What denomination is Tucker these days? He was raised Anglican (Episcopalian) but has recently described it as a false church. If someone got him a copy of "And Forgive them Their Debts" he might go nuclear. By the way, this is the most effective "Communist Propaganda" you could ever ask for in America. Americans are more interested in what Jesus Christ had to say about Political Economy than Karl Marx.

There's too much to correct people on for any swift correction to the prevailing ideology of the American Empire. You have to start from first principles, & every step you have to fight centuries of ingrained propaganda. It will only be possible to rebuild after a complete collapse in faith in American institutions-- which is ongoing presently, but only accelerates with the cost of "finding out" after "fucking around." We are past the need for ideological justifications-- there was much more of an effort to sell the wars in Iraq & Afghanistan. Today they're just wheeling out a paper tiger puppet "Persian King" & expecting us to just accept it. "I guess we're making those now" comic.

The split between Mussolini and Hitler regarding the correct application of racism is very funny to me. Mussolini’s brand of Fascism required recasting all British & Germanic achievement as stolen valor from the Mediterranean “Roman” race while Germanic fascism required “the innate superiority of the nordic blond haired blue eyed”— both required a means of describing the British as neither nordic nor Mediterranean but a third, sort of Jewish, thing. “Too utilitarian, too mercantile, not PASSIONATE & irrational enough” etc This noble tradition of intersectional far right infighting based upon Skyrim level historiographies continues in our time— where each individual “far right” ideologue has their own distinct rank ordering hierarchy of races, which naturally places themselves at the top.

REMINDER: Tolerance of illegal immigration is primarily about depressing wages & depressing wages is the only Fed sanctioned means of lowering inflation. It is considered a nightmare scenario to cut off immigration as it would lead to an increase in the value of labor.
They use a lot of economic jargon to say “workers making too much money is bad for the economy. Increasing the reserve army of labor decreases the value of labor.” Bankers love illegal immigration— if it was up to the Banks, there only citizens of America would be bankers, & everyone else would be a “migrant laborer.”

It’s funny to see people (especially not Americans) who think that this round of riots & protests is “going somewhere”— I remember in 2020 when people said the same thing & how much flak I got for saying it’s all spectacle & has no political import anymore than Philadelphians rioting for a sports franchise victory— a french “communist” is telling me that Mexicans are going to take back California & deport me, in 2020 the midwestern neonazis were telling me that George Floyd Militants were going to raid my apartment & execute my cats. Nothing happens, either way. The realization no one wants to have is “this is normal”— this is what “the American Normal” is— every so often you get a little riot as a treat & the cops get overtime & hazard pay & the property owners get insurance payouts & at best some sexless collegiate “activist” gets some solidarity pussy. It’s all in good fun, after all. Some kids get to steal some televisions. Some kids get to shoot off some fireworks at the cops. Some kids get to feel their hearts racing as they bike away from a police kettling op with a single airpod in playing the Drive soundtrack. Everyone is having fun.

Los Angeles in the news just makes me think about how True Detective Season 2 was the "real parapolitics" season & Season 1 was just pulp horror garbage designed to get enough money to make Season 2, & then the show had to be destroyed because Season 2 was too real. Los Angeles-- what is it? What is it really? It is really a crossroads, ports, highways, gigantic industrial projects, artificial rivers, power stations. It is really a gritty industrial machine-- the powers that operate it are not "Hollywood" or "Media"-- it is criminal syndicates, shipping magnates, importer/exporters, utilities, construction...

I. Man’s perceptions are not bounded by organs of perception; he percieves more than sense (tho’ ever so acute) can discover.
II. Reason, or the ratio of all we have already known, is not the same that it shall be when we know more.
[III lacking]
IV. The bounded is loathed by its possessor. The same dull round even of a universe would soon become a mill with complicated wheels.
V. If the many become the same as the few when possess’d, More! More! is the cry of a mistaken soul. Less than All cannot satisfy Man.
VI. If any could desire what he is incapable of possessing, despair must be his eternal lot.
VII. The desire of Man being Infinite, the possession is Infinite & himself Infinite.
Application. He who sees the Infinite in all things sees God. He who sees the Ratio only sees himself only.
Conclusion. If it were not for the Poetic or Prophetic character the Philosophic & Experimental would soon be at the ratio of all things, & stand still unable to do other than repeat the same dull round over again.
Therefore God becomes as we are, that we may be as he is.

-William Blake In 1788 he wrote this, & you can still just repeat this verbatim to the Rationalists & they will turn to stone.

I think drinking makes you enter your preconscious mode of cognition which is often the exact opposite / an inversion of conscious metacognition. My basic metacognitive mood is Anger, so I am a Jolly drunk. I know many who are the opposite, metacognitively jolly, deep down pre-consciously angry, It is like “what mood am I in when I am asleep”— for me, this is the best mood, & the moment I wake up my first instinct is to be pissed off about the fact that I’m not sleeping anymore. I think some people are “angry sleepers” & thus angry drunks.

