R.Сам 🦋🐏 Profile picture
Jun 30 4 tweets 2 min read Read on X
I think the phenomenology of the train ride in comparison to flight explains the austerity of our times— a train ride is an expanded domain of movement— you can walk on the train, you can go into different rooms, you can even have your own room. Rich people get private jets to get the quality of life of a luxury suite on a train— but even they have to be locked in lift off & landing— literally restrained, like being in a car. The train is just a long hallway which is itself moving— it is the feeling of walking on a peoplemover amplified— it feels like “walking over massive space” with a colossal gait— being on an airplane feels like being a package, like a drugged animal in a cargo hold.
There is a romance to walking to the train station & getting on the train & then getting off the train & walking directly out into the human world again. The airport however is like entering Dantean retail surveillance hell, being strapped to a gurney, MKUltraing yourself with slop, & then agonizingly exiting through the layers of Dantean hell that surround the airport, which is never “in the city” but in its own deterritorialized nonplace adjacent to it.
I believe these are reflective & constructive elements of life— a society that produces a sense of republican social being embraces the train & the train evokes in the traingoer a sense of republican social being— the passenger on the airplane basically “oks” themselves with this financial-surveillance hell— “Sure scan my asshole search my bags I’m popping a xanax & passing out to a Marvel movie, just make this suffering end”— we produced this, but it also produces us.
On the train, you make friends— there is room to do this, you can sit at the bar— on the airplane you are locked into an acquaintance with a stranger who must, by design, intrude upon your limited personal space & you cannot leave to find somewhere else to sit…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with R.Сам 🦋🐏

R.Сам 🦋🐏 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Logo_Daedalus

Jun 26
CPUSA lost the plot by tailing FDR. It's been kaputt since then. They tied themselves to "The War Effort" after having put up a strong resistance to it. The CPUSA was, originally, a member of the AMERICA FIRST COMMITTEE. They supported ISOLATIONISM. Their slogan was "THE YANKS ARE NOT COMING." -- they were then pressured to "join the war effort" from Moscow, once the Soviet Union was invaded-- but in doing so, they basically made every compromise possible to become a part of "the war effort" & ultimately this meant that the Communist Party of America became an extension of the American Military Industrial Complex. The Yanks Came. Here we are now. The CPUSA's Joe Sims now has to equivocate-- "We oppose both PUTIN & BIDEN's war in Ukraine." but then also "We must fight fascism." But "Fighting Fascism in Ukraine" isn't justified or something...Image
The CPUSA failed by not seeking, first, to gain power in America-- rather than being an "adjunct" to the establishment of Communism in Russia. This was also the same issue that ultimately caused the Sino-Soviet split. The USSR was "socially imperialist" in assuming its own establishment of Communism within its own nation was the paramount priority of Communists internationally. The Chinese said: "We got our own shit to deal with here." -- the CPUSA should have done the same & established itself as a real, consistent, opposition rather than what it was easily characterized as after the war "a flunky for a foreign power with deep ties to the FDR produced Deep State"
This is why I think Americans who, generally, hate "Communists" are correct to do so. American Communists, historically (in the 20th century), have been nothing but pencil pushing intellectual opportunists. They do not stand on business-- they capitulate to whoever is going to give them "legitimacy"-- probably caused, ultimately, by the American intellectual's deep distrust of "the backwards anti-intellectual American masses"
Read 8 tweets
Jun 26
The thing that’s actually annoying about Zohran is that urban leftoids are only interested in making “urban socialist policies” & have no ambition to govern the entire nation (including rural populations)— “this is good enough” they say, as they introduce one more neolib compromised “market socialist” program, while making 0 ground in the vast majority of America’s landmass.

I see that Kantbot has said my “project” is “reactionary”— but he’s just tailing the normal urban new leftist shit that has accomplished absolutely nothing on a national/civilizational level. You can make New York City have as many Northwest European Social Democratic programs & policies as you wish, it will gain you no ground in upstate new york or the deindustrialized hinterlands.

My “project” is simply accepting the necessity of a revolution *on a national level* which necessarily requires both understanding and recognizing the legitimacy of rural opposition to “urban new leftism.” Thomas Massie understands that “New York New Left Policy” makes less than zero sense in rural appalachian townships with 2k populations. I guess coming form the a town with a population of 2k in the “foothills of appalachia” in Massachusetts & having lived in NYC for 6 years allows me to have this sort of, idk, DIALECTICAL perspective on the actual material reality of America & the necessity of not actively alienating rural populations, but instead addressing their legitimate concerns.

