People think I'm biased against Jeff Bezos, but here's F. Caraceni Sartoria, widely considered one of the best bespoke tailoring houses in the world, commenting on Bezos's wedding suit.
"The most terrible, frightening, horrible tuxedo ever seen in my life. I'm really suffering"
Nothing to do with politics, only quality tailoring. F. Caraceni made suits for Silvio Berlusconi, who was hardly beloved by progressives. Many people don't know much about tailoring, which is fine, but this doesn't mean that rich or expensive = good.
Caraceni's work:
Here is a dinner suit F. Caraceni made for Yves Saint Laurent.
People keep asking me how this can happen, as Bezos has all the money in the world.
It's not surprising to me that a culture that devalues clothing, makes it hard for artisans to survive (e.g. skyrocketing rents in big cities), and worships celebrity, luxury, brand names, and money, should result in a culture where it's increasingly difficult to find good tailors.
Most wealthy people today don't use tailors. They go to luxury brands, which may or may not have a dept for custom clothing. I can only speak for menswear (where this system would be known as bespoke), not womenswear (which would be haute couture). But for menswear, luxury brands are not placing any real emphasis on their custom tailoring departments.
These parts of the business are often just used to give the luxury ready-to-wear line a halo, which in turn is used to give a halo for a sprawling line of cheaply made accessories for people who can't afford absurdly priced luxury clothes (e.g., $20,000 coat, $5,000 shirts, and other bullshit). So these people are left to buy perfumes, plastic sunglasses, and machine-made belts, which similarly lack any craftsmanship, but at least cost less than four figures.
Thus, if you're Bezos or some other rich person, you are left looking out onto the market. And what do you see? Mostly luxury brands that promise to deliver "the best." And surely, why shouldn't they be the best? Look at the comments I've received so far. "It's expensive, are you so stupid to think that this is not good?" So they pay $10,000 for a ready-to-wear garment. Or a custom garment that was simply made by adjusting a block pattern (nevermind if they are a good fit for the block). The garment may even be made in a factory! Not on a bench, as would happen in a traditional bespoke workshop.
There are some "luxury" or "designer" lines that are truly impressive, such as Rick Owens, which places a strong emphasis on design. But people like Bezos are not buying such avant-garde clothes. They are buying plain looking ready-made clothes that were produced in a factory. The desirable aspect is simply in the fact that someone had the gumption to charge $20,000 for a beige sweater.
Getting a truly beautiful tailored garment requires three things: 1) money, 2) knowledge (as the best tailors are often little-known shops), and 3) patience (four meetings, which include three fittings, and the desire to tweak things throughout the process, as sometimes the first tailor doesn't produce the best result for you!).
Does someone like Bezos have all three? Certainly, he has the first (money). Most stylists are working with luxury brand (some even get paid on the back end to bring in clients! Which is a conflict of interest!). But even if he found the right stylist, he would have to personally invest time.
Most rich people are just going to go to Tom Ford, ask for a custom suit, and be done with it. That's why most rich people look terrible. Society has made it impossible for most tailors to carve out a living, as skyrocketing rents increase cost and a total devaluation of clothing ("this is gay" or "I'm a more authentic, virtuous person by dressing like shit") decreases income. Thus we're all left with brands.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Trump released a $250 fragrance (one for women, one for men).
Sometimes a fragrance can be expensive because it contains certain ingredients or involve artisanal, small-batch production. But with no note breakdown or even a description of the scent, what justifies this price?
I'm reminded of this 2016 blog post by Luca Turin, one of the best writers on fragrances. Even for niche perfumery he warns: "Niche perfumery stands a good chance of disappearing up its own rear end if it merely becomes yet another golden opportunity to rip off the customer."
If you're into fragrances, as I am, I encourage you to not support celebrity bullshit like this. Go to real perfumers. Some of my favorites include:
— AbdesSalaam Attar: He's a self-taught Sicilian Sufi perfumer who only uses natural ingredients. Many of his perfumes feel like you're walking through a Middle Eastern bazaar or spice market. Milano Caffe, Cuoio dei Dolci, and Tabac are worth a sniff. He can also do bespoke perfumes using your favorite notes.
— DS & Durga: David Moltz describes himself as doing "scent travel." He has an uncanny ability to transport you to far off places. I like Cowboy Grass, Debaser, Amber Kiso, and Burning Barbershop. If you can get a sample of his Pale Grey Mountain, Small Black Lake Sample (made part of his Hylands collection), it's really good with tailored tweeds.
— Anything by Jean Claude Ellena: One of the most famous perfumers in the world. His scents have been likened to watercolor paintings and chamber music because they're light, airy, and have a transparent quality. This makes them particularly good for spring/ summer. Check his scents from Hermes, such as Terre d'Hermes and Un Jardin sur le Nil, which are easy to find on discount. L'Eau d'Hiver for Frederic Malle is also great, but a bit more expensive.
— Tauer Perfumes: Andy Tauer is a chemist and self-taught perfumer who specializes in dry, spicy, woody scents. L'Air du Desert Marocain makes you feel like you're in the middle of the desert at night. Lonestar Memories is like being next to a crackling campfire while picking up on the scent of tobacco and leather. IMO, a must try if you're exploring niche perfumery.
Always try to get samples before buying a bottle. Check shops such as Luckyscent, Surrender to Chance, and The Perfumed Court. Also pick up a copy of Perfumes by Luca Turin and Tania Sanchez.
Let me make the case for why the NHL should abolish its dress code, which currently requires players to wear a suit and tie while heading to and from games. 🧵
The arguments I've seen for the dress code fall into one of two categories: players look better in a coat-and-tie (some use descriptions such as "classy"). Others say that requiring players to dress in this way shows respect for the game. I will address each argument in turn.
It's true that tailoring once played a larger role in sports. Basketball coaches, for instance, used to wear tailored jackets pretty regularly, even at games. Some even looked quite good in these outfits.
It's true that progressives valorize "ugliness." But I think this person doesn't interrogate this position enough and thus lands at the wrong conclusion.
Let me give you a new perspective on ugliness. 🧵
In popular discourse, the world was once good, people were virtuous, and all things were beautiful. Then modernity came along and destroyed everything. In this view, beauty is an objective standard that has been corrupted by liberalism.
I contend that beauty in personal appearance is subjective, not objective. In fact, its standards rest on the shifting tectonic plates of politics, economics, and technology. Let me give you examples.
Today, we think of these photos as the standard for male beauty and dress:
Earlier this week, I asked which tie knot you think looks better. Of course, you can wear whichever you like. But here's the social history behind both knots and why some people consider one better than the other. 🧵
In the mid-19th century, as ready-to-wear tailoring started to take form, people got around in horse-drawn carriages. After all, the car had not yet been invented. During this time, some formed driving clubs, where they rode drags.
Check out the text in this lithograph:
The term "drag" refers to the carriage you see above, which was a sporting vehicle that was lighter than the more robust stagecoach. Men in driving clubs raced drags. Hence the term "drag race" first appearing in an 1863 issue of Racing Times.
People keep asking me to do a thread breaking down why these suits don't look great. I gather that these are famous, very well accomplished F1 drivers (I don't know these people). Since I only talk about famous people, I will do a thread. 🧵
Please note nothing in this thread is meant to diminish the men in these clothes. If anything, it's the people who dressed them that failed them. I am only talking about the clothes. Hopefully, by pointing out these issues, you will learn something for when you're shopping.
A pinstripe suit with a white business shirt cries out for tie. If you don't want to wear a tie, then you need a more casual shirt or a more casual suit. Additionally, the shoes are too chunky for this outfit.