Worth remembering that whenever a prisoner in Scotland takes legal action, it's against Scottish Ministers directly, not the prison service.

The SPS has no separate legal identity of its own - it's what's called an executive agency./

https://twitter.com/magnusllewellin/status/1926347426853450140

So, just as for slopping out, if a case is goes ahead, it will be Ministers who are in the spotlight defending the decision to allow some male prisoners to be housed with women based on self-ID. Potentially as we head into the 2026 Holyrood election.
news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/scotland/…

So before I come off Twitter, a short thread about a conversation I’ve just had with a woman in the street. This is someone I’ve known for years, who knows what I do, but isn’t in anyway a campaigner or activist on this subject. One of the actually kindest people I know.🧵 And she stopped me, to say (a) how that grateful she was to @ForWomenScot and (b) how “angry” she was at the coverage. Esp on the BBC. And the 2nd word really took me aback, as this is not someone who I have ever seen express anger. It’s way off the range I associate with her./

We should keep remembering that the SG and bodies it funds spent years telling us a GRC was just a piece of paper, while going to court to argue the opposite. And are now arguing the world has been turned upside down, because the UKSC decided a GRC is... just a piece of paper. / The backlash is of course really about people (including the SG, rather strangely, as it was party to the case) only just noticing a decision in *2022*, in the first FWS judicial review, which made clear that sex in the EA was biological (leaving only a question about GRCs)./

It occurs to me that the reason that interviewers in the past week have kept suggesting women campaigning here haven’t thought about this (🤨: see next tweet…). It’s because *they* never have (and reflexive bloke-first thinking, I know). /

https://twitter.com/tweetdodger/status/1914997421823639573

I suspect I’m typical of a lot women, in that when I first started engaging with this topic I spent quite a lot of time in conversations trying to answer the question, about what the solution was for the men who said they couldn’t use the Gents./

Rhetorical shifts 🧵

Most of the protest and media questioning isn’t about the issue the UKSC decided (GRCs), but about its confirmation of what the Scottish courts had already determined - sex in the EA 2010 is not self-ID; and/ its explicit following through of the logic of that, that a single sex thing cannot by definition also be mixed sex.

The objection is very clearly to spaces and services deemed for women not allowing the presence of anyone male./

The women who run FWS, all volunteers doing this, took the astonishingly bold and brave step of taking the Scottish government to court. Their tenacity then opened the door for other organisations @SexMattersOrg @AllianceLGB @project_lesbian @ScotLesbians to make their case too/

https://twitter.com/forwomenscot/status/1910272949350695371

before the highest court in the UK. Is it absurd that things have reached this point? Yes, it is. It is absurd because the Scottish government is absurd, and also has been extraordinarily dishonest, in making arguments in court that it refused to make in parliament./

I watched the evidence earlier about people not feeling safe to attend a film screening. And remembered *at the third, successful* screening, the riled up crowd outside, the hefty actual police presence, the guy who was grabbing at women's legs as they had to step over him,/ the crash barriers *inside* the building, the groups who hung around after to yell at women leaving, and this little gang, some distance from the actual exit, who were yelling insults at all groups of women walking off campus, just to be on the safe side/

https://x.com/LucyHunterB/status/1727491549842272756

Most recent stories about Stonewall are about what it's been doing. This one - unusually - is about whether it is doing anything in Scotland (that it wouldn't be doing anyway), in exchange for a six-figure annual grant from the Scottish Government. 1/n
thetimes.com/article/08d4dd… Stonewall Scotland gets £106k a year from the Scottish Government. In 2021, this was described, for up to September 2024, as being for a Scottish specific piece of work, called "Free to Be: Advancing LGBTQ+ Equality in Scotland". supported by 3.75 FTE staff, "across 7 roles". 2/n

I am continuing with my project of testing the development of AI by asking it to write cheese scone recipes in the style of Judith Butler. This remains a reliable source of satirical entertainment.

https://twitter.com/johnhundeslit/status/1903820298220196089

But it always works best if you remind it to remove the quantities, the ingredients, and the instructions. x.com/i/grok/share/B…

In a Scottish parliamentary committee today, I discovered that the current most senior civil servant in Scotland does not understand the concept of a policy.



1/however many this needsheraldscotland.com/news/25018496.… At the Finance and Public Administration Committee today, JP Marks, outgoing Permanent Secretary of the Scottish Government, was asked by Michelle Thomson MSP about the SG's "Trans and Non Binary Equality and Inclusion Policy"

Policy. Is the last word there. 2/n

International Women’s Day didn’t start as a chance for jolly statements by the comfy. It has radical roots. So in that spirit, these women facing up to power - political, male physical and institutional - today, in Scotland and the North of England are its true inheritors. 1/4 Edinburgh. Protest outside an SNP meeting attended by the current First Minister John Swinney and former First Minister Nicola Sturgeon. 2/4

https://twitter.com/forwomenscot/status/1898375309050659154

Visual protest has been central to women's recent campaigning in Scotland. It's been organic and creative. So we're truly grateful to our photographers, and to our publishers, Constable, for allowing us to use #WomenWhoWouldntWheesht as a record of that.

A selection below./ The first ribbon, tied and photographed by @Dis_Critic, whose words also open the book./

It was so good just to sit in a room and have a meeting.

Six years ago, when “no debate” really meant “aggressive harassment of women raising concerns”, one of Lisa, Kath and my aims was to help bring this all back into normal mainstream political debate./

https://twitter.com/lwdscotland/status/1893354866531082255

And that’s now happening. Women’s Declarations groups in all the main parties have played a central role in that - often under horrible conditions within their parties that should be a permanent stain on those parties’ histories, with male aggression too often allowed free rein/

It wasn't pleasant today to watch a nurse of decades' standing so uncomfortable at being asked questions about the relationship between changing how you dress and your cheek swab result, and the relevance of sex to medical treatment./ For everyone who has done well out of reality denial about sex, there are so many more it chews up and spits out./

|An employment tribunal against NHS Fife for its treatment of a nurse who wanted a single-sex changing room is running past the initial allotted fortnight is *because its lawyers are *still* disclosing documents they were under a court order to disclose much earlier*.

https://twitter.com/LucyHunterB/status/1889710301827764277

Whether or not such late disclosure happens routinely at these tribunals (and a couple of people have reported having this experience in other cases), it still ought to be headline news. They are saying they have stuff relevant to *tomorrow's* witness they will produce overnight.

Counsel for Sandie Peggie raised this morning how often she'd been interrupted during her cross-examination of Dr Upton yesterday, by counsel for NHS Fife/Dr Upton.

I noted 17 times in first session (just over an hour), at which point there was a break at Ms Russell's request. Started keeping track when first one happened 10 mins in, because the contrast with how little Cunningham had interrupted Russell last week was so immediately obvious. It slowed down a bit later, but in the end, there were 34 in just over 3 1/4 hours. May have missed some.

With each case you learn something new about the judicial process. With this one, it's how little disincentive there seems to be for the respondents at an ET to mess up the other side's case by being very slow at document production, as well as resistant and apparently confused/ Up to and including telling the court something hasn't happened which late disclosed documents then refer to.
If there are no penalties for this behaviour, justice surely isn't served? (Regardless of the outcome of the case)

Episode 1. A female nurse tells her manager she is uncomfortable the changing room has become in effect mixed sex. No action is taken./ She is the only one who raises it with management, though she is directly aware others also feel uncomfortable about this. /

A doctor working in the NHS, getting legal support on the NHS, believes that any female member of staff who has a particular difficulty sharing a changing room due to something in her personal history shouldn’t expect a properly managed single sex changing room, but/ should instead have to disclose her personal history to management and have special arrangements made. I’m thinking the woman I know who only in her late 40s disclosed with great difficulty has sexual abuse as a child./

Though this does give me an excuse to tell the story of the single funniest result from FoI response we’ve ever received. Needs more than one tweet. 1/n

https://twitter.com/lucyhunterb/status/1887218160363053071

We put in a request for the info held on their consideration of the 2011 article by Dhejne, which had not been mentioned in the EQIA they published in 2019, and was still absent from the revised one in 2022, two years after we (and others) had drawn it to their attention. 2/m

Despite being someone of very definite views (you may have noticed), for the 15 years I spent benefitting from the influence, salary and security granted by being in the policy part of the civil service, I left it all at the door when I went to work./ So my attitude to those who want all the personal satisfaction of activism, while enjoying the benefits of being in the civil service, is very very uncharitable.