If all you want is Kantian Liberal Universalism with Welfare State characteristics, New York City Social Democracy is about as good as it gets. If kantbot was consistent he’d just call the Chinese Communist Party “fascist” & call it a day. “Mao was a fascist”— he necessarily concludes this because Mao “courted the reactionaries of the Qing dynasty & the Nationalist Army.” Mao enabled “backwards peasants” to humiliate the chinese bourgeois who could afford to read Kant. He’s just a Kamala voter who is happy he can vote for Zohran & get backpats at the functions that used to call HIM a fascist. Very chill celebration for Zohran at the Verso Loft. Who fucking cares, it accomplishes nothing on a civilizational level.
If you're essentially an Upper West Side shut-in, who cares what some "rural reactionary" believes about anything-- they're barbarians-- you're in the cradle of civilization-- the only "REAL CITY" in America-- etc. See how that works out when shit really hits the fan.
I actually understand the legitimacy of the complaints of "rural reactionaries" who find Zohran's "ban all guns" tweets disturbing-- because banning firearms in a town with a 2k population is beyond tyrannical. They would never vote for anyone who ever said "ban all guns"-- for good reason. It's very simple shit.
Read 6 tweets
Jun 25
The issue with America is that politics have become primarily federal, & Americans don’t know enough about America (& other Americans) for this to work out. The original schema of state representatives electing their federal representatives was better. People are much more knowledgeable about their immediate communities than matters of federal state.
Most people are right about what works where they are— but then they extrapolate this to an “absolute right” in a one sided manner— & you have people from the city claiming to know how to govern people in rural areas & vice versa etc. It’s insane to me how people who would never even consider living in NYC are concerned for how they govern themselves.
In China they kept that electoral model we used to have, & so you have politicians building intelligence & acumen from first principles— first you govern this town, then this county, then this state, then this region, then the whole nation. You have to ascend through the system, not be “selected” through the media operation of two private corporate entities in the two party electoralist oligarchy.
Read 11 tweets
Jun 19
What denomination is Tucker these days? He was raised Anglican (Episcopalian) but has recently described it as a false church. If someone got him a copy of "And Forgive them Their Debts" he might go nuclear.
By the way, this is the most effective "Communist Propaganda" you could ever ask for in America. Americans are more interested in what Jesus Christ had to say about Political Economy than Karl Marx.
I say this as someone who appreciates Karl Marx-- but it's like telling Americans that the most important thing for them to do right now is to understand 19th century Bulgarian novella. I like to recommend heavy literature myself-- but it's not for beginners.
Read 8 tweets
Jun 17
There's too much to correct people on for any swift correction to the prevailing ideology of the American Empire. You have to start from first principles, & every step you have to fight centuries of ingrained propaganda. It will only be possible to rebuild after a complete collapse in faith in American institutions-- which is ongoing presently, but only accelerates with the cost of "finding out" after "fucking around."
We are past the need for ideological justifications-- there was much more of an effort to sell the wars in Iraq & Afghanistan. Today they're just wheeling out a paper tiger puppet "Persian King" & expecting us to just accept it. "I guess we're making those now" comic.
Even the Ukraine conflict had a full spectrum media package to go along with it-- it's clear to me that Trump got completely used by Netanyahu because if he was on board with this whole plan from the beginning, we'd have had more promotion of this for longer. We'd've had "Persia King" on Tucker Carlson & shit like that.
Read 9 tweets
Jun 12
The split between Mussolini and Hitler regarding the correct application of racism is very funny to me. Mussolini’s brand of Fascism required recasting all British & Germanic achievement as stolen valor from the Mediterranean “Roman” race while Germanic fascism required “the innate superiority of the nordic blond haired blue eyed”— both required a means of describing the British as neither nordic nor Mediterranean but a third, sort of Jewish, thing. “Too utilitarian, too mercantile, not PASSIONATE & irrational enough” etc
This noble tradition of intersectional far right infighting based upon Skyrim level historiographies continues in our time— where each individual “far right” ideologue has their own distinct rank ordering hierarchy of races, which naturally places themselves at the top.
Split every fascist room by asking “are Palestinians racially inferior or racially superior to the Israelis?” Nobody can agree. The great question of the right is “is it worse to be brown or jewish?”
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(