Sean Casten Profile picture
Jul 2 14 tweets 4 min read Read on X
If you've tuned into CSPAN anytime in the last 2 hours and found yourself slapping the side of the TV, wondering why the screen isn't changing, here's what's happening... Image
1. Lots of us including yours truly got in really late last night to vote on a bill that would slash taxes for billionaires, kick 17 million people off their health insurance, force lots of kids, seniors and veterans to go hungry AND is really unpopular. It's an easy "no" vote.
2. BUT, Trump wants it. And he wants it before July 4th so that he can go out and tell the American people how much he hates veterans, seniors, children and other Americans who are not billionaires. And if Daddy wants something, Republicans will do it.
3. A few principled Republicans have said they'll vote no on this. And before you praise them, they are generally people who's principles are pretty evil. Here's the letter the freedom caucus sent around. Image
Image
Image
Image
4. So bad principles. But principles nonetheless. And there are enough of them suggesting they'll vote no that the bill would go down. Which would be the truly patriotic thing to be doing this week, albeit for different reasons.
5. A functioning House leadership team would work the members, make changes as necessary and bring this bill to the floor once they knew they could pass it. But Mike Johnson is not a leader. He does what Daddy says and Daddy said pass it before July 4.
6. So this morning, we went in and voted on the previous question (a procedural step) on a straight party line basis and then this amendment from Ms. Foxx you see on CSPAN right now. As you can see, the Foxx amendment has enough votes to pass.
7. But, for the last 2+ hours, the Republicans have refused to gavel out and close the vote. Because they don't have the votes to pass the rule (which would then trigger an hour of debate and a vote on final passage).
8. So now we sit here, with 435 members who moved schedules, cancelled constituent meetings and all the other things we had planned at home this week to travel to DC, so we could sit around and wait for them to see if they will choose patriotism or fealty to Trump.
9. If they were choosing patriotism, we'd be done by now. If they had the votes for Trump fealty, we'd be done by now. Instead, they are floundering, hoping that before this day is out they will find a way to hurt the American people as Daddy has demanded.
10. The bill is terrible. But the details really aren't the point. If you think adding $5T to the national debt so you can cut billionaire taxes while you make Americans sicker and hungrier because - I dunno, fewer taxes on tips - you've got deeper ethical issues.
11. The bigger question for the @HouseGOP: why do you want this job? We are a coequal branch. Your decisions affect all Americans. If you think that you should only do what Trump wants regardless of the ask and even if your constituents don't like it you aren't a representative.
@HouseGOP 12. And you certainly aren't a leader. You're just an interchangeable, disposable rubber stamp. This job, and this country is too important for people of such low personal ambition.
@HouseGOP 13. And with that... I'll go back to sitting around and waiting for these clowns to do something vaguely resembling patriotism. OTOH, at least they're not cosplaying as patriots at a parade today. /fin for now

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Sean Casten

Sean Casten Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @SeanCasten

Jun 28
Because a number of folks keep asking, let’s talk about why the Democrats overwhelmingly voted to table Al Green’s motion to impeach Donald Trump. TL;DR: if you want Trump to be out of office ASAP, this was the right call, right now. Read on for the explanation…
1. Shortly after my wife and I got engaged we took a vacation to Wyoming. In the course of a horseback trip, our guide, upon learning of our upcoming nuptials, prior to offering me some advice said “I’ve been married 5 times, so I think I know a little something about women”.
2. In that vein, in my 6 years in Congress, I’ve seen 3 house impeachments (Trump 2x where I voted yes, Mayorkas 1x where I opposed). None were removed. So I think I know a little something about removing people from office…
Read 14 tweets
Jun 22
This is not about the merits of Iran’s nuclear program. No president has the authority to bomb another country that does not pose an imminent threat to the US without the approval of Congress. This is an unambiguous impeachable offense.
I’m not saying we have the votes to impeach. I’m saying that you DO NOT do this without Congressional approval and if Johnson doesn’t grow a spine and learn to be a real boy tomorrow we have a BFing problem that puts our very Republic at risk.
To be clear, I do not dispute that Iran is a nuclear threat. That’s why Obama negotiated the JCPOA. But whether that is better resolved through diplomatic or military measures is not a decision that the executive branch has unilaterally.
Read 7 tweets
Jun 16
This is the reason why our Constitution has an emoluments clause. And every day that the House GOP refuses to do any oversight of the Trump family's grift is another day that our Republic gets a little more fragile. Thread: ft.com/content/13a6ce…
1. I've been raising a stink about Sun and Trump ever since he fronted $30M to World Liberty Financial, Trump's shady AF defi platform. thedefiant.io/news/tokens/ju…
2. That "investment" triggered provisions in the initial World Liberty financing documents that allowed the Trump family to take cash out of the business. In exchange, Sun got a stake in tokens that cannot be sold and are controlled by the Trump family. Literally nothing.
Read 10 tweets
May 25
Liz Truss lasted 49 days as Prime Minister. For context, that's less than 20% of the time that Kevin McCarthy lasted as speaker. And yet she - like him - thinks she has some wisdom to offer from that experience. (TL;DR: she's learned nothing.) washingtonpost.com/opinions/2025/…
As I said on the floor earlier this week, mediocre businesses hate competition for the same reason mediocre politicians hate DEI. Because they can't win in a meritocracy. But economic growth depends on competition - in labor and energy markets. Image
Under Bessent's watch, investors have fled US equities and treasuries for other countries. Saying that he should pro-growth is fine. But you should praise him (or Brexit supporters) for it in the same way you praise me for my ability to win the NBA slam dunk contest. Image
Read 7 tweets
May 20
Watching the Senate cloture vote on the (highly misnamed) Genius Act and keep thinking back to a conversation I had with a Senior official in the Biden WH 4 years ago. I asked him what he thought about crypto and he said “how do you define money?” Thread:
1. It was a very Socratic process, but goes to the heart of the rot in the crypto space. The whole thesis is that it’s currency. But it isn’t, and never will be, for the same reason that gold, fine art and pork bellies aren’t money.
2. “A store of value” isn’t the definition of money. After all, you can go back thousands of years in human history and dig up coins minted in precious or semi-precious metals with the Caesar / Emporer’s face. Why bother making that money if the metal had value?
Read 11 tweets
May 17
This is scary and highlights something that's painfully obvious in DC: smart people either don't want to work in this administration or are being turned away. But effective government - esp when crisis strikes - depends on having smart people around. washingtonpost.com/business/2025/…
And that's huge own-goal. There is a deep pool of talent in DC that wants to work in the WH. Not the electeds (no disrespect intended) but the people they hire. Because while winning an election depends on a whole host of factors, hiring staff is an embarrassment of riches.
Some of the smartest people I've met in my life are the career hill staffers, and the just-below-cabinet level tier in the WH. Thousands of people want those jobs and the WH gets to pick the best.
Read 12 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(