Jordan Peterson is explicitly not a Christian— he has even described himself in the lineage of Nietzsche as a *critic* of Christianity on a fundamental level— what he says here is the Nietzschean description of “truth”— there is only “truth” in the pursuit & use of power, “truth” is what you *kill* for. He basically tells the atheists here that Christianity is *esoterically* a poetic description of attaining “single mindedness” in the recognition of oneself as God. This is the Jungian “psychological Christ” (what I would describe as a form of Antichrist). It’s mostly neoconservatism dressed up as Christ— this is “we must defend the zionist state” christianity. He says what is true is what you are willing to kill for. He said “Give them hell Netanyahu.” That’s what he believes— it has nothing to do with the noble proletarian carpenter of Roman occupied Judaea. He wouldn’t “die for his belief in the bodily resurrection of all men & their subsequent trial & judgment by Jesus Christ”— he’d ask the would be executioner “well what do you mean by believe? It’s really an event of the mind, you see, in the pursuit of single mindedness…”

Zoomers & beyond will be far more revolutionary than Millennials because Millennials are (presently) inheriting the windfall of the Great Boomer Die Off. While the generations after Millennials will never get the opportunity of, for instance, pre-covid mortgage rates.

https://twitter.com/emily_14568/status/1925950740918358468

As Engels wrote a long time ago— Communism in America doesn’t catch on because so much money can still be made in land speculation (& other sorts of speculative investment). Why be a communist if DOGEcoin is mooning & so on?

Parapolitics loses a lot of its “cosmic horror” punch when you realize the satirical insight that the most absurd retarded & evil things are necessary features of the prevailing superstructure & not incidental divergences from some posited innate goodness of mankind. Was the Israeli ambassador or whatever shooting a false flag by the deep state? Was the shooter “programmed to kill”? Does it even matter? This is what America necessarily produces in the year 2025. It’s all grist of the mill— the mill is unipolar dollar hegemony buttressed by the international black market.

This is just the natural consequences of the cueing system of literacy pedagogy in which people are trained to “guess” what something says piece by piece rather than grasping the gestalt through repeated exposure. Nobody “talks like Dickens writes” nowadays— so they have no knowledge base from which to “guess”— the only way to learn how to read a Victorian novel’s figurative language is to read many things that are similar to a victorian novel. No matter how much Steven’s Universe you watch, none of it will equip you with the skills to read the Pickwick Papers et al Eventually this lack of exposure (ie: illiteracy) compounds & you’re in college & you have to pretend to understand a book that you literally cannot read because you should have started reading books like that when you were ten years old.

I understand the famous Tertullian "apology" for Christian Faith: "Credo quia absurdum"/"certum est, quia impossibile" ("I believe because it is absurd"/"It is certain because it is impossible") -- that's the sort of world it is-- reality itself seems the most impossible. Before Christianity, the reality of life was not understood deeply enough-- there was a type of false seriousness, the kind that betokens a sort of midwittery-- it's only with the figure of Christ that the absolute transcendentally ironic lunacy of reality becomes apparent.

The basis of Marxism is very simple common sense stuff that pretty much everyone has already intuited considering we live more than a century later & his ideas have diffused through the entire world such that there are no states in the world that are not "marxist" to some degree. The basis of Marxism is this: "There is a fundamental conflict between the class of people who own everything & the class of people who own nothing." Do you want to know who would agree with this? The Intelligence Agencies of the Anglsophere. The CIA would say "thanks to Marxist theory, we are aware of our role in managing & mediating this class conflict such that society remains stable & there is no revolution"-- in fact, the criticism of the Soviet Union offered by Langley & so on, even back in the 1950s, was that the USSR was engaged in "Social Imperialism" -- this is to say that the "Marxist Critique of the Soviet Union" was developed in Western Intelligence Agencies.

["Communist Principles & Tactics..."; November 1952; for J Edgar Hoover's FBI]

My message to 20-somethings is that your 20s milieu is an anarchy server & when everyone hits 30 the great sort occurs & people who are most invested in their 20something identity get completely owned by time & the rest become normal. If you’re 30something & you are on Discord you have lost the plot. It’s forgivable to be an internet retard cybergoon in your 20s— in your 30s such a person is basically invisible & only exists as a ghostly warning to 20somethings— like the super senior at the high school party

Something that I've learned about America is that having grown up in New England, it's easier for me to be extremely cynical about "progressivism" than it is for someone raised a fundamentalist evangelical christian who then "becomes progressive" in college or whatever. For me, the dream world of the fundamentalist evangelical kid who just wants to be punk rock & do drugs & listen to secular music & even *ghasp* evil pagan metal music-- this is just the world I grew up in, it has no "edginess" to me at all.

Arguably the wealth polarization of the present is worse than in the Gilded Age because back then if you got rich enough you’d run out of things to buy & you couldn’t just give your money to be managed by “civil society” in the form of NGOs & charities yet, so often times you’d give a ton of money to the construction of public infrastructure with the proviso that something or other gets named after you. Even if Zuckerberg or someone else now donates enough to get the hospital named after them, the hospital is not actually public infrastructure in the way that every library Andrew Carnegie built is to this day. Back then you’d have these heiresses sitting on millions of dollars & instead of donating to some charity at a charity gala, they’d give their money to the city or state with the promise it would build some public good that would get named after them. Andrew Carnegie personally paid for the construction of 2,509 libraries.

