the biochemical model of disease because it creates a pipeline for expensive, patentable drugs, and it often leaves patients and their families in the dark, rather than empowered and in control.

It’s not about finding root causes. It’s about finding something you can bill for.

That’s why the industry has spent decades treating Alzheimer’s like a “chemical imbalance” in the brain caused by amyloid plaques—even though hundreds of trials targeting amyloid have failed.

The more the theory collapsed, the harder the system doubled down. Just like cholesterol and heart disease, the medical machine kept pushing the failed model long after it broke.Image
Read 27 tweets
May 28
Tucker Carlson admitted he used to make fun of people who believe vaccines cause autism.

He now describes his behavior as “unthinking, stupid, and reactionary.”

Tucker says people are noticing what Robert De Niro noticed about vaccines before he suddenly abandoned the issue: “There’s something there that people aren’t addressing” with vaccines and autism.

De Niro declared this on “The Today Show” back in 2016. Let the clip roll, and you’ll see it.

Fast forward to today, and it’s hard to believe De Niro actually said what he did on mainstream television.

What’s even harder to believe is just how most of the vaccines used today got approved in the first place.

“Placebo” doesn’t mean what most people think it means when it comes to vaccines.

Once you understand what a vaccine “placebo” is, the way evidence gets buried starts making a lot more sense. 🧵
Something strange happens when people first start looking seriously at vaccine safety data.

They do the research. They find the studies. They bring the evidence carefully into a conversation that feels safe and possible.

But nothing moves.

The other person doesn’t adjust. Doesn’t even get curious. They just double down harder.

Nothing about it feels like a normal disagreement. It feels like something else entirely.

Because it is.

And there’s actually a specific reason for that. A reason that goes much deeper than tribalism.Image
The reason vaccine orthodoxy functions differently from almost every other medical debate isn’t random.

It’s structural. It was designed and built this way.

To understand why the evidence lands differently here—why the same standards of proof that apply literally everywhere else somehow don’t apply to vaccines—you have to understand what vaccines actually represent in Western medicine.

And it’s probably not what you think.Image
Read 33 tweets
May 26
At the height of COVID, a “crazy” doctor was treating patients with a 99.96% survival rate.

Dr. Zelenko’s protocol was so effective, it sparked a war against HCQ.

They mocked his claims, but they kept coming true. Here’s what he said:

#1 - “Not everyone got the same thing.”
In an interview with Mel K, Dr. Zelenko said, “Some of the lots were 5,000% more lethal than others — or think of it as 50x. So, let’s say one vial killed one person. Another vial killed 50 people.”

“If everyone would have gotten the same thing, it would be a clear correlation that you’re being poisoned, and no one would take it,” Dr. Zelenko concluded. Thus, the answer to why some people took the shot and turned out okay is because “not everyone got the same thing.”
Dr. Zelenko’s bold claim was confirmed in March 2023, when a study performed by Schmeling and colleagues found that 4.2% of the batches accounted for a staggering 71% of adverse events. Image
Read 15 tweets
May 25
In 2015, Scott Adams made a “crazy” prediction that most people thought was impossible.

He said Trump had a 98% chance of becoming president, and he made that call on a single observation.

The winning attribute that made Scott confident in Trump’s victory was his one-of-a-kind persuasion skills.

While political betting markets dismissed Trump’s chances, Adams argued—using his background in persuasion and hypnosis—that Trump was the most psychologically effective candidate in the race and therefore favored to win. He built a massive following by showing how persuasion, not policy, drives political outcomes.

That insight proved correct. But it also revealed something darker. 🧵
After Trump’s victory, Adams pivoted to punditry—and during COVID, even he struggled to see the truth.

Scott strongly endorsed the vaccines, vaccinated himself, and publicly belittled followers who refused. Many later derisively called him “Clot Adams.”

In January 2023, Adams admitted—on video—that he’d been wrong and that the anti-vaxxers were correct. But he framed it as luck: the right people just happened to distrust the government, while “all the data” supposedly pointed intelligent analysts toward vaccination.

That framing matters. It reveals how even skilled observers of persuasion can mistake marketing consensus for truth—and how the same system that manufactures medical certainty also hides the limits of medicine, until reality forces a reckoning.
Last May, Scott told the world something most people never say out loud until it’s unavoidable: he had terminal, metastatic prostate cancer.

He openly stated he planned to use California’s medically assisted dying to reduce suffering.

He also shut down speculation—saying he had already tried fenbendazole and ivermectin and had no interest in continuing them.

The reaction was explosive.

People weren’t just debating treatment choices—they were watching, in real time, what a protracted, modern death actually looks like.

For many, it shattered comforting abstractions about both cancer and mortality.
Read 33 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(