This “Abraham Shield Plan” is a post-sovereignty architecture for permanent Israeli hegemony in the region. It repackages conquest as reform, ethnic erasure as stabilization, and colonial encirclement as regional security. Let’s break it down in real terms. 
Israel proposes to declare victory in Gaza, install a technocratic regime, disarm the population, abolish cash, and flood the Strip with foreign police forces, while retaining the right to launch raids at will. It’s colonial digital trusteeship. No local agency, no self-determination. Just algorithmic control and foreign-backed “moderation.”
“ZeroCash” means biometric dependency, external surveillance, and conditional humanitarian access, designed to neutralize resistance before it’s even thought.
“ZeroCash” means biometric dependency, external surveillance, and conditional humanitarian access, designed to neutralize resistance before it’s even thought.
By calling for a “transition from Hamastan to Abrahamstan,” the plan openly rebrands the occupied Palestinian territories as extensions of Israeli-managed normalization, no longer defined by history, trauma, or dignity, but by alignment to the Abraham Accords framework. Every reform demanded of Palestinians is one-sided, top-down, and effectively treats national consciousness as a security threat.
Education must be rewritten. Mosques must be monitored. Political parties must be banned unless they accept Israeli supremacy. It’s psychological surrender scripted in Tel Aviv and rubber-stamped in Riyadh.
Education must be rewritten. Mosques must be monitored. Political parties must be banned unless they accept Israeli supremacy. It’s psychological surrender scripted in Tel Aviv and rubber-stamped in Riyadh.
The so-called ‘moderate regional coalition’ is a euphemism for an Arab NATO with Israel at its core and the U.S. underwriting the backend.
The plan elevates Gulf states as disciplinary enforcers against Palestinian resistance. Binds Egypt and Jordan into a security client role. Incentivizes compliance via mega-projects, trade routes, and tech integration, all conditional on deference to Israel
This is what Zionist futurists call “sovereign management”, the outsourcing of regional discipline to Arabs willing to police their own for the sake of access to Western capital and Israeli tech.
The plan elevates Gulf states as disciplinary enforcers against Palestinian resistance. Binds Egypt and Jordan into a security client role. Incentivizes compliance via mega-projects, trade routes, and tech integration, all conditional on deference to Israel
This is what Zionist futurists call “sovereign management”, the outsourcing of regional discipline to Arabs willing to police their own for the sake of access to Western capital and Israeli tech.
Iran is framed as the master of all evil, Gaza, Lebanon, Iraq, Syria, Yemen, even infiltration of Jordan and Egypt. The only logical solution in this document is an open-ended regional campaign to strangle Iran economically, militarily, and diplomatically, with full-spectrum cooperation from Arab regimes.
It’s escalation doctrine, built on the idea that Israel must isolate, degrade, and decapitate Iran to secure its own borders.
The irony is the same states now being asked to join Israel’s blockade are the ones who will collapse under economic blowback and public fury once this escalates into regional war.
It’s escalation doctrine, built on the idea that Israel must isolate, degrade, and decapitate Iran to secure its own borders.
The irony is the same states now being asked to join Israel’s blockade are the ones who will collapse under economic blowback and public fury once this escalates into regional war.
Syria is to become a cauterized frontier, where regional cooperation means removing sovereign resistance and replacing it with NATO-compatible governance. The fact that this is said openly tells you how normalized neocolonial planning has become in elite Zionist doctrine.
This is not a roadmap to a two-state solution. It’s a delay tactic masquerading as vision.
Israel demands 10 years of demilitarization, censorship, puppet governance, financial sterilization, and ideological purification before even considering what amounts to a non-sovereign Bantustan.
All of it, every single clause, is pegged not to Palestinian rights or legal frameworks, but to whether they’re compatible with Abraham Accord economics and anti-Iranian posturing.
Israel demands 10 years of demilitarization, censorship, puppet governance, financial sterilization, and ideological purification before even considering what amounts to a non-sovereign Bantustan.
All of it, every single clause, is pegged not to Palestinian rights or legal frameworks, but to whether they’re compatible with Abraham Accord economics and anti-Iranian posturing.
The “Abraham Shield” is doctrinal domination, coded in diplomacy and enforced through architecture, finance, and digital control.
It is a blueprint for a Middle East where, Palestine exists only as a security vacuum to be filled. Iran is sanctioned into collapse. Arab states become logistics corridors and police zones. Israel, as the unspoken sovereign, writes the rules, redraws the maps, and names the new cities.
If “Hamastan” becomes “Abrahamstan,” it means the region has accepted not peace, but defeat. This is occupation in high-definition, with branding, funding, and backing from every regime too cowardly or compromised to say no.
It is a blueprint for a Middle East where, Palestine exists only as a security vacuum to be filled. Iran is sanctioned into collapse. Arab states become logistics corridors and police zones. Israel, as the unspoken sovereign, writes the rules, redraws the maps, and names the new cities.
If “Hamastan” becomes “Abrahamstan,” it means the region has accepted not peace, but defeat. This is occupation in high-definition, with branding, funding, and backing from every regime too cowardly or compromised to say no.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
