🧵🧵The Unelected President: Neera Tanden, the NGO Cartel, and the Greatest Conflict of Interest in Modern American Politics
On June 24, 2025, the mask finally slipped.
Testifying before Congress behind closed doors, Neera Tanden, a longtime Democratic operative and former president of the far-left think tank Center for American Progress (CAP) she admitted to running the autopen for President Joe Biden. She didn’t just witness the signature process. She oversaw it. In some cases, she was the one signing the President’s name to executive orders and laws.
This wasn’t a technicality. This was a transfer of power. Joe Biden was not acting as President. Neera Tanden was.
And that’s only half the scandal.
Follow the Money: From Washington to the NGO Empire
Before stepping into the West Wing, Tanden spent years at the helm of CAP, where she helped craft a quiet revolution in federal funding strategy:
•Traditionally, federal money flowed to state and local governments, empowering elected officials to implement policy based on local needs.
•Under guidance from CAP and its policy architects including Tanden that model was dismantled.
•In its place? A massive NGO distribution network.
Rather than giving money to mayors, governors, or county agencies, the Biden administration began funneling billions in taxpayer dollars directly to “approved” nonprofit groups, many of which were politically aligned with CAP and other progressive institutions.
These NGOs became the new gatekeepers of public money, funding everything from housing to education to public health. And they weren’t accountable to voters. They were accountable to bureaucrats, often the same people who helped build them.
The Circular Scam: Tanden’s Role on Both Ends
This is where the conflict of interest becomes undeniable and explosive.
•As head of CAP, Tanden helped design the policy architecture that gave preferred NGOs outsized control of federal money.
•Later, as Director of the White House Domestic Policy Council, she wielded executive authority over how those policies were implemented.
•Now, in sworn testimony, we learn she also signed the documents via autopen that activated the very programs and funding models her allies stood to profit from.
This is not just a revolving door. It’s a closed loop of power and money.
Neera Tanden wasn’t just advising on policy. She was authoring executive orders, overseeing disbursements, and enabling unaccountable NGOs to control billions of dollars—while holding the pen with Joe Biden’s name on it.
Biden the Figurehead, Tanden the Executor
The June 24 revelations confirmed what critics have long suspected: Joe Biden was no longer exercising the powers of the presidency.
Whether due to cognitive decline, political shielding, or deliberate administrative design, he wasn’t governing. Tanden was.
And that raises urgent constitutional questions:
•Who authorized her to sign legally binding documents?
•How many billions were distributed under autopen signatures?
•Which NGOs benefited and what role did they play in Democratic electoral operations?
The Hidden Cartel of Influence
Tanden’s NGO network isn’t a conspiracy it’s a documented reality:
•Center for American Progress, along with allied groups like Arabella Advisors, Indivisible, and the Tides Foundation, helped coordinate nonprofit entities that received government contracts and grants.
•Many of these organizations now sit on millions of dollars in unspent taxpayer funds administered without local oversight or transparency.
•These same networks have been tied to political activism, lawfare against conservative policies, and progressive social engineering efforts at the local level.
And the woman who helped build them? She was the one quietly signing the checks.
The Bottom Line: A Quiet Coup
Neera Tanden was never elected. She was never confirmed by the Senate for a major Cabinet post. Her radical policy views were considered too extreme even by members of her own party.
Yet for nearly two years, she:
•Signed executive orders and laws as if she were President
•Directed billions in federal spending
•Oversaw a system that enriched and empowered a partisan nonprofit cartel
This isn’t just a conflict of interest. It’s a constitutional and ethical crisis.
The American people were told Joe Biden was their President. In reality, they were governed by a progressive operative with a pen and no mandate.
There Must Be Consequences
This is not just political malpractice. It is a subversion of democratic government and a potential criminal abuse of power.
If an unelected staffer can impersonate the President, override the chain of command, and direct billions to partisan NGOs with no accountability, then we are no longer a republic we are something far more dangerous.
Congress must pursue criminal charges. Investigations are not enough. This wasn’t incompetence it was corruption by design. And it must be prosecuted as such.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
🧵🧵I was so hoping some idiot would bring up Haaretz the “Israeli” newspaper supported by the American left and NGOs so I could talk about it. So thanks.
Haaretz has only 5% of Israel’s domestic newspaper market. It is a tiny paper inside Israel. So how does it survive and why does it punch so far above its weight internationally?
Maybe because it’s funded and paid for in part-by an American NGO that took money from Soros among others.
When the Israeli government cut its advertising and subscription ties to Haaretz, the New Israel Fund stepped in immediately and purchased 1,500 subscriptions for Israeli university students, announcing it had “joined forces with Haaretz and TheMarker to strengthen democracy in Israel.”
The New Israel Fund is itself heavily funded by the Soros network and European governments. So when Israel’s government withdrew funding, a Soros-linked organization literally replaced it within weeks. That is not a coincidence. That is a pipeline.
They only fund anti-Zionist stuff. Like all the other members of the progressive left.
And they are based in America. Imagine that. 😂🤡
I always bring the receipts. Influence Watch.
The English Edition Is a Different Product
The English edition of Haaretz is not journalism for Israelis. Its “completely ridiculous, ideological capture, partisan framing” in the English-language edition is distinct from even the Hebrew edition. 
The English edition is a product manufactured for Western diplomats, NGO workers, journalists, academics, and international institutions who need Israeli-sourced quotes to validate anti-Israel narratives. It is providing a service to a specific paying customer base and that customer base has a very clear ideological profile.
🧵🧵 The House Judiciary Committee released a memorandum today, the second installment of an investigation into claims that the Biden-Harris administration funneled U.S. taxpayer money to non-governmental organizations that helped fund the 2023 protests against Netanyahu’s judicial-reform plan.
Biden’s government opposed Netanyahu out loud, used the exact intermediaries and the exact playbook a bipartisan Senate panel already caught in 2015, and funneled taxpayer money to the protest infrastructure and to a charitable network that bleeds into terror and then, looked away when its own inspectors warned it.
This isn’t the first time. It happened under Obama.
In 2015 it already happened, and a bipartisan Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations (Portman-R, McCaskill-D) proved it.
The State Department gave the NGO OneVoice $349,000 “to support peace negotiations.” Soon after the grant period, OneVoice used the campaign infrastructure built partly with State Department funds a voter database, a social-media platform that doubled during the grant, and a network of activists recruited and trained under the grant to power V15, a campaign whose goal was to elect “anybody but Bibi.” 
Most damning: OneVoice told the State Department about its anti-Netanyahu plans during the grant period, and the State Department did nothing.
US consulting firm 270 Strategies founded by Jeremy Bird, Barack Obama’s 2012 national field director.
American political operatives, trained on a US presidential campaign, were deployed to Israel to run a turnout operation against a sitting allied prime minister, on infrastructure US taxpayers helped build.
The 2023 operation is the same playbook at ten times the scale.
The same agencies (USAID, State) funneled money to the same kind of intermediaries.
Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors took in 50M in federal grants and, in the same window, fed PEF and the Rockefeller Brothers Fund.
PEF then routed 18M to Blue White Future the literal headquarters of the anti-Netanyahu protest coalition and bankrolled Standing Together, Darkenu, and the groups that ran Kaplan Street.
Federal records show RPA received its money shortly before the protests began.
 Money is fungible: a federal grant for “Project A” frees the recipient’s other dollars for the protests. And two recipients didn’t even need the laundering Abraham Initiatives took 2M in US funds and openly “led the effort to oppose the judicial overhaul,” and Movement for Quality Government took State Department money and helped orchestrate the protests.
🧵🧵🧵What Is Bernie Sanders’ Wife Doing Trying to Undermine the United States in Latin America?
There is an organization most Americans have never heard of called Progressive International.
It was co-founded by Jane O’Meara Sanders, the wife of Senator Bernie Sanders, through her think tank The Sanders Institute, in partnership with a European far-left movement called DiEM25 led by former Greek finance minister Yanis Varoufakis.
The two groups issued a joint call in November 2018 from Burlington, Vermont, and the formal launch came in May 2020.
The founding declaration, in plain English on their own website, says: “We aspire to eradicate capitalism everywhere.”
And in the last fifteen months, that organization has built a hemispheric political project explicitly designed to undermine the foreign policy of the elected government of the United States in Latin America.
They named it themselves. They call it “Nuestra América.” They call Trump’s hemispheric strategy the “Donroe Doctrine.” They are not hiding what they are doing. Most Americans simply just don’t know they are doing it.
Within weeks of Trump’s second term, his administration began executing the most aggressive Latin America strategy since the Reagan era.
Cuba was returned to the State Sponsors of Terrorism list. Tariffs and pressure went on Colombia after Petro initially refused U.S. deportation flights.
Sanctions tightened on Maduro and Ortega.
A $25 million reward was placed on Maduro’s head for narcoterrorism.
By September 2025, the U.S. military was striking Venezuelan vessels in the Caribbean.
Progressive International watched the first year of this and then mobilized. On January 24 and 25, 2026, they convened what they called an “emergency hemispheric convening” in Bogotá, Colombia.
Ninety delegates from twenty countries attended. They adopted what they called the San Carlos Declaration. They named the project “Nuestra América,” which is Our America, a deliberate echo of José Martí’s anti-American essay from 1891.
They explicitly framed it as a counter-operation to the Monroe Doctrine and to Trump personally, coining the term “Donroe Doctrine.”
The Colombian government did not just allow this. They hosted it. The Colombian Foreign Minister, Rosa Yolanda Villavicencio, opened the summit alongside David Adler, the American who serves as PI’s Co-General Coordinator. Delegates met with Colombian President Gustavo Petro at Casa de Nariño, the presidential palace, on Saturday, January 24.
A sitting U.S. ally used its diplomatic and political resources to host an organization explicitly framed as resistance to U.S. policy.
The next Nuestra América summit is scheduled for Havana, Cuba.
THREAD: The NYT Iran war story wasn’t written for the left. It was written for MAGA. Here’s the proof including where the story’s own claims fall apart. 🧵
The only question I have left is which Eurasian slop peddler thought of this plan.
On April 7 hours before the Iran ceasefire the NYT dropped a 4,500-word story on how Trump went to war.
Bylined Maggie Haberman and Jonathan Swan.
Sourced entirely from anonymous officials.
A preview of their forthcoming book “Regime Change,” due June 23 from Simon & Schuster.
Every major outlet treated it as the definitive account.
The MAGA anti-war crowd treated it as scripture.
And that’s the tell.
The story’s core claims:
— Netanyahu gave Trump a “hard sell” in the Situation Room on Feb 11
— Ratcliffe called the regime change plan “farcical”
— Rubio said “in other words, it’s bullshit”
— Vance was the most vocal opponent warned of regional chaos and MAGA betrayal
“For the gifts and the calling of God are irrevocable.” - Romans 11:29
The complete biblical case against replacement theology.
1. The Unchanging Character of God
Scripture repeatedly declares that God does not change His mind, break His promises, or abandon His covenant commitments.
“God is not man, that he should lie, or a son of man, that he should change his mind. Has he said, and will he not do it? Or has he spoken, and will he not fulfill it?” (Numbers 23:19)
“For I the LORD do not change; therefore you, O children of Jacob, are not consumed.” (Malachi 3:6)
If God promised Abraham that his descendants through Isaac would be an “everlasting people” with an “everlasting covenant” and an “everlasting land inheritance” (Genesis 17:7-8, 13, 19), then either: (1) These promises remain in effect for ethnic Israel, or (2) God lied.
There is no third option.
Replacement theology states that God’s “everlasting” doesn’t actually mean everlasting when it comes to Israel.
2. The Irrevocability of God’s Calling
Paul writes about this in Romans 11 specifically in the context of discussing Israel’s relationship with God.
The word “irrevocable”(ametamelēta) means “without regret” or “not to be repented of.” God does not regret choosing Israel. He has not taken back His calling. The gifts He gave them which are the covenants, the Law, the temple worship, and the promises remain theirs (Romans 9:4-5).
3. The Abrahamic Covenant
The covenant God made with Abraham was unconditional because it depended totally on God’s faithfulness, not on Abraham’s or his descendants’ obedience. This is shown through both the content and the ratification of the covenant.
In Genesis 15:9-21, God establishes His covenant with Abraham through an ancient Near Eastern covenant ceremony. Animals are cut in half, and the covenant parties walk between the pieces signifying “may I be torn apart like these animals if I break this covenant.”
Remarkably, only God passes through the pieces while Abraham sleeps. This unilateral ratification means the covenant’s fulfillment depends solely on God’s faithfulness, not on human performance. Otherwise Abraham would not have been unconscious the entire time.
Everlasting Promises
The word “everlasting” (Hebrew: olam) appears repeatedly in God’s promises to Israel:
• Everlasting covenant: “I will establish my covenant between me and you and your offspring after you throughout their generations for an everlasting covenant, to be God to you and to your offspring after you.” (Genesis 17:7)
• Everlasting possession: “And I will give to you and to your offspring after you the land of your sojournings, all the land of Canaan, for an everlasting possession, and I will be their God.” (Genesis 17:8)
• Everlasting people: “But my covenant I will establish with Isaac, whom Sarah shall bear to you at this time next year.” (Genesis 17:21)
This covenant line continues through Jacob/Israel as an everlasting nation.
Replacement theology must explain how ‘everlasting’ actually means ‘until the Church age’ or ‘conditional on behavior.’ This pretzel twisting gymnastics is necessary only because the plain meaning of the words contradict the replacement theology framework.
🧵🧵Understanding how you’re being manipulated is the first step to not being manipulated.
These techniques are consistent across every one of the last eight Tucker episodes.
Once you see them, you cannot unsee them.
Technique 1: The Building
Every episode begins on solid ground. Free speech really is under attack. The Iraq War really was a disaster. American munitions could be depleted. Iran’s nuclear program really has been discussed for decades. This is the ground floor.
The technique is to use that solid ground as the entry point into a building whose upper floors are somewhere you would never go voluntarily. You enter agreeing with the claim on floor one. By the time you’ve climbed to floor five, you’re agreeing that Zionist billionaires control the financial system, that Israel deliberately engineers European demographic collapse, that Kennedy was killed to protect Israel’s nuclear program, and that your Christian faith has been weaponized against you by Jewish power.
No single step felt like a leap. Every step felt like a reasonable extension of the last. That’s the architecture. That’s how it works.
Technique 2: The Bait and Switch
Bait -
∙Free speech suppression (legitimate)
∙American soldiers dying in wars they didn’t choose (legitimate)
∙Foreign lobbying influence on American policy (legitimate)