Leftists don’t understand that Rightists are Rightists not out of “sentiment” but usually out of deference to what they believe to be the truth about reality. They literally don’t have a theory of mind for MAGA people & it’s making them as counterproductive as possible.

https://twitter.com/SuperachiUWU/status/1918019759360360675

I remember talking to “socialists” about this— that the normie MAGA guy who calls himself a “capitalist” is generally suggesting that capitalism *outperforms* socialism in terms of providing for the common good. Obviously, this isn’t true, but they *believe* it is true— it’s not like they’re saying “I have no concern for the good of anyone & only want to be greedy because I’m evil”

The thing is, this is why the Elite of the Anti-Semites are also Zionists-- it makes perfect sense-- they go "Yeah, we don't like them, which is why we want them to all go over there, & we also don't like the people there, racially, so fuck 'em too, & we can send them money & shit who cares they just buy our weapons anyway, just fuck off with the jewish culture stuff blah blah"-- you can support Israel very deeply out of a sense of profound anti-semitism too lol that's why Herzl wrote in his diaries: "the anti-Semites will become our most dependable friends, the anti-Semitic countries our allies." -- why wouldn't they be? If you hate Jews so much, then put them all over there, & make some money off that arrangement. It's not like the Nazis paid room & board for the Jews in the concentration camps-- they were enslaved & had to produce goods on their behalf. The existence of Israel is "making good use of the Jews" for the elite Anti-semite-- hell, even in the urban mythology of "the Illuminati" -- the Illuminati only produces Israel in order to usher in the end of all Abrahamic religions & the institution of Global Luciferianism (which is, ultimately, American Financial Imperialism). Like in that fictitious Albert Pike letter to Mazini about "the Three World Wars" (nobody to my knowledge has ever found the primary source of this, the British Library denies that it exists in their holdings, or even where it was first forged & published). The Elite Antisemite of the Illuminati would necessarily support Israel's existence vehemently, as it was ostensibly created by them in their ostensible plot to abolish all abrahamic religions & usher in a return to some sort of mystical paganism by producing three world wars in succession etc. There is a real difference between let's say BAP or Richard Spencer, elite "antisemites" who love Israel, & the lower rungs of "white nationalists" who do not have that sort of Illuminated Bohemianism, to appreciate "Jewish Ethnonationalism" as a model for their own struggle etc. Notably, the "white nationalists" are usually "Christian White Nationalists" -- & the "Elite Antisemites" are usually Mystical Irrationalists & more interested in Occultism & Vitalism etc & not fans of Christianity at all, except where it is "Pagan" in some way. Landshark here is actually a "Chestertonian Orthodox Anglophile" (he's an anglophile, why would a Belarussian be on the English part of the internet writing in English?) -- he loves Chesterton-- Chesterton was also fairly antisemitic by today's standards. Chesterton was a "Judeobolshevik" type of guy in his time. He depicts Communism as fundamentally "jewish" etc-- he has to invent his own sort of "Christian Socialism" in Distributism-- which is actually the same sort of "Syndicalism" favored by most of the leftoid "woke" anarchists in the anglosphere anyway-- they just want one with rainbows & others want it with crucifixes. Isn't that funny?

Right wing art generally isn’t about “normal low anxiety” blahblah— funny for the guy named after HP Lovecraft whose works are about cyberhorror pornography & “the anxieties of the present”— “Right Wing Art” is usually, actually, quite eccentric & outside the mainstream, if you mean “far right wing art” & not merely “conservative liberal art”— Mishima’s works are mostly about freaks, perverts, murderers, etc— Houellebecq writes almost exclusively about “the anxieties of modern life” & is for this reason “right wing”— I don’t understand this desire for “right wing art”— there’s plenty of it— good art, however, is much rarer. Good art is about the refinement of technique more than it is about “a political statement” of some sort or other. Mishima isn’t good because he’s “right wing”— he’s good because his prose is compelling, his descriptions are lucid, & his plotting is ornate— he’s read still for those reasons, not because of “his ideas” Why are Ersnt Junger’s novels good? Because his prose is compelling, his almost Borgesian minimalism in his science fictions, his profound sense of irony & his ability to depict characters both as they actually are & how they believe themselves to be— allowing that juxtaposition to confront the reader etc

The Louis Theroux documentary is a great example of British Liberalism being unable to do anything but gesture at people who are 100% sincere & materially motivated & say “this is a bit odd innit?” — just pointing at it & going “yikes innit” To the Palestinians, Louis Theroux goes “yikes innit?”

To the Israelis he goes “yikes innit?”

They both agree, yes, yikes— but this agreement in disagreement cannot be the grounds of some sort of end to the conflict. The Israelis need to be occupied by a supranational entity.