The Lib Dems have just won a council by-election in Edinburgh.
The party of Ben "Toxicity" Maguire, Alex "Standing Ovation" Cole-Hamilton, Christine Jardine, Sheila Ritchie and so many other allies would want voters to know how important self-ID is to them, wouldn't it?
1/n
Someone who lives in the ward has kindly been collecting all the election leaflets she got through the door for this election.
2/n
The Lib Dem Group recently helped pass a motion putting pressure on Edinburgh Women's Aid, after SWA made clear that trans-identifying men could only access those of its services which don't involve direct contact with women survivors using them. 3/n murrayblackburnmackenzie.org/2025/06/16/the…
So it would be timely and relevant to say something to local voters about how much it believes in self-ID, wouldn't it? 4/n
And the Lib Dems did do several household drops. 5/n
So there were a few chances for the party to use this opportunity to promote its position on self-ID to local voters, and do its bit to challenge the (as many of elected representatives would say) "toxic debate". 6/n
And with the Supreme Court decision so much in the news, voters might have been more interested in this issue than ever? Maybe in relation to what the Lib Dems think this should mean in schools, as a key local service? 7/n
But I think a whole bunch of "fascist" (as Mr Maguire put it, before deleting) women activists must have infiltrated Lib Dem leaflet production in Edinburgh, literally erasing the party's passionately-felt position about self-ID from its election literature. 8/n
The party must know how much its voters want to hear how important this issue is to them. Time for @scotlibdems to act! 9/n
Otherwise this terrible act of sabotage and erasure of party policy may be repeated in future election literature.
FAO @LibVoice4Women @hollowood_zoe
10/10
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Spending today (yet again) sitting in the court of session listening to the Scottish government discuss its determination that some men should be treated by like women, in one way or another. This time - prisons. I expect to hear much talk “balancing of rights”. But/
As others said, this is a case where an attractive-sounding concept has been introduced into a context where it simply does not belong. Whether we’re talking about rights as moral/ethical, protected in domestic law or international human rights standards…/
there are plenty of times where I don’t have a right to something and “balancing” simply doesn’t come into it. As a trivial example, I don’t have the right to…./
I’ve been chatting to a young woman I know who is involved in guiding. She is happy with the return to a clearly single-sex organisation but other volunteers she respects and likes are upset at the exclusion of pre-pubertal, esp, children. It struck me that Cass/
seems to have passed Girl Guiding by completely. All the messages about social transition apply strongly here. The only reason a little boy is placed in Rainbows or Brownies by his parents is because they’re strongly engaged in a process of social transition of a kid under 11./
I am afraid we still have some way to go convincing a cohort of young women that it is not unkind, and sometimes important, to have spaces just for girls, but from my conversation yesterday, getting these young women who are so concerned about being kind to these little boys/
@Cyclefree2 @Wonkypolicywonk @sacrareleges @bphillipsonMP @ClaireCoutinho I think that they must be looking at s14(9) EA 2006. But the Code's introduction states that it is explicitly about Part 3 and Part 7 EA 2010.
While s149, 153 and 154 are all in Part 11 of EA 2010. /
@Cyclefree2 @Wonkypolicywonk @sacrareleges @bphillipsonMP @ClaireCoutinho Sections 153 and 154 look absolutely irrelevant. S149 is the PSED. There are only a handful of passing references to the PSED in the Code (and those weren't affected by the consultation).
This herring is so red it should be in space, outshining Mars.
@Cyclefree2 @Wonkypolicywonk @sacrareleges @bphillipsonMP @ClaireCoutinho It should be speedily clarified if this is the bit of law the SofS means, because as far as I can see the extent of consultation it *tenuously at most* requires is to show those screen-shotted paras above to the devolved administrations, saying "nothing here has changed."/
I am here to award top marks for Freedom of Information comedy to the Cabinet Office, and perhaps an innovation award too.
A 🧵for your entertainment./
In early July I submitted this self-explanatory FoI request. Note that it includes a request for a copy of a job advert reportedly issued by the Cabinet Office./
On the due date I received the reply below.
In a new move to me, Cabinet Office explained that it needed more time to consider whether it would be in the public interest *neither to confirm nor deny* that they have a copy of.... their own job advert (among other things)./
Before the rally started is what I handed to one of the police on duty. I have his badge number. I asked for it to be given to the most senior officer present. It took some discussion to get him to take it from me, but eventually he took it and separately recorded my details./
Today, I will send it to my MSP, copied to all those who MSPs who I know attended, with all the responses I got to my question here about the impact on those present of the police taking no action./
I will add some of the other things I have seen on here about people’s experience of interacting with officers attendance. I think that’s about as much as I can do, and the ball that goes into the court of what, for want of a better term, I’ll call the system./
Unbelievable. We included a chapter in The Women Who Wouldn’t Wheesht about these kind of allegations. There’s a huge sexism and ageism in the offensive assumption that the only way we could all do what we have is because of access to huge secret funds. Bollocks./
But, as we say in the book, also revealing. People for whom this stuff is a day job, with employment contracts, and six-figure budgets, literally can’t believe that it’s not like that for everybody else.
I have the last few years surrounded by bright, energetic, determined women of all backgrounds with years of campaigning and work experience in all sorts of fields. It’s been the only really positive side of dealing with this stuff.