The use of the @iaeaorg as a mechanism for generating war propaganda is now exposed, @rafaelmgrossi. And it fits a clear pattern showing how organisations established for peace have become propaganda tools for war. ddgeopolitics.substack.com/p/the-ai-that-… x.com/rafaelmgrossi/…
1) In relation to the 'regime'-change war against Syria, the @opcw was used to help promote a strategic deception claiming the Syrian government was using chemical weapons. When scientists from that organisation blew the whistle on its corruption, they were smeared and silenced.berlingroup21.org/front-matter-a…
2) Britain, UK, France, Israel, Qatar, Saudi Arabia and Turkey were all involved at various stages with the chemical deceptions that the @opcw ending up playing along with, see the first three parts of this series ukcolumn.org/article/homs-2…
4) and ukcolumn.org/article/from-s…
5) And, in the case of the 2003 Iraq 'regime'-change war, the then @opcw Director General Jose Bustani had to be forced from office by @AmbJohnBolton precisely because he would not play ball with US propaganda regarding Iraqi WMD:
6) As we know now, no weapons of mass destruction ever existed in Iraq: academic.oup.com/psq/article/12…
7) The co-optation of the world's nuclear and chemical watchdogs- the @opcw and the @iaeaorg - for the purposes of justifying western militarism is an obvious crime. There should be accountability. onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.111…
8) There is a clear pattern here in which false claims about the production and use of prohibited weapons - chemical, biological, nuclear - are made by belligerent states seeking to instigate and justify war. In doing so international organisations, which are supposed to maintain the peace by objectively and fairly monitoring any alleged activities, are either sidelined or co-opted by belligerent nations. Institutions established for peace have become weapons of war.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
