What do Sun Tzu, Machiavelli, and Otto von Bismarck all have in common?
They knew that in order to rule effectively, one must shun ideology.
Instead, they embraced realpolitik: rule based on facts, not lofty ideals…🧵
So what is realpolitik?
Realpolitik, as it is understood today, is the approach of making political or diplomatic decisions based on the given circumstances of a matter, not on moral or ethical considerations.
It’s political pragmatism to the nth degree.
The 19th century German writer Ludwig von Rochau first coined the term. He described it as the implementation of the idea that “the law of power governs the world of states just as the law of gravity governs the physical world.”
Just as one cannot dispute the effects of gravity, one cannot deny that raw power is the root of all effective political action — not ideology or emotions.
He claimed the modern era had forgotten this difficult truth, trying to conform political decisions to Enlightenment ideals.
Though the term is only a couple centuries old, rulers have followed realpolitik for millennia.
The legendary Chinese general and author of “The Art of War,” Sun Tzu is an early precursor. He would have been unfamiliar with the term, but his work reflects realpolitik.
His philosophy centered around a basic truth: war is unavoidable. He writes:
“The art of war is of vital importance to the State. It is a matter of life and death, a road either to safety or to ruin. Hence it is a subject of inquiry which can on no account be neglected.”
His strategic advice, like the simple command to “avoid what is strong, and strike at what is weak” reveals a mindset of practicality, offering feasible solutions that nearly guarantee victory rather than bold assertions that sound nice but result in ruin.
Perhaps the most famous political philosopher of all time, Niccolo Machiavelli, also conformed to this practical mindset of realpolitik.
His work “The Prince” is basically a 16th century guidebook for teaching rulers to apply realpolitik.
One example is his often cited aphorism “it is safer to be feared than loved,” which reflects the idea that rulers should prioritize political power over the desire to be popular with their subjects.
Machiavelli underscores this point later when he says that the ends can justify the means, as long as the ends are successful…
He writes:
“In the actions of all men, and especially of princes, where there is no court to appeal to, one looks to the end. So let prince win and maintain his state: the means will always be judged honorable, and will be praised by everyone.”
This mindset is fundamental to realpolitik: leaders are justified in using any effective method to maintain power and stability.
For instance, Machiavelli posited that effective rulers should lie if it's politically expedient, forsaking ideals like loyalty and honesty, especially when opponents are likely to do the same.
The statesman that realpolitik has been most associated with is Otto Von Bismarck. Via a series of cunning political maneuvers that prioritized pragmatism over ideological conformity, Bismarck pursued the unification of Germany.
His approach was one of “iron and blood”:
“The position of Prussia in Germany will not be determined by its liberalism but by its power…Not through speeches and majority decisions will the great questions of the day be decided…but by iron and blood.”
Militarily, Bismark was willing to turn on former allies like Austria in 1866 and pressure neighbors into war like France in 1870.
He was also flexible in social policy, adopting some left-wing policies to weaken the appeal of socialist parties and ensure political stability.
So what are the takeaways?
1. Power is the currency of politics; authority trumps ideology. As Sun Tzu said, war is often impossible to avoid — so learn to fight.
2. Win first, ask forgiveness later: Machiavelli points out that if you’re successful, the means with which you achieved that success will be “judged honorable, and will be praised by everyone.”
3. Flexibility is key: Bismarck’s maneuvers show alliances can shift and concessions often need to be made in order to achieve political goals. Pragmatism means adapting to the circumstances.
Enjoy this content and want to go deeper? Join our newsletter.
Gothic cathedrals were the height of medieval architecture—but how did they build these jaw-dropping structures with only rudimentary tools?
Here's the step-by-step process of building a gothic cathedral🧵
In the 11th-13th centuries, unprecedented population growth and newfound wealth in northern Europe created a need for larger church buildings. The aging Romanesque-style churches were simply too small.
In comes gothic architecture.
With a focus on large, cavernous spaces, gothic churches allowed more people to congregate inside while their pointed arches, flying buttresses, and intricate masonry meant they could serve as visible symbols of a city’s prestige.
There are a lot of misconceptions about feudalism.
Rather than a contrived political system, feudalism was really just a series of loyalties.
For near a millennia, civilization was held together by the oaths of honorable men...🧵
After the breakdown of the Western Roman Empire in the 5th and 6th centuries, society went through a restructuring. The political and social infrastructure provided by Rome ceased to function, creating a power vacuum that needed to be filled.
Enter Feudalism.
Rather than a planned political system, feudalism can best be understood as an emergent phenomenon that occurred where there was no overarching political entity running the show.
When institutions fail, oaths between men are all that’s left.
Among the most visible reminders of Rome's storied hegemony are its aqueducts.
These engineering marvels channeled the lifeblood of civilization for near a millennium.
Here’s how they worked🧵 (thread)
Rome’s aqueducts had humble origins, much like the city itself.
The first aqueduct, the Aqua Appia, was constructed in 312 BC to supply the city’s cattle market.
Its source could be found in a group of springs inhabiting a stretch of local marshland, flowing an impressive 10.2 miles to Rome from the east and emptying into the Forum Boarium.
Modern man has a severe case of amnesia — he’s forgotten the immense wisdom of the past.
Luckily, it can be rediscovered through great literature.
12 old books that will make you wiser… 🧵
12. Enchiridion, Epictetus
Epictetus never wrote down anything himself, but his student Arrian collected his teachings, recording them for future generations. His lessons enlighten the reader on matters regarding ethics and achieving inner freedom.
11. The Prince, Niccolo Machiavelli
Machiavelli’s classic is a 16th-century handbook on effective governance. It’s an essential read for anyone who wishes to understand the motivations and reasoning behind great leaders from the past or savvy politicians today.
The design of a cathedral is theologically based and instructive in the faith. Though beautiful, its construction is not arbitrary — it wasn’t arranged simply to look pretty.
The layout, artwork, statues, and stained glass windows all serve an edifying purpose🧵
The plan of a cathedral is cruciform in shape and is usually oriented eastward—ad orientum. Worshippers face the rising sun, a daily reminder of Christ’s resurrection.
The north and south transepts or “arms” represent Christ’s right and left hands on the cross.
The entrance at the West end corresponds with His feet; one enters at the foot of the cross and proceeds upward as they approach the altar.
The layout is divided into three parts: the narthex/vestibule for catechumens, the nave for laymen, and the sanctuary for clergy.
The Holy Roman Empire lasted ~1000 years, and it looked like this:
How did such a fractured political entity last so long?
It has to do with a concept called “subsidiarity”, and it holds the key to implementing responsible government today 🧵 (thread)
Voltaire famously derided the Holy Roman Empire (HRE) as “neither Holy, nor Roman, nor an Empire”, but what couldn't be denied was its longevity.
Existing from 800-1806, it was birthed before William the Conqueror invaded England and continued on after the American Revolution.
It’s considered one of the longest lasting empires in history, a feat of particular intrigue when one considers its central geographical location and lack of natural defensible borders.