It's now less than 24 hours until MPs are expected to vote on disability benefit cuts.
We still have very little information and what we do know is concerning.
A thread on some of the things we do and don't know, and why MPs cannot take this leap into the dark 🧵1/12
For new PIP claimants, they will need to score 4 or above in a Daily Living Activity category. Needing help to cut food, wash below the waist or dress yourself scores below a 4. These people could be denied PIP. 2/12
The government points to the PIP review which could change the activities that are assessed and the amount they score.
It claims this will be co-produced with disabled people, but disabled people say this would not be meaningful when the plan is to make £3 billion in cuts. 3/12
With the PIP review not completing until autumn 2026, there is also a risk that some people fall through a gap where the new 4 point rule has come into effect before the changes from the review. 4/12
Therefore, MPs are being asked to take a leap into the dark, voting for this now, with no guarantee at all that people who need support will receive it.
According to the government's current estimates, an additional 150,000 people will be in poverty. 5/12
Others argue it will be more like 250,000. These cuts will cost lives.
The only way to ensure that we are not pushing more disabled people into poverty and risking even more deaths in the benefits system, is to stop this Bill. 6/12
It's also not clear that all existing claimants will be unaffected. If you have a fluctuating condition and upon reassessment you no longer qualify for PIP, if you need to put a new claim in in the future, it will be harder still for you to receive it. 7/12
The same could apply to the Universal Credit health element. If you got a job (as the government wants you to do) but then a few years later your health worsened and you needed UC again, you stand to receive less money than you did before. 8/12
In any case, we are creating a two-tier system where people with the same needs could receive vastly different sums. The government hasn't given an answer for why this is fair, apart from the fact that this has happened before (not a good enough reason!) 9/12
The Bill is also being rushed through. There has been no formal consultation with disabled people, no OBR analysis of the employment impact, no assessment of the impact on health and care needs.
All the remaining Commons stages are being crammed into a single day. 10/12
In short, we don't know what we are about to vote on, and the government is failing to provide the necessary evidence or guarantees.
This is not how we should be making laws. The government should pull this Bill. If it doesn't, I'll be voting against it. 11/12
It’s not too late to make your voice heard, if you haven’t already. You can still email your MP. Find them here: 12/12members.parliament.uk/FindYourMP
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
As the Cass review is published, my thoughts are with the trans community.
Young trans people already face huge barriers to healthcare, including years-long waiting lists.
Their health and wellbeing should not be a front in a toxic culture war.
While some recommendations may positively impact the care young trans people receive, I know that others will cause significant concern.
I'm also aware of concerns raised about aspects of the review's methodology and therefore the basis upon which recommendations have been made.
In the coming days, I'll be speaking to experts, relevant organisations, and trans people themselves to better understand the report and its implications.
Its findings must not be spun by those ideologically opposed to trans healthcare.
Today is the last day of LGBTQ+ History Month 2024.
Recent years have been difficult for our community. That’s why I wanted to post a short thread to remind us of some of our movement’s past victories in the UK.
Like we won then, we can win again.
From the Middle Ages up until the 1960s, all sex between men was a crime. From 1958, the Homosexual Law Reform Society campaigned for decriminalisation.
The 1967 Sexual Offences Act legalised homosexual acts between men over 21, taking place in private.
However, the age of consent for queer men still remained higher than for straight couples (16). This perpetuated the harmful (and still prevalent) idea of LGBTQ+ people as predators.
After a long campaign, it was first lowered to 18 and then finally equalised in 2001.
Liz Truss’ new cabinet is filled with out-of-touch ultra-Thatcherites who have opposed women’s and LGBTQ rights, dismissed the climate emergency and insulted working class people.
Here’s a thread of some of the leading stars and their greatest hits 🧵👇🏽
Deputy PM & Health Secretary Therese Coffey:
- Hostile to abortion, voted against extending access to at-home abortion pills
- Voted against same sex marriage & against extending it to Northern Ireland
- Wrongly claimed UC claimants could make up £20 cut by working two hours
Chancellor Kwasi Kwarteng:
- Co-authored Britannia Unchained which called UK workers "among the worst idlers in the world"
- Toured around Saudi Arabia as Business Secretary, paid for by Saudi oil giant Aramco
- Defended then-Tory MP Owen Paterson after his sleaze scandal
The first ballot in the #ToryLeadershipContest is taking place today, so here are some facts about the 8 MPs who could become Prime Minister in just a matter of weeks.🧵👇🏽
1) Rishi Sunak.
Worth £730 million. Held a green card (= a permanent US resident) while he was Chancellor. His wife used non-dom status to avoid tax.
Said he would run the economy like Thatcher.
Biggest drop in living standards since 1956 while he was Chancellor.
2) Penny Mordaunt.
Previously supported greater rights for trans people. U-turned and lied about her previous position to win Tory votes.
Lied about Turkey joining the EU in the Brexit referendum.
Lied to firefighters while Fire Minister about guaranteeing pensions.
As Ministers spent Christmas Day in the comfort of their homes, they told 67 people trying to cross the Channel they’re not welcome.
The Borders Bill is the govt doubling down on political choices that have already cost lives. It will be a death sentence for future refugees.
Talk of criminal gangs is a tactic to distract from the government’s hostile environment creating perfect conditions for traffickers: closing safe and legal routes, stripping people’s rights when they arrive, plus foreign policy decisions forcing many to move in the first place.
To stop people dying in the Channel, we must completely reimagine our immigration system.
The status quo is free movement for the rich only. FM for all would not only benefit the person moving, it would reduce exploitation by criminal gangs and employers, benefitting everyone.