Why precision matters.

“Fake news” became a global insult.

But it was never a clear category.

This thread explains why vague, viral language is dangerous—and how we fight it.
Cunha et al. (2018) show that “fake news” changed fast.

It went from describing satire and hoaxes—to being a political weapon, media frame, and emotional trigger.

But its definition never caught up.
Why is that a problem?

Because vague terms are:

Easy to politicize
Hard to challenge
Ripe for manipulation

If “fake news” can mean anything, it can be used against everything.
What “fake news” often gets used to describe:

False content
Biased reporting
Unfavorable coverage
Satire
Political opposition
Journalism itself

Different things. Same label. No clarity.
Precision isn’t pedantic—it’s protective.

When language loses meaning, so does accountability.

We can’t fix what we can’t name.

And we can’t fight disinformation with words that collapse under pressure.
The authors warn us early:

By 2018, the emotional weight of “fake news” had already overtaken its meaning.

We didn’t just lose a term—we lost a tool.

That matters more in 2025 than it did then.
This is how information ecosystems erode.

Not just through lies—but through linguistic entropy.

When concepts become weaponized and vague, facts have no stable ground to stand on.
So what can we do?

Use specific terms: disinformation, satire, propaganda, misinformation

Clarify intent and context

Resist viral language that invites outrage without accuracy

Teach how meaning shifts—not just what’s true.
The real fight isn’t over facts.

It’s over frames.
Over definitions.
Over who gets to name what’s real.

Words are weapons.
So choose them like it matters.

Because it does.
Final takeaway:

“Fake news” didn’t just label a problem.

It became one.

And it reminds us: in the battle for truth, language is the first terrain.

#FakeNews #Disinformation #MediaLiteracy

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Gavril Ducu 🇷🇴🇩🇪🇺🇲🇳🇱🇪🇺@🇺🇦

Gavril Ducu 🇷🇴🇩🇪🇺🇲🇳🇱🇪🇺@🇺🇦 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @DucuGavril

Jun 30
Listen to me now, because I am not saying this for you.

I am saying it for myself, and for the people I love.

This is a warning.

Not an opinion.
Not a metaphor.

A warning.
Russia is not just at war with Ukraine.

It is not just feuding with the West.

It is enacting a cosmic mission—drawn from a real, historical ideology.

Its name is Cosmism. And it has never gone away. Image
Cosmism began in 19th-century Russia with one idea:

That humanity’s sacred task is to defeat death, resurrect the dead, and colonize the stars.

It inspired rockets. Eugenics. Cryonics. Nationalist theology.

And it is shaping Kremlin policy right now.

philosophyforlife.org/blog/17-russia…
Read 13 tweets
Jun 30
.
Margarita Simonyan just told Russians they don’t need breakfast, bottled water, or to worry about death.

Because everyone who ever lived will be “medically resurrected.”

This isn’t just propaganda.

It’s Russian Cosmism—a real ideology with deep roots and growing power. Image
The belief in techno-resurrection and cosmic destiny isn’t fringe in Russia.

It was first proposed by Nikolai Fedorov in the 1800s and later embraced by literary giants, rocket scientists, and Communist utopians.

They called it the “Philosophy of the Common Task.”
The Common Task?

Achieve immortality
Resurrect every human who ever lived
Colonize the cosmos to make room for them

Not metaphorically.

Literally.

Fedorov saw science and faith as partners in a human-divine mission.
Read 11 tweets
Jun 29
How “fake news” became a weapon.

It started as a joke.
Became an accusation.

And turned into a global threat to journalism and truth.

This recap covers what Cunha et al. (2018) taught us about the rise—and distortion—of a viral term.
Our source:

Cunha et al. (2018)

Fake News as We Feel It: Perception and Conceptualization of the Term ‘Fake News’ in the Media

Presented at SocInfo, published by Springer

academia.edu/43228329/Fake_…
Key finding #1: The 2016 election was a turning point.

Before 2016, “fake news” meant satire or clickbait.

After 2016, it became a political slur—used to discredit real journalism.

One moment redefined global media language.
Read 11 tweets
Jun 29
When a joke stops being funny.

“Fake news” used to mean satire.

Then it became slander.

This thread explains how humor lost its clarity—and why that confusion became a powerful tool for manipulation.
Cunha et al. (2018) point to a key shift:

Before 2016, “fake news” often referred to sites like:

The Onion
The Daily Show
Saturday Night Live

It meant parody. It meant commentary. It meant “clearly not real.”
But satire relies on one thing: shared understanding.

When audiences know the joke, it’s humor.
When they don’t—it’s misinformation.
And when people confuse the two, trust breaks down.

That’s where the danger starts.
Read 10 tweets
Jun 29
How one election redefined a global term.

Before 2016, “fake news” meant satire, hoaxes, or clickbait.

After 2016, it became a political weapon.

This thread explains how the U.S. election made “fake news” a global insult.
Cunha et al. (2018) show how fast the shift happened.

They analyzed:

The rise of “fake news” in media articles
The surge in emotional negativity around the term
The global uptake of a U.S.-rooted phrase

The tipping point: the 2016 U.S. presidential election.
Before the election, “fake news” had low visibility.

It appeared occasionally to describe:

Satirical news

Parody websites

Obvious fabrications for clicks

It was informal. Sometimes even playful.
Read 10 tweets
Jun 29
“Fake news” didn’t start as a political weapon.

It was once used to describe satire.

Then it became a global slur.
Now it's used to undermine truth itself.

This series looks back at when—and how—that shift began.
Our source:

Cunha et al. (2018)
Fake News as We Feel It: Perception and Conceptualization of the Term ‘Fake News’ in the Media

Presented at SocInfo 2018 (Springer)

academia.edu/43228329/Fake_…
Why this matters:

We’re in 2025.

“Fake news” has become a tool to:

Smear journalists
Suppress dissent
Justify censorship
Erase inconvenient truths

Understanding how that started is part of resisting it.